Re: du -s excluding size from directory entries? (original) (raw)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
From: | Pádraig Brady |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: du -s excluding size from directory entries? |
Date: | Sat, 13 Apr 2013 10:15:50 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
On 04/13/2013 08:22 AM, Aaron Davies wrote:
is there an easy way to `du -s' a tree and ignore the size of the directories themselves?
if, e.g., i have one deep directory tree with a long history of modifications, and another directory tree created from a
cp -a' of the_ _first, their
du -sb' results are likely to be somewhat different.i can get this result with something like `find -not -type d -print0|xargs -r0 stat -c %s|paste -sd+|bc', but a simpler solution would be nice.
How about:
find -not -type d -print0 | du -hc --files0-from=- | tail -n1
That deals with hard links in the set too.
Thanks, Pádraig.
- du -s excluding size from directory entries?, Aaron Davies, 2013/04/13
- Re: du -s excluding size from directory entries?,Pádraig Brady <=
- Prev by Date:du -s excluding size from directory entries?
- Next by Date:read ODF files using less
- Previous by thread:du -s excluding size from directory entries?
- Next by thread:read ODF files using less
- Index(es):