RDFCore Telecon Agenda 2001-06-29 from Brian McBride on 2001-06-28 (w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from June 2001) (original) (raw)

Time: 10:00:00 Fri Jun 29 2001 in America/New_York

which according to:

http://www.timezoneconverter.com/cgi-bin/tzc.tzc

converts to:

15:00:00 Fri Jun 29 2001 in Europe/London 23:00:00 Fri Jun 29 2001 in Asia/Tokyo

Phone Number: +1 630 536 3003 room #3003

irc: irc.openprojects.net #rdfcore

WELCOME, ROLL CALL, SCRIBE

REVIEW AGENDA

REVIEW MINUTES OF MEETING on 15th June 2001

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Jun/att-0471/01-Minutes-20010615.txt

with the correction that action JUN-01-01-#1 was closed as per

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Jun/0477.html

REVIEW MINUTES OF TELECON on 22nd June 2001

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Jun/0422.html

with the correction that only Brian should be shown as chair as per

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Jun/0423.html

and action JUN-01-01-#1 was closed in the previous meeting as per

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Jun/0477.html

and action A4 was closed and discussion of the issue #rdfms-reification-required was postponed.

CONFIRM FOLLOWING ACTIONS COMPLETED (1 min)

ACTION: 2001-06-22#6: DanBri: start activating issues on RDFS

REVIEW STATUS OF FOLLOWING ACTIONS (5 min)

ACTION: JUN-01-01-#9: Ora: send a note to the WG that describes how aboutEach is being used and how it was implemented

ACTION: 2001-06-22#2: Brian: Write a draft on what issues are in scope, how are they allocated to partitions, what are the dependencies.

ACTION: 2001-06-22#3: All: Post issue priorities with reasons

ACTION: 2001-06-22#4: Sergey: Summarize priorities that are posted

ACTION: 2001-06-22#5: DanBri: Get a draft of RDFSchema to the group.

ACTION: 2001-06-22#7: Brian: Do a writeup of the containers proposal.

ACTION 2001-06-08#2: Dan Brickley: write up decision to allow partial descriptions of containers up in more detail for the list

ISSUE rdf-containers-syntax-ambiguity, rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema Brian McBride (10 mins)

http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-containers-syntax-ambiguity http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking#rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema

Resolve that the container specific productions (M&S Section 6, productions 6.25 to 6.31) and any references to them be removed from the grammar.

Resolve that rdf:li elements will be translated to rdf:_nnn elements when they are found matching either a propertyElt (production 6.12) or a a typedNode (production 6.13).

This change is made because:

o the container specific productions in the grammar are redundant and add nothing to the language.

o The container specific productions fail to recognise subclasses of container.

o The current specification is unclear about how to process rdf:li elements which are not propertyElt's recognised within a container specific production.

An advantage of the decision is that rdf:li elements can be used to number members of sub-classes of containers.

There are test cases in:

http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/

This closes these issues.

ISSUE rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about Aaron Swartz (10 mins)

Consider Aaron's resulution in: http://www.blogspace.com/rdf/rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about/

ISSUE rdfms-aboutEach-on-object Steve (10 minutes)

http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-aboutEach-on-object

Consider Steve's summary in:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Jun/0386.html

Decide whether to accept Steve's recommendation to disallow aboutEach on objects.

ISSUE rdfms-xml-base Owner Jan Grant (10 mins)

http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-xml-base

Discuss Jan's proposal in:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Jun/0340.html

Next meeting - 10am Boston time, 6th July 2001. Is this feasible, given the 4th July Holiday?

AOB (5 mins)

CLOSE

Received on Thursday, 28 June 2001 10:13:30 UTC