[Security-sig] Take a decision for os.urandom() in Python 3.6 (original) (raw)
Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Sun Aug 7 19:11:09 EDT 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [Security-sig] Take a decision for os.urandom() in Python 3.6
- Next message (by thread): [Security-sig] Take a decision for os.urandom() in Python 3.6
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sorry, PEP 524 is accepted, and PEP 522 is rejected. Let os.urandom() be blocking, and let os.getrandom() be added. Congrats, Victor!
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com> wrote:
I am sorry but I'm in holiday and I'm unable to understand if your (Guido) email means that the PEP 524 is accepted, or if the PEP still needs to be reworked?
Can someone help me? I'm lost. :-( (Why is this specific topic so much annoying? :-)) Victor
-- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
- Previous message (by thread): [Security-sig] Take a decision for os.urandom() in Python 3.6
- Next message (by thread): [Security-sig] Take a decision for os.urandom() in Python 3.6
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]