H. Nur Kızılyaprak | Marmara University (original) (raw)

Papers by H. Nur Kızılyaprak

YAPI Dergisi, 2024

19. yüzyılda kurulmuş Kurbağalıdere Çiftliklerinden biri olan V. Murad Av Köşkü’nden geriye tek k... more 19. yüzyılda kurulmuş Kurbağalıdere Çiftliklerinden biri olan V. Murad Av Köşkü’nden geriye tek kalan V. Murad Av Köşkü Hamamı’nın 2017 yılında tamamlanan ve restorasyon trajedisi olarak nitelendirilen tartışmalı son restorasyonundan sonra, tekrar ve sürdürülebilir bir şekilde kullanımını sağlamak için yürütülen yeni koruma çalışması konu edinmektedir. Kullanılamaz durumda olan kültür varlığı olarak tescilli hamam için yeni kararlar alınmadan önce, bu trajik restorasyonun nedenleri irdelenmiş; koruma ilke ve esasları referans alınarak yapıya özel kurgulanmış bir cetvelde, yapının tüm süreçleri değerlendirilmiştir. Bilimsel bir araştırma
projesine temellenen bu çalışmada, değerlendirme yönteminin kurgusuna ilişkin geniş bir anlatımla beraber, cetvelde değerlendirilen çeşitli uygulamaların detaylarına yer verilmiştir.

Of the 19th century Kurbağalıdere Çiftlik as an imperial farm in Kadıköy, only the building known as the 1855 Murad V. Hunting Lodge Bathhouse has survived to the present day. The building, which remained dysfunctional and idle for many years, underwent a controversial restoration in 2017, which received such a reaction that it made the news. As a result, it has irreversibly lost many of its original values and has become unusable. Although this process started with good intentions, it has turned into “restoration tragedy”. The building needs to be repaired again. This study has been based on a research project dealing with the new conservation efforts carried out to ensure the sustainable reuse of the bath, which is labeled a restoration tragedy. As a first step within the scope of the project, the board-approved project and its implementation have been analyzed, and all processes have been evaluated in a specially designed chart by taking the principles and fundamentals peculiar to conservation as a reference. All subsequent conservation decisions were justified based on this evaluation step. Within the scope of this article, how this method of analysis and evaluation was constructed is presented in a broad narrative and exemplified with the details of some applications to be more explanatory.

Kent Akademisi

Systematic thinking in construction design provides guidance for architecture students, especiall... more Systematic thinking in construction design provides guidance for architecture students, especially in establishing cause-effect relationships between the concepts of function, constructability, and visual effect. The act of detailing requires a systematic organization in which the inputs and outputs of the consecutive actions following the conceptual design are clearly revealed. It is observed that systematic

Kocaeli Üniversitesi Mimarlık ve Yaşam Dergisi, 2019

catider.org.tr

Page 1. 1 ÇATI ELEMANI TASARIMI İÇİN BİR YAKLAŞIM H. Nur Genç 1 M. Cem Altun 2 Konu Başlık No: 3 ... more Page 1. 1 ÇATI ELEMANI TASARIMI İÇİN BİR YAKLAŞIM H. Nur Genç 1 M. Cem Altun 2 Konu Başlık No: 3 Çatı ve Cephe Sistemlerinde Süreçler ÖZET ... Bu durum, özgün binalar ve detaylar üretebilmek için yeni tasarım yöntemlerine başvurmayı kaçınılmaz kılmaktadır. ...

AEI 2011, 2011

Building elements, namely walls, roofs, slabs, stairs, ramps, doors, windows, internal walls, are... more Building elements, namely walls, roofs, slabs, stairs, ramps, doors, windows, internal walls, are the physical “architectural” components of the building. In the design process there are different approaches for developing typical details of building elements. “Copying” or “adapting” typical details from manufacturers’ brochures, websites, catalogues or “best practice” handbooks are one way in developing building elements. The other way is to “design” genuine details of building elements, which comprises the integration of technology into design. In designing a “genuine” detail of a building element, designers have to cope with the complexity of a huge amount of criteria related to requirements, resources, constrains etc. and millions of alternative combinations of possible solutions. As “intuitive” design approaches might be insufficient in overcoming those difficulties, using “design methods” is a rational way. Especially for design students and inexperienced designers “design methods” are an important aid in the design process. But how efficient is it to use a “methodic” approach in designing building elements instead of an “intuitive” way? In the paper a “building element design method” from the German literature; “Methods of Construction and Choosing of Building Materials” (Methodik des Konstruierens und Wahl der Baustoffe) by H.F.O. Muller is examined. The method, which is based on VDI regulations (Association of German Engineers), is analyzed and the stages of the proposed process are defined. In “refining” and “clarifying” the method some new modules are added and some existing modules are extended. Finally the building element “design method” is simplified and transformed into a “stage by stage” process flow chart, easy to use for inexperienced designers. An experimental design process of building elements determines the “usability” of the method. As a result the simplified “stage by stage” procedure of the method and its “easy to use” rating from an inexperienced designer’s point of view, are presented.

AEI 2011, 2011

The building industry has become a complex world with the exploding number of new building materi... more The building industry has become a complex world with the exploding number of new building materials and construction techniques since the industrial revolution and changing demands since the end of WWII. “Design methods” have been introduced instead of traditional design approaches in coping with complex design problems of modern times. Especially in the area of architectural technology in terms of detailing building elements, using “design methods” is an important aid in the design process. As the detailing of building elements stage has inputs which are mostly defined systematically, it is a rational way to use methodic approaches in the design process. In the paper, three “building element design methods” are examined. The first method is; H.F.O. Müller’s “Method of Construction and Choosing of Building Materials”, which is based on VDI regulations. The second method is; “Principles of Building Element Design”, by P. Rich and Y. Dean. The last method, discussed in the paper is; “Generation and Evaluation of Alternatives for Building Elements” by M. Aygün. Those methods are analysed and the stages of the proposed processes are defined. Each “building element design method” is simplified and transformed into a “step by step” process flow chart to achieve a basis for better comparison. The three “building element design methods”, from different cultural, technological and economical environments are evaluated with criteria for characterization and choosing of design methods. As a result the characteristics of the methods in comparison with each other are presented.

AEI 2011, 2011

The building industry has become a complex world with the exploding number of new building materi... more The building industry has become a complex world with the exploding number of new building materials and construction techniques since the industrial revolution and changing demands since the end of WWII. “Design methods” have been introduced instead of traditional design approaches in coping with complex design problems of modern times. Especially in the area of architectural technology in terms of detailing building elements, using “design methods” is an important aid in the design process. As the detailing of building elements stage has inputs which are mostly defined systematically, it is a rational way to use methodic approaches in the design process. In the paper, three “building element design methods” are examined. The first method is; H.F.O. Müller’s “Method of Construction and Choosing of Building Materials”, which is based on VDI regulations. The second method is; “Principles of Building Element Design”, by P. Rich and Y. Dean. The last method, discussed in the paper is; “Generation and Evaluation of Alternatives for Building Elements” by M. Aygün. Those methods are analysed and the stages of the proposed processes are defined. Each “building element design method” is simplified and transformed into a “step by step” process flow chart to achieve a basis for better comparison. The three “building element design methods”, from different cultural, technological and economical environments are evaluated with criteria for characterization and choosing of design methods. As a result the characteristics of the methods in comparison with each other are presented.

Journal of Current Researches on Social Sciences (JoCReSS), ISSN: 2547-9644, 2019

The importance of Building Technology education, one of the sub-fields of Architectural Technolog... more The importance of Building Technology education, one of the sub-fields of Architectural Technology Education, is inarguable in terms of Turkey's construction industry conditions; and evidently, it has a great share in Architecture Education. However, when focused on the Building Technology education given in the undergraduate programs in different architecture schools, it has seen that definition of the content and the educational objectives of the Building Technology education quite diverse. In accordance with this determination, this paper aims to define this variety of different approaches and to map the Building Technology Education in Turkey. For analysis, firstly, the thirty schools that could represent the whole picture of architecture education in Turkey have been chosen from the recent undergraduate programs list, and accordingly the Building Technology courses have been identified in those schools' curriculums. The Building Technology courses of these thirty schools has been analyzed regarding their levels and semester distributions. Secondly, as a continuation of the research, fifteen schools which could be reached data from their official academic package web pages, have been selected and a study has been carried out to determine the content and the educational objectives of the Building Technology courses according to the Bloom's Taxonomy. In conclusion, it has been targeted to present an outline of the Building Technology education in Turkey with a systematic approach by determining the levels and semester distributions and reconsidering the contents and aims given in the courses of the related sub-field.

AEI 2011, 2011

Building elements, namely walls, roofs, slabs, stairs, ramps, doors, windows, internal walls, are... more Building elements, namely walls, roofs, slabs, stairs, ramps, doors, windows, internal walls, are the physical “architectural” components of the building. In the design process there are different approaches for developing typical details of building elements. “Copying” or “adapting” typical details from manufacturers’ brochures, websites, catalogues or “best practice” handbooks are one way in developing building elements. The other way is to “design” genuine details of building elements, which comprises the integration of technology into design. In designing a “genuine” detail of a building element, designers have to cope with the complexity of a huge amount of criteria related to requirements, resources, constrains etc. and millions of alternative combinations of possible solutions. As “intuitive” design approaches might be insufficient in overcoming those difficulties, using “design methods” is a rational way. Especially for design students and inexperienced designers “design methods” are an important aid in the design process. But how efficient is it to use a “methodic” approach in designing building elements instead of an “intuitive” way? In the paper a “building element design method” from the German literature; “Methods of Construction and Choosing of Building Materials” (Methodik des Konstruierens und Wahl der Baustoffe) by H.F.O. Müller is examined. The method, which is based on VDI regulations (Association of German Engineers), is analyzed and the stages of the proposed process are defined. In “refining” and “clarifying” the method some new modules are added and some existing modules are extended. Finally the building element “design method” is simplified and transformed into a “stage by stage” process flow chart, easy to use for inexperienced designers. An experimental design process of building elements determines the “usability” of the method. As a result the simplified “stage by stage” procedure of the method and its “easy to use” rating from an inexperienced designer’s point of view, are presented.

AEI 2011, 2011

The building industry has become a complex world with the exploding number of new building materi... more The building industry has become a complex world with the exploding number of new building materials and construction techniques since the industrial revolution and changing demands since the end of WWII. “Design methods” have been introduced instead of traditional design approaches in coping with complex design problems of modern times. Especially in the area of architectural technology in terms of detailing building elements, using “design methods” is an important aid in the design process. As the detailing of building elements stage has inputs which are mostly defined systematically, it is a rational way to use methodic approaches in the design process. In the paper, three “building element design methods” are examined. The first method is; H.F.O. Müller’s “Method of Construction and Choosing of Building Materials”, which is based on VDI regulations. The second method is; “Principles of Building Element Design”, by P. Rich and Y. Dean. The last method, discussed in the paper is; “Generation and Evaluation of Alternatives for Building Elements” by M. Aygün. Those methods are analysed and the stages of the proposed processes are defined. Each “building element design method” is simplified and transformed into a “step by step” process flow chart to achieve a basis for better comparison. The three “building element design methods”, from different cultural, technological and economical environments are evaluated with criteria for characterization and choosing of design methods. As a result the characteristics of the methods in comparison with each other are presented.

Mimarlık ve Yaşam, 2019

Architectural education is a generous field for researches; however, the studies about Architectu... more Architectural education is a generous field for researches; however, the studies about Architecture Technology education are very limited. Especially when the architecture schools in Turkey are considered, it is safe to say that the number of different approaches about the Architectural Technology education is parallel with the increasing number of different architectural education programs in universities. To clarify this tangled picture, this study intends to make a research regarding different approaches about Architectural Technology education in Turkey and to put forward the current types and trends. In order to demonstrate different approaches in Architectural Technology education, thirty architecture schools have been chosen and analyzed to reflect the main picture. The selection has been carried out according to the OSYM 's list of undergraduate programs. The research material has been obtained from the schools' education programs declared in their web sites as "Academic Package" and the analysis has been made by the quantitative factors. As a result of these analysis process, it is possible to evaluate and compare the sub-fields of the Architectural Technology education (Building Materials, Building Construction, Building Physics, Structures etc.) according to the ECTS values, number of the courses, weekly course hours, and semesters. Öz Mimarlık eğitimi, bilimsel araştırmalar için oldukça zengin bir alan olmasına rağmen Mimarlık Teknolojisi eğitimi ile ilgili çalışmalara çok rastlanılamamaktadır. Özellikle Türkiye'deki mimarlık okulları göz önüne alındığında, Mimarlık Teknolojisi eğitimi ile ilgili farklı yaklaşımların sayısının, üniversitelerde artan sayıda farklı mimari eğitim programlarına paralel olduğunu söylemek yanlış olmaz. Bu karmaşayı netleştirmek amacıyla yapılan bu çalışma ile Türkiye'de Mimarlık Teknolojisi eğitimi ile ilgili farklı yaklaşımlar hakkında bir araştırma yapmak ve mevcut türleri ve eğilimleri ortaya koymak hedeflenmiştir. Mimari Teknoloji eğitimindeki farklı yaklaşımları göstermek için otuz mimarlık fakültesi seçilmiş ve genel yönelimleri yansıtmak üzere analiz edilmiştir. Üniversitelerin seçimleri ÖSYM'nin "Merkezi Yerleştirme İle Öğrenci Alan Yükseköğretim Lisans Programları" listesindeki taban puan sıralamasına göre yapılmıştır. Araştırma verileri, okulların resmi web sitelerindeki "Akademik Paket" sekmelerinde ilan edilen eğitim programlarından elde edilmiş ve niceliksel bir analiz yapılmıştır. Bu analiz sürecinin sonucunda Mimari Teknoloji eğitimini oluşturan alt-alanların (Yapı Malzemeleri, Mimarlıkta Yapı ve Yapım Teknolojileri, Yapı Fiziği, Taşıyıcı Sistemler vb.) AKTS değerleri, ders sayıları, haftalık ders saatleri ve yer aldıkları eğitim-öğretim dönemlerine yönelik olarak bir değerlendirme ve karşılaştırma yapmak mümkün olmuştur.

Building elements, namely walls, roofs, slabs, stairs, ramps, doors, windows, internal walls, are... more Building elements, namely walls, roofs, slabs, stairs, ramps, doors, windows, internal walls, are the physical “architectural” components of the building. In the design process there are different approaches for developing typical details of building elements. “Copying” or “adapting” typical details from manufacturers’ brochures, websites, catalogues or “best practice” handbooks are one way in developing building elements. The other way is to “design” genuine details of building elements, which comprises the integration of technology into design. In designing a “genuine” detail of a building element, designers have to cope with the complexity of a huge amount of criteria related to requirements, resources, constrains etc. and millions of alternative combinations of possible solutions. As “intuitive” design approaches might be insufficient in overcoming those difficulties, using “design methods” is a rational way. Especially for design students and inexperienced designers “design methods” are an important aid in the design process. But how efficient is it to use a “methodic” approach in designing building elements instead of an “intuitive” way?
In the paper a “building element design method” from the German literature; “Methods of Construction and Choosing of Building Materials” (Methodik des Konstruierens und Wahl der Baustoffe) by H.F.O. Müller is examined. The method, which is based on VDI regulations (Association of German Engineers), is analyzed and the stages of the proposed process are defined. In “refining” and “clarifying” the method some new modules are added and some existing modules are extended. Finally the building element “design method” is simplified and transformed into a “stage by stage” process flow chart, easy to use for inexperienced designers. An experimental design process of building elements determines the “usability” of the method. As a result the simplified “stage by stage” procedure of the method and its “easy to use” rating from an inexperienced designer’s point of view, are presented.

The building industry has become a complex world with the exploding number of new building materi... more The building industry has become a complex world with the exploding number of new building materials and construction techniques since the industrial revolution and changing demands since the end of WWII. “Design methods” have been introduced instead of traditional design approaches in coping with complex design problems of modern times. Especially in the area of architectural technology in terms of detailing building elements, using “design methods” is an important aid in the design process. As the detailing of building elements stage has inputs which are mostly defined systematically, it is a rational way to use methodic approaches in the design process.
In the paper, three “building element design methods” are examined. The first method is; H.F.O. Müller’s “Method of Construction and Choosing of Building Materials”, which is based on VDI regulations. The second method is; “Principles of Building Element Design”, by P. Rich and Y. Dean. The last method, discussed in the paper is; “Generation and Evaluation of Alternatives for Building Elements” by M. Aygün. Those methods are analysed and the stages of the proposed processes are defined. Each “building element design method” is simplified and transformed into a “step by step” process flow chart to achieve a basis for better comparison. The three “building element design methods”, from different cultural, technological and economical environments are evaluated with criteria for characterization and choosing of design methods. As a result the characteristics of the methods in comparison with each other are presented.

Hızla değişen bilgi ve değer sistemleri sonucu yetersiz kalan geleneksel tasarım yöntemleri, diğe... more Hızla değişen bilgi ve değer sistemleri sonucu yetersiz kalan geleneksel tasarım yöntemleri, diğer alanlardan daha geç de olsa, mimarlık alanında da yerini yeni yöntemlere bırakmaktadır. Günümüz mimari yapısal tasarım eylemlerinde sıkça kullanılan, çeşitli kaynaklardan " kopyalama " ve/veya mevcut bilgi birikimine dayalı sezgisel yaklaşımla detaylar oluşturulması, hem özgünlüğü azaltmakta hem de malzeme ve teknikteki yeniliklerle baş edememektedir. Bu durum, özgün binalar ve detaylar üretebilmek için yeni tasarım yöntemlerine başvurmayı kaçınılmaz kılmaktadır. Bu çalışmda, " çatı " yapı elemanının tasarımı problemi üzerinden, sistemli bir tasarım yöntemi sunulacak ve bu yöntemin bir örnekle desteklenmiş anlatımı yapılacaktır. Süreç olarak, içiçe geçmiş dört fazdan oluşan yöntem, tasarım probleminin detaylı analizi, ilkesel tasarım, ön tasarım ve bütünsel tasarımı içine alan yedi adımı içermektedir. Her adımın çıktısı, belli bir değerlendirme sonucu bir sonraki adımın girdisi olarak kabul edilmekte ve kesintisiz bir akışla kullanıcıyı sonuca götürmektedir. Girdi ve çıktıların netliği, sonucun güvenilirliğini arttırmakta, yöntem içindeki esneklik ise sonuçta ulaşılan ürünlerde, özgünlük ve çeşitliliği oluşmaktadır. Sonuç olarak bu çalışmayla, girdileri belli olan bir problemin, yöntemli bir tasarımla çözümü ve bu çözümün irdelenmesi yapılacak, ayrıca bu tarz sistemli bir yaklaşımla, tasarımın adımları net bir şekilde ortaya konulacaktır.

Conference Presentations by H. Nur Kızılyaprak

6. ULUSAL YAPI KONGRESİ VE SERGİSİ DEĞİŞEN DÜNYADA YAPILI ÇEVRE, 2023

19. yüzyılda kurulmuş Kurbağalıdere Çiftliklerinden günümüze, V. Murad Av Köşkü Hamamı ayakta kal... more 19. yüzyılda kurulmuş Kurbağalıdere Çiftliklerinden günümüze, V. Murad Av Köşkü Hamamı ayakta kalmıştır. Uzun yıllar işlevsiz ve âtıl durumda kalmış, 2017 yılında haberlere çıkacak ölçüde tepki alan bir restorasyon geçirmiştir. Uygulama sonunda birçok özgün değerini geri döndürülemez ölçüde kaybetmiş, iyi niyetli olarak başlanılsa da bu uygulama, bir restorasyon trajedisine dönüşmüştür. Yapının tekrar onarım görmesi gerekmektedir. Bu çalışma, hamamın tekrar ve sürdürülebilir bir şekilde kullanımını sağlamak için yürütülen yeni koruma çalışmalarını konu edinmektedir. Hamamın kurul onaylı projesi ve uygulaması analiz edilerek koruma ilke ve esaslarının referans alındığı yapıya özel kurgulanmış bir cetvelde, yapının tüm süreçleri değerlendirilmektedir. Yeni koruma projesine referans olacak bu analiz yönteminin nasıl kurgulandığının geniş anlatımı ve birkaç uygulama ile detayları sunulmaktadır.

ARCHITECTURAL EPISODES 02: NEW DIALOGUES IN ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION AND PRACTICE PROCEEDINGS, 2022

Investigation of the Collaboration and Communication Parameters of BIM Ecosystem.…………………………………………... more Investigation of the Collaboration and Communication Parameters of BIM Ecosystem.………………………………………………………………………………………334 Betül Yazarkan, Aktan Acar PANEL DISCUSSIONS…………………………………………………………………………345 SYMPOSIUM PROGRAMME………………….………………………………………………355 SHORT BIOGRAPHIES OF THE PARTICIPANTS………………….………………………357 design of the course structure. The multidisciplinary design process in architectural design studio is clarified co-actors involved in the process while examples from studio outputs are shared. The findings show that configuring co-structured steps in the design education brought up intensive and collaborative dialogues and it also enabled different actors in the process to come into play at different layers within the timeline and put forward a process management and design that supports each other.

Dicle University 2. International Architecture Symposium Proceeding, 2021

YAPI Dergisi, 2024

19. yüzyılda kurulmuş Kurbağalıdere Çiftliklerinden biri olan V. Murad Av Köşkü’nden geriye tek k... more 19. yüzyılda kurulmuş Kurbağalıdere Çiftliklerinden biri olan V. Murad Av Köşkü’nden geriye tek kalan V. Murad Av Köşkü Hamamı’nın 2017 yılında tamamlanan ve restorasyon trajedisi olarak nitelendirilen tartışmalı son restorasyonundan sonra, tekrar ve sürdürülebilir bir şekilde kullanımını sağlamak için yürütülen yeni koruma çalışması konu edinmektedir. Kullanılamaz durumda olan kültür varlığı olarak tescilli hamam için yeni kararlar alınmadan önce, bu trajik restorasyonun nedenleri irdelenmiş; koruma ilke ve esasları referans alınarak yapıya özel kurgulanmış bir cetvelde, yapının tüm süreçleri değerlendirilmiştir. Bilimsel bir araştırma
projesine temellenen bu çalışmada, değerlendirme yönteminin kurgusuna ilişkin geniş bir anlatımla beraber, cetvelde değerlendirilen çeşitli uygulamaların detaylarına yer verilmiştir.

Of the 19th century Kurbağalıdere Çiftlik as an imperial farm in Kadıköy, only the building known as the 1855 Murad V. Hunting Lodge Bathhouse has survived to the present day. The building, which remained dysfunctional and idle for many years, underwent a controversial restoration in 2017, which received such a reaction that it made the news. As a result, it has irreversibly lost many of its original values and has become unusable. Although this process started with good intentions, it has turned into “restoration tragedy”. The building needs to be repaired again. This study has been based on a research project dealing with the new conservation efforts carried out to ensure the sustainable reuse of the bath, which is labeled a restoration tragedy. As a first step within the scope of the project, the board-approved project and its implementation have been analyzed, and all processes have been evaluated in a specially designed chart by taking the principles and fundamentals peculiar to conservation as a reference. All subsequent conservation decisions were justified based on this evaluation step. Within the scope of this article, how this method of analysis and evaluation was constructed is presented in a broad narrative and exemplified with the details of some applications to be more explanatory.

Kent Akademisi

Systematic thinking in construction design provides guidance for architecture students, especiall... more Systematic thinking in construction design provides guidance for architecture students, especially in establishing cause-effect relationships between the concepts of function, constructability, and visual effect. The act of detailing requires a systematic organization in which the inputs and outputs of the consecutive actions following the conceptual design are clearly revealed. It is observed that systematic

Kocaeli Üniversitesi Mimarlık ve Yaşam Dergisi, 2019

catider.org.tr

Page 1. 1 ÇATI ELEMANI TASARIMI İÇİN BİR YAKLAŞIM H. Nur Genç 1 M. Cem Altun 2 Konu Başlık No: 3 ... more Page 1. 1 ÇATI ELEMANI TASARIMI İÇİN BİR YAKLAŞIM H. Nur Genç 1 M. Cem Altun 2 Konu Başlık No: 3 Çatı ve Cephe Sistemlerinde Süreçler ÖZET ... Bu durum, özgün binalar ve detaylar üretebilmek için yeni tasarım yöntemlerine başvurmayı kaçınılmaz kılmaktadır. ...

AEI 2011, 2011

Building elements, namely walls, roofs, slabs, stairs, ramps, doors, windows, internal walls, are... more Building elements, namely walls, roofs, slabs, stairs, ramps, doors, windows, internal walls, are the physical “architectural” components of the building. In the design process there are different approaches for developing typical details of building elements. “Copying” or “adapting” typical details from manufacturers’ brochures, websites, catalogues or “best practice” handbooks are one way in developing building elements. The other way is to “design” genuine details of building elements, which comprises the integration of technology into design. In designing a “genuine” detail of a building element, designers have to cope with the complexity of a huge amount of criteria related to requirements, resources, constrains etc. and millions of alternative combinations of possible solutions. As “intuitive” design approaches might be insufficient in overcoming those difficulties, using “design methods” is a rational way. Especially for design students and inexperienced designers “design methods” are an important aid in the design process. But how efficient is it to use a “methodic” approach in designing building elements instead of an “intuitive” way? In the paper a “building element design method” from the German literature; “Methods of Construction and Choosing of Building Materials” (Methodik des Konstruierens und Wahl der Baustoffe) by H.F.O. Muller is examined. The method, which is based on VDI regulations (Association of German Engineers), is analyzed and the stages of the proposed process are defined. In “refining” and “clarifying” the method some new modules are added and some existing modules are extended. Finally the building element “design method” is simplified and transformed into a “stage by stage” process flow chart, easy to use for inexperienced designers. An experimental design process of building elements determines the “usability” of the method. As a result the simplified “stage by stage” procedure of the method and its “easy to use” rating from an inexperienced designer’s point of view, are presented.

AEI 2011, 2011

The building industry has become a complex world with the exploding number of new building materi... more The building industry has become a complex world with the exploding number of new building materials and construction techniques since the industrial revolution and changing demands since the end of WWII. “Design methods” have been introduced instead of traditional design approaches in coping with complex design problems of modern times. Especially in the area of architectural technology in terms of detailing building elements, using “design methods” is an important aid in the design process. As the detailing of building elements stage has inputs which are mostly defined systematically, it is a rational way to use methodic approaches in the design process. In the paper, three “building element design methods” are examined. The first method is; H.F.O. Müller’s “Method of Construction and Choosing of Building Materials”, which is based on VDI regulations. The second method is; “Principles of Building Element Design”, by P. Rich and Y. Dean. The last method, discussed in the paper is; “Generation and Evaluation of Alternatives for Building Elements” by M. Aygün. Those methods are analysed and the stages of the proposed processes are defined. Each “building element design method” is simplified and transformed into a “step by step” process flow chart to achieve a basis for better comparison. The three “building element design methods”, from different cultural, technological and economical environments are evaluated with criteria for characterization and choosing of design methods. As a result the characteristics of the methods in comparison with each other are presented.

AEI 2011, 2011

The building industry has become a complex world with the exploding number of new building materi... more The building industry has become a complex world with the exploding number of new building materials and construction techniques since the industrial revolution and changing demands since the end of WWII. “Design methods” have been introduced instead of traditional design approaches in coping with complex design problems of modern times. Especially in the area of architectural technology in terms of detailing building elements, using “design methods” is an important aid in the design process. As the detailing of building elements stage has inputs which are mostly defined systematically, it is a rational way to use methodic approaches in the design process. In the paper, three “building element design methods” are examined. The first method is; H.F.O. Müller’s “Method of Construction and Choosing of Building Materials”, which is based on VDI regulations. The second method is; “Principles of Building Element Design”, by P. Rich and Y. Dean. The last method, discussed in the paper is; “Generation and Evaluation of Alternatives for Building Elements” by M. Aygün. Those methods are analysed and the stages of the proposed processes are defined. Each “building element design method” is simplified and transformed into a “step by step” process flow chart to achieve a basis for better comparison. The three “building element design methods”, from different cultural, technological and economical environments are evaluated with criteria for characterization and choosing of design methods. As a result the characteristics of the methods in comparison with each other are presented.

Journal of Current Researches on Social Sciences (JoCReSS), ISSN: 2547-9644, 2019

The importance of Building Technology education, one of the sub-fields of Architectural Technolog... more The importance of Building Technology education, one of the sub-fields of Architectural Technology Education, is inarguable in terms of Turkey's construction industry conditions; and evidently, it has a great share in Architecture Education. However, when focused on the Building Technology education given in the undergraduate programs in different architecture schools, it has seen that definition of the content and the educational objectives of the Building Technology education quite diverse. In accordance with this determination, this paper aims to define this variety of different approaches and to map the Building Technology Education in Turkey. For analysis, firstly, the thirty schools that could represent the whole picture of architecture education in Turkey have been chosen from the recent undergraduate programs list, and accordingly the Building Technology courses have been identified in those schools' curriculums. The Building Technology courses of these thirty schools has been analyzed regarding their levels and semester distributions. Secondly, as a continuation of the research, fifteen schools which could be reached data from their official academic package web pages, have been selected and a study has been carried out to determine the content and the educational objectives of the Building Technology courses according to the Bloom's Taxonomy. In conclusion, it has been targeted to present an outline of the Building Technology education in Turkey with a systematic approach by determining the levels and semester distributions and reconsidering the contents and aims given in the courses of the related sub-field.

AEI 2011, 2011

Building elements, namely walls, roofs, slabs, stairs, ramps, doors, windows, internal walls, are... more Building elements, namely walls, roofs, slabs, stairs, ramps, doors, windows, internal walls, are the physical “architectural” components of the building. In the design process there are different approaches for developing typical details of building elements. “Copying” or “adapting” typical details from manufacturers’ brochures, websites, catalogues or “best practice” handbooks are one way in developing building elements. The other way is to “design” genuine details of building elements, which comprises the integration of technology into design. In designing a “genuine” detail of a building element, designers have to cope with the complexity of a huge amount of criteria related to requirements, resources, constrains etc. and millions of alternative combinations of possible solutions. As “intuitive” design approaches might be insufficient in overcoming those difficulties, using “design methods” is a rational way. Especially for design students and inexperienced designers “design methods” are an important aid in the design process. But how efficient is it to use a “methodic” approach in designing building elements instead of an “intuitive” way? In the paper a “building element design method” from the German literature; “Methods of Construction and Choosing of Building Materials” (Methodik des Konstruierens und Wahl der Baustoffe) by H.F.O. Müller is examined. The method, which is based on VDI regulations (Association of German Engineers), is analyzed and the stages of the proposed process are defined. In “refining” and “clarifying” the method some new modules are added and some existing modules are extended. Finally the building element “design method” is simplified and transformed into a “stage by stage” process flow chart, easy to use for inexperienced designers. An experimental design process of building elements determines the “usability” of the method. As a result the simplified “stage by stage” procedure of the method and its “easy to use” rating from an inexperienced designer’s point of view, are presented.

AEI 2011, 2011

The building industry has become a complex world with the exploding number of new building materi... more The building industry has become a complex world with the exploding number of new building materials and construction techniques since the industrial revolution and changing demands since the end of WWII. “Design methods” have been introduced instead of traditional design approaches in coping with complex design problems of modern times. Especially in the area of architectural technology in terms of detailing building elements, using “design methods” is an important aid in the design process. As the detailing of building elements stage has inputs which are mostly defined systematically, it is a rational way to use methodic approaches in the design process. In the paper, three “building element design methods” are examined. The first method is; H.F.O. Müller’s “Method of Construction and Choosing of Building Materials”, which is based on VDI regulations. The second method is; “Principles of Building Element Design”, by P. Rich and Y. Dean. The last method, discussed in the paper is; “Generation and Evaluation of Alternatives for Building Elements” by M. Aygün. Those methods are analysed and the stages of the proposed processes are defined. Each “building element design method” is simplified and transformed into a “step by step” process flow chart to achieve a basis for better comparison. The three “building element design methods”, from different cultural, technological and economical environments are evaluated with criteria for characterization and choosing of design methods. As a result the characteristics of the methods in comparison with each other are presented.

Mimarlık ve Yaşam, 2019

Architectural education is a generous field for researches; however, the studies about Architectu... more Architectural education is a generous field for researches; however, the studies about Architecture Technology education are very limited. Especially when the architecture schools in Turkey are considered, it is safe to say that the number of different approaches about the Architectural Technology education is parallel with the increasing number of different architectural education programs in universities. To clarify this tangled picture, this study intends to make a research regarding different approaches about Architectural Technology education in Turkey and to put forward the current types and trends. In order to demonstrate different approaches in Architectural Technology education, thirty architecture schools have been chosen and analyzed to reflect the main picture. The selection has been carried out according to the OSYM 's list of undergraduate programs. The research material has been obtained from the schools' education programs declared in their web sites as "Academic Package" and the analysis has been made by the quantitative factors. As a result of these analysis process, it is possible to evaluate and compare the sub-fields of the Architectural Technology education (Building Materials, Building Construction, Building Physics, Structures etc.) according to the ECTS values, number of the courses, weekly course hours, and semesters. Öz Mimarlık eğitimi, bilimsel araştırmalar için oldukça zengin bir alan olmasına rağmen Mimarlık Teknolojisi eğitimi ile ilgili çalışmalara çok rastlanılamamaktadır. Özellikle Türkiye'deki mimarlık okulları göz önüne alındığında, Mimarlık Teknolojisi eğitimi ile ilgili farklı yaklaşımların sayısının, üniversitelerde artan sayıda farklı mimari eğitim programlarına paralel olduğunu söylemek yanlış olmaz. Bu karmaşayı netleştirmek amacıyla yapılan bu çalışma ile Türkiye'de Mimarlık Teknolojisi eğitimi ile ilgili farklı yaklaşımlar hakkında bir araştırma yapmak ve mevcut türleri ve eğilimleri ortaya koymak hedeflenmiştir. Mimari Teknoloji eğitimindeki farklı yaklaşımları göstermek için otuz mimarlık fakültesi seçilmiş ve genel yönelimleri yansıtmak üzere analiz edilmiştir. Üniversitelerin seçimleri ÖSYM'nin "Merkezi Yerleştirme İle Öğrenci Alan Yükseköğretim Lisans Programları" listesindeki taban puan sıralamasına göre yapılmıştır. Araştırma verileri, okulların resmi web sitelerindeki "Akademik Paket" sekmelerinde ilan edilen eğitim programlarından elde edilmiş ve niceliksel bir analiz yapılmıştır. Bu analiz sürecinin sonucunda Mimari Teknoloji eğitimini oluşturan alt-alanların (Yapı Malzemeleri, Mimarlıkta Yapı ve Yapım Teknolojileri, Yapı Fiziği, Taşıyıcı Sistemler vb.) AKTS değerleri, ders sayıları, haftalık ders saatleri ve yer aldıkları eğitim-öğretim dönemlerine yönelik olarak bir değerlendirme ve karşılaştırma yapmak mümkün olmuştur.

Building elements, namely walls, roofs, slabs, stairs, ramps, doors, windows, internal walls, are... more Building elements, namely walls, roofs, slabs, stairs, ramps, doors, windows, internal walls, are the physical “architectural” components of the building. In the design process there are different approaches for developing typical details of building elements. “Copying” or “adapting” typical details from manufacturers’ brochures, websites, catalogues or “best practice” handbooks are one way in developing building elements. The other way is to “design” genuine details of building elements, which comprises the integration of technology into design. In designing a “genuine” detail of a building element, designers have to cope with the complexity of a huge amount of criteria related to requirements, resources, constrains etc. and millions of alternative combinations of possible solutions. As “intuitive” design approaches might be insufficient in overcoming those difficulties, using “design methods” is a rational way. Especially for design students and inexperienced designers “design methods” are an important aid in the design process. But how efficient is it to use a “methodic” approach in designing building elements instead of an “intuitive” way?
In the paper a “building element design method” from the German literature; “Methods of Construction and Choosing of Building Materials” (Methodik des Konstruierens und Wahl der Baustoffe) by H.F.O. Müller is examined. The method, which is based on VDI regulations (Association of German Engineers), is analyzed and the stages of the proposed process are defined. In “refining” and “clarifying” the method some new modules are added and some existing modules are extended. Finally the building element “design method” is simplified and transformed into a “stage by stage” process flow chart, easy to use for inexperienced designers. An experimental design process of building elements determines the “usability” of the method. As a result the simplified “stage by stage” procedure of the method and its “easy to use” rating from an inexperienced designer’s point of view, are presented.

The building industry has become a complex world with the exploding number of new building materi... more The building industry has become a complex world with the exploding number of new building materials and construction techniques since the industrial revolution and changing demands since the end of WWII. “Design methods” have been introduced instead of traditional design approaches in coping with complex design problems of modern times. Especially in the area of architectural technology in terms of detailing building elements, using “design methods” is an important aid in the design process. As the detailing of building elements stage has inputs which are mostly defined systematically, it is a rational way to use methodic approaches in the design process.
In the paper, three “building element design methods” are examined. The first method is; H.F.O. Müller’s “Method of Construction and Choosing of Building Materials”, which is based on VDI regulations. The second method is; “Principles of Building Element Design”, by P. Rich and Y. Dean. The last method, discussed in the paper is; “Generation and Evaluation of Alternatives for Building Elements” by M. Aygün. Those methods are analysed and the stages of the proposed processes are defined. Each “building element design method” is simplified and transformed into a “step by step” process flow chart to achieve a basis for better comparison. The three “building element design methods”, from different cultural, technological and economical environments are evaluated with criteria for characterization and choosing of design methods. As a result the characteristics of the methods in comparison with each other are presented.

Hızla değişen bilgi ve değer sistemleri sonucu yetersiz kalan geleneksel tasarım yöntemleri, diğe... more Hızla değişen bilgi ve değer sistemleri sonucu yetersiz kalan geleneksel tasarım yöntemleri, diğer alanlardan daha geç de olsa, mimarlık alanında da yerini yeni yöntemlere bırakmaktadır. Günümüz mimari yapısal tasarım eylemlerinde sıkça kullanılan, çeşitli kaynaklardan " kopyalama " ve/veya mevcut bilgi birikimine dayalı sezgisel yaklaşımla detaylar oluşturulması, hem özgünlüğü azaltmakta hem de malzeme ve teknikteki yeniliklerle baş edememektedir. Bu durum, özgün binalar ve detaylar üretebilmek için yeni tasarım yöntemlerine başvurmayı kaçınılmaz kılmaktadır. Bu çalışmda, " çatı " yapı elemanının tasarımı problemi üzerinden, sistemli bir tasarım yöntemi sunulacak ve bu yöntemin bir örnekle desteklenmiş anlatımı yapılacaktır. Süreç olarak, içiçe geçmiş dört fazdan oluşan yöntem, tasarım probleminin detaylı analizi, ilkesel tasarım, ön tasarım ve bütünsel tasarımı içine alan yedi adımı içermektedir. Her adımın çıktısı, belli bir değerlendirme sonucu bir sonraki adımın girdisi olarak kabul edilmekte ve kesintisiz bir akışla kullanıcıyı sonuca götürmektedir. Girdi ve çıktıların netliği, sonucun güvenilirliğini arttırmakta, yöntem içindeki esneklik ise sonuçta ulaşılan ürünlerde, özgünlük ve çeşitliliği oluşmaktadır. Sonuç olarak bu çalışmayla, girdileri belli olan bir problemin, yöntemli bir tasarımla çözümü ve bu çözümün irdelenmesi yapılacak, ayrıca bu tarz sistemli bir yaklaşımla, tasarımın adımları net bir şekilde ortaya konulacaktır.

6. ULUSAL YAPI KONGRESİ VE SERGİSİ DEĞİŞEN DÜNYADA YAPILI ÇEVRE, 2023

19. yüzyılda kurulmuş Kurbağalıdere Çiftliklerinden günümüze, V. Murad Av Köşkü Hamamı ayakta kal... more 19. yüzyılda kurulmuş Kurbağalıdere Çiftliklerinden günümüze, V. Murad Av Köşkü Hamamı ayakta kalmıştır. Uzun yıllar işlevsiz ve âtıl durumda kalmış, 2017 yılında haberlere çıkacak ölçüde tepki alan bir restorasyon geçirmiştir. Uygulama sonunda birçok özgün değerini geri döndürülemez ölçüde kaybetmiş, iyi niyetli olarak başlanılsa da bu uygulama, bir restorasyon trajedisine dönüşmüştür. Yapının tekrar onarım görmesi gerekmektedir. Bu çalışma, hamamın tekrar ve sürdürülebilir bir şekilde kullanımını sağlamak için yürütülen yeni koruma çalışmalarını konu edinmektedir. Hamamın kurul onaylı projesi ve uygulaması analiz edilerek koruma ilke ve esaslarının referans alındığı yapıya özel kurgulanmış bir cetvelde, yapının tüm süreçleri değerlendirilmektedir. Yeni koruma projesine referans olacak bu analiz yönteminin nasıl kurgulandığının geniş anlatımı ve birkaç uygulama ile detayları sunulmaktadır.

ARCHITECTURAL EPISODES 02: NEW DIALOGUES IN ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION AND PRACTICE PROCEEDINGS, 2022

Investigation of the Collaboration and Communication Parameters of BIM Ecosystem.…………………………………………... more Investigation of the Collaboration and Communication Parameters of BIM Ecosystem.………………………………………………………………………………………334 Betül Yazarkan, Aktan Acar PANEL DISCUSSIONS…………………………………………………………………………345 SYMPOSIUM PROGRAMME………………….………………………………………………355 SHORT BIOGRAPHIES OF THE PARTICIPANTS………………….………………………357 design of the course structure. The multidisciplinary design process in architectural design studio is clarified co-actors involved in the process while examples from studio outputs are shared. The findings show that configuring co-structured steps in the design education brought up intensive and collaborative dialogues and it also enabled different actors in the process to come into play at different layers within the timeline and put forward a process management and design that supports each other.

Dicle University 2. International Architecture Symposium Proceeding, 2021