Navneet Sharma - Mdu Rohtak (original) (raw)
Related Authors
Uploads
Papers by Navneet Sharma
Jurisprudence is a highly debated topic within the legal studies community and among law professi... more Jurisprudence is a highly debated topic within the legal studies community and among law
professionals worldwide. The central point of contention revolves around whether Jurisprudence
should be updated to reflect the evolving nature of society. Jurisprudence is commonly defined as
the theoretical examination of the appropriateness of the law. Differing perspectives and arguments
exist on this matter. This present paper aims to provide a balanced analysis of these contrasting
viewpoints through a literature-based review. The objective is to comprehend the start and historical
advancement of Jurisprudence, explore the arguments and counterarguments surrounding the
modern interpretation of Jurisprudence, examine its contemporary perspectives and global
implications, and foster a comprehensive understanding of the underlying principles of
Jurisprudence. It is crucial to grasp these arguments and counterarguments to establish coherent
guidelines concerning this significant issue. Such guidelines are essential for legal practitioners
worldwide, as they contribute to maintaining order and promoting justice within global society,
minimizing injustices and ensuring a harmonious existence for all individuals across the globe.
The congruence of Section 211 in The Indian Penal Code along with the thought of Jurisprudence
– takes into consideration that how law takes it’s own turn, when it comes to providing justice to
every citizen, as there are several victims of false charges by the law enforcement agencies due to
several socio-political reasons, and they suffer indiscriminately due to such in-justice and face jail
time and social boycott due to such false accusations and charges. They have all the right to protect
and defend themselves all across and get all those law enforcement officials punished (who
implicated the victim with the false charges) as per the constitutional rights guaranteed to them as
per the Constitution of INDIA.
Jurisprudence is a highly debated topic within the legal studies community and among law professi... more Jurisprudence is a highly debated topic within the legal studies community and among law
professionals worldwide. The central point of contention revolves around whether Jurisprudence
should be updated to reflect the evolving nature of society. Jurisprudence is commonly defined as
the theoretical examination of the appropriateness of the law. Differing perspectives and arguments
exist on this matter. This present paper aims to provide a balanced analysis of these contrasting
viewpoints through a literature-based review. The objective is to comprehend the start and historical
advancement of Jurisprudence, explore the arguments and counterarguments surrounding the
modern interpretation of Jurisprudence, examine its contemporary perspectives and global
implications, and foster a comprehensive understanding of the underlying principles of
Jurisprudence. It is crucial to grasp these arguments and counterarguments to establish coherent
guidelines concerning this significant issue. Such guidelines are essential for legal practitioners
worldwide, as they contribute to maintaining order and promoting justice within global society,
minimizing injustices and ensuring a harmonious existence for all individuals across the globe.
The congruence of Section 211 in The Indian Penal Code along with the thought of Jurisprudence
– takes into consideration that how law takes it’s own turn, when it comes to providing justice to
every citizen, as there are several victims of false charges by the law enforcement agencies due to
several socio-political reasons, and they suffer indiscriminately due to such in-justice and face jail
time and social boycott due to such false accusations and charges. They have all the right to protect
and defend themselves all across and get all those law enforcement officials punished (who
implicated the victim with the false charges) as per the constitutional rights guaranteed to them as
per the Constitution of INDIA.