Natural Health Response - Bias and Credibility (original) (raw)
Home Natural Health Response – Bias and Credibility
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information; therefore, fact-checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.
- Overall, we rate the Natural Health Response a quackery-level pseudoscience based on promoting anti-vaccine and anti-science propaganda that does not align with the consensus of facts.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCEFactual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
History
According to the Natural Health Response about page, they claim “For years he’s been the trusted doctor for celebrities, world-class athletes, and countless seniors looking to reclaim their health. And now…for the first time ever… he’s making his medical breakthroughs available to readers all across America. Dr. Richard Gerhauser, M.D. is one of the most pioneering and innovative minds in medicine today – and he delivers cutting-edge cures each month through his Natural Health Response newsletter.”
The website was formerly called the Alliance for Advanced Health.
Read our profile on the United States government and media.
Funded by / Ownership
NewMarket Health Publishing, LLC owns and publishes the Natural Health Response. Subscription fees generate revenue.
Analysis / Bias
In review, the Natural Health Response promotes anti-vaccination propaganda such as this NEVER Get the Flu! (No Vaccine Necessary) and conspiracies where the Government is withholding cancer cures for the benefit of Big Pharma. Natural Health Response Health does publish credible info, but overall, we rate them a Conspiracy-Pseudoscience site based on promoting anti-vaccination propaganda and government conspiracies.
Failed Fact Checks
- A third party has not fact-checked them.
Overall, we rate the Natural Health Response a quackery-level pseudoscience based on promoting anti-vaccine and anti-science propaganda that does not align with the consensus of facts. (D. Van Zandt 1/28/2018) Updated (10/18/2023)
Source: https://naturalhealthresponse.com/
Last Updated on October 18, 2023 by
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or