Culture Wars Magazine - Bias and Credibility (original) (raw)


Detailed Report

Bias Rating: RIGHT CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCEFactual Reporting: LOW Country: USA Press Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

History

Established in 1981, Culture Wars Magazine was initially called Fidelity Magazine. According to its About page, E. Michael Jones founded it after his dismissal from St. Mary’s College. Originally focused on Catholic issues, its content evolved to encompass a broader cultural perspective influenced by socio-political developments. Culture Wars Magazine is located in South Bend, IN

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

Michael Jones owns and publishes Culture Wars Magazine. Donations and subscriptions generate revenue. There are links to Fidelity Press, suggesting book sales also contribute to its revenue.

Analysis / Bias

The content and history of Culture Wars Magazine suggest a strong editorial stance aligned with conservative Catholic values. The magazine critiques liberalism, particularly its impact on the Catholic Church and broader cultural values.

Culture Wars Magazine publishes articles like “The Jew Taboo,” which focuses on questioning established historical facts and the significance of the Holocaust in modern culture and criticizes the societal and legal repercussions for those who express doubt or alternative views on the topic. The article promotes conspiracy theories and includes aspects that might be seen as antisemitic. For instance, it suggests a disproportionate Jewish involvement in various historical events, such as the Bolshevik Revolution. A quote from the article reads: “The predominately Jewish nature of Communism and the Bolshevik Revolution has been endorsed by many Jews and Jewish publications.” It also implies a secretive control or undue influence by Jews in global affairs, a common theme in many conspiracy theories.

Further, the author challenges established historical facts about the Holocaust and relies on sources that are often revisionist or fringe. For example, references to “Inconvenient History” and works by Thomas Dalton (likely a pseudonym), known for controversial perspectives on the Holocaust, suggest a selective use of sources that support a particular narrative.

Furthermore, Frequent citations of E. Michael Jones, the founder of Culture Wars, indicate a reliance on sources within their ideological sphere. In summary, The article’s portrayal of Jewish history and global involvement exhibits a clear bias and agenda. The tone and source selection of the article cast doubt on its factual reliability and the possibility of perpetuating damaging stereotypes and false information.

Another article in Culture Wars Magazine titled “Greta Thunberg: Climate Change And Mental Illness” discusses Greta Thunberg’s climate activism and focuses on her mental health. The article portrays Thunberg as the media’s “child Messiah of climate change” and cites comments from Fox News commentator Michael Knowles about her influence on the climate change movement. The article’s view is skeptical towards the mainstream scientific consensus on climate change and casts doubt on Thunberg’s role in environmental activism. The sources cited in the article’s endnotes include Fox News, Washington Examiner, The Daily Beast (which is often considered left-biased), Breitbart (a far-right news source), and The Telegraph (a UK-based publication with a right-center bias).

Generally, Culture Wars Magazine is a publication that strongly aligns with far-right Catholic perspectives based on its history, ownership, and editorial content. The magazine promotes conspiracy theories and pseudoscience, as observed in the analysis of their articles. For example, they promote the conspiracy theory that the 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump and Covid-19 vaccine disinformation.

Failed Fact Checks

Overall, we rate Culture Wars magazine as right-biased based on story selection and editorial positions that usually favor the right. We also rate them Low for factual reporting due to the promotion of conspiracy theories and pseudoscience. (M. Huitsing 01/19/2024)

Source: culturewars.com

Last Updated on January 19, 2024 by


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free

or

MBFC Donation




Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources