GeoEngineering Watch - Bias and Credibility (original) (raw)
Home GeoEngineering Watch – Bias and Credibility
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information; therefore, fact-checking and further investigation is recommended per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.
- Overall, GeoEngineering Watch is a one of the kind conspiracy and pseudoscience website. This one has few rivals in how far they will go to sell unproven, misleading claims regarding GeoEngineering.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCEFactual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
History
GeoEngineering Watch does not have an about page, though it does have contact information that directs to Dane Wigington of Bella Vista, California. According to a Whois Search, the domain was purchased in November 2009.
Read our profile on the United States government and media.
Funded by / Ownership
GeoEngineering Watch does not indicate ownership or funding on its website; however, Dane Wigington is listed as the contact person, and there is a donation link on the website. There isn’t any labeled advertising on the website.
Analysis / Bias
In review, GeoEngineering Watch is primarily concerned with weather manipulation for sinister means and the use of HAARP. For example, they claim that the devastating hurricane Florence was manipulated by Microwaves Transmissions and that the government is using Chemtrails for control of the environment as well. Throw in some anti-vax hysteria, and you have yourself a truly tin foil-quackery website.
Failed Fact Checks
Overall, GeoEngineering Watch is a one of the kind conspiracy and pseudoscience website. This one has few rivals in how far they will go to sell unproven, misleading claims regarding GeoEngineering. (8/10/2016) Updated (D. Van Zandt 08/01/2024)
Source: http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/
Last Updated on August 1, 2024 by
Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.
or