Matthew Caverly | Middle Georgia State University (original) (raw)
Books by Matthew Caverly
Cognella Academic, 2023
This is a sample chapter from the academic book, Issue Areas & Political Time: The multiple presi... more This is a sample chapter from the academic book, Issue Areas & Political Time: The multiple presidencies and congresses of foreign & domestic policy construction. It lays out the thesis that policy determines politics, no the other way around. And, that history serves as a setting condition for the construction of said policies between the two proactive branches of the national government--the presidency and the Congress.
The Drama of the American Political System, 2011
The Drama of the American Political System is a volume of canonical essays discussing the head an... more The Drama of the American Political System is a volume of canonical essays discussing the head and heart of American national politics. Exploring the full panoply of American national politics, these essays collectively suggest that our political system may best be understood as a dramatic metaphor. This metaphor asks us to watch the play of American politics in a theater representative of our polity. We will look across a stage that fragments power horizontally and vertically, and to a background of unifying characteristics called the American political culture. While in the foreground, we will see an arrangement of actors that originate from a core of national political institutions. From there we move out to a semi-periphery of political organizations, and finally disappear into the shadows where the media, political participators, and public opinion make their presence felt.
The Multiple Presidencies Thesis: Presidential-Congressional Foreign Policy Relations across Issues Areas and Political Time, 2008
Chapter 4 of the book published by VDM, this sample chapter lays out the empirical theory I devel... more Chapter 4 of the book published by VDM, this sample chapter lays out the empirical theory I developed in order to explain the foreign policy construction process. An inter-institutional policy making procedure shared between the president and the Congress via the component issue areas of foreign affairs across the vagaries of a politicized conception of historical time.
Articles by Matthew Caverly
This essay aspires to answer the question, “Why did the German polity so readily accept National ... more This essay aspires to answer the question, “Why did the German polity so readily accept National Socialism as its power-determining ideology?” Scholars, statesmen, journalists, and other interested onlookers have grappled with this question far longer than the Third Reich’s rise and fall. Some have claimed that the repressive peace imposed on the Germans in the wake of the First World War—the Treaty of Versailles—is to blame (Paxton 2011). Others have found specifically racialist and racist bases for the adoption of Nazism by the Germans with its twin pillars of Aryanism and Anti-Semitism speaking to long held traditions of Teutonic might and historical destiny (Peukert 1989; cf. Rosenberg 1930 and cf. Fichte 1808). Populist uprisings against both the extant capitalist bourgeois order and its Bolshevik communistic alternative have been portrayed as legitimate cause celebrity for the advancement of Nazism in Germany (Fritzsche 1990). Yet others have laid the claim/blame on the advancement of imperialism or on the excesses of unrestrained domestic and international capitalism as setting conditions for Hitler’s rise (Barkai 1990 and Hayes 1987). Of course, perhaps the most dominant portrayal of Nazi ideological adoption by German society is found in the veritable cult of personality developed by the party’s leader—Adolf Hitler as “Der Fuhrer” (Shirer 1990). Finally, the role of Pan-Germanic Nationalism as a unifying device which articulated a “cult of sacrifice” within the people of Germany or as the promoter of a nationalist-imperium have been examined as causes of the “descent to irrationalism” (Gerwarth 2006; Goldhagen 1997; and Koenigsberg 2009).
This paper will look at the role played by Germanic militarism as a determiner of Nazi ideological adoption by the German State and Society during the 1930’s. I will examine the historical background, socio-cultural characteristics, and generalizable implications from this case analysis for the broader political milieu. Unlike most of the other reasons given for the German people’s adoption of Nazism, the case of relatively unrestrained militarism is not unique to the Germans in the 18th, 19th, and early 20th centuries. In fact, militarism can be seen in other historical examples of nationalist uprisings, imperialisms, and general ideological renderings as parts of respective “philosophies of history.” The warnings that this piece will sound are not meant as after-the-fact accusations to a people and system (i.e. the Third Reich) now largely long dead. But, such warnings are done in order to showcase troubling patterns of ideological extremism that we continue to face in the modern world.
Book Reviews by Matthew Caverly
Library of Social Science, 2018
Review of Dr. Koenigsberg's Hitler's Holocaust.
A book review of Richard Koenigsberg's, Nations Have a Right to Kill published by the Library of ... more A book review of Richard Koenigsberg's, Nations Have a Right to Kill published by the Library of Social Science.
Encyclopedia Articles by Matthew Caverly
Encyclopedia article on the origins, ideology, and political influence of the conservative think ... more Encyclopedia article on the origins, ideology, and political influence of the conservative think tank--the Heritage Foundation.
An American interest group that lobbies on behalf of the interests of the State of Israel.
An American left wing party that promoted Marxist-socialism.
An American minor political party that operated, mostly, in the right wing of the country's polit... more An American minor political party that operated, mostly, in the right wing of the country's politics. It had an emphasis on the promotion of isolationism and to a lesser extent, nativism as policy focuses.
An American minor political party that operated under Nazi ideology.
A minor party in American politics that operates at the left wing end of the polity.
The American Conservative Union (ACU) is an interest group that is, perhaps best known, for promo... more The American Conservative Union (ACU) is an interest group that is, perhaps best known, for promoting the ideals of conservatism by rating the votes of congressional and state legislators according to their perceived proximity to conservative orthodoxy. Conservative
A conservative think tank that lobbies and analyzes policy issues.
The American Foreign Service Association is an interest group which serves as the professional as... more The American Foreign Service Association is an interest group which serves as the professional association for the United States Foreign Service. It lobbies on behalf of the bureaucrats who serve at all levels within the various national level departments that are principally engaged in civilian foreign affairs. The organization represents and recruits its
Examines the American Farm Bureau Federation in terms of its origins and impacts on the interest ... more Examines the American Farm Bureau Federation in terms of its origins and impacts on the interest group universe of American politics.
The American Immigration Control Foundation (AIC-Foundation) is an interest group dedicated to re... more The American Immigration Control Foundation (AIC-Foundation) is an interest group dedicated to restricting immigration by enforcing and expanding upon the existing legislative,
A historical and contemporary overview of the American minor political party called the Democrati... more A historical and contemporary overview of the American minor political party called the Democratic Socialists of America (1982-present). The party uses an evolutionary form of socialist ideology and largely operates within the far left wing of the Democratic Party and its ideological affiliates.
Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Organizations that Shaped America, 2018
CSP is an American think tank that promotes neo-conservative perspectives on foreign security pol... more CSP is an American think tank that promotes neo-conservative perspectives on foreign security policies. Encyclopedia article for Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Organizations that Shaped America.
Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Organizations that Shaped America, 2018
Americans United for Separation of Church and State (AU) is an interest group that lobbies office... more Americans United for Separation of Church and State (AU) is an interest group that lobbies officeholders as well as the general public for the promotion of enforcing the separation of church and state within the United States. Encyclopedia article for Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Organizations that Shaped America.
Cognella Academic, 2023
This is a sample chapter from the academic book, Issue Areas & Political Time: The multiple presi... more This is a sample chapter from the academic book, Issue Areas & Political Time: The multiple presidencies and congresses of foreign & domestic policy construction. It lays out the thesis that policy determines politics, no the other way around. And, that history serves as a setting condition for the construction of said policies between the two proactive branches of the national government--the presidency and the Congress.
The Drama of the American Political System, 2011
The Drama of the American Political System is a volume of canonical essays discussing the head an... more The Drama of the American Political System is a volume of canonical essays discussing the head and heart of American national politics. Exploring the full panoply of American national politics, these essays collectively suggest that our political system may best be understood as a dramatic metaphor. This metaphor asks us to watch the play of American politics in a theater representative of our polity. We will look across a stage that fragments power horizontally and vertically, and to a background of unifying characteristics called the American political culture. While in the foreground, we will see an arrangement of actors that originate from a core of national political institutions. From there we move out to a semi-periphery of political organizations, and finally disappear into the shadows where the media, political participators, and public opinion make their presence felt.
The Multiple Presidencies Thesis: Presidential-Congressional Foreign Policy Relations across Issues Areas and Political Time, 2008
Chapter 4 of the book published by VDM, this sample chapter lays out the empirical theory I devel... more Chapter 4 of the book published by VDM, this sample chapter lays out the empirical theory I developed in order to explain the foreign policy construction process. An inter-institutional policy making procedure shared between the president and the Congress via the component issue areas of foreign affairs across the vagaries of a politicized conception of historical time.
This essay aspires to answer the question, “Why did the German polity so readily accept National ... more This essay aspires to answer the question, “Why did the German polity so readily accept National Socialism as its power-determining ideology?” Scholars, statesmen, journalists, and other interested onlookers have grappled with this question far longer than the Third Reich’s rise and fall. Some have claimed that the repressive peace imposed on the Germans in the wake of the First World War—the Treaty of Versailles—is to blame (Paxton 2011). Others have found specifically racialist and racist bases for the adoption of Nazism by the Germans with its twin pillars of Aryanism and Anti-Semitism speaking to long held traditions of Teutonic might and historical destiny (Peukert 1989; cf. Rosenberg 1930 and cf. Fichte 1808). Populist uprisings against both the extant capitalist bourgeois order and its Bolshevik communistic alternative have been portrayed as legitimate cause celebrity for the advancement of Nazism in Germany (Fritzsche 1990). Yet others have laid the claim/blame on the advancement of imperialism or on the excesses of unrestrained domestic and international capitalism as setting conditions for Hitler’s rise (Barkai 1990 and Hayes 1987). Of course, perhaps the most dominant portrayal of Nazi ideological adoption by German society is found in the veritable cult of personality developed by the party’s leader—Adolf Hitler as “Der Fuhrer” (Shirer 1990). Finally, the role of Pan-Germanic Nationalism as a unifying device which articulated a “cult of sacrifice” within the people of Germany or as the promoter of a nationalist-imperium have been examined as causes of the “descent to irrationalism” (Gerwarth 2006; Goldhagen 1997; and Koenigsberg 2009).
This paper will look at the role played by Germanic militarism as a determiner of Nazi ideological adoption by the German State and Society during the 1930’s. I will examine the historical background, socio-cultural characteristics, and generalizable implications from this case analysis for the broader political milieu. Unlike most of the other reasons given for the German people’s adoption of Nazism, the case of relatively unrestrained militarism is not unique to the Germans in the 18th, 19th, and early 20th centuries. In fact, militarism can be seen in other historical examples of nationalist uprisings, imperialisms, and general ideological renderings as parts of respective “philosophies of history.” The warnings that this piece will sound are not meant as after-the-fact accusations to a people and system (i.e. the Third Reich) now largely long dead. But, such warnings are done in order to showcase troubling patterns of ideological extremism that we continue to face in the modern world.
Library of Social Science, 2018
Review of Dr. Koenigsberg's Hitler's Holocaust.
A book review of Richard Koenigsberg's, Nations Have a Right to Kill published by the Library of ... more A book review of Richard Koenigsberg's, Nations Have a Right to Kill published by the Library of Social Science.
Encyclopedia article on the origins, ideology, and political influence of the conservative think ... more Encyclopedia article on the origins, ideology, and political influence of the conservative think tank--the Heritage Foundation.
An American interest group that lobbies on behalf of the interests of the State of Israel.
An American left wing party that promoted Marxist-socialism.
An American minor political party that operated, mostly, in the right wing of the country's polit... more An American minor political party that operated, mostly, in the right wing of the country's politics. It had an emphasis on the promotion of isolationism and to a lesser extent, nativism as policy focuses.
An American minor political party that operated under Nazi ideology.
A minor party in American politics that operates at the left wing end of the polity.
The American Conservative Union (ACU) is an interest group that is, perhaps best known, for promo... more The American Conservative Union (ACU) is an interest group that is, perhaps best known, for promoting the ideals of conservatism by rating the votes of congressional and state legislators according to their perceived proximity to conservative orthodoxy. Conservative
A conservative think tank that lobbies and analyzes policy issues.
The American Foreign Service Association is an interest group which serves as the professional as... more The American Foreign Service Association is an interest group which serves as the professional association for the United States Foreign Service. It lobbies on behalf of the bureaucrats who serve at all levels within the various national level departments that are principally engaged in civilian foreign affairs. The organization represents and recruits its
Examines the American Farm Bureau Federation in terms of its origins and impacts on the interest ... more Examines the American Farm Bureau Federation in terms of its origins and impacts on the interest group universe of American politics.
The American Immigration Control Foundation (AIC-Foundation) is an interest group dedicated to re... more The American Immigration Control Foundation (AIC-Foundation) is an interest group dedicated to restricting immigration by enforcing and expanding upon the existing legislative,
A historical and contemporary overview of the American minor political party called the Democrati... more A historical and contemporary overview of the American minor political party called the Democratic Socialists of America (1982-present). The party uses an evolutionary form of socialist ideology and largely operates within the far left wing of the Democratic Party and its ideological affiliates.
Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Organizations that Shaped America, 2018
CSP is an American think tank that promotes neo-conservative perspectives on foreign security pol... more CSP is an American think tank that promotes neo-conservative perspectives on foreign security policies. Encyclopedia article for Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Organizations that Shaped America.
Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Organizations that Shaped America, 2018
Americans United for Separation of Church and State (AU) is an interest group that lobbies office... more Americans United for Separation of Church and State (AU) is an interest group that lobbies officeholders as well as the general public for the promotion of enforcing the separation of church and state within the United States. Encyclopedia article for Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Organizations that Shaped America.
Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Organizations that Shaped America, 2018
AAI is an interest group that promotes the interest of Arabs and Arab-Americans within the United... more AAI is an interest group that promotes the interest of Arabs and Arab-Americans within the United States and its government. Encyclopedia article for Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Organizations that Shaped America.
Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Organizations that Shaped America, 2018
CAP is an American liberal think tank that promotes research and policies which advance the ideas... more CAP is an American liberal think tank that promotes research and policies which advance the ideas of the modern progressive movement within and outside of the Democratic Party. Encyclopedia article for Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Organizations that Shaped America.
Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Organizations that Shaped America, 2018
The Center for International Policy (CIP) was founded in 1975 as a liberal idealist think tank pr... more The Center for International Policy (CIP) was founded in 1975 as a liberal idealist think tank promoting the public policy virtues of peaceful conflict resolution. More generally, it has advocated on behalf of the development of an American demilitarized foreign policy agenda in the wake of the end of the Vietnam War (1959-1975). This article, explores the origins, background, ideological commitments, issue/policy development, as well as activism of CIP. Encyclopedia article for Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Organizations that Shaped America.
Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Organizations that Shaped America, 2018
Encyclopedia article for Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Organizations that Shaped Americ... more Encyclopedia article for Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Organizations that Shaped America. Discusses the NFTC as a free trade ideology promoting American interest group in operation since the time of the Great War.
Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Organizations that Shaped America, 2018
Halliburton is an American multinational energy company with significant lobbying interests and i... more Halliburton is an American multinational energy company with significant lobbying interests and influence within the U.S. national security and foreign policy communities. Encyclopedia article for Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Organizations that Shaped America.
Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Organizations that Shaped America, 2018
Veterans for Peace (VFP) is an activist group that promotes peaceful alternatives to war and oppo... more Veterans for Peace (VFP) is an activist group that promotes peaceful alternatives to war and opposes excessive militarism in foreign policy. The group sits in the liberal idealist tradition. Encyclopedia article for Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Organizations that Shaped America.
Research and writing proposal for the Multiple Presidencies Thesis.
The Multiple Presidencies Thesis, Jan 2008
An examination into the presidential-congressional policy construction process throughout the iss... more An examination into the presidential-congressional policy construction process throughout the issue areas of foreign policy and across the periods of political time.
This paper explores the role of symbolism within presidential power by examining its historical o... more This paper explores the role of symbolism within presidential power by examining its historical origins within the presidency of George Washington. Through the development of this "reservoir of power" Washington firmly entrenched the presidency within the American psyche as its "First Office." And, furthermore, he established a setting condition whereby future presidents would dip into the symbolic presidency as an antecedent for consequential political action. Finally, and most importantly, the symbolic presidency fully instantiated its first incumbent as well as all future occupants as the unchallenged "Head of State."
This paper searches for the source of presidential power and finds it in the contributions of a f... more This paper searches for the source of presidential power and finds it in the contributions of a finite number of " magnificent presidencies. " What makes presidents great is not the specific contributions they make when holding office but whether or not their efforts to empower the
This paper examines executive-legislative policymaking during the mid-nineteenth century in the y... more This paper examines executive-legislative policymaking during the mid-nineteenth century in the years prior to the Civil War. It looks at the politics of policy during the Jacksonian Age of the 1830s to the 1850s. It does so by showcasing the nuances of the policy development relationship that Jackson and his immediate successors had with Congresses controlled by, at times, the Democrats and, at others, the Whigs.
In this paper, I will examine the politics of domestic policy in terms of the presidential-congre... more In this paper, I will examine the politics of domestic policy in terms of the presidential-congressional relationship across political time. I will be incorporating an issue areas analysis along with the conceptualizations of American Political Development into a cohesive synthesis. Such an effort, tries to demystify the complex inter-institutional relationship between our nation’s first two branches of government. It does this by showcasing the role that issue area and sub-policy categories within the domestic sphere of policy play. Further that role is contextualized into a larger socio-historical milieu that "sees" history as having an independent impact on raising and lowering the policy fomenting fortunes of one constitutional branch relative to another.
This paper examines the executive-legislative relationship in the United States through an inquir... more This paper examines the executive-legislative relationship in the United States through an inquiry made into the “politics of policy” as it is exhibited in the contextualized nature of history. Accordingly, we work from two assumptions: (1) that inter-institutional policymaking results largely from its issue area/sub-policy type and (2) that the arrangements of such policymaking takes various forms as to which institution—the Congress or the presidency—is empowered. This phenomenon, is itself, a matter of historical conditioning for which institutionally favorable (or the reverse) political environments are constructed as “regimes” that rise, peak, and ultimately fall in varying cyclical patterns. The theoretical power of this argument is that it captures static and dynamic patterns of the presidential-congressional political-policy relationship across time. We employ a mixed model technique for hypothesis generation and testing that bridges the quantitative-qualitative divide. My co-researcher and I do this by providing a comparison of two slices of what we will refer to as “timespaces.” Accordingly, the two of us attempt to compare the politics of policy in the Early Republic when the environment favored congressional action at the expense of the Chief Magistrate against a more recent period of near-present time which largely falls within the orbit of a presidentially-dominant national policymaking politics.
One of the central debates within American foreign policy scholarship revolves around the the... more One of the central debates within American foreign policy scholarship revolves around the theoretical concept used in determining the “dominant force” regarding the actual construction of such policies. Two theoretical lenses have been presented to account for the above; the first, emanates out of the realist paradigm and suggests a “state-centrist” orientation for policy formulation (see Morgenthau 1993 and Alison and Zelikow 1999). The second such lens employed by IR scholars in American foreign policy research is associated with the idealist paradigm and embodies a “domestic variables” approach to the study of policy making in foreign affairs (see Gourevitch 1996 and again Alison and Zelikow 1999). The statist or state-centrist formulation posits that the state is best viewed as a unitary actor projecting itself as a unified political entity onto the international system or as an agent reacting to that system (Morgenthau 1993 and Waltz 1979). Regarding foreign policy creation, this framework stresses the role of the “core foreign policy executive” in determining and enacting the “national interest” (Krasner 1987 for an economic application and Kissinger 1994 for a number of diplomatic/military applications). The domestic variables conception, on the other hand, posits that states are “conglomerations of interests” interacting with themselves and the international system of which they are a part (Gourevitch 1978 and 1996). Under this articulation, foreign policy is the by-product of a complex system of interrelationships between a varying mix of actors under conditions approximating pluralism and emphasizing the inherent connections of the principals involved (Keohane and Nye 1977, Fearon 1994, Rogowski 1987, Snyder 1991 and Putnam 1988 for types of applications).
Accordingly, in this study, I present a theoretical alternative to the above accounts which I believe captures the inherent “nuances” of the real world conditions which foreign policy construction occurs in (at least as far as the American case is concerned). Therefore, I propose that foreign policy construction is best analyzed through an “issue areas” perspective that examines each of the “sets” of issue areas contained within foreign affairs including trade, aid, immigration and security. Furthermore, I suggest that within these “sets” of foreign policy issue areas internal categorical differences pervade like for instance various “types” of foreign aid including economic, military and humanitarian. A study of these issue areas as separate and only loosely interrelated “categories of foreign policy” will offer a truer “picture” as to how foreign policy is “actually” constructed rather than the “cookie-cutter one size fits all” statist and domestic variables applications to a single category presentation of “foreign policy.”
Using the above framework with a roll call analysis of presidential position votes in the appropriate categories and sub-categories for the initial years of the Eisenhower, Kennedy and Clinton presidencies reveals that the answer to the state-centrism vs. domestic variables approach “question” is found in the Aristotelian “Golden Mean,” in that, those issue areas that are of a security nature and/or successfully “securitized” as such state-centrist approaches are best for understanding the foreign policy construction process. However, in those issue areas that are of a more “domesticated” nature (meaning that they have a high level of interaction with domestic policy groups like non-security/ non-securitized aid, trade and immigration) a domestic variables perspective is most appropriately employed.
The implications of such findings are that they can tell us a lot about the “real world” of foreign policy rather than the “constructed” realm established by over simplified models and even theories. Another implication is in the employment of “synthesizing approaches” which attempt to take what is best from the existing scholarship and reject what is worst in it. Also, the marriage of two competing theoretical frameworks from competing paradigms suggests that future research in world politics could benefit from more “mixed theoretical and perhaps even paradigmatic perspectives” which conceivably could lead to a greater mutual respect for ideas that on the surface may seem irreconcilable.
In this paper, I present evidence from a meta-analysis of one of the most dominant theoretical pe... more In this paper, I present evidence from a meta-analysis of one of the most dominant theoretical perspectives in executive-legislative policy making relations—Aaron Wildavsky's (1966) two presidencies thesis. Wildavsky's work suggested that no less than two policy making presidencies existed within a single president's relationship with the Congress (1966). Furthermore, that while the president " dominated " the construction of policies in foreign affairs vis-à-vis the Congress; he was impeded in that effort in the realm of domestic politics (1966). After Wildavsky's work was published no less than an entire school of academic thought grew up around the idea and inherent possibilities of a " two presidencies thesis " (Shull 1991). It is my intention in this analysis to examine that body of literature and report on its general conclusions relative to the existence of and subsequent evolution of the two presidencies as an intellectual endeavor. My findings indicate that the two presidencies is subject to examination within institutional, methodological and partisan terms and from that an adequate theoretical, empirical and normative critique can be developed which is the finished project of this paper. As an empirical theory, the two presidencies is rather strongly support with a support rate among two presidency researchers of 62.5%. The strongest level for the explanatory existence of the two presidencies comes from Wildavsky's classic institutional (Wildavsky 1966) version and the strongest reason for rejection of the two presidencies comes from its notion as a " cultural phenomenon " (Peppers 1975). Despite wide spread discussion within the literature there is little evidence to support a strictly partisan version of the thesis probably due to its lack of clear association between itself and either support or refutation of the thesis. (see Edwards 1986). Methodologically, the two presidencies has some association between the employment of an aggregate level of analysis and the institutional explanation, however, while some qualitative evidence exists for such a relationship between the employment of an individual level of analysis and the partisan version of the two presidencies no such relationship is corroborated quantitatively. Also, the cultural version of the theory is associated at least through the qualitative meta-analysis with the employment of qualitative methods; this relationship does not appear in the quantitative portion of the meta-analysis. Finally, the lack of normative study either as a critique of executive-legislative relations or as a reflexive commentary on the body of research itself holds the two presidencies back from fulfilling a broader promise regarding American political analysis. Lastly, the need for re-theorization is necessitated by the conclusions of this meta-analysis because the two presidencies as it currently exists is not developed enough to truly get at the " heart of the executive-legislative policy making divide. " A more nuanced approach is needed to provide greater empirical " fit, " provide stronger explanative/ predictive " power, " and establish a normative " critique " as to the appropriateness of presidential prerogatives and congressional involvement in foreign and domestic policy making.
This paper proposes an alternative theory for understanding extant presidential-congressional rel... more This paper proposes an alternative theory for understanding extant presidential-congressional relations in foreign affairs. Utilizing an issue areas analysis, I break the foreign policy domain up into its component issue areas as national security, domestic security, diplomacy, trade, foreign aid and immigration. Then, I theorize that multiple sets of executive-legislative policy making relations co-exist along a dimension of high politics (containing national security, domestic security and diplomacy) to low politics (containing trade, foreign aid and immigration) arenas. I call this theory the multiple presidencies thesis and further suggest that regarding the unit level relationship between the presidency and the Congress the high politics arena (issues relating to the politics of war and peace) is characterized by presidency-centered conditions which favor securitization—the presentation of foreign affairs issues within the arena as security-oriented and hence then subject to greater presidential dominance vis-à-vis the Congress. Likewise, the low politics arena (issues relating to the politics of everything else) is characterized by Congress-centered conditions which favor domestication—the presentation of foreign policy issues as being highly intermestic (co-mixture of foreign and domestic policy) in nature and hence subject to greater congressional penetration relative to the presidency. The reason for the above is that presidential power in foreign affairs is a function of the presidency’s “opportunity structure” in security and similarly the Congress’ power in foreign policy rests with the relative domestic content of the foreign issue areas themselves because the Congress’ “opportunity structure” is in domestic politics. Therefore, executive-legislative relations in foreign policy are best summarized as a securitizing president versus a domesticating Congress along the multiple issue areas of foreign affairs.
Operating at the structural (systemic) level of the political environment itself, the forces of macro-level economic and historical change alters the contours of presidential-congressional foreign issue area relations by privileging certain opportunity structures over others in distinct periods of time. This mechanism can lead to a periodization scheme for categorizing the “types” of presidential-congressional foreign issue area relations during the Post-War Era (1953-2004).
I test this theory by employing time series and longitudinal regression analysis of presidential position vote success rates in foreign policy and the component issue areas of foreign affairs across the time-line of the Post-War Era (1953-2004). The variable success rates along the issue areas support the basic thesis from a unit level perspective. Also, macro-level economic and historical factors are found to be influential on presidential success in foreign affairs relative to the Congress. This finding suggests that time plays a major part as a structuring element for the political environment of executive-legislative foreign issue area relations. In fact, no less than three distinct orders of such relations can be time-delineated including: (1) a War Power Order (1953-1972), (2) a Confrontation Politics Order (1973-1989) and (3) an Imperial Presidency Politicized Order (1990-present).
At the intersection of historical moments, like the twin extra-systemic security dilemmas of the ... more At the intersection of historical moments, like the twin extra-systemic security dilemmas of the late 1980’s-early 1990’s War on Drugs and the early 2000’s War on Terror analysts were provided with unique opportunities to study presidential-congressional foreign policy construction. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the reasons that lie behind such differing policy outcomes (limited war on the one hand and total war on the other) relative to how these dilemmas were addressed. These outcomes are not entirely, though partially, explained by the presence of different actors in both the White House and on Capitol Hill as well as their varying partisan circumstances relative to one another. Also, it is potentially true that these events were conditioned by deviating circumstances—the lack of an attack on the one hand and the presence of one on the other. In other words, context matters in shaping elite behavior in foreign policy security dilemma response scenarios.
This paper will deal with presidential-congressional relations regarding the differential responses by each of the Bush presidencies to the emergent foreign policy and intermestic security dilemmas of their early terms—the War on Drugs for President George H. W. Bush and the War on Terror for the George W. Bush presidency. Basically, this is a comparison contrast paper that emphasizes the similar foreign policy context of extant executive-legislative relations for the two Bush administrations near the beginning of their perspective terms in office. Also, it will emphasize the differing responses of the two Bush presidencies regarding the major security dilemmas of their respective situations.
I will employ a quantitative study of presidential position votes on the relevant foreign policy issues as they are conditioned by structural and agential factors in combination with a qualitative study of the legislative histories involved to answer the question, “What, if anything, dictated the differential responses of the two Bush administrations to similar extra-systemic dilemmas, the ‘War on Drugs’ for Bush I and the ‘War on Terror’ for Bush II?” I argue that Archer’s (1985) morphogenetic thesis as re-interpreted for foreign policy decision making by Carlsnares (1992) is the best device for understanding extant presidential-congressional relations in these two cases. The claim is that the exogenous and endogenous structural environments faced by the national security state provide a series of opportunities or constraints that impact the individual leader’s agential factors in their ability to be utilized freely in the construction of security dilemma responses. The external structuration factor for this study is the uni-polar position of the United States in the international system. The internal structuration factor of concern is the partisan behavior of the Congress relative to the presidency. And, the agential factor in this study is operationalized as the political belief system of the president as derived from his operational code, foreign policy ideology, and characterological personality traits.
Finally, this analysis will shed some light on the issue of security dilemma response to the new security threats facing the American national security state in the immediate past, the present and most likely the future.
This paper examines the legislative-executive domestic policy making relationship between the Con... more This paper examines the legislative-executive domestic policy making relationship between the Congress and the presidency across functional sub-policies and issue areas in the context of political time. It attempts to answer the rather simplistic question; ―What is the domestic policy relationship between the Congress and the presidency? In particular it provides an updating and synthesis of three streams of disparate theoretical literature; in the form of, Lowi‘s (1964, 1972) functional sub-policies thesis, various issue area alternatives {especially Ragsdale‘s (2008)}, and Davidson‘s (in Thurber 1996) congressional orders theory. This research occurs within the larger discussion of competing congresses, one as an institution dedicated to national public policy construction and the other as a body of individual members dedicated to particularistic policy making, as attributed in Davidson, Olezsek, and Lee‘s (2012) masterful text, Congress and Its Members. Essentially, this paper operates from the notion that there is a multiplicity of legislative-executive domestic policy making relations. In turn, this inter-institutional relationship is dependent on the policy‘s functional category and issue area as well as the ebb and flow of historical conditions (termed political time) for the congressional-presidential policy construction environment. This is the heart of what we mean by the term, the multiple congresses thesis.
This paper examines the legislative-executive domestic policy making relationship between the Con... more This paper examines the legislative-executive domestic policy making relationship between the Congress and the presidency across functional policy typologies in the context of political time. It attempts to answer the rather simplistic question, “What is the domestic policy relationship between the Congress and the presidency?” In particular it provides an updating and synthesis of two streams of disparate theoretical literature; in the form of, Lowi’s (1964, 1972) policy typology thesis and Davidson’s (1988, 1996) congressional orders theory. This research occurs within the larger discussion of competing congresses, one as an institution dedicated to national public policy construction and the other as a body of individual members dedicated to particularistic policy making, as attributed in Davidson, Olezsek, and Lee’s (2010) masterful text, Congress and Its Members. Essentially, this paper operates from the notion that there is a multiplicity of legislative-executive domestic policy making relations. In turn, this inter-institutional relationship is dependent on the functional category of policy as well as the ebb and flow of history as a setting condition for the congressional-presidential policy construction environment. This is the heart of what I mean by the term, the multiple congresses thesis.
My thesis is that legislative-executive relations in the domestic sphere are contingent on two primary forces, the one, is institutional in orientation and builds around the degree to which the Congress dominates the domestic policy making environment via the policy’s functional category as first observed by Theodore Lowi (i.e., regulatory, distributive, re-distributive, and constituency). This phenomenon is itself a function of the proximity of the policy-to-institutional or individual behavioral orientations within the Congress. Thus, the relationship between the policy and the institution/individual captures the dynamic of the Congress-as-an-aggregate or as-a-collection-of-often-competing-MC’s (members of Congress) because it is a function of how convergent or distal that policy is in its relationship to individual MC’s constituent level of domestic policy saliency. Institutionally based functional categories like re-distributive and to a lesser extent regulatory policies have a more nationally focused orientation and hence constituency. In these domestic policy areas, the Congress is more likely to follow the lead of an activist legislative presidency and therefore be less prone to engage in anything more than pork barrel legislating. However, in those functional categories that are closer to individual MC’s constituent interests like those in distributive and possibly constituent policies; the Congress will take a more active lead in policy creation, implementation, evaluation, and revision. Hence, the Congress will be less likely to follow presidential legislative leadership in these domestic policies because they are inherently more particularistic in orientation. And, particularistic policy making is what the Congress has been seen to be most effective in as opposed to national policy making which is more prone to be a presidential endeavor.
The second force impacting the domestic legislative-executive policy relationship is the ebb and flow of historical political time. As Davidson (in Thurber, 1996) has shown, there are perceptible eras of congressional behavior during the Post-War Period (the time since the end of the Second World War) where the legislative flow was largely explained by certain ideological and partisan coalitions including: the Bipartisan Conservative Era 1947-1964, the Liberal Ascendancy Era 1965-1978, and the Post-Reform/Party Unity Era 1979-present.
This paper examines presidential-congressional relations in foreign affairs by utilizing issue ar... more This paper examines presidential-congressional relations in foreign affairs by utilizing issue area and political time analyses. The theory proposed is the multiple presidencies thesis, a more nuanced updating of the founding work on the " two presidencies " by Aaron Wildavsky (1966). I suggest that between the presidency and the Congress a high politics arena characterized by presidency-centered conditions favors securitization and greater presidential dominance vis-à-vis the Congress. The low politics arena is characterized by Congress-centered conditions which favor domesticization and greater congressional penetration relative to the presidency. Both are subject to the vagaries of history which amount to a structuring element on the conduct of the inter-institutional relationship. I test this theory by conducting presidential roll call analyses on foreign policy issue areas. The findings support the issue area schema and show that political time is a factor in the executive-legislative construction of foreign policies.
Ideology has connotatively moved from the “science of ideas” as it was originally depicted by De ... more Ideology has connotatively moved from the “science of ideas” as it was originally depicted by De Tracy to the “humanism of ideals” through its re-interpretation by Marx as ideational history changed with the death of the Enlightenment and the birth of Romanticism. For all the positives as well as negatives this transition in the social psyche of Western Civilization played, it has paled in comparison to the difficult connotative re-orderings of ideological notions that have appeared in late modernity. Specifically, this essay will discuss the rather banal concept that ideology has degenerated into a secular theology where differentiation between individuals and groups is privileged at the expense of aggregation over common means and ends. As its starting point, I will examine some of the relevant background concepts that together have moved ideological renderings away from logicality and toward the embrace of irrational fanaticism. The work of Willem Zuurdeeg’s (1958) An Analytical Philosophy of Religion will serve as a thematic origination point but this essay will not be a textual study, instead, I will use it as a building block in constructing a normative criticism of modern ideology. For it is my contention that Zuurdeeg ultimately makes the same mistake that most other political commentators’ do which is that ideology is at heart a positive concept.
I argue that when ideology became a “way to order policies” in terms of their directions and purposes, it set itself up as quasi-religious dogma. The attempted rationalizations by the Hegelians, Marxists, Pragmatists and others opened the door by the end of the 19th century for emotive based understandings of the proper role of such party platforms in Western societies. The rise of existentialism as a philosophical alternative to logical analysis was all that was left to turn ideology away from politics and toward religion. I do not mean that religion somehow supersedes politics in modern policy discourse, what I mean is that political discourse has taken on the quality of religious fervor. The ecstatic spectacles found in Nazi and Communist events (and more recently the rise of Islamofascism) are only the more extreme versions of what one can see in the political channeling of Republicans and Democrats. I further suggest that the difficulty of “truth in the absence of proof” when applied to politics ultimately presages potential acts of extreme brutality as the opposition is re-cast as secular political infidel.
This work applies Salisbury's (1969) Entrepreneurial Theory to legislative-executive relations. I... more This work applies Salisbury's (1969) Entrepreneurial Theory to legislative-executive relations. It does this by re-conceptualizing members of Congress (MCs) as rational actors engaging in independent agential activities in order to influence the conduct of the aggregate congressional-presidential policy making relationship.
We flow in space and time by being both in-and out-of it simultaneously. Such endeavors make us a... more We flow in space and time by being both in-and out-of it simultaneously. Such endeavors make us a part of-, yet fully distinct-from, any specific existential location in which we "find ourselves" or, the lack thereof. Using Zadie Smith's, "Speaking in Tongues" as an example of the complexities of cultural space as a place wherein, we locate ourselves and are also located by Caverly | 1
Op-ed on the theological basis for Jesus' call for the beatitude of meekness.
This is a study of the politics of policy; in particular, it is an examination into the contours ... more This is a study of the politics of policy; in particular, it is an examination into the contours of the national level executive-legislative relationship within the United States. Political science is a discipline defined primarily by two things: a fascination with the exigencies of power and an orientation towards the employment of scientific methodology in order to understand that before-mentioned focus on power. As a contribution to this effort I will be engaging in an analysis of one place where power is manifested systematically; the policy making process shared between the American presidency and its primary interlocutor in this endeavor—the U.S. Congress.
One of the central debates within American foreign policy scholarship revolves around the theoret... more One of the central debates within American foreign policy scholarship revolves around the theoretical concept used in determining the “dominant force” regarding the actual construction of such policies. Two theoretical lenses have been presented to account for the above; the first emanates out of the realist paradigm and suggests a “state-centrist” orientation for policy formulation (see Morgenthau, 1993 and Alison and Zelikow, 1999). The second such lens employed by IR scholars in American foreign policy research is associated with the idealist paradigm and embodies a “domestic variables” approach to the study of policy making in foreign affairs (see Gourevitch, 1996 and again Alison and Zelikow, 1999). The statist or state-centrist formulation posits that the state is best viewed as a unitary actor projecting itself as a unified political entity onto the international system or as an agent reacting to that system (Morgenthau 1993 and Waltz 1979). Regarding foreign policy creation, this framework stresses the role of the “core foreign policy executive” in determining and enacting the “national interest” (Krasner 1987 for an economic application and Kissinger 1994 for a number of diplomatic/military applications). The domestic variables conception, on the other hand, posits that states are “conglomerations of interests” interacting with themselves and the international system of which they are a part (Gourevitch, 1978 and 1996). Under this articulation, foreign policy is the by-product of a complex system of interrelationships between a varying mix of actors under conditions approximating pluralism and emphasizing the inherent connections of the principals involved (Keohane and Nye, 1977; Fearon, 1994; Rogowski, 1989; Snyder, 1991; and Putnam, 1988 for types of applications).
Accordingly, in this study, I present a theoretical-methodological alternative to the above accounts which I believe captures the inherent “nuances” of the real world conditions which foreign policy construction occurs in (at least as far as the American case is concerned). Therefore, I propose that foreign policy construction is best analyzed through an “issue areas” perspective that examines each of the “sets” of issue areas contained within foreign affairs including trade, aid, immigration and security. Furthermore, I suggest that within these “sets” of foreign policy issue areas internal categorical differences pervade like for instance various “types” of foreign aid including economic, military and humanitarian. A study of these issue areas as separate and only loosely interrelated “categories of foreign policy” will offer a truer “picture” as to how foreign policy is “actually” constructed rather than the “cookie-cutter one size fits all” statist and domestic variables applications to a single category presentation of “foreign policy.”
To test my thesis I employed a roll call analysis of political determinants including partisan/ideological, popular and electoral factors on annual presidential position success rates vis-à-vis the Congress in the appropriate foreign issue area categories for the Eisenhower-W. Bush presidencies. The results reveal that the answer to the state-centrism vs. domestic variables approach “question” is found in the Aristotelian “Golden Mean.” In that, those issue areas that are of a security nature and/or successfully “securitized” as such state-centrist approaches are best for understanding the foreign policy construction process. However, in those issue areas that are of a more “domesticated” nature (meaning that they have a high level of interaction with domestic policy groups like non-security/ non-securitized aid, trade and immigration) a domestic variables perspective is most appropriately employed. Regarding the specifics inherent within the multiple presidencies of presidential-congressional relations, partisan and to a lesser extent ideological factors are more predictive of foreign affairs outcomes at least as measured by the annual presidential success rates across the main issue areas of concern.
The implications of such findings are that they can tell us a lot about the “real world” of foreign policy rather than the “constructed” realm established by over simplified methods and theories. Another implication is in the employment of “synthesizing approaches” which attempt to take what is best from the existing scholarship and reject what is worst in it. Also, the marriage of two competing theoretical frameworks from competing paradigms suggests that future research in world politics could benefit from more “mixed theoretical and perhaps even paradigmatic perspectives” which conceivably could lead to a greater mutual respect for ideas that on the surface may seem irreconcilable.
This commentary is dedicated to an analysis and historical overview of the civil and women's righ... more This commentary is dedicated to an analysis and historical overview of the civil and women's rights movements in the United States during the 19th and 20th centuries. First, we will look at the historical narrative, emphasizing major path dependent issues, events, and personalities that have shaped these two movements. Then, we must engage in comparison-contrast analysis of the two movements in order to showcase their confluences and divergences. Finally, we will provide a brief summation of our activities in this analysis.
This commentary examines U.S. military policy as to its historical development, impacts on societ... more This commentary examines U.S. military policy as to its historical development, impacts on society, and dominant debates. We will look at each through a war-by-war examination across the narrative of American military history and tradition, and then we will conclude with a summary of our efforts.
A perennial question that has perplexed political thinkers across the ages has been, “What is the... more A perennial question that has perplexed political thinkers across the ages has been, “What is the appropriate mix of Liberty and Order in an ideal political society?” This question is the focus of this paper and in answering it we will gain a new appreciation for the complexity and the enormity of this problem as it has related to state-to-society relations from the time of the ancients forward. In examining this dilemma, I am relying on a literary and to some extent even an aesthetic analysis of two of the most famous fictional figures in all of pop culture—Superman and Batman. Superman represents the moral exemplar of Liberty, with its attendant notions regarding progressivism in political thought and action. While, the Batman serves as his polemical opposite promoting the virtues of an Order based society, this idea, has its own notions emphasizing a certain reactionary tendency within those who buy into the Hobbesian view of man’s fundamental Nature. In this essay, I will discuss several key points regarding the two characters’ dissimilarities on the state-society issue through a cursory review of their literary presentations as moral ideal points for Liberty (Superman) and Order (Batman) within the superhero comic book genre. I will also be drawing parallel lines of thought amidst canonical philosophers who have addressed this same question in a more academically systematized manner. In particular, I will be contrasting Hobbes and Locke with some additional commentary being provided by other historical as well as contemporary political thinkers.
This paper examines the ontological premises, ideational debates, and intellectual history of emp... more This paper examines the ontological premises, ideational debates, and intellectual history of empiricism. It looks at the construct's applications in sociopolitical theory as well as its basis in ancient, medieval, as well as early and late modern philosophy. The work was originally proposed as an article for the Encyclopedia of Political Thought but was, ultimately, rejected from publication consideration.
In this commentary we will discuss the role played by the media and public opinion as a determini... more In this commentary we will discuss the role played by the media and public opinion as a determining, or at the very least, an influencer in the outcomes of recent presidential and congressional elections. For starters, we will review some of the basic contours of the media and public opinion within the United States that political behaviorists and rationalists have
This is a lecture commentary covering general issues as they relate to the systematic study of Am... more This is a lecture commentary covering general issues as they relate to the systematic study of American Government and Politics. It is meant as a base overview of the broad details of Americanist political science and to a lesser extent, the discipline as a whole.
This paper looks at the myriad features of public administration and policy in the United States.... more This paper looks at the myriad features of public administration and policy in the United States. It describes the features as a field within political science in historical, structural, and process-orientations.
This essay examines the broad spectrum of American Public Law from its ideational core to its app... more This essay examines the broad spectrum of American Public Law from its ideational core to its application(s) as a field of study within political science and legal studies as well as its existence as a guiding text which governs the nuances of American Political Society.
This paper discusses the nuances of the American Political Economy. In particular it looks at the... more This paper discusses the nuances of the American Political Economy. In particular it looks at the structural features of the American Economic System as well as the dominant paradigmatic traditions developed by political economists to analytically theorize and methodologically render the contours of the American economic materialscape.
This work provides a synopsis of the extant literature associated with the political science sub-... more This work provides a synopsis of the extant literature associated with the political science sub-field known as "American Political Development." Which as a body of thought employs the theoretical and methodological tools derived from historical-institutionalism in order to develop social scientific explanations of stasis and change within American politics.
This is a comparative politics essay which examines institutionalism as a paradigm within the fie... more This is a comparative politics essay which examines institutionalism as a paradigm within the field through the lens encapsulated within the regime types of presidentialism (i.e., the American system) and parliamentarianism (i.e., the British system).
This essay examines the development of personal politics through the lens provided by the Kennedy... more This essay examines the development of personal politics through the lens provided by the Kennedy campaign in the 1960 presidential primary season, in particular, his battle against Hubert Humphrey in West Virginia and Wisconsin. In particular, it looks at JFK's attempt to overcome the "politics of identity" (in this case, his Catholicism) as the fundamental strategic point in his campaign. Kennedy's usage of direct voter appeals as opposed to operating through surrogates and party machine officials is what was found by this research to be decisive in his attainment of victory over the Humphrey campaign.
This research was done with original archival materials, emboldened by then-contemporary accounts of journalists and Kennedy team members.
In this paper, I argue that JFK utilized an early version of candidate-centered politics in the 1... more In this paper, I argue that JFK utilized an early version of candidate-centered politics in the 1960 presidential primaries in order to overcome the dominance of the then,extant, party-centered system. Kennedy's campaign was an early example of "personal politics," wherein, direct voter appeals form the core of presidential electioneering. JFK's usage of this technique was systematic and served as a harbinger of things to come in how we elect presidents in the United States.
Furthermore, this research combined archivist and historical approaches with social scientific theorizing in order to produce a cross-disciplinary hybrid of humanistic arts and socially-specified science.
This paper looked at the role, or lack thereof, in which personal values played in determining in... more This paper looked at the role, or lack thereof, in which personal values played in determining individual vote choice in the 2004 presidential election. This work was built off of a focus group interview of undergraduate and graduate students done in the wake of the 2004 election at the University of Florida.
This paper uses newspaper article archives in order to examine the strategies employed by the Ken... more This paper uses newspaper article archives in order to examine the strategies employed by the Kennedy campaign in the 1960 presidential primaries. A special emphasis is placed on JFK's efforts to overcome the "Catholic issue" by his attempts to win over Protestant voters in the West Virginia and Wisconsin Primaries.
This paper provides a synopsis of the executive control literature as it exists in public adminis... more This paper provides a synopsis of the executive control literature as it exists in public administration theory. The studies stress the opportunities as well as the challenges faced by executives in their relationship with their own bureaucracies, in particular at the national level of the presidency; in terms of leadership, political strategy, and policy development.
This essay seeks to answer the question, "Has political science moved closer to becoming a develo... more This essay seeks to answer the question, "Has political science moved closer to becoming a developed science as described by the Kuhnian framework with its attendant notion of a normal science guided by a global paradigm?" I ask this question because Kuhn published his The Structure of Scientific Revolutions in 1962. In the near six decades since Kuhn articulated
A study of domain-inclusion actualism which critiques it as to its worth as a form of metaphysica... more A study of domain-inclusion actualism which critiques it as to its worth as a form of metaphysical actualism.
Pursuing the "Cause" of Causation's Cause What is the cause of a cause? At its most rudimentary l... more Pursuing the "Cause" of Causation's Cause What is the cause of a cause? At its most rudimentary level, this question seems more like a pun than a real question. We could assume that the cause of causation is a vacuously trivial Caverly | 1
Examines Thomas Hobbes' Leviathan from the perspective that the state has a moral idealistic purp... more Examines Thomas Hobbes' Leviathan from the perspective that the state has a moral idealistic purpose to move mankind to a more perfectible condition. This viewpoint stands in contrast to the normal stance taken by most political theorists and philosophers that Hobbes' Leviathan was an absolutist power aggrandizer (i.e., a monster).
Studies the debate over the ethics of epistemology by contrasting the views of Clifford and James... more Studies the debate over the ethics of epistemology by contrasting the views of Clifford and James relative to the issue of the "morality of knowledge."
Studies the Gettier Problem by offering up an original case and then working through its central ... more Studies the Gettier Problem by offering up an original case and then working through its central features in order to posit a possible resolution this epistemological dilemma.
Examines the ethical foundation of Adman Smith's "Theory of Moral Sentiments."
Examination of the political biographical origins of Carl Schmitt's "The Concept of the Political."
This paper analyzes the relationship, if any, between the constitution of American national gover... more This paper analyzes the relationship, if any, between the constitution of American national government and annual federal deficit spending. Accordingly, it posits the following question: Does divided government have a negative impact on the federal budget by systematically promoting deficit spending? Analytically, we will draw some comparative statistical correlations between the extent of deficit conditions and the constitution of the two proactive branches of the national government—the presidency and the Congress. We will do this in order to test some general and specific hypotheses that will shed light on the relationship, most importantly, whether it exists at all!
This paper analyzes the main philosophical notion which abounds within the controversies entailed... more This paper analyzes the main philosophical notion which abounds within the controversies entailed by the technological development of artificial intelligence (AI). Namely, is artificial intelligence possible? Accordingly, the paper asserts that which assumptions one makes about the workings of the mind, ultimately, lead you to either support or reject the hypothetical conditions needed for AI to be brought into empirical reality.
This paper is a comparative epistemology work that examines the intricacies of the nature of know... more This paper is a comparative epistemology work that examines the intricacies of the nature of knowledge. It does this by reviewing Rene Descartes' Rationalist doctrine (i.e., the French School) in contradistinction to G.E. Moore's defense of Empiricism (in other words, the British School).
This paper examines the Non-Commissioned Officer (NCO) leadership style of Command Sergeant Major... more This paper examines the Non-Commissioned Officer (NCO) leadership style of Command Sergeant Major (CSM) Basil Plumley during the Battle of Ia Drang Valley at Landing Zone (LZ) X-Ray (X) on 14-16 NOV 1965 in the Central Highlands of South Vietnam. This event occurred at the onset of American ground operations in the Vietnam War. It served as somewhat of a precursor for much of the combat actions that came about during the escalation phase of the
unpublished, 2023
This paper argues for the credible employment of the Servant-Leadership Style for tactical milita... more This paper argues for the credible employment of the Servant-Leadership Style for tactical military organizations by operational-level Senior Non-commissioned Officers (Sr. NCOs). It utilizes the case analysis of First Sergeant (1SG) Carwood Lipton of the 506th Parachute Infantry Regiment. A unit within the 101st Airborne Division conducting combatant operations during the Ardennes Offensive in early 1945.
unpublished, 2023
This is a case study of the direct leadership style displayed by SSG Eversmann, Matthew of the 3r... more This is a case study of the direct leadership style displayed by SSG Eversmann, Matthew of the 3rd Battalion (BN), 75th Ranger Regiment (REG). It looks at his efforts as a Non-commissioned Officer (NCO) in tactical command of Chalk Four (4) within Task Force Ranger's (TFR) actions on contact during the Battle of Mogadishu. The events pertinent to this analysis occur over an 18-hour period between the 3rd and 4th of October in 1993. They showcase Eversmann's tactical leadership under great combat duress in which he embodied a participatory style of leadership. A leadership style that is highly useful when dealing with experienced subordinates. This case study is generated from a review of Eversmann's actions as they were duplicated on film by actor Josh Hartnett in, "Black Hawk Down." It was a 2001 war movie based on journalist Mark Bowden's (1999) book, Black Hawk Down: A story of modern war.
unpublished, 2024
Characteristics of Leadership as Derived from the film, "Hamburger Hill."
Essay on Leadership as portrayed in the film, "Band of Brothers."
Film analysis of Leadership as portrayed in Band of Brothers
Narrative for award of Military Emergency Management Specialist Flash by the State Guard Associat... more Narrative for award of Military Emergency Management Specialist Flash by the State Guard Association of the United States. The narrative details actions taken by SGT Caverly during Operation Oleander, the response to Hurricane Dorian in early September of 2019.
Practicum for award of the Master Military Emergency Management Badge. It is a participant-observ... more Practicum for award of the Master Military Emergency Management Badge. It is a participant-observation study of the Defense Support to Civil Authorities response to Hurricane Michael in October of 2018 by the 5th Brigade of the Georgia State Defense Force.
Narrative describing individual soldier and unit actions taken during a Defense Support of Civil ... more Narrative describing individual soldier and unit actions taken during a Defense Support of Civil Authorities (DSCA) mission--Operation Defender Kastura, the natural disaster response incident for Hurricane Irma in 2017.
A brief analysis of tuberculosis in Georgia and across the country, emphasizing its condition, sy... more A brief analysis of tuberculosis in Georgia and across the country, emphasizing its condition, symptoms, cause, transmission, and treatment.
I will discuss an NCO that has made an impact upon me. He has done this by portraying the leaders... more I will discuss an NCO that has made an impact upon me. He has done this by portraying the leadership qualities inherent within the role of the NCO. This NCO is 1SG Steve Scruggs, the recently retired Acting CSM of 5 th Brigade, GSDF.
I will analyze the NCO Creed in answer to the question, " What does the NCO Creed mean to me? " I... more I will analyze the NCO Creed in answer to the question, " What does the NCO Creed mean to me? " I will utilize the first element of the NCO Creed: No one is more professional than I in order to interpret and evaluate the Creed. I hope that the reader will gain insight into my own military character through this process.
This paper will present an analysis of the NCO Creed as it pertains to my personal reflections in... more This paper will present an analysis of the NCO Creed as it pertains to my personal reflections in answer to the question, “What does the NCO Creed mean to me?” It will utilize the core elements of the NCO Creed in the form of their premising declarative statements: No one is more professional than I, Competence is my watchword, and Officers of my unit will have maximum time to accomplish their duties; they will not have to accomplish mine as bases from which to develop my own interpretations and evaluations of the characteristics contained within the Creed. I hope that the reader will gain insight into my own military character as he or she engages the narrative contained within this text.
Reviews "George Washington, His Ambitions, and the Jumonville Incident" by Elizabeth Stiles
Commentary on David Foster Wallace's, "Tense Present."
The Encyclopedia of Political Thought, Sep 15, 2014
The iron law of oligarchy states that when organizations attain a certain level of complexity the... more The iron law of oligarchy states that when organizations attain a certain level of complexity they inevitably give way to an oligarchy of elite control. Furthermore, the law functions regardless of the democratic or autocratic character of the organization or for that matter the purpose, political or otherwise, of said organization. In particular, it is applied to understanding of the operational maintenance of political parties in either democratic or authoritarian circumstances. The iron law of oligarchy is one of the profoundest theoretical innovations of the twentieth century regarding the development of an understanding for the internal dynamics of social organizational life. The law claims that organizations have inherent tendencies toward elitism, in particular political parties. It claims that social complexity and organizational needs move even the most democratic of entities into a state of perpetual elite domination. This phenomenon is due to the rise of politically sophisticated social elites within the organization as well as the organization's need to maintain consistent command and control administrative governance in order to attain its goals. For instance, in order for a political party to enact its policy program or be competitive in elections it must develop an internal hierarchy that is led through political elites who are policy or campaign experts. Thus, the mass membership within the political party are out of necessity relegated to a secondary position defined by elite leadership. Keywords: authoritarianism; democracy; elite theory; politics
This volume brings together leading political scientists to explore the distinctive features of t... more This volume brings together leading political scientists to explore the distinctive features of the American political economy. The introductory chapter provides a comparatively informed framework for analyzing the interplay of markets and politics in the United States, focusing on three key factors: uniquely fragmented and decentralized political institutions; an interest group landscape characterized by weak labor organizations and powerful, parochial business groups; and an entrenched legacy of ethno-racial divisions embedded in both government and markets. Subsequent chapters look at the fundamental dynamics that result, including the place of the courts in multi-venue politics, the political economy of labor, sectional conflict within and across cities and regions, the consolidation of financial markets and corporate monopoly and monopsony power, and the ongoing rise of the knowledge economy. Together, the chapters provide a revealing new map of the politics of democratic capit...
The Encyclopedia of Civil Liberties in America, 2015
Critical realignment theory is a synthesis of perspectives emanating out of political science and... more Critical realignment theory is a synthesis of perspectives emanating out of political science and history that suggest the existence and impact of “critical elections” as major determinants in the practice of democratic politics. These elections are said to mobilize new voters, bring new issues to bear, promote a new class of political elites, and most profoundly, alter the distribution of voter alignments in a sudden and durable manner. Critical realignment theory is one of the most profound developments in empirical political thought and stands out as a cross-disciplinary phenomenon between political science and political history. It also served as the initial theoretical contribution for an entire subfield within Americanist political science – now known as American political development. This subfield employs systematic historical analysis in theoretical and methodological ways in order to study American politics. Keywords: political theory; public opinion; voting
Encyclopedia of Military Science
Encyclopedia entry for the Encyclopedia of Military Sciences
The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements, 2013
Resource mobilization, a dominant theoretical approach to the study of social movements for many ... more Resource mobilization, a dominant theoretical approach to the study of social movements for many decades, points to social movement organizations (SMOs) as a focal point for efforts to understand the variations in both the impact and fate of social movements. SMOs, like other types of political organizations, are expected to represent members' common preferences for some specified social change, acting to bring about such change by influencing formal political decisions, or the values and behaviors of the members of a polity, or both. In this context, the classic analysis offered by Robert Michels (1962) of typical evolutionary processes in the governance of political organizations, and the impact of such processes on organizations' goals, is very relevant to scholars of social movements. Early studies of social movements often drew heavily on Michels' work (e.g., Messinger 1955; Sills 1957; Zald & Denton 1963; Zald & Ash 1966), documenting and fleshing out the nature of the evolutionary processes he posited, and the transformational consequences for social movements. Concern with movement transformation has been less dominant in contemporary work, despite a lack of evidence that such processes are any less operative in current movement organizations. Below, the key processes involved in what Michels' referred to as the “iron law of oligarchy” are sketched, followed by a brief discussion of some of the implications of this analysis for social movement researchers. Keywords: political sociology; bureaucracy; democracy; institutionalization
&... more ""Abstract This paper proposes an alternative theory for understanding extant presidential-congressional relations in foreign affairs. Utilizing an issue areas analysis, I break the foreign policy domain up into its component issue areas as national security, domestic security, diplomacy, trade, foreign aid and immigration. Then, I theorize that multiple sets of executive-legislative policy making relations co-exist along a dimension of high politics (containing national security, domestic security and diplomacy) to low politics(containing trade, foreign aid and immigration) arenas. I call this theory the multiple presidencies thesis and further suggest that regarding the unit level relationship between the presidency and the Congress the high politics arena (issues relating to the politics of war and peace) is characterized by presidency-centered conditions which favor securitization—the presentation of foreign affairs issues within the arena as security-oriented and hence then subject to greater presidential dominance vis-à-vis the Congress.Likewise, the low politics arena (issues relating to the politics of everything else) is characterized by Congress-centered conditions which favor domestication—the presentation of foreign policy issues as being highly intermestic (co-mixture of foreign and domestic policy) in nature and hence subject to greater congressional penetration relative to the presidency. The reason for the above is that presidential power in foreign affairs is a function of the presidency’s “opportunity structure” in security and similarly the Congress’ power in foreign policy rests with the relative domestic content of the foreign issue areas themselves because the Congress’ “opportunity structure” is in domestic politics. Therefore, executive-legislative relations in foreign policy are best summarized as a securitizing president versus a domesticating Congress along the multiple issue areas of foreign affairs.Operating at the structural (systemic) level of the political environment itself, the forces of macro-level economic and historical change alters the contours of presidential-congressional foreign issue area relations by privileging certain opportunity structures over others in distinct periods of time. This mechanism can lead to a periodization scheme for categorizing the “types” of presidential-congressional foreign issue area relations during the Post-War Era (1953-2004).I test this theory by employing time series and longitudinal regression analysis of presidential position vote success rates in foreign policy and the component issue areas of foreign affairs across the time-line of the Post-War Era (1953-2004). The variable success rates along the issue areas support the basic thesis from a unit level perspective.Also, macro-level economic and historical factors are found to be influential on presidential success in foreign affairs relative to the Congress. This finding suggests thattime plays a major part as a structuring element for the political environment of executive-legislative foreign issue area relations. In fact, no less than three distinct ordersof such relations can be time-delineated including: (1) a War Power Order (1953-1972),(2) a Confrontation Politics Order (1973-1989) and (3) an Imperial Presidency PoliticizedOrder (1990-present).2"&...
Academia Letters
Reviews Jose Figueiredo's, "Tacit knowledge, action, learning, and sprits of science."
Papers and Publications: Interdisciplinary Journal of Undergraduate Research , 2019
In this review, I will examine the article manuscript titled, “God’s Will in the Governmental Fou... more In this review, I will examine the article manuscript titled, “God’s Will in the Governmental Foundation of the United States.” This is a work of political theory which asks us to look back at the role that Protestant Theology played in the formation of the United States. In particular, it focuses us toward the question, “What role did the pursuit of the Will of God by the Founders play in establishing the principles of government within the nascent American nation-state? The review will follow a section-by-section critique of the author’s argument in order to maintain an intellectual cohesion with the structure of the parent essay. This format will, in turn, critique the paper’s arguments regarding God’s Will as a political theory in an examination of rights—both cultural and natural, and government/law in terms of regimes as well as the source for corresponding political authority.
Georgia State Defense Force, 2022
This white paper proposes a re-organizing principle for tactical field units within the Georgia S... more This white paper proposes a re-organizing principle for tactical field units within the Georgia State Defense Force (GSDF) based around the "team concept." An idea originating in special forces and and, also, applied in security forces assistance units. It is based around the development of additional skill identifiers (ASIs) that will allow for a more mobile, scalable, and expertise based tactical unit. Such a unit will be enabled to be utilized across the mission-space in a more credible manner than the current table of organization.