Nicole Chapin | Moody Theological Seminary (original) (raw)
My main focus is on science education, but I am also a generalist and a scholar with many interests and I believe that all fields of study can be informed and improved by cooperation with other fields. My other interests include ESL, Multiculturalism, and Math Education. one of my major goals as an educator is to encourage creativity in problem-solving and foster critical thinking skills. I am particularly interested in Christian Education and how Faith is informed by diligent scholarship.
less
Uploads
Thesis Chapters by Nicole Chapin
This project suggests that ESL can be useful for encouraging mutually beneficial cross-cultural f... more This project suggests that ESL can be useful for encouraging mutually beneficial cross-cultural fellowship in churches by providing a practical language need and giving English learners ability to communicate and have fellowship with English speakers. If the teaching is done by faith with humility and respect for the language and the culture of the students, it can also foster cross-cultural respect and Christian fellowship.
Science Education is at a crucial point in America. Because of perceived shortfalls, changes are... more Science Education is at a crucial point in America. Because of perceived shortfalls, changes are currently being made both at elementary and secondary levels that may change not only how science is taught, but what is taught in science. International tests indicate that America is doing fairly well at teaching scientific facts, but it is not a clear leader. However, until a better way to determine the effectiveness of education systems in creating free thinkers who can problem-solve is developed, it is unwise to claim that American science education is inferior. The No Child Left Behind approach to teaching science tends to promote factual knowledge but not necessarily thinking skills. Inquiry Based Learning promotes the scientific method. STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) is the new method that emphasizes practical applications for science and will likely bring new funds and energy into science curriculum but could also be used to censor minority opinions on some scientific topics. While some think there is need of more censorship of certain topics such as creationism and denial of a climate crisis, these topics allow students to practice analyzing differing viewpoints and evaluating arguments. Though the courts have decided that Creationism has little place in the classroom, at least one in eight science teachers use it as a way to promote critical thinking in the classroom. Instead of criticizing science teachers for the way they teach and pointing to international test scores as evidence that they are not doing their job, people need to recognize that the goals of American science teachers are different than those of other countries. Science teachers in America face, not only the task of teaching students content knowledge but also teaching them to analyze differing viewpoints on controversial topics that relate to science.
This project suggests that ESL can be useful for encouraging mutually beneficial cross-cultural f... more This project suggests that ESL can be useful for encouraging mutually beneficial cross-cultural fellowship in churches by providing a practical language need and giving English learners ability to communicate and have fellowship with English speakers. If the teaching is done by faith with humility and respect for the language and the culture of the students, it can also foster cross-cultural respect and Christian fellowship.
Science Education is at a crucial point in America. Because of perceived shortfalls, changes are... more Science Education is at a crucial point in America. Because of perceived shortfalls, changes are currently being made both at elementary and secondary levels that may change not only how science is taught, but what is taught in science. International tests indicate that America is doing fairly well at teaching scientific facts, but it is not a clear leader. However, until a better way to determine the effectiveness of education systems in creating free thinkers who can problem-solve is developed, it is unwise to claim that American science education is inferior. The No Child Left Behind approach to teaching science tends to promote factual knowledge but not necessarily thinking skills. Inquiry Based Learning promotes the scientific method. STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) is the new method that emphasizes practical applications for science and will likely bring new funds and energy into science curriculum but could also be used to censor minority opinions on some scientific topics. While some think there is need of more censorship of certain topics such as creationism and denial of a climate crisis, these topics allow students to practice analyzing differing viewpoints and evaluating arguments. Though the courts have decided that Creationism has little place in the classroom, at least one in eight science teachers use it as a way to promote critical thinking in the classroom. Instead of criticizing science teachers for the way they teach and pointing to international test scores as evidence that they are not doing their job, people need to recognize that the goals of American science teachers are different than those of other countries. Science teachers in America face, not only the task of teaching students content knowledge but also teaching them to analyze differing viewpoints on controversial topics that relate to science.