Carl Jacobs - Academia.edu (original) (raw)
Papers by Carl Jacobs
The Psychoanalytic Review, 2024
Conversation with Mark Solms on the Revised Standard Edition
The psychoanalytic review/Psychoanalytic review, Mar 1, 2024
The American Journal of Gastroenterology, Oct 1, 2016
On Endings and Authenticity, 2024
As an introduction to the panel on "Aging, Dying, and the Analytic Process," and to the Focus of ... more As an introduction to the panel on "Aging, Dying, and the Analytic Process," and to the Focus of this issue of The Psychoanalytic Review, this article offers personal comments linked to affective neuropsychoanalytic theory, and advocates an ability to think about illness and death as an integral part of lived experience.
The Psychoanalytic Review, 2019
Even Freud had a difficult time explaining narcissism. It may account for why he only wrote one p... more Even Freud had a difficult time explaining narcissism. It may account for why he only wrote one paper explicitly concerning this topic. The author proposes that the field of affective neuroscience has developed theoretical concepts that were not available to Freud, and that have created the potential for discussion of how narcissism may begin to explain much of the rampant disagreements among psychoanalysts studying the field of psychoanalysis. Specifically, the author suggests that a source of narcissism in the mammalian brain/mind is beginning to be knowable through advances in knowledge from the collective baseline of neurophysiology, affective as well cognitive neuroscience, and psychoanalysis.
The Psychoanalytic Review, 2020
The Psychoanalytic Review, 2020
Review of Fred Busch book on Bion's enigmatic concept of Reverie, published in The Psychoanalytic... more Review of Fred Busch book on Bion's enigmatic concept of Reverie, published in The Psychoanalytic Review Feb 2020 and in Press a reprint in the Revista Psychoanalysisis, Argentiana
Division/REVIEW, 2016
Intro to Psychoanalysis on Ice panel on Psychoanalytic Education, Transmission and Formation, wit... more Intro to Psychoanalysis on Ice panel on Psychoanalytic Education, Transmission and Formation, with Otto Kernberg, Joseph Shacter, Carmen de Medici, and Dany Nobus
Division/ReviewFall, 2016
Panel on Psychoanalytic Education , with Otto Kernberg and Dany Nobus and myself
Division/REVIEW, 2015
Short piece on THe Ends of Analysis
The Psychoanalytic Review, 2019
The Psychoanalytic Review, 2011
Theodor Reik showed us that it is the surprises that matter most. Beginning with New Ways in Psyc... more Theodor Reik showed us that it is the surprises that matter most. Beginning with New Ways in Psychoanalytic Technique (1933), Sur-prise and the Psychoanalyst (1936), and Listening with the Third Ear (1948), Reik showed the way for psychoanalysts to bridge the gap between ...
The Psychoanalytic Review, 2005
In a postmodern age of theories being elevated to would be meta-psychol-ogies, Dr. Rangell offers... more In a postmodern age of theories being elevated to would be meta-psychol-ogies, Dr. Rangell offers us his view of psychoanalysis since 1941, that is, sixty-three years of work, understanding, truth, politics, chance, trag-edy, misunderstanding and hope. After a brief ...
First presented at Psychoanalysis on Ice, Reykjavek, IS. October 2014
The Psychoanalytic Reiew, 2011
The Psychoanalytic Review, 2024
Conversation with Mark Solms on the Revised Standard Edition
The psychoanalytic review/Psychoanalytic review, Mar 1, 2024
The American Journal of Gastroenterology, Oct 1, 2016
On Endings and Authenticity, 2024
As an introduction to the panel on "Aging, Dying, and the Analytic Process," and to the Focus of ... more As an introduction to the panel on "Aging, Dying, and the Analytic Process," and to the Focus of this issue of The Psychoanalytic Review, this article offers personal comments linked to affective neuropsychoanalytic theory, and advocates an ability to think about illness and death as an integral part of lived experience.
The Psychoanalytic Review, 2019
Even Freud had a difficult time explaining narcissism. It may account for why he only wrote one p... more Even Freud had a difficult time explaining narcissism. It may account for why he only wrote one paper explicitly concerning this topic. The author proposes that the field of affective neuroscience has developed theoretical concepts that were not available to Freud, and that have created the potential for discussion of how narcissism may begin to explain much of the rampant disagreements among psychoanalysts studying the field of psychoanalysis. Specifically, the author suggests that a source of narcissism in the mammalian brain/mind is beginning to be knowable through advances in knowledge from the collective baseline of neurophysiology, affective as well cognitive neuroscience, and psychoanalysis.
The Psychoanalytic Review, 2020
The Psychoanalytic Review, 2020
Review of Fred Busch book on Bion's enigmatic concept of Reverie, published in The Psychoanalytic... more Review of Fred Busch book on Bion's enigmatic concept of Reverie, published in The Psychoanalytic Review Feb 2020 and in Press a reprint in the Revista Psychoanalysisis, Argentiana
Division/REVIEW, 2016
Intro to Psychoanalysis on Ice panel on Psychoanalytic Education, Transmission and Formation, wit... more Intro to Psychoanalysis on Ice panel on Psychoanalytic Education, Transmission and Formation, with Otto Kernberg, Joseph Shacter, Carmen de Medici, and Dany Nobus
Division/ReviewFall, 2016
Panel on Psychoanalytic Education , with Otto Kernberg and Dany Nobus and myself
Division/REVIEW, 2015
Short piece on THe Ends of Analysis
The Psychoanalytic Review, 2019
The Psychoanalytic Review, 2011
Theodor Reik showed us that it is the surprises that matter most. Beginning with New Ways in Psyc... more Theodor Reik showed us that it is the surprises that matter most. Beginning with New Ways in Psychoanalytic Technique (1933), Sur-prise and the Psychoanalyst (1936), and Listening with the Third Ear (1948), Reik showed the way for psychoanalysts to bridge the gap between ...
The Psychoanalytic Review, 2005
In a postmodern age of theories being elevated to would be meta-psychol-ogies, Dr. Rangell offers... more In a postmodern age of theories being elevated to would be meta-psychol-ogies, Dr. Rangell offers us his view of psychoanalysis since 1941, that is, sixty-three years of work, understanding, truth, politics, chance, trag-edy, misunderstanding and hope. After a brief ...
First presented at Psychoanalysis on Ice, Reykjavek, IS. October 2014
The Psychoanalytic Reiew, 2011