anjali lathwal | University Of Health Sciences , Rohtak ,India (original) (raw)

Papers by anjali lathwal

Research paper thumbnail of Comparative evaluation of gingival displacement produced by three different gingival retraction materials

International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS), Oct 10, 2022

To compare and evaluate the gingival displacement produced by three different gingival retraction... more To compare and evaluate the gingival displacement produced by three different gingival retraction materials. Materials and Methods: A study was conducted to evaluate the gingival displacement produced by three gingival retraction materials. 12 subjects were selected for the study. T-stat retraction paste system (Nexobio co.Ltd,Korea), 3M ESPE Retraction Paste (3M Deutschland GmbH, Germany), Roeko Stay-put retraction cord (Coltene Whaledent Pvt. Ltd.) were used in the study. Results: Out of the three materials used, lateral displacement was maximum with the Stay-put retraction cord followed by 3M retraction paste and least by T-Stat retraction paste. All the materials produced acceptable amount of vertical gingival retraction. When compared Stay-put retraction cord was found to be most effective among the three materials. On comparison of the cordless retraction materials, it was found that the material which was more viscous in consistency (3M retraction paste) was able to produce more lateral gingival displacement than the material having less viscosity (T-stat retraction paste) even though both the cordless materials provided almost similar amount of vertical gingival displacement. The overall gingival retraction produced by the Stay-put cord was the highest followed by 3M retraction paste and least by the 3333 T-stat retraction paste. Conclusion: Accurate impressions that capture the prepared margin and finish line are paramount to achieve successful, well-fitting indirect restorations. A vital component in impression making is a traumatic gingival displacement. Modern impression materials and techniques have improved the accuracy of impression making, however, the fundamentals for all current techniques still require management of the gingival tissues adjacent to the preparation, moisture control and adequate placement of the material around the finish line.

Research paper thumbnail of Comparative evaluation of gingival displacement produced by three different gingival retraction materials

International journal of health sciences

Aim: To compare and evaluate the gingival displacement produced by three different gingival retra... more Aim: To compare and evaluate the gingival displacement produced by three different gingival retraction materials. Materials and Methods: A study was conducted to evaluate the gingival displacement produced by three gingival retraction materials. 12 subjects were selected for the study. T-stat retraction paste system (Nexobio co.Ltd,Korea), 3M ESPE Retraction Paste (3M Deutschland GmbH, Germany), Roeko Stay- put retraction cord (Coltene Whaledent Pvt. Ltd.) were used in the study. Results: Out of the three materials used, lateral displacement was maximum with the Stay-put retraction cord followed by 3M retraction paste and least by T-Stat retraction paste. All the materials produced acceptable amount of vertical gingival retraction. When compared Stay-put retraction cord was found to be most effective among the three materials. On comparison of the cordless retraction materials, it was found that the material which was more viscous in consistency (3M retraction paste) was able to pr...

Research paper thumbnail of Cleft Lip and Palate: A Review

Indian Journal of Contemporary Dentistry, 2016

Orofacial clefts comprise a range of congenital deformities and are the most common head and neck... more Orofacial clefts comprise a range of congenital deformities and are the most common head and neck congenital malformation. Cleft has significant psychological and socio-economic effect on patient quality of life and requires a multidisciplinary team approach for management. The complex interplay between genetic and environmental factors plays a significant role in the incidence and cause of cleft. In the following review article, the embryology, classification, etiology, clinical features and management of cleft lip and palate are discussed along with primary goals of surgical repair to restore normal function, speech development, and facial esthetics. Different techniques are employed based on surgeon expertise and the unique patient presentations.

Research paper thumbnail of Comparative evaluation of gingival displacement produced by three different gingival retraction materials

International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS), Oct 10, 2022

To compare and evaluate the gingival displacement produced by three different gingival retraction... more To compare and evaluate the gingival displacement produced by three different gingival retraction materials. Materials and Methods: A study was conducted to evaluate the gingival displacement produced by three gingival retraction materials. 12 subjects were selected for the study. T-stat retraction paste system (Nexobio co.Ltd,Korea), 3M ESPE Retraction Paste (3M Deutschland GmbH, Germany), Roeko Stay-put retraction cord (Coltene Whaledent Pvt. Ltd.) were used in the study. Results: Out of the three materials used, lateral displacement was maximum with the Stay-put retraction cord followed by 3M retraction paste and least by T-Stat retraction paste. All the materials produced acceptable amount of vertical gingival retraction. When compared Stay-put retraction cord was found to be most effective among the three materials. On comparison of the cordless retraction materials, it was found that the material which was more viscous in consistency (3M retraction paste) was able to produce more lateral gingival displacement than the material having less viscosity (T-stat retraction paste) even though both the cordless materials provided almost similar amount of vertical gingival displacement. The overall gingival retraction produced by the Stay-put cord was the highest followed by 3M retraction paste and least by the 3333 T-stat retraction paste. Conclusion: Accurate impressions that capture the prepared margin and finish line are paramount to achieve successful, well-fitting indirect restorations. A vital component in impression making is a traumatic gingival displacement. Modern impression materials and techniques have improved the accuracy of impression making, however, the fundamentals for all current techniques still require management of the gingival tissues adjacent to the preparation, moisture control and adequate placement of the material around the finish line.

Research paper thumbnail of Comparative evaluation of gingival displacement produced by three different gingival retraction materials

International journal of health sciences

Aim: To compare and evaluate the gingival displacement produced by three different gingival retra... more Aim: To compare and evaluate the gingival displacement produced by three different gingival retraction materials. Materials and Methods: A study was conducted to evaluate the gingival displacement produced by three gingival retraction materials. 12 subjects were selected for the study. T-stat retraction paste system (Nexobio co.Ltd,Korea), 3M ESPE Retraction Paste (3M Deutschland GmbH, Germany), Roeko Stay- put retraction cord (Coltene Whaledent Pvt. Ltd.) were used in the study. Results: Out of the three materials used, lateral displacement was maximum with the Stay-put retraction cord followed by 3M retraction paste and least by T-Stat retraction paste. All the materials produced acceptable amount of vertical gingival retraction. When compared Stay-put retraction cord was found to be most effective among the three materials. On comparison of the cordless retraction materials, it was found that the material which was more viscous in consistency (3M retraction paste) was able to pr...

Research paper thumbnail of Cleft Lip and Palate: A Review

Indian Journal of Contemporary Dentistry, 2016

Orofacial clefts comprise a range of congenital deformities and are the most common head and neck... more Orofacial clefts comprise a range of congenital deformities and are the most common head and neck congenital malformation. Cleft has significant psychological and socio-economic effect on patient quality of life and requires a multidisciplinary team approach for management. The complex interplay between genetic and environmental factors plays a significant role in the incidence and cause of cleft. In the following review article, the embryology, classification, etiology, clinical features and management of cleft lip and palate are discussed along with primary goals of surgical repair to restore normal function, speech development, and facial esthetics. Different techniques are employed based on surgeon expertise and the unique patient presentations.