Rodent Models of Focal Stroke: Size, Mechanism, and Purpose (original) (raw)

Abstract

Summary: Rodent stroke models provide the experimental backbone for the in vivo determination of the mechanisms of cell death and neural repair, and for the initial testing of neuroprotective compounds. Less than 10 rodent models of focal stroke are routinely used in experimental study. These vary widely in their ability to model the human disease, and in their application to the study of cell death or neural repair. Many rodent focal stroke models produce large infarcts that more closely resemble malignant and fatal human infarction than the average sized human stroke. This review focuses on the mechanisms of ischemic damage in rat and mouse stroke models, the relative size of stroke generated in each model, and the purpose with which focal stroke models are applied to the study of ischemic cell death and to neural repair after stroke.

Keywords: Necrosis, apoptosis, neural repair, malignant infarction, rat, mouse

INTRODUCTION

Stroke is the third leading cause of death in the United States. With 700,000 cases per year, a person dies from stroke every 3 min.1 These statistics have propelled the search for neuroprotective therapies to reduce cell death and infarct volume after stroke. Stroke is also the leading cause of adult disability, because 76% of people survive their stroke. Of these survivors, 50% have a hemiparesis, 26% are dependent in activities of daily living, and 26% are forced into a nursing home. This long-term disability means that 30billionofthe30 billion of the 30billionofthe53.5 billion annual dollar cost of stroke is incurred in supporting long-term survivors.1 Thus, stroke is a lethal disease, but it disables more than it kills. This fact has led a recent effort to develop strategies for neural repair after stroke.2

The push to translate stroke therapies from the animal model to the hospital produced a spate of clinical trials in the 1990s. Many recent reviews have covered the resultant failures in these efforts, as they relate both to limitations in the animal models, and to problems with clinical trial design.3,4 Several recent reviews have also focused on the mechanisms of cell death, neuroprotection, and neural repair after stroke.2,4,5 This review will deal with the specific aspects of human disease modeled in rodent stroke models of focal ischemic stroke. The development of primate and higher mammal stroke models is an important goal6 but without institutional change in animal facilities and costs, rodent models will continue to provide the predominant basic science research into the mechanisms of neuroprotection and neural repair after stroke. Several recent animal models have been designed specifically to determine reparative events in the brain after stroke, and many standard rodent models are best suited to testing neuroprotective therapies. This review will focus on this rough grouping: animal models of acute cell death in stroke, and animal models of neural repair in stroke.

MODELING HUMAN STROKE

Stroke can occur as end-arteriolar or small vessel occlusion, large artery occlusive disease, artery-to-artery embolism, and cardioembolism. Each source of stroke is associated with different infarct mechanisms and size, ranging from the lacunar strokes of small vessel disease to the large wedge-shaped cortical and subcortical infarctions of embolic stroke. However, large-scale clinical trials and the advent of routine angiographic and brain imaging studies have documented common characteristics of human stroke. Many of these characteristics common to human stroke are well modeled by animal stroke models. These include the concept of evolving stroke damage, in which ischemic cell death or cell stress responses progress after the initial ischemic insult; and the region of the ischemic penumbra, a brain region adjacent to the earliest region of ischemic cell death that will itself progress to infarction over time unless treated. But three principles in human stroke appear to have been less primarily included in animal models of stroke and warrant discussion.

Small size

Human strokes are mostly small in size (Table 1) . In large population studies and clinical trials, strokes range from 28–80 mm3. Using human hemisphere volumetric measurements,7–10 this translates to 4.5–14% of the ipsilateral hemisphere (Table 1). This relative size holds true in selected subsets of stroke, such as cardioembolic11 or larger cortical/subcortical strokes.12 Using large clinical trials as a source for overall stroke size may introduce a potential bias in favor of stroke with less severe symptomatology, and hence smaller stroke, as these would be more likely to lead to survival and hospital presentation12,13 or inclusion in the trial design. However, it is precisely these most common types of stroke that are the target of neurotherapeutics. This is because larger strokes have worse functional recovery and more often present as malignant infarction.

TABLE 1.

Human Stroke Size and Malignant Infarction

Malignant infarction comprises approximately 10% of all strokes and is a syndrome of large stroke producing progressive edema, arterial compression, and infarct expansion.14 Medical therapy is largely ineffective, leading to severe brain damage, herniation and death, or emergent craniectomy, and an overall mortality of up to 80%.14–16 Although there has been a clinical proviso that this stroke subtype occurs when infarcts encompass more than 50% of the ipsilateral cerebral hemisphere on imaging, in fact a comparison of the reported volumes of malignant infarction with estimated cerebral hemispheric size indicates that malignant infarction occurs when the stroke size is greater than 39% of the ipsilateral hemisphere (Table 1). This is a little less than 10-fold greater than the reported normal range of nonmalignant human stroke.

Reperfusion

Human stroke involves a substantial degree of reperfusion. This comes from three sources. First, early clot lysis occurs in 15–18.8% percent of all strokes as assessed by serial monitoring.17,18 Second, collateralization occurs through the circle of Willis and leptomeningeal collaterals.19,20 Long a field of some controversy,21 leptomeningeal collaterals have been formally shown to provide peri-infarct blood flow and improved outcome in stroke.22–24 As intra-arterial therapies grow in importance in stroke, it is likely that additional angiographic studies will document the rapid peri-infarct flow provided by these superficial channels.20 Indeed, intra-arterial therapies themselves lead in part to the final source of reperfusion in stroke. The only approved or clinically effective agents in stroke produce reperfusion: intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), intra-arterial urokinase or tPA, platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists, Ancrod (a fibrinoloytic) and the recently approved intravascular clot retrieval device.25–27 As these agents gain more widespread use, the incidence of reperfusion in human stroke will increase.

Patterns of recovery

Stroke produces behavioral deficits by damaging neuronal circuits specific to a given brain function. This seems obvious to the neuroscientist or neurologist, but both animal models and clinical trials have focused on stroke size irrespective of the circuits that are damaged.28 Animal models in particular have focused on reducing the size of large strokes in rodents. However, human deficits after stroke occur with damage to specific circuits, such as in motor cortex maps,29 and recovery follows a reproducibly determined functional reorganization in the brain. Motor, sensory, and language recovery involves a progressive reorganization and recovery of activation in peri-infarct and ipsilateral connected cortical sites after stroke.30–34 Successful rehabilitative therapies, such as constraint-induced therapy,35–37 increase this functional remapping in brain areas adjacent to stroke. Thus, to go beyond studies of cell death, modeling neural repair in human stroke will require that animal stroke models produce injury in defined brain circuits so as to identify the molecular and cellular events that produce reorganization and recovery in the spared circuits adjacent to the infarct.

ANIMAL MODELS OF CELL DEATH IN STROKE

Animal models of cell death in stroke are designed to generate reproducible infarcts in a high throughput manner with a minimum of surgical manipulation to determine mechanisms of cell death and test neuroprotective therapies. MCAo [intra-arterial suture occlusion of the middle cerebral artery (MCA)] through the internal carotid artery is the most widely used and has been extended to the mouse in recent genetic studies of cell death mechanisms. Most of these models have advantages in following the human stroke condition of large artery occlusion, are technically not difficult to perform, and can be applied to studies of stroke and cell death in the aged brain without prohibitive time or cost constraints. However in some forms, rodent models of cell death in stroke produce very large infarcts that may not model the most common, and treatable, human strokes.

MCAo

MCAo was introduced by Kozuimi et al.38 and subsequently modified to reduce subarachnoid hemorrhage and premature reperfusion by coating the suture, such as with silicone.39,40 This technique involves transecting the external carotid artery, temporarily tying off the common carotid artery and using the external carotid artery trunk as a side path to pass a suture through the internal carotid artery to lodge in the junction of the anterior and middle cerebral arteries. The suture can be left in place for a variable duration of time and then removed to produce reperfusion. The most common durations of suture occlusion of the MCA in the rat are 60, 90, and 120 min and permanent occlusion. This technique does not require craniotomy, produces focal occlusion of a large cerebral artery as seen in human stroke and can be done in a high throughput manner. However, even with modifications such as coating the suture, MCAo is associated with an approximate 12% rate of subarachnoid hemorrhage, which reduces cerebral blood flow bilaterally.40,41 Also, transection of the ECA renders the muscles of mastication and swallow ischemic, producing difficulty in eating and weight loss. Although this does not alter overall infarct size, it is associated with poorer performance on post-stroke behavioral outcome measures.42

MCAo produces primary ischemic cell death in striatum and overlying frontal, parietal, temporal, and portions of occipital cortex, but also variable damage in the thalamus, cervicomedullary junction, substantia nigra, and hypothalamus.43–45 Damage to widespread and functionally diverse brain regions is likely to produce complex motor, sensory, autonomic, and cognitive deficits and confound study of the specific circuits involved in recovery of these functions after stroke. In suture occlusion of 60 min duration or greater, hypothalamic damage is robust and occurs early.43,46 Hypothalamic ischemia is rarely seen in human stroke. Hypothalamic ischemia generates a hyperthermic response in rats that persists for at least 1 d after the animal has recovered46 and is often unmonitored. Hyperthermia exacerbates cell death and this means that temperature fluctuations themselves may be a source of variability in ischemic cell death in MCAo.46–48 Historically, this confounded early neuroprotective studies, particularly for MK-801. It is now clear that the primary neuroprotective effect of MK-801 is mediated through its hypothermic effect, and not through NMDA antagonism in the excitotoxic infarct bed.49

The most consistent pattern of cell death in MCAo follows a well-described progression from early infarction in the striatum to delayed infarction in the dorsolateral cortex overlying the striatum. Striatal infarction is mostly necrotic, occurs rapidly,43,50 and is resistant to most neuroprotective agents administered after the procedure.51–55 Cortical infarction is more delayed, involves a prolonged and biphasic opening of the blood brain barrier, and contains a greater degree of apoptotic cell death than in striatal infarction.43,50,56,57 In MCAo with reperfusion, the striatum remains densely ischemic, but the overlying cortex returns to control blood flow values.58 Thus, in MCAo striatal infarction is an ischemic core, and cortical infarction is a region of delayed, progressive neuronal death, or an ischemic penumbra. Consistent with this idea, many hypoxia-induced genes involved in neuroprotection are induced solely in cortex after MCAo, such as heat shock protein 70, Bcl-2, Bcl-XL, and Bax.59–61 The progressive cell death in dorsolateral cortex is also associated with delayed inflammatory mediators of ischemic cell death, including neutrophil invasion, tumor necrosis factor α and interleukin-1β cytokine release, inducible nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenase-2 activation62–65 as well as oxidative cellular injury.66 The delayed progression of cell death in cortex in MCAo is an advantage of this model. The time course and clinical realities of human stroke make the ischemic penumbra, and secondary mediators of ischemic cell death such as inflammation and oxidative injury, the main targets for neuroprotective therapies.3,4

Mouse MCAo

Intraarterial suture occlusion of the middle cerebral artery is the most common focal stroke model in the mouse. As with rat MCAo, MCAo in the mouse avoids skull soft tissue damage, prolonged surgery time and animal morbidity associated with craniotomy. Subarachnoid hemorrhage affects roughly 10% of MCAo in the mouse.67 Unlike rat MCAo, MCAo in the mouse leads to hypothermia.68 Hypothalamic damage occurs in both species, but the large surface area/volume of the mouse leads to temperature loss in the postoperative period.68 Also unlike rat MCAo, MCAo in the mouse is uniquely plagued by substantial variations in the volume of damage within and between strains and by the easy possibility of generating large infarcts in widespread and diverse brain structures.

Mice exhibit profound interstrain differences in infarct volume after MCAo. In several studies of permanent suture-induced MCAo, C57BL/6 mice exhibit significantly larger infarct volumes than Sv12969,70 and in global ischemia C57BL6 is more sensitive than BALBc and other strains.71 Interestingly, in distal MCAo (see below), BALBc mice have larger strokes than C57BL/6 and Sv129 strains.72–74 There are strain differences in arterial collaterals and sensitivity to excitotoxic cell death that may partially account for these differences. C57BL/6 have poorly developed posterior communicating arteries,71,75,76 which will limit collateral flow to the territory distal to an occluded MCA. However, the degree of development of the circle of Willis does not strictly correlate with distal blood flow71,72 or with infarct size.77 Of the commonly used mice strains, C57BL/6 and BALB/c are more resistant than Sv129 and FVB/N mice to kainite-induced excitotoxic hippocampal damage,78 which is the inverse pattern of sensitivity to suture-induced MCAo. Thus, the mechanism for this interstrain difference in ischemic cell death remains to be determined. However, mouse strains have differences in many gene systems, including those related to cytokine and major histocompatibility complex expression, glial reactivity, and intracellular protein processing73,79 that may contribute to differential sensitivity to ischemic cell death. An important point of this variability is that principles of cell death or neuroprotection derived from a single mouse strain should be replicated in additional strains before they are considered as generalized fact.

Arterial occlusion in the mouse produces a steep relationship between occlusion time and increases in ischemic cell death. The difference between 15 and 30 min of MCAo is a fivefold increase in infarct volume in C57BL/6 mice.76 Similarly, in bilateral common carotid artery occlusion, 6 min of interruption of blood flow produces no ischemic damage, but 8 min produces damage to striatum and hippocampus in C57BL/6.80 The exquisite sensitivity of the mouse to infarct extension over minutes of MCAo may account for the variation in infarct size in this model: published studies of infarct size within the same strain, using the same duration of MCAo and the same survival period produce measures of infarct volume that range over a fivefold difference (see Table 2). When infarct size extends into larger volumes in the mouse, the damage involves a substantial amount of the cerebral hemisphere and very different brain structures, including most of the ipsilateral cortex, striatum, thalamus, hippocampus, pyriform cortex, accumbens, and the subventricular zone.70,76,81 The progression of ischemic cell death in mouse MCAo mirrors that in rat, with comparable events shifted toward shorter MCAo occlusion times. Thus, with brief MCAo (30 min), there is rapid infarction in the striatum, and delayed infarction in overlying cortex, associated with heat shock protein and immediate early gene induction in cortex.82 With longer MCAo, such as 1 h and permanent occlusion, there is widespread, simultaneous damage in both striatum and cortex, and indeed much of the ipsilateral cerebral hemisphere83,84 with a small region of pernumbral cortex. Thus brief MCAo in the mouse (30 min) resembles longer MCAo in the rat (60–120 min), but longer MCAo in the mouse (60–120 min) produces rapid, simultaneous infarction in much of the cerebral hemisphere.

TABLE 2.

Rodent Stroke Size

Modeling malignant infarction

Suture occlusion of the MCA in the mouse and rat frequently produces tissue damage in a substantial portion of the ipsilateral cerebral hemisphere. When a large number of recent or important past publications are surveyed and normalized for hemispheric volume, infarct size in both species ranges from around 5% to 50% of the cerebral hemisphere, with most studies noting infarcts between 21 and 45% of the ipsilateral hemisphere. This range occurs independently of reperfusion time (Table 2). As noted previously, in humans infarcts consistently greater than 39% of the ipsilateral hemisphere are malignant infarctions (Table 1). These develop substantial edema and progressive infarct expansion, with outcomes of either brain herniation or pan-hemispheric destruction, and minimal functional recovery. Instead, the most common forms of human stroke are not malignant infarctions. These most common humans strokes are approximately an order of magnitude smaller (Table 1) and are all associated with some degree of recovery. In comparing these numbers from rodent and human stroke, it is clear that there is a risk that many studies of MCAo in rodents, and particularly in the mouse, are not modeling the usual cases of human stroke, but are modeling malignant infarction. In fact, it is a unique characteristic of the lissencephalic rodent brain that these animals even survive this large stroke in appreciable numbers. In cats, distal or proximal MCAo of similar occlusion times produces large hemispheric infarctions, progressive edema, and death.85,86 In humans, malignant infarction is associated with diminished local collateral flow and a reduced region of penumbra.87,88 Similarly in rats, laser Doppler flow measurements suggest that suture occlusion of the MCAo also results in reduced local collateral flow, compared with other stroke models.89 Thus, rodent MCAo may in many cases be modeling progressive ischemic cerebral edema, but not small, focal stroke.

Other models of MCAo: distal MCAo and embolic MCAo

There are two main distal occlusion models of the middle cerebral artery. Both produce more restricted damage to the cerebral hemisphere, avoiding the thalamic, hypothalamic, hippocampal, and midbrain damage seen in suture-occlusion of the MCAo of greater than 60 min. As a result, there is no hyperthermic response in these models.47 In a method originally developed by Tamura et al.,89 the MCA is transected after it gives off lencticulostriate branches at the basal surface of the lateral part of the cerebral hemisphere. Most investigators do not divide the zygomatic arch as was originally described, but the surgical approach still involves skillful separation of the parotid gland and temporalis muscle and a narrow craniotomy over the MCA.44,72,73,90,91 The ischemic damage includes much of the striatum, subcortical white matter, and ipsilateral cortex (Table 2). The second technique involves occlusion of the MCA on the surface of the brain, and bilateral common carotid occlusion—the three-vessel occlusion model. For a consistent infarction in normotensive animals (i.e., not the spontaneously hypertensive stain of rat), there needs to be a period of at least 60 min in the rat in which the MCA on the surface of the brain and both common carotids are occluded.91–94 In the rat, variations on the three-vessel occlusion model relate to whether the MCA and ipsilateral carotid arteries are permanently or transiently occluded. These variations include permanent occlusion of the ipsilateral common and middle cerebral carotid arteries,92 permanent occlusion of the ipsilateral common carotid artery alone,95 permanent occlusion of the middle cerebral artery alone,94 and temporary occlusion of all three vessels.96 A comparison of infarct size across these variations suggests that this approach generates a reproducible infarct volume, especially within the same lab.94 Ischemic damage involves most of the frontal, parietal, temporal and rostral occipital cortex, the underlying white matter and a small region of dorsolateral striatum.92,94,96 Importantly, both the Tamura and three-vessel occlusion models involve reperfusion. In the Tamura model, local collaterals from the anterior cerebral artery provide a zone of reflow in medial frontal and parietal cortex.89,97,98 and in the three-vessel models removal of the transient occlusion on the common carotids, or middle cerebral artery, establishes reperfusion.94–96 In the mouse, permanent distal MCA and bilateral common carotid artery occlusion limited to 15 min produces infarction confined to cortex, but common carotid occlusion for 30 min or more produces elements of global infarction bilaterally in the striatum and globus pallidus (C57BL/6 strain, Ohab, J. and S. T. Carmichel, personal observations). Also in the mouse, permanent occlusion of the MCA and ipsilateral common carotid artery (a two-vessel model) provides a similar degree of cortical infarction as the three vessel rat models.74

These distal MCA occlusion models produce an infarct core in the frontal and parietal cortex, and evolving infarction over 3–4 days in adjacent temporal, frontal, and cingulate cortex and dorsolateral striatum, characterized by leukocyte infiltration, cytokine production, caspase activation and apoptosis.44,73,91 The advantage of these models compared to suture MCAo is that they produce smaller infarcts (Table 2). The disadvantage is that they require craniotomy, a degree of acquired neurosurgical skill, and more preparation time. A recent modification using Rose-Bengal and photocoagulation of the MCA (see below) through the intact skull in the mouse further improves the distal MCAo in this species.74

Embolic MCA occlusion

Three models use embolic MCA stroke: microsphere/macrosphere injection or thrombotic clot embolization. The macrosphere technique involves installation of large 300–400 μm diameter spheres into the internal carotid artery. These lodge in the middle cerebral artery and produce an infarct of similar size and location as the permanent suture-occlusion of the MCA, without hypothalamic damage and subsequent hyperthermia.49,99 The microsphere model utilizes 50 μm diameter spheres, instilled into the MCA or internal carotid artery, that produce smaller, multifocal infarctions throughout the brain,100,101 modeling distal and diffuse embolism. Thromboembolic clots use either spontaneously formed clots from autologous blood placed into the MCA, or thrombin-induced clots in the middle cerebral artery, to directly model the clot-induced human stroke.102,103 The infarction in this model is smaller and more variable than suture-induced MCAo.103 Microvessels in the striatum and cortex are occluded at 1 h, and then cortical vessels clear by 3 h and striatal microvessels clear by 24 h, suggesting a continuous process of endogenous thrombolysis.104 The degree of thrombolysis will differ depending on the mechanism of clot formation: spontaneous ex vivo clot formation versus intravascular clot induction with thrombin.105 This model closely mimics human stroke, but produces infarcts of more variable size and location, which will make analysis of neuroprotective treatments difficult. However, it provides an excellent system to evaluate new thrombolytic therapies, especially when coupled with real-time magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment.103

Photothrombosis model

Photothrombotic stroke models use local intravascular photooxidation to generate highly circumscribed ischemic cortical lesions. Rose-bengal or other photosensitive dyes are injected intravenously and irradiated within minutes through the intact skull, generating singlet oxygen, focal endothelial damage, platelet activation, simultaneous microvascular occlusion throughout the irradiated area and secondary ischemia.106,107 The region of irradiation can be stereotactically determined so as to place the infarct within functionally distinct cortical areas, such as barrel field or hindpaw somatosensory cortex.108,109 Rapidly evolving ischemic cell death occurs in the irradiated cortical bed, as measured by nonselective indicators of cell death, such as terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated biotinylated uridine triphosphate nick end labeling (TUNEL) staining, or indicators of apoptotic progression, such as cytoplasmic cytochrome c.110,111 T cells infiltrate the edge of the lesion, followed by microglial/macrophage activation and both local and distant cytokine production in cortex.112,113 The advantages of this model are the small size of the infarcts, the ability to place the infarct within distinct functional subdivisions of cortex, and the minimal surgical manipulation of the animal. This model has recently been modified in the mouse so that rose-bengal is administered intraperitoneally, further streamlining the technique.111 The disadvantages of this model stem from the microvascular insult. There is relatively little ischemic penumbra or region of local collateral flow and reperfusion, as seen in the Tamura and three-vessel occlusion models.90,94 This is supported by the finding of oxidative damage within the infarct core, rather than progressively distributed in peri-infarct areas as in other models.66,111,114,115 Also the simultaneous disruption of endothelial integrity and rapidly progressive infarction in a small cortical volume results in substantial local vasogenic edema.106 MRI of photothrombotic stroke shows early increases in T2 signal at the same time as decreased apparent diffusion of water, indicating the simultaneous development of substantial vasogenic edema at the same time as ischemic infarction.116,117 In acute brain lesions, T2 signal is a function of extracellular water. This means that photothrombosis induces simultaneous vasogenic (extracellular) edema and cytotoxic (intracellular) edema, i.e., leaky vessels and swollen cells at the same time. This is a very different pattern than seen in human stroke, where infarcts develop with decreased diffusion of water (as measured by the ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient)—a pattern of cytotoxic edema alone that is diagnostic in the acute setting of human focal stroke.118 In fact, the simultaneous development of both significant vasogenic and cytotoxic edema in MRI of photothrombotic stroke more closely resembles traumatic brain injury models than focal stroke.119,120 Induction of photothrombotic stroke with a ring filter provides a central area within the lesioned cortex that has not been optically thrombosed.121 This may provide an area of penumbra, but this potential penumbral area is present within the evolving vasogenic edema and it is unclear if this accurately models the human penumbra.

Despite these limitations in edema and penumbral areas, experiments with photothrombotic stroke have provided a large body of data on changes in neuronal physiology and neurotransmission in peri-infarct and contralateral cortex. Witte and colleagues122,123 have used the precise localization of these lesions for both in vivo and slice electrophysiological experiments that have shown increased baseline neuronal firing rates, diminished recurrent neuronal inhibition, and enhanced long-term potentiation after stroke. Diminished GABAα receptor binding and subunit expression, and increased NMDA receptor expression may underlie these physiological changes, and occur within a large region of cortex both ipsi- and contralateral to photothrombotic stroke.109,124 These data on cellular and network properties in peri-infarct cortex provide the beginnings of a mechanistic link between early ischemic cell death in stroke, and the later stages of dendritic and axonal sprouting, circuit reorganization and functional remapping that may mediate recovery.2 Such a detailed physiological analysis of peri-infarct cortex would be more difficult with lesion models of more variable location in the cerebral hemisphere. It remains to be seen whether the lack of local collateral reflow and reperfusion injury and the profound local edema limit this model in its application to the study of neural repair after stroke.

ANIMAL MODELS OF NEURAL REPAIR IN STROKE

The study of neural repair after stroke is taking on adding importance as the field develops scientific understanding of the basic cellular mechanisms of neuronal reorganization after injury. As noted above, imaging studies have begun to define consistent patterns of recovery within functional circuits in the human brain after stroke and have implicated peri-infarct cortex and closely connected ipsilateral areas as important in recovery after a stroke. At a cellular level in peri-infarct cortex, axonal sprouting establishes new patterns of cortical connections,2, 125 neural progenitor cells differentiate and send newly born neurons into peri-infarct tissue126,127 and synaptic plasticity changes the organization of cortical maps.128 To define the cellular and molecular mechanisms of these reparative processes requires that an animal model allow direct study of the relevant neuronal circuits as they sprout, differentiate, or re-map after stroke. Most of the animal models of cell death in stroke, including suture occlusion of the MCA, the Tamura model, embolic MCAo and the three-vessel model, produce substantial damage to many different brain regions, sparing very rostral and medial frontal cortex, lateral temporal cortex and occipital cortex89,92,95,129 (FIG. 1). In rodents, the connectional structure of these areas is not well established and difficult to study for the patterns of cellular repair after stroke. In contrast, the motor and sensory body maps provide a well described region in which over 50 years of neuroscientific study has defined the anatomy and physiology of the cortical structure. Animal models of stroke in the motor and sensory body maps can use these regions as a template, or circuit board, to determine the basic mechanisms of cellular repair and recovery after stroke. Stroke models in the rodent somatosensory barrel field and forelimb sensorimotor cortex have used this template to define principles of neural repair after stroke.

FIG. 1.

Stroke in rodent and human. A: TTC stained section from mouse with a 2-h suture occlusion of the MCA 1 day after the infarct was induced. The pale area is the infarcted tissue. B: TTC-stained section from rat with a permanent MCAO, one day after infarct was induced. C: T2-weighted MRI from a patient with a malignant infarction. This patient developed malignant edema and required hemicraniectomy. D: T2-weighted image from a patient with an infarct more representative of average human stroke size (Table 2). Panel A is reprinted with permission from Foerch et al. Serum S100B predicts a malignant course of infarction in patients with acute middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke 35:2160–2164. Copyright © 2004, Elsevier. All rights reserved.168 Panel B is reprinted with permission from Kim et al. Agmatine reduces infarct area in a mouse model of transient focal cerebral ischemia and protects cultured neurons from ischemia-like injury. Exp Neurol 189:122–130. Copyright © 2004, Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.169 Panel C is courtesy of Dr. Noriko Salamon, Division of Diagnostic Neuroradiology, Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA. Panel D is taken from the authors’ cases in the UCLA Stroke Service, Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA.

Two models have been applied to produce small focal stroke in rodent somatosensory or motor cortex. One model takes advantage of the arterial branching pattern of the MCA in the parietal region130 to focally interrupt blood supply to the somatosensory barrel cortex.115,131 The cortical representation of each facial whisker forms a structural module, or barrel, that is easily visualized in the adult brain. Together, these modules constitute the barrel cortex, which forms a significant part of the entire rodent cortex (FIG. 2). To generate reproducible stroke and a component of reperfusion injury, arterial branches to the barrel cortex are permanently interrupted and both common carotids are occluded for one hour.115,125 The outcome of this technique is a small cortical stroke in a specific, functionally defined region of the rat barrel field.115,125 Because the connections of the barrel field are well established, this model allowed the first definitive description of new patterns of connections, or axonal sprouting, in peri-infarct cortex after stroke.125 Small strokes in the barrel field produce successively separated tissue compartments of pan-necrosis; partial tissue damage constituting apoptotic cell death, oxidative DNA damage, and dense reactive gliosis; and cellular stress and distributed gliosis.115 Each of the tissue microenvironments is located within distinct functional regions of rat somatosensory and motor cortex. The precise mapping of tissue microenvironments after stroke within a defined cortical structure has allowed comparison of mechanisms of stroke damage between aged and young adults, and identified reduced neuroprotective and cellular stress responses in the aged brain.132 A similar model has been developed in the mouse (FIG. 2). We have used this model to identify the molecular profile of a neuronal growth program triggered by stroke that mediates axonal sprouting, and a unique region of neuronal regeneration after stroke.133 The precise mapping of apoptotic cell death, oxidative DNA damage and partial neuronal injury115 also allows definitive study of the molecular profile of glial scar formation in the brain after stroke.133 Thus, this model has the advantages of producing strokes of similar size to the most common humans strokes, with a mechanism of reperfusion, in a brain region that serves as a connectional template for the study of reparative processes after stroke. The major disadvantage of this model is that the strokes are variable in size115 and this interanimal variability limits study of stroke size, or neuroprotective effect, between treatment groups.

FIG. 2.

Focal stroke in rodent barrel field. Left column shows normal and post-stroke rat cortex; right column shows normal and post-stroke mouse cortex. A and C: Tangential sections of flattened rat cortex through cortical layer IV and stained for cytochrome oxidase and nestin shows the rat somatosensory body map. The barrel field (PMBSF and ALBSF) form a significant portion of the total surface area of the rat cortex. In panel C, a stroke has been produced in a portion of the barrel field and is highlighted by dark, nestin-positive reactive astrocytes. E: Coronal section through the infarct stained for MAP2 shows the relatively small total area occupied by the infarct. B and D: Tangential sections of mouse cortex through layer IV and stained for cytochrome oxidase show the somatosensory body map. The infarct is larger in the mouse, but also positioned within and adjacent to the barrel field. F: Coronal section through the infarct stained for Nissl. Bar in C = 1 mm and applied to A and C; bar in D = 400 μm and applied to B and D. Bar in E =1 mm; bar in F = 250 μm. PMBSF = posteromedial barrel field; ALBSF = anterolateral barrel field.

A second model of focal stroke in rodent sensory and motor cortex uses local endothelin-1 application. Endothelin-1 is a potent and long-acting venous and arterial vasoconstrictor.134 Intracerebral injection or surface application of endothelin-1 produces a local dose dependent ischemic lesion with minimal tissue edema.135,136 Endothelin-1 application can be directed to distinct cortical regions to produce localized stroke within specific brain circuits.137,138 Endothelin-1 can also be injected into subcortical white matter to produce focal subcortical stroke in the rodent.139 This approach potentially offers the ability to direct focal ischemia into deep and superficial brain compartments in an animal model of stroke. However, endothelin-1, endothelin-1-converting enzyme and both subtypes of endothelin-1 receptors are found not only on endothelial cells, but also on neurons and astrocytes in the brain.140,141 Endothelin-1 application induces astrocytosis and appears to facilitate axonal sprouting in spinal cord injury.142,143 These findings suggest that endothelin-1 exerts a direct, receptor-mediated signaling effect within astrocytes and neurons that may interfere with the production and interpretation of neural repair experiments.

CONCLUSION

Individual rodent stroke models each capture elements of the human disease. With careful attention to size, mechanism, and purpose, selected rodent models can be used to study the major targets of human neuroprotective therapies—reperfusion injury, delayed apoptotic cell death, and inflammatory cascades3,4; or the cellular elements of neural repair. Rodent models can be easily shifted to study cell death and repair in aged animals, the actual population target for stroke therapies, without prohibitive cost and time constraints. However, rodent models have many well-recognized limits, such as differences in tolerance to cerebral edema, a small region of subcortical white matter to model lacunar infarction, and important molecular differences in thrombotic, inflammatory, and DNA repair cascades compared with primates.144,145 In reality, biomedical funding and space constraints make the animal modeling of stroke a progressive endeavor, with intellectual risk and discovery carried out in rodent stroke models and concept replication and proof of principle carried through primate models.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke 1R01 NS45729 and the Nathan Shappell fund.

REFERENCES

• 1.American Heart Association, Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics Update 2004.http://www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=3000090.
• 2.Carmichael ST. Plasticity of cortical projections after stroke. Neuroscientist 9: 64–75, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 3.Gladstone DJ, Black SE, Hakim AM. Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario Centre of Excellence in Stroke Recovery. Toward wisdom from failure: lessons from neuroprotective stroke trials and new therapeutic directions. Stroke 33: 2123–2236, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 4.Cheng YD, Al-Khoury L, Zivin JA. Neuroprotection for ischemic stroke: two decades of success and failure. NeuroRx 1: 36–45, 2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 5.Sugawara T, Fujimura M, Noshita N, Kim GW, Saito A, Hayashi T, et al. Neuronal death/survival signaling pathways in cerebral ischemia. NeuroRx 1: 17–25, 2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 6.Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable. Recommendations for standards regarding preclinical neuroprotective and restorative drugs. Stroke 30: 2752–2758, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 7.Brott T, Marler JR, Olinger CP, Adams HP Jr, Tomsick T, Barsan WG, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: lesion size by computed tomography. Stroke 20: 871–875, 1989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 8.Lyden PD, Zweifler R, Mahdavi Z, Lonzo L. A rapid, reliable, and valid method for measuring infarct and brain compartment volumes from computed tomographic scans. Stroke 25: 2421–2428, 1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 9.Nopoulos P, Flaum M, O’Leary D, Andreasen NC. Sexual dimorphism in the human brain: evaluation of tissue volume, tissue composition and surface anatomy using magnetic resonance imaging. Psychiatry Res 98: 1–13, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 10.Sowell ER, Peterson BS, Thompson PM, Welcome SE, Henkenius AL, Toga AW. Mapping cortical change across the human life span. Nat Neurosci 6: 309–315, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 11.National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Effect of intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator on ischemic stroke lesion size measured by computed tomography. Stroke 31: 2912–2919, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 12.Lindgren A, Norrving B, Rudling O, Johansson BB. Comparison of clinical and neuroradiological findings in first-ever stroke. A population-based study. Stroke 25: 1371–1377, 1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 13.Kissela B, Broderick J, Woo D, Kothari R, Miller R, Khoury J, et al. Greater Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Stroke Study: volume of first-ever ischemic stroke among blacks in a population-based study. Stroke 32: 1285–1290, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 14.Hacke W, Schwab S, Horn M, Spranger M, De Georgia M, von Kummer R. “Malignant” middle cerebral artery territory infarction: clinical course and prognostic signs. Arch Neurol 53: 309–315, 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 15.Berrouschot J, Sterker M, Bettin S, Koster J, Schneider D. Mortal of space-occupying (“malignant”) middle cerebral artery infarction under conservative intensive care. Intensive Care Med 24: 620–623, 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 16.Schwab S, Steiner T, Aschoff A, Schwarz S, Steiner HH, Jansen O, et al. Early hemicraniectomy in patients with complete middle cerebral artery infarction. Stroke 29: 1888–1893, 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 17.Molina CA, Montaner J, Abilleira S, Ibarra B, Romero F, Arenillas JF, et al. Timing of spontaneous recanalization and risk of hemorrhagic transformation in acute cardioembolic stroke. Stroke 32: 1079–1084, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 18.Kassem-Moussa H, Graffagnino C. Nonocclusion and spontaneous recanalization rates in acute ischemic stroke: a review of cerebral angiography studies. Arch Neurol 59: 1870–1873, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 19.Bisschops RH, Klijn CJ, Kappelle LJ, van Huffelen AC, van der Grond J. Collateral flow and ischemic brain lesions in patients with unilateral carotid artery occlusion. Neurology 60: 1435–1441, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 20.Kim JJ, Fischbein NJ, Lu Y, Pham D, Dillon WP. Regional angiographic grading system for collateral flow: correlation with cerebral infarction in patients with middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke 35: 1340–1844, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 21.Brozici M, van der Zwan A, Hillen B. Anatomy and functionality of leptomeningeal anastomoses: a review. Stroke 34: 2750–2762, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 22.Ringelstein EB, Biniek R, Weiller C, Ammeling B, Nolte PN, Thron A. Type and extent of hemispheric brain infarctions and clinical outcome in early and delayed middle cerebral artery recanalization. Neurology 42: 289–298, 1992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 23.Arnold M, Nedeltchev K, Mattle HP, Loher TJ, Stepper F, Schroth G, et al. Intra-arterial thrombolysis in 24 consecutive patients with internal carotid artery T occlusions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 74: 739–742, 2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 24.Schramm P, Schellinger PD, Fiebach JB, Heiland S, Jansen O, Knauth M, et al. Comparison of CT and CT angiography source images with diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with acute stroke within 6 hours after onset. Stroke 33: 2426–2432, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 25.Sherman DG, Atkinson RP, Chippendale T, Levin KA, Ng K, Futrell N, et al. Intravenous ancrod for treatment of acute ischemic stroke: the STAT study: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke Treatment with Ancrod Trial. JAMA 283: 2395–2403, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 26.Burton A. Abciximab extends treatment window for stroke. Lancet Neurol 2: 390, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 27.Schellinger PD, Kaste M, Hacke W. An update on thrombolytic therapy for acute stroke. Curr Opin Neurol 17: 69–77, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 28.Corbett D, Nurse S. The problem of assessing effective neuroprotection in experimental cerebral ischemia. Prog Neurobiol 54: 531–548, 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 29.Crafton KR, Mark AN, Cramer SC. Improved understanding of cortical injury by incorporating measures of functional anatomy. Brain 126: 1650–1659, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 30.Traversa R, Cicinelli P, Bassi A, Rossini PM, Bernardi G. Mapping of motor cortical reorganization after stroke. A brain stimulation study with focal magnetic pulses. Stroke 28: 110–117, 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 31.Karbe H, Thiel A, Weber-Luxenburger G, Herholz K, Kessler J, Heiss WD. Brain plasticity in poststroke aphasia: what is the contribution of the right hemisphere? Brain Lang 64: 215–230, 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 32.Nelles G, Spiekramann G, Jueptner M, Leonhardt G, Muller S, Gerhard H, et al. Evolution of functional reorganization in hemiplegic stroke: a serial positron emission tomographic activation study. Ann Neurol 46: 901–919, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 33.Marshall RS, Perera GM, Lazar RM, Krakauer JW, Constantine RC, DeLaPaz RL. Evolution of cortical activation during recovery from corticospinal tract infarction. Stroke 31: 656–661, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 34.Calautti C, Leroy F, Guincestre JY, Marie RM, Baron JC. Sequential activation brain mapping after subcortical stroke: changes in hemispheric balance and recovery. Neuroreport 12: 3883–3886, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 35.Liepert J, Bauder H, Wolfgang HR, Miltner WH, Taub E, Weiller C. Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke 31: 1210–1216, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 36.Schaechter JD, Kraft E, Hilliard TS, Dijkhuizen RM, Benner T, Finklestein SP, et al. Motor recovery and cortical reorganization after constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients: a preliminary study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 16: 326–338, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 37.Wittenberg GF, Chen R, Ishii K, Bushara KO, Eckloff S, Croarkin E, et al. Constraint-induced therapy in stroke: magnetic-stimulation motor maps and cerebral activation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 17: 48–57, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 38.Koizumi J, Yoshida Y, Nakazawa T, Ooneda G. Experimental studies of ischemic brain edema. I. A new experimental model of cerebral embolism in which recirculation can introduced into the ischemic area. Jpn J Stroke 8: 108, 1986. [Google Scholar]
• 39.Belayev L, Alonso OF, Busto R, Zhao W, Ginsberg MD. Middle cerebral artery occlusion in the rat by intraluminal suture. Neurological and pathological evaluation of an improved model. Stroke 27: 1616–622, 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 40.Schmid-Elsaesser R, Zausinger S, Hungerhuber E, Baethmann A, Reulen HJ. A critical reevaluation of the intraluminal thread model of focal cerebral ischemia: evidence of inadvertent premature reperfusion and subarachnoid hemorrhage in rats by laser-Doppler flowmetry. Stroke 29: 2162–2170, 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 41.Chen TY, Goyagi T, Toung TJ, Kirsch JR, Hurn PD, Koehler RC, et al. Prolonged opportunity for ischemic neuroprotection with selective κ-opioid receptor agonist in rats. Stroke 35: 1180–1185, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 42.Dittmar M, Spruss T, Schuierer G, Horn M. External carotid artery territory ischemia impairs outcome in the endovascular filament model of middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats. Stroke 34: 2252–2257, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 43.Garcia JH, Liu KF, Ho KL. Neuronal necrosis after middle cerebral artery occlusion in Wistar rats progresses at different time intervals in the caudoputamen and the cortex. Stroke 26: 636–642, 1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 44.Kanemitsu H, Nakagomi T, Tamura A, Tsuchiya T, Kono G, Sano K. Differences in the extent of primary ischemic damage between middle cerebral artery coagulation and intraluminal occlusion models. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 22: 1196–1204, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 45.Williams AJ, Berti R, Dave JR, Elliot PJ, Adams J, Tortella FC. Delayed treatment of ischemia/reperfusion brain injury: extended therapeutic window with the proteosome inhibitor MLN519. Stroke 35: 1186–1191, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 46.Li F, Omae T, Fisher M. Spontaneous hyperthermia and its mechanism in the intraluminal suture middle cerebral artery occlusion model of the rat. Stroke 30: 2464–2471, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 47.Yamashita K, Busch E, Wiessner C, Hossmann KA. Thread occlusion but not electrocoagulation of the middle cerebral artery causes hypothalamic damage with subsequent hyperthermia. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 37: 723–727, 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 48.Reglodi D, Somogyvari-Vigh A, Maderdrut JL, Vigh S, Arimura A. Postischemic spontaneous hyperthermia and its effects in middle cerebral artery occlusion in the rat. Exp Neurol 163: 399–407, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 49.Gerriets T, Stolz E, Walberer M, Kaps M, Bachmann G, Fisher M. Neuroprotective effects of MK-801 in different rat stroke models for permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion: adverse effects of hypothalamic damage and strategies for its avoidance. Stroke 34: 2234–2239, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 50.Li Y, Chopp M, Jiang N, Zhang ZG, Zaloga C. Induction of DNA fragmentation after 10 to 120 minutes of focal cerebral ischemia in rats. Stroke 26: 1252–1257, 1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 51.Mohamed AA, Gotoh O, Graham DI, Osborne KA, McCulloch J, Mendelow AD, et al. Effect of pretreatment with the calcium antagonist nimodipine on local cerebral blood flow and histopathology after middle cerebral artery occlusion. Ann Neurol 18: 705–711, 1985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 52.Buchan AM, Xue D, Huang ZG, Smith KH Lesiuk H. Delayed AMPA receptor blockade reduces cerebral infarction induced by focal ischemia. Neuroreport 2: 473–476, 1991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 53.Sydserff SG, Borelli AR, Green AR, Cross AJ. Effect of NXY-059 on infarct volume after transient or permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion in the rat; studies on dose, plasma concentration and therapeutic time window. Br J Pharmacol 135: 103–112, 2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 54.Minematsu K, Fisher M, Li L, Davis MA, Knapp AG, Cotter RE, McBurney RN, et al. Effects of a novel NMDA antagonist on experimental stroke rapidly and quantitatively assessed by diffusion-weighted MRI. Neurology 43: 397–403, 1993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 55.Yrjanheikki J, Tikka T, Keinanen R, Goldsteins G, Chan PH, Koistinaho J. A tetracycline derivative, minocycline, reduces inflammation and protects against focal cerebral ischemia with a wide therapeutic window. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 13496–13500, 1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 56.Linnik MD, Miller JA, Sprinkle-Cavallo J, Mason PJ, Thompson FY, Montgomery LR, et al. Apoptotic DNA fragmentation in the rat cerebral cortex induced by permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 32: 116–124, 1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 57.Li Y, Chopp M, Jiang N, Yao F, Zaloga C. Temporal profile of in situ DNA fragmentation after transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in the rat. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 15: 389–397, 1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 58.Takagi K, Zhao W, Busto R, Ginsberg MD. Local hemodynamic changes during transient middle cerebral artery occlusion and recirculation in the rat: a [14C]iodoantipyrine autoradiographic study. Brain Res 691: 160–168, 1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 59.Gillardon F, Lenz C, Waschke KF, Krajewski S, Reed JC, Zimmermann M, Kuschinsky W. Altered expression of Bcl-2, Bcl-X, Bax, and c-Fos colocalizes with DNA fragmentation and ischemic cell damage following middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 40: 254–260, 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 60.Schmidt-Kastner R, Truettner J, Zhao W, Belayev L, Krieger C, Busto R, et al. Differential changes of bax, caspase-3 and p21 mRNA expression after transient focal brain ischemia in the rat. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 79: 88–101, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 61.Sharp FR, Lu A, Tang Y, Millhorn DE. Multiple molecular penumbras after focal cerebral ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 20: 1011–1132, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 62.Wang XK, Yue T-L, Barone FC, White RF, Young PR, McDonnell PC, et al. Concomitant cortical expression of TNFα and IL-1β mRNA following transient focal ischemia. Mol Chem Neuropathol 23: 103–114, 1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 63.Zhang Rl, Chopp M, Chen H, Garcia JH. Temporal profile of ischemic damage, neutrophil response, and vascular plugging following permanent and transient (2H) middle cerebral artery occlusion in the rat. J Neurol Sci 125: 3–10, 1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 64.Yokota C, Kaji T, Kuge Y, Inoue H, Tamaki N, Minematsu K. Temporal and topographic profiles of cyclooxygenase-2 expression during 24 h of focal brain ishemia in rats. Neurosci Lett 357: 219–222, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 65.Zhu DY, Deng Q, Yao HH, Wang DC, Deng Y, Liu GQ. Inducible nitric oxide synthase expression in the ischemic core and penumbra after transient focal cerebral ischemia in mice. Life Sci 71: 1985–1996, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 66.Nagayama T, Lan J, Henshall DC, Chen D, O’Horo C, Simon RP, Chen J Induction of oxidative DNA damage in the peri-infarct region after permanent focal cerebral ischemia. J Neurochem 75: 1716–1728, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 67.Tsuchiya D, Hong S, Kayama T, Panter SS, Weinstein PR. Effect of suture size and carotid clip application upon blood flow and infarct volume after permanent and temporary middle cerebral artery occlusion in mice. Brain Res 970: 131–139, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 68.Barber PA, Hoyte L, Colbourne F, Buchan AM. Temperature-regulated model of focal ischemia in the mouse: a study with histopathological and behavioral outcomes. Stroke 5: 1720–1725, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 69.Connolly ES, Winfree CJ, Stern DM, Solomon RA, Pinsky DJ. Procedural and strain-related variables signficantly affect outcome in a murine model of focal cerebral ischemia. Neurosurgery 38: 523–532, 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 70.Maeda K, Hata R, Hossmann KA. Regional metabolic disturbances and cerebrovascular anatomy after permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion in C57Black/6 and SV129. Neurobiol Dis 6: 101–108, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 71.Yang G, Kitagawa K, Matshushita K, Mabuchi T, Yagita Y, Yanagihara T, Matsumoto M. C57BL/6 stain is most susceptible to cerebral ischemia following bilateral common carotid occlusion among seven mouse strains: selective neuronal death in the murine transient forebrain ischemia. Brain Res 752: 209–218, 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 72.Majid A, He YY, Gidday JM, Kaplan SS, Gonzales ER, Park TS, et al. Differences in ischemic vulnerability to permanent cerebral ischemia among 3 common mouse strains. Stroke 31: 2707–2714, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 73.Lambertsen KL, Gregersen R, Finsen B. Microglial-macrophage synthesis of tumor necrosis factor after focal cerebral ischemia in mice is strain dependent. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 22: 785–797, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 74.Sugimori H, Yao H, Ooboshi H, Ibayashi S, Iida M. Krypton laser-induced photothrombotic distal middle cerebral artery occlusion without craniectomy in mice. Brain Res Brain Res Protoc 13: 189–196, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 75.Beckmann N High resolution magnetic resonance angiography non-invasively reveals mouse strain differences in the cerebrovascular anatomy in vivo. Magn Reson Med 44: 252–258, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 76.McColl BW, Carswell HV, McCulloch J, Horsburgh K. Extension of cerebral hypoperfusion and ischaemic pathology beyond MCA territory after intraluminal filament occlusion in C57Bl/6J mice. Brain Res 997: 15–23, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 77.Furuya K, Kawahara N, Kawai K, Toyoda T, Maeda K, et al. Proximal occlusion of the middle cerebral artery in C57Black6 mice: relationship of patency of the posterior communicating artery, infarct evolution, and animal survival. J Neurosurg 100: 97–105, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 78.Schauwecker, PE, Steward O. Genetic determinants of susceptibility to excitotoxic cell death: implications for gene targeting approaches. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 4103–4108, 1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 79.Fernandes C, Paya-Cano JL, Sluyter F, D’Souza U, Plomin R, Schalkwyk LC. Hippocampal gene expression profiling across eight mouse inbred strains: towards understanding the molecular basis for behaviour. Eur J Neurosci 19: 2576–2582, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 80.Wu C, Zhan R, Qi S, Fujihara H, Taga K, Shimoji K. A forebrain ischemic preconditioning model established in C57Black/Crj6 mice. J Neurosci Methods 107: 101–106, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 81.Belayev L, Busto R, Zhao W, Fernandez G, Ginsberg MD. Middle cerebral artery occlusion in the mouse by intraluminal suture coated with poly-L-lysine: neurological and histological validation. Brain Res 833: 181–190, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 82.Hermann DM, Kilc E, Hata R, Hossman KA, Mies G. Relationship between metabolic dysfunctions, gene responses and delayed cell death after mild focal cerebral ischemia in mice. Neurosience 104: 947–955, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 83.Hata R, Maeda K, Hermann D, Mies G, Hossmann KA. Dynamics of regional brain metabolism and gene expression after middle cerebral artery occlusion in mice. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 20: 306–315, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 84.Hata R, Maeda K, Hermann D, Mies G, Hossmann KA. Evolution of brain infarction after transient focal cerebral ischemia in mice. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 20: 937–946, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 85.Vexler ZS, Roberts TP, Bollen AW, Derugin N, Arieff AI. Transient cerebral ischemia. Association of apoptosis induction with hypoperfusion. J Clin Invest 99: 1453–1459, 1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 86.Toyota S, Graf R, Valentino M, Yoshimine T, Heiss WD. Malignant infarction in cats after prolonged middle cerebral artery occlusion: glutamate elevation related to decrease of cerebral perfusion pressure. Stroke 33: 1383–1391, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 87.Dohman C, Bosche B, Graf R, Staub F, Kracht L, Sobesky J, et al. Prediction of malignant course in MCA infarction by PET and microdialysis. Stroke 34: 2152–2158, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 88.Thomalla G, Kucinski T, Schoder V, Fiehler J, Knab R, Zeummer H, et al J. Prediction of malignant middle cerebral artery infarction by early perfusion-and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Stroke 34: 1892–1900, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 89.Tamura A, Graham DI, McCulloch J, Teasdale GM. Focal cerebral ischemia in the rat: 1. Description of technique and early neuropathological consequences following middle cerebral artery occlusion. J Cereb Blood Flow Met 1: 53–60, 1981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 90.Herz RC, Kasbergen CM, Hillen B, Versteeg DH, de Wildt DJ. Rat middle cerebral artery occlusion by an intraluminal thread compromises collateral blood flow. Brain Res 791: 223–228, 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 91.Guegan C, Sola B. Early and sequential recruitment of apoptotic effectors after focal permanent ischemia in mice. Brain Res 856: 93–100, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 92.Chen ST, Hsu CY, Hogan EL, Marico H, Balentine JD. A model of focal ischemic stroke in the rat: reproducible extensive cortical infarction. Stroke 17: 738–743, 1986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 93.Rubino GJ, Young W. Ischemic cortical lesions after permanent occlusion of the individual middle cerebral artery branches in rats. Stroke 19: 870–877, 1988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 94.Brint S, Jacewicz M, Kiessling M, Tanabe J, Pulsinelli W. Focal brain ischemia in the rat: methods for reproducible neocortical infarction using tandem occlusion of the distal middle cerebral and ipsilateral common carotid arteries. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 8: 474–483, 1988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 95.Yanamoto H, Nagata I, Niitsu Y, Xue J, Zhang Z, Kikuchi H. Evaluation of MCAO stroke models in normotensive rats: standardized neocortical infarction by the 3VO tecnique. Exp Neurol 182: 261–274, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 96.Buchan AM, Xue D, Slivka A. A new model of temporary focal neocortical ischemia in the rat. Stroke 23: 273–279, 1992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 97.Lin TN, Sun SW, Cheung WM, Li F, Chang C. Dynamic changes in cerebral blood flow and angiogenesis after transient focal cerebral ischemia in rats. Stroke 33: 2985–2991, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 98.Herz RC, Hillen B, Versteeg DH, De Wildt DJ. Collateral hemodynamics after middle cerebral artery occlusion in Wistar and Fischer-344 rats. Brain Res 793: 289–296, 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 99.Gerriets T, Li F, Silva MD, Meng X, Brevard M, Sotak CH, Fisher M. The macrosphere model: evaluation of a new stroke model for permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats. J Neurosci Methods 122: 201–211, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 100.Miyake M, Takeo S, Kaijihara H. Sustained decrease in regional blood flow after microsphere injection in rats. Stroke 24: 415–420, 1993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 101.Mayzel-Oreg O, Omae T, Kazemi M, Li F, Fisher M, Cohen Y, et al. Microsphere-induced embolic stroke: an MRI study. Magn Reson Med 51: 1232–1238, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 102.Zhang Z, Zhang RL, Jiang Q, Raman SB, Cantwell L, Chopp M. A new rat model of thrombotic focal cerebral ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 17: 123–135, 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 103.Beech JS, Williams SC, Campbell CA, Bath PM, Parsons AA, Hunter AJ, et al. Further characterisation of a thromboembolic model of stroke in the rat. Brain Res 895: 18–24, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 104.Wang CX, Todd KG, Yang Y, Gordon T, Shuaib A. Patency of cerebral microvessels after focal embolic stroke in the rat. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 21: 413–421, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 105.Niessen F, Hilger T, Hoehn M, Hossmann KA. Differences in clot preparation determine outcome of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator treatment in experimental thromboembolic stroke. Stroke 34: 2019–2024, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 106.Watson BD, Dietrich WD, Busto R, Wachtel MS, Ginsberg MD. Induction of reproducible brain infarction by photochemically initiated thrombosis. Ann Neurol 17: 497–504, 1985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 107.Dietrich WD, Ginsberg MD, Busto R, Watson BD. Photochemically induced cortical infarction in the rat. 2. Acute and subacute alterations in local glucose utilization. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 6: 195–202, 1986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 108.Dietrich WD, Watson BD, Busto R, Ginsberg MD. Metabolic plasticity following cortical infarction: a 2-deoxyglucose study. In: Cerebrovascular disorders (Raichel ME, Powers WJ, eds), pp 285–295. New York: Raven Press, 1987.
• 109.Que M, Schiene K, Witte OW, Zilles K. Widespread up-regulation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors after focal photothrombotic lesion in rat brain. Neurosci Lett 273: 77–80, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 110.Braun JS, Jander S, Schroeter M, Witte OW, Stoll G. Spatiotemporal relationship of apoptotic cell death to lymphomonocytic infiltration in photochemically induced focal ischemia of the rat cerebral cortex. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 92: 255–263, 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 111.Kim GW, Sugawara T, Chan PH. Involvement of oxidative stress and caspase-3 in cortical infarction after photothrombotic ischemia in mice. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 20: 1690–1701, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 112.Schroeter M, Jander S, Huitinga I, Witte OW, Stoll G. Phagocytic response in photochemically induced infarction of rat cerebral cortex. The role of resident microglia. Stroke 28: 382–386, 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 113.Jander S, Schroeter M, Stoll G. Role of NMDA receptor signaling in the regulation of inflammatory gene expression after focal brain ischemia. J Neuroimmunol 109: 181–187, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 114.Hayashi T, Sakurai M, Itoyama Y, Abe K. Oxidative damage and breakage of DNA in rat brain after transient MCA occlusion. Brain Res 832: 159–163, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 115.Katsman D, Zheng J, Spinelli K, Carmichael ST. Tissue microenvironments within functional cortical subdivisions adjacent to focal stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 23: 997–1009, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 116.van Bruggen N, Cullen BM, King MD, Doran M, Williams SR, Gadian DG, et al. T2- and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of a focal ischemic lesion in rat brain. Stroke 23: 576–582, 1992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 117.Lee VM, Burdett NG, Carpenter A, Hall LD, Pambakian PS, Patel S, Wood NI, James MF. Evolution of photochemically induced focal cerebral ischemia in the rat. Magnetic resonance imaging and histology. Stroke 27: 2110–2118, 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 118.Provenzale JM, Jahan R, Naidich TP, Fox AJ. Assessment of the patient with hyperacute stroke: imaging and therapy. Radiology 229: 347–359, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 119.Albensi BC, Knoblach SM, Chew BG, O’Reilly MP, Faden AI, Pekar JJ. Diffusion and high resolution MRI of traumatic brain injury in rats: time course and correlation with histology. Exp Neurol 162: 61–72, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 120.Schneider G, Fries P, Wagner-Jochem D, Thome D, Laurer H, Kramann B, et al. Pathophysiological changes after traumatic brain injury: comparison of two experimental animal models by means of MRI. MAGMA 14: 233–241, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 121.Hu X, Wester P, Brannstrom T, Watson BD, Gu W. Progressive and reproducible focal cortical ischemia with or without late spontaneous reperfusion generated by a ring-shaped, laser-driven photothrombotic lesion in rats. Brain Res Brain Res Protoc 7: 76–85, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 122.Witte OW, Stoll G. Delayed and remote effects of focal cortical infarctions: secondary damage and reactive plasticity. Adv Neurol 73: 207–227, 1997. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 123.Hagemann G, Redecker C, Neumann-Haefelin T, Freund HJ, Witte OW. Increased long-term potentiation in the surround of experimentally induced focal cortical infarction. Ann Neurol 44: 255–258, 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 124.Neumann-Haefelin T, Staiger JF, Redecker C, Zilles K, Fritschy JM, Mohler H, et al. Immunohistochemical evidence for dysregulation of the GABAergic system ipsilateral to photochemically induced cortical infarcts in rats. Neuroscience 87: 871–879, 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 125.Carmichael ST, Wei L, Rovainen CM, Woolsey TA. New patterns of intracortical projections after focal cortical stroke. Neurobiol Dis 8: 910–922, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 126.Arvidsson A, Collin T, Kirik D, Kokaia Z, Lindvall O. Neuronal replacement from endogenous precursors in the adult brain after stroke. Nat Med 8: 963–970, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 127.Parent JM, Vexler ZS, Gong C, Derugin N, Ferriero DM. Rat forebrain neurogenesis and striatal neuron replacement after focal stroke. Ann Neurol 52: 802–813, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 128.Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F, Milliken GW. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science 272: 1791–1794, 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 129.Longa EZ, Weinstein PR, Carlson S, Cummins R. Reversible middle cerebral artery occlusion without craniectomy in rats. Stroke 20: 84–91, 1989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 130.Cox SB, Woolsey TA, Rovainen CM. Localized dynamic changes in cortical blood flow with whisker stimulation corresponds to matched vascular and neuronal architecture of rat barrels. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 13: 899–913, 1993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 131.Wei L, Rovainen CM, Woolsey TA. Ministrokes in rat barrel cortex. Stroke 26: 1459–1462, 1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 132.Li S, Zheng J, Carmichael ST. Increased oxidative protein and DNA damage but decreased stress response in the aged brain following experimental stroke. Neurobiol Dis 18: 432–440, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 133.Carmichael ST, Archibeque I, Luke L, Nolan T, Momiy J, Li S. Growth-associated gene expression after stroke: evidence for a regenerative zone in peri-infarct cortex. Exp Neurol, in press. [DOI] [PubMed]
• 134.Masaki T, Yanagisawa M. Endothelins. Essays Biochem 27: 79–89, 1992. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 135.Hughes PM, Anthony DC, Ruddin M, Botham MS, Rankine EL, Sablone M, et al. Focal lesions in the rat central nervous system induced by endothelin-1. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 62: 1276–1286, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 136.Fuxe K, Bjelke B, Andbjer B, Grahn H, Rimondini R, Agnati LF. Endothelin-1 induced lesions of the frontoparietal cortex of the rat. A possible model of focal cortical ischemia. Neuroreport 8: 2623–2629, 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 137.Adkins-Muir DL, Jones TA. Cortical electrical stimulation combined with rehabilitative training: enhanced functional recovery and dendritic plasticity following focal cortical ischemia in rats. Neurol Res 25: 780–788, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 138.Luke LM, Allred RP, Jones TA. Unilateral ischemic sensorimotor cortical damage induces contralesional synaptogenesis and enhances skilled reaching with the ipsilateral forelimb in adult male rats. Synapse, in press. [DOI] [PubMed]
• 139.Gilmour G, Iversen SD, O’Neill MF, Bannerman DM. The effects of intracortical endothelin-1 injections on skilled forelimb use: implications for modelling recovery of function after stroke. Behav Brain Res 150: 171–183, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 140.Nakagomi S, Kiryu-Seo S, Kiyama H. Endothelin-converting enzymes and endothelin receptor B messenger RNAs are expressed in different neural cell species and these messenger RNAs are coordinately induced in neurons and astrocytes respectively following nerve injury. Neuroscience 101: 441–449, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 141.Naidoo V, Naidoo S, Mahabeer R, Raidoo DM. Cellular distribution of the endothelin system in the human brain. J Chem Neuroanat 27: 87–98, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 142.Uesugi M, Kasuya Y, Hama H, Yamamoto M, Hayashi K, Masaki T, Goto K. Endogenous endothelin-1 initiates astrocytic growth after spinal cord injury. Brain Res 728: 255–259, 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 143.Uesugi M, Kasuya Y, Hayashi K, Goto K. SB209670, a potent endothelin receptor antagonist, prevents or delays axonal degeneration after spinal cord injury. Brain Res 786: 235–259, 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 144.Tagaya M, Liu KF, Copeland B, Seiffert D, Engler R, Garcia JH, et al. DNA scission after focal brain ischemia. Temporal differences in two species. Stroke 28: 1245–1254, 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 145.Fukuda S, del Zoppo GJ. Models of focal cerebral ischemia in the nonhuman primate. ILAR J 44: 96–104, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 146.Belayev L, Khoutorova L, Xhang Y, Belayev A, Zhao W, Busto R, et al. Caffeinol confers cortical but not subcortical neuroprotection after transient focal cerebral ischemia in rats. Brain Res 1008: 278–283, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 147.Inoue S, Drummond JC, Davis DP, Cole DJ, Patel PM. Combination of isoflurane and caspase inhibition reduces cerebral injury in rats subjected to focal cerebral ischemia. Anesthesiology 101: 75–81, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 148.Matucz E, Moricz K, Gigler G, Simo A, Barkoczy J, Levay G, et al. Reduction of cerebral infarct size by non-competitive AMPA antagonists in rats subjected to permanent and transient focal ischemia. Brain Res 1019: 210–216, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 149.Cervera A, Justicia C, Reverter JC, Planas AM, Chamorro A. Steady plasma concentration of unfractionated heparin reduces infarct volume and prevents inflammatory damage after transient focal cerebral ischemia in the rat. J Neurosci Res 77: 565–572, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 150.Virley D, Beech JS, Smart SC, Williams SC, Hodges H, Hunter AJ. A temporal MRI assessment of neuropathology after transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in the rat: correlations with behavior. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 20: 563–582, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 151.Andrabi SA, Spina MG, Lorenz P, Ebmeyer U, Wolf G, Horn TF. Oxyresveratrol (trans-2,3′,4,5′-tetrahydroxystilbene) is neuroprotective and inhibits the apoptotic cell death in transient cerebral ischemia. Brain Res 1017: 98–107, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 152.Petty MA, Neumann-Haefelin C, Kalisch J, Sarhan S, Wettstein JG, Juretschke HP. In vivo neuroprotective effects of ACEA 1021 confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging in ischemic stroke. Eur J Pharmacol 474: 53–62, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 153.Williams AJ, Hale SL, Moffett JR, Dave JR, Elliott PJ, Adams J, et al. Delayed treatment with MLN519 reduces infarction and associated neurologic deficit caused by focal ischemic brain injury in rats via antiinflammatory mechanisms involving nuclear factor-κB activation, gliosis, and leukocyte infiltration. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 23: 75–87, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 154.Andersen M, Overgaard K, Meden P, Boysen G, Choi SC. Effects of citicoline combined with thrombolytic therapy in a rat embolic stroke model. Stroke 30: 1464–1471, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 155.Takamatsu H, Tatsumi M, Nitta S, Ichise R, Muramatsu K, Iida M, et al. Time courses of progress to the chronic stage of middle cerebral artery occlusion models in rats. Exp Brain Res 146: 95–102, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 156.Boutin H, LeFeuvre RA, Horai R, Asano M, Iwakura Y, Rothwell NJ. Role of IL-1α and IL-1β in ischemic brain damage. J Neurocsi 21: 5528–5534, 2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 157.Borsello T, Clarke PG, Hirt L, Vercelli A, Repici M, Schorderet DF, Bogousslavsky J, Bonny C. A peptide inhibitor of c-Jun N-terminal kinase protects against excitotoxicity and cerebral ischemia. Nat Med 9: 1180–1186, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 158.Yu F, Sugawara T, Chan PH. Treatment with dihydroethidium reduces infarct size after transient focal cerebral ischemia in mice. Brain Res 978: 223–227, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 159.Gibson CL, Murphy SP. Progesterone enhances functional recovery after middle cerebral artery occlusion in male mice. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 24: 805–813, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 160.Luo Y, Qin Z, Hong Z, Zhang X, Ding D, Fu JH, et al. Astragaloside IV protects against ischemic brain injury in a murine model of transient focal ischemia. Neurosci Lett 363: 218–223, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 161.Wexler EJ, Peters EE, Gonzales A, Gonzales ML, Slee AM, Kerr JS. An objective procedure for ischemic area evaluation of the stroke intraluminal thread model in the mouse and rat. J Neurosci Methods 113: 51–58, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 162.Shichinohe H, Kuroda S, Abumiya T, Ikeda J, Kobayashi T, Yoshimoto T, et al. FK506 reduces infarct volume due to permanent focal cerebral ischemia by maintaining BAD turnover and inhibiting cytochrome c release. Brain Res 1001: 51–519, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 163.Yanamoto H, Nagata I, Hashimoto N, Kikuchi H. Three-vessel occlusion using a micro-clip for the proximal left middle cerebral artery produces a reliable neocortical infarct in rats. Brain Res Brain Res Protoc 3: 209–220, 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 164.McDaniel B, Sheng H, Warner DS, Hedlund LW, Benveniste H. Tracking brain volume changes in C57BL/6J and ApoE-deficient mice in a model of neurodegeneration: a 5-week longitudinal micro-MRI study. Neuroimage 14: 1244–1255, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 165.Saver JL, Johnston KC, Homer D, Wityk R, Koroshetz W, Truskowski LL, Haley EC. Infarct volume as a surrogate or auxiliary outcome measure in ischemic stroke clinical trials. The RANTTAS Investigators. Stroke 30: 293–298, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 166.Mori K, Aoki A, Yamamoto T, Horinaka N, Maeda M. Aggressive decompressive surgery in patients with massive hemispheric embolic cerebral infarction associated with severe brain swelling. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 143: 483–491, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 167.Oppenheim C, Samson Y, Manai R, Lalam T, Vandamme X, Crozier S, et al. Prediction of malignant middle cerebral artery infarction by diffusion-weighted imaging. Stroke 31: 2175–2181, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 168.Foerch C, Otto B, Singer OC, Neumann-Haefelin T, Yan B, Berkefeld J, et al. Serum S100B predicts a malignant course of infarction in patients with acute middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke 35: 2160–2164, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 169.Kim JH, Yenari MA, Giffard RG, Cho SW, Park KA, Lee JE. Agmatine reduces infarct area in a mouse model of transient focal cerebral ischemia and protects cultured neurons from ischemia-like injury. Exp Neurol 189: 122–130, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]