The mouse gut T lymphocyte, a novel type of T cell. Nature, origin, and traffic in mice in normal and graft-versus-host conditions (original) (raw)

Abstract

Lymphocytes of the mouse intestinal mucosa, identified in tissue sections or purified suspensions of intraepithelial lymphocytes as T cells (gut T lymphocytes [GTL]), were studied in normal mice or in beige mice (the equivalent of the Chediak-Higashi syndrome in man, characterized by giant granules in various cell types, including mast cells). Mice were studied in normal or in germ-free conditions, or during a graft versus host (GVH) reaction resulting from the injection of parental thymocytes into lethally irradiated F1 mice, a condition leading to massive accumulation of T lymphocytes of donor origin in the host gut mucosa. In normal as well as in GVH conditions, a high percentage of the gut IE lymphocytes contain granules (up to 80% in the beige mouse). These granules have ultrastructural, hostochemical and other features resembling those of mast cell granules; in beige mice, up to 50% of them can be shown to contain histamine. Granulated T cells are also found in the lamina propria. It appears that the GTL may progressively lose their surface T antigens when the granules become more developed. Kinetics of [3H]TdR labeling of the GTL, transfer experiments with T cells of various origins, selective [3H]TdR labeling and selective irradiation of the Peyer's patches (PP), and effect of thoraic duct (TD) drainage led to the conclusion that GTL are the progeny of T cells stimulated to divide in the PP microenvironment, which endows them with a gut-homing tendency. From the PP, these cells follow a cycle, migrating to the TD and to the blood to colonize the whole intestinal mucosa, the majority of them as dividing cells undergoing a single round of traffic, with some probably able to recirculate and becoming a more long-lived variety. Antigenic stimulation within the PP is necessary for the emergence of GTL progenitors, but their gut-homing property is unrelated to the antigen as shown with fetal gut grafts, notably in GVH where grafts syngeneic to the host or donor become similarly infiltrated by GTL. On the basis of their properties and of further evidence to be reported elsewhere, it is proposed that GTL belong to a special class of T lymphocytes, related to the immune defenses of the mucosal systems in general, and capable of acting as progenitors of mucosal mast cells.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BURNET F. M. MAST CELLS IN THE THYMUS OF NZB MICE. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1965 Jan;89:271–284. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bienenstock J., Johnston N. A morphologic study of rabbit bronchial lymphoid aggregates and lymphoepithelium. Lab Invest. 1976 Oct;35(4):343–348. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cahill R. N., Poskitt D. C., Frost D. C., Trnka Z. Two distinct pools of recirculating T lymphocytes: migratory characteristics of nodal and intestinal T lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1977 Feb 1;145(2):420–428. doi: 10.1084/jem.145.2.420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cerottini J. C., Engers H. D., Macdonald H. R., Brunner T. Generation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes in vitro. I. Response of normal and immune mouse spleen cells in mixed leukocyte cultures. J Exp Med. 1974 Sep 1;140(3):703–717. doi: 10.1084/jem.140.3.703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chi E. Y., Ignácio E., Lagunoff D. Mast cell granule formation in the beige mouse. J Histochem Cytochem. 1978 Feb;26(2):131–137. doi: 10.1177/26.2.624833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cohen A., Schlesinger M. Absorption of guinea pig serum with agar. A method for elimination of itscytotoxicity for murine thymus cells. Transplantation. 1970 Jul;10(1):130–132. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197007000-00027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Davidson W. F., Parish C. R. A procedure for removing red cells and dead cells from lymphoid cell suspensions. J Immunol Methods. 1975 Jun;7(2-3):291–300. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(75)90026-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Enerbäck L. Mast cells in rat gastrointestinal mucosa. 4. Monoamine storing capacity. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1966;67(3):365–379. doi: 10.1111/apm.1966.67.3.365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ferguson A. Intraepithelial lymphocytes of the small intestine. Gut. 1977 Nov;18(11):921–937. doi: 10.1136/gut.18.11.921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ferguson A., Parrott D. M. Growth and development of "antigen-free" grafts of foetal mouse intestine. J Pathol. 1972 Feb;106(2):95–101. doi: 10.1002/path.1711060205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ginsburg H., Lagunoff D. The in vitro differentiation of mast cells. Cultures of cells from immunized mouse lymph nodes and thoracic duct lymph on fibroblast monolayers. J Cell Biol. 1967 Dec;35(3):685–697. doi: 10.1083/jcb.35.3.685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Glaister J. R. Factors affecting the lymphoid cells in the small intestinal epithelium of the mouse. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1973;45(5):719–730. doi: 10.1159/000231071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Guy-Grand D., Griscelli C., Vassalli P. Peyer's patches, gut IgA plasma cells and thymic function: study in nude mice bearing thymic grafts. J Immunol. 1975 Aug;115(2):361–364. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Guy-Grand D., Griscelli C., Vassalli P. The gut-associated lymphoid system: nature and properties of the large dividing cells. Eur J Immunol. 1974 Jun;4(6):435–443. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830040610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hollingsworth J. W., Carr J., Ford W. L. Lymphopenia produced by polyethylene-32P strips applied to the rabbit appendix. Cell Immunol. 1972 Aug;4(4):407–415. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(72)90042-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ishizaka T., Adachi T., Chang T-H, Ishizaka K. Development of mast cells in vitro. II. Biologic function of cultured mast cells. J Immunol. 1977 Jan;118(1):211–217. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Joel D. D., Chanana A. D., Cottier H., Cronkite E. P., Laissue J. A. Fate of thymocytes: studies with 125I-iododeoxyuridine and 3H-thymidine in mice. Cell Tissue Kinet. 1977 Jan;10(1):57–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lamm M. E. Cellular aspects of immunoglobulin A. Adv Immunol. 1976;22:223–290. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60550-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lemmel E. M., Fichtelius K. E. Life span of lymphocytes within intestinal epithelium, Peyer's patch epithelium, epidermis, and liver of mice. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1971;41(5):716–728. doi: 10.1159/000230563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Miller H. R., Walshaw R. Immune reactions in mucous membranes. IV. Histochemistry of intestinal mast cells during helminth expulsion in the rat. Am J Pathol. 1972 Oct;69(1):195–208. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pierce N. F., Gowans J. L. Cellular kinetics of the intestinal immune response to cholera toxoid in rats. J Exp Med. 1975 Dec 1;142(6):1550–1563. doi: 10.1084/jem.142.6.1550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Piguet P. F., Dewey H. K., Vassalli P. Origin and nature of the cells participating in the popliteal graft versus host reaction in mouse and rat. Cell Immunol. 1977 Jun 15;31(2):242–254. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(77)90026-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Piguet P. F., Vassalli P. Study of the thymic-derived or -independent nature of mouse spleen cells induced to proliferate in culture by various mitogens and antigens. Eur J Immunol. 1973 Aug;3(8):477–483. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830030805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rudzik O., Bienenstock J. Isolation and characteristics of gut mucosal lymphocytes. Lab Invest. 1974 Mar;30(3):260–266. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ruitenberg E. J., Elgersma A. Absence of intestinal mast cell response in congenitally athymic mice during Trichinella spiralis infection. Nature. 1976 Nov 18;264(5583):258–260. doi: 10.1038/264258a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Röpke C., Everett N. B. Kinetics of intraepithelial lymphocytes in the small intestine of thymus-deprived mice and antigen-deprived mice. Anat Rec. 1976 May;185(1):101–108. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091850110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Röpke C., Everett N. B. Proliferative kinetics of large and small intraepithelial lymphocytes in the small intestine of the mouse. Am J Anat. 1976 Mar;145(3):395–408. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001450307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sauser D., Anckers C., Bron C. Isolation of mouse thymus-derived lymphocyte specific surface antigens. J Immunol. 1974 Aug;113(2):617–624. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Shelley W. B., Ohman S., Parnes H. M. Mast cell stain for histamine in freeze-dried embedded tissue. J Histochem Cytochem. 1968 Jun;16(6):433–439. doi: 10.1177/16.6.433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sprent J. Fate of H2-activated T lymphocytes in syngeneic hosts. I. Fate in lymphoid tissues and intestines traced with 3H-thymidine, 125I-deoxyuridine and 51chromium. Cell Immunol. 1976 Feb;21(2):278–302. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(76)90057-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sprent J., Miller J. F. Interaction of thymus lymphocytes with histoincompatible cells. I. Quantitation of the proliferative response of thymus cells. Cell Immunol. 1972 Mar;3(3):361–384. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(72)90244-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Trowbridge I. S., Mazauskas C. Immunological properties of murine thymus-dependent lymphocyte surface glycoproteins. Eur J Immunol. 1976 Aug;6(8):557–562. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830060806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]