The relationship of the number of Meissner's corpuscles to dermatoglyphic characters and finger size (original) (raw)

Abstract

This study investigated the relationships between the density of Meissner's corpuscles and the dermatoglyphic characteristics of human fingers. Dermatoglyphic prints and tissue samples were collected from the index (II) and ring (IV) fingers of 28 cadavers from the Medical School, University of Adelaide. Pattern types, pattern intensity, total ridge count and ridge breadth, were determined for each sample and the density of Meissner's corpuscles established by recording the mean number of Meissner's corpuscles underlying a 10 mm long line on the skin surface. No relationship was found between the density of Meissner's corpuscles and pattern type, pattern intensity or total ridge count. Negative correlations were found for the density of Meissner's corpuscles with both ridge width and size of fingers. Males were found to have significantly larger fingers, larger ridge breadth, and a lower density of Meissner's corpuscles per 10 mm compared with females. However, there was no difference between the total number of Meissner's corpuscles per finger in males and females. No significant differences were found in either the density of Meissner's corpuscles between antimeres or between the index and ring fingers. These results suggest that for both the left and right hand in males and females, there is a similar number of Meissner's corpuscles for both the index and ring fingers.

Keywords: Mechanoreceptors, fingerprints, handedness, histology, cadavers

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (228.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Acree M. A. Is there a gender difference in fingerprint ridge density? Forensic Sci Int. 1999 May 31;102(1):35–44. doi: 10.1016/s0379-0738(99)00037-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bolton C. F., Winkelmann R. K., Dyck P. J. A quantitative study of Meissner's corpuscles in man. Neurology. 1966 Jan;16(1):1–9. doi: 10.1212/wnl.16.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brill T., Stier S. Hand parameter differences between psychiatric patients and normal controls: a preliminary evaluation. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 1999;36(2):105–114. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bruce M. F., Sinclair D. C. The relationship between tactile thresholds and histology in the human finger. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1980 Mar;43(3):235–242. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.43.3.235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. CAUNA N., ROSS L. L. The fine structure of Meissner's touch corpuscles of human fingers. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1960 Oct;8:467–482. doi: 10.1083/jcb.8.2.467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Caruso G., Nolano M., Lullo F., Crisci C., Nilsson J., Massini R. Median nerve sensory responses evoked by tactile stimulation of the finger proximal and distal phalanx in normal subjects. Muscle Nerve. 1994 Mar;17(3):269–275. doi: 10.1002/mus.880170303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Craig J. C. Grating orientation as a measure of tactile spatial acuity. Somatosens Mot Res. 1999;16(3):197–206. doi: 10.1080/08990229970456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Crawford M. H., Duggirala R. Digital dermatoglyphic patterns of Eskimo and Amerindian populations: relationships between geographic, dermatoglyphic, genetic, and linguistic distances. Hum Biol. 1992 Oct;64(5):683–704. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Esteban E., Moral P. Finger dermatoglyphics in a Mediterranean population (Murcia, Spain): pattern types and pattern intensity index. Anthropol Anz. 1993 Jun;51(2):159–167. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fañanas L., van Os J., Hoyos C., McGrath J., Mellor C. S., Murray R. Dermatoglyphic a-b ridge count as a possible marker for developmental disturbance in schizophrenia: replication in two samples. Schizophr Res. 1996 Jul 5;20(3):307–314. doi: 10.1016/0920-9964(95)00013-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. GHENT L. Developmental changes in tactual thresholds on dominant and nondominant sides. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1961 Dec;54:670–673. doi: 10.1037/h0047319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gutiérrez B., Van Os J., Vallès V., Guillamat R., Campillo M., Fañanás L. Congenital dermatoglyphic malformations in severe bipolar disorder. Psychiatry Res. 1998 May 8;78(3):133–140. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1781(98)00016-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Henneberg M. Decrease of human skull size in the Holocene. Hum Biol. 1988 Jun;60(3):395–405. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Iggo A., Andres K. H. Morphology of cutaneous receptors. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1982;5:1–31. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.05.030182.000245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Krishnan T., Reddy B. M. Geographical and ethnic variability of finger ridge-counts: biplots of male and female Indian samples. Ann Hum Biol. 1994 Mar-Apr;21(2):155–169. doi: 10.1080/03014469400003182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lacour J. P., Dubois D., Pisani A., Ortonne J. P. Anatomical mapping of Merkel cells in normal human adult epidermis. Br J Dermatol. 1991 Dec;125(6):535–542. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1991.tb14790.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Loesch D. Z., Martin N. G. Finger ridge patterns and tactile sensitivity. Ann Hum Biol. 1984 Mar-Apr;11(2):113–124. doi: 10.1080/03014468400006961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Minkov D. Dermatoglyphics in psoriasis patients. Folia Med (Plovdiv) 1982;24(3):43–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Murai M., Lau H. K., Pereira B. P., Pho R. W. A cadaver study on volume and surface area of the fingertip. J Hand Surg Am. 1997 Sep;22(5):935–941. doi: 10.1016/S0363-5023(97)80094-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rajangam S., Janakiram S., Thomas I. M. Dermatoglyphics in Down's syndrome. J Indian Med Assoc. 1995 Jan;93(1):10–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Reddy B. M., Chopra V. P. Biological affinities between migrant and parental populations of fishermen on the east coast of India. Hum Biol. 1999 Oct;71(5):803–822. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Schimrigk K., Rüttinger H. The touch corpuscles of the plantar surface of the big toe. Histological and histometrical investigations with respect to age. Eur Neurol. 1980;19(1):49–60. doi: 10.1159/000115128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Singh P. K., Pandey S. S., Singh G. Dermatoglyphics in psoriasis. Indian J Dermatol. 1983 Apr;28(2):47–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sirajuddin S. M., Duggirala R., Crawford M. H. Population structure of the Chenchu and other south Indian tribal groups: relationships between genetic, anthropometric, dermatoglyphic, geographic, and linguistic distances. Hum Biol. 1994 Oct;66(5):865–884. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Than M., Myat K. A., Khadijah S., Jamaludin N., Isa M. N. Dermatoglyphics of Down's syndrome patients in Malays--a comparative study. Anthropol Anz. 1998 Dec;56(4):351–365. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. WEINSTEIN S., SERSEN E. A. Tactual sensitivity as a function of handedness and laterality. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1961 Dec;54:665–669. doi: 10.1037/h0044145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. White N. G. The use of digital dermatoglyphics in assessing population relationships in Aboriginal Australia. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1979;15(6):437–454. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]