A novel DNA-binding motif in the nuclear matrix attachment DNA-binding protein SATB1 (original) (raw)

Abstract

The nuclear matrix attachment DNA (MAR) binding protein SATB1 is a sequence context-specific binding protein that binds in the minor groove, making virtually no contact with the DNA bases. The SATB1 binding sites consist of a special AT-rich sequence context in which one strand is well-mixed A's, T's, and C's, excluding G's (ATC sequences), which is typically found in clusters within different MARs. To determine the extent of conservation of the SATB1 gene among different species, we cloned a mouse homolog of the human STAB1 cDNA from a cDNA expression library of the mouse thymus, the tissue in which this protein is predominantly expressed. This mouse cDNA encodes a 764-amino-acid protein with a 98% homology in amino acid sequence to the human SATB1 originally cloned from testis. To characterize the DNA binding domain of this novel class of protein, we used the mouse SATB1 cDNA and delineated a 150-amino-acid polypeptide as the binding domain. This region confers full DNA binding activity, recognizes the specific sequence context, and makes direct contact with DNA at the same nucleotides as the whole protein. This DNA binding domain contains a novel DNA binding motif: when no more than 21 amino acids at either the N- or C-terminal end of the binding domain are deleted, the majority of the DNA binding activity is lost. The concomitant presence of both terminal sequences is mandatory for binding. These two terminal regions consist of hydrophilic amino acids and share homologous sequences that are different from those of any known DNA binding motifs. We propose that the DNA binding region of SATB1 extends its two terminal regions toward DNA to make direct contact with DNA.

1852

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Benyajati C., Worcel A. Isolation, characterization, and structure of the folded interphase genome of Drosophila melanogaster. Cell. 1976 Nov;9(3):393–407. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(76)90084-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berezney R., Coffey D. S. Identification of a nuclear protein matrix. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1974 Oct 23;60(4):1410–1417. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(74)90355-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bode J., Kohwi Y., Dickinson L., Joh T., Klehr D., Mielke C., Kohwi-Shigematsu T. Biological significance of unwinding capability of nuclear matrix-associating DNAs. Science. 1992 Jan 10;255(5041):195–197. doi: 10.1126/science.1553545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bode J., Maass K. Chromatin domain surrounding the human interferon-beta gene as defined by scaffold-attached regions. Biochemistry. 1988 Jun 28;27(13):4706–4711. doi: 10.1021/bi00413a019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brotherton T., Zenk D., Kahanic S., Reneker J. Avian nuclear matrix proteins bind very tightly to cellular DNA of the beta-globin gene enhancer in a tissue-specific fashion. Biochemistry. 1991 Jun 18;30(24):5845–5850. doi: 10.1021/bi00238a006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Buttyan R., Olsson C. A. Prediction of transcriptional activity based on gene association with the nuclear matrix. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1986 Aug 14;138(3):1334–1340. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(86)80429-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Churchill M. E., Travers A. A. Protein motifs that recognize structural features of DNA. Trends Biochem Sci. 1991 Mar;16(3):92–97. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(91)90040-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ciejek E. M., Tsai M. J., O'Malley B. W. Actively transcribed genes are associated with the nuclear matrix. Nature. 1983 Dec 8;306(5943):607–609. doi: 10.1038/306607a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cockerill P. N., Garrard W. T. Chromosomal loop anchorage of the kappa immunoglobulin gene occurs next to the enhancer in a region containing topoisomerase II sites. Cell. 1986 Jan 31;44(2):273–282. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90761-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cockerill P. N., Yuen M. H., Garrard W. T. The enhancer of the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus is flanked by presumptive chromosomal loop anchorage elements. J Biol Chem. 1987 Apr 15;262(11):5394–5397. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cook P. R., Brazell I. A. Spectrofluorometric measurement of the binding of ethidium to superhelical DNA from cell nuclei. Eur J Biochem. 1978 Mar 15;84(2):465–477. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1978.tb12188.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dijkwel P. A., Hamlin J. L. Matrix attachment regions are positioned near replication initiation sites, genes, and an interamplicon junction in the amplified dihydrofolate reductase domain of Chinese hamster ovary cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Dec;8(12):5398–5409. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.12.5398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Earnshaw W. C. Mitotic chromosome structure. Bioessays. 1988 Nov;9(5):147–150. doi: 10.1002/bies.950090502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gasser S. M., Laemmli U. K. Cohabitation of scaffold binding regions with upstream/enhancer elements of three developmentally regulated genes of D. melanogaster. Cell. 1986 Aug 15;46(4):521–530. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90877-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gasser S. M., Laemmli U. K. The organisation of chromatin loops: characterization of a scaffold attachment site. EMBO J. 1986 Mar;5(3):511–518. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04240.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hayes J. J., Tullius T. D. The missing nucleoside experiment: a new technique to study recognition of DNA by protein. Biochemistry. 1989 Nov 28;28(24):9521–9527. doi: 10.1021/bi00450a041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hoffman A., Sinn E., Yamamoto T., Wang J., Roy A., Horikoshi M., Roeder R. G. Highly conserved core domain and unique N terminus with presumptive regulatory motifs in a human TATA factor (TFIID). Nature. 1990 Jul 26;346(6282):387–390. doi: 10.1038/346387a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hozák P., Hassan A. B., Jackson D. A., Cook P. R. Visualization of replication factories attached to nucleoskeleton. Cell. 1993 Apr 23;73(2):361–373. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90235-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jackson D. A., Cook P. R. Replication occurs at a nucleoskeleton. EMBO J. 1986 Jun;5(6):1403–1410. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04374.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jarman A. P., Higgs D. R. Nuclear scaffold attachment sites in the human globin gene complexes. EMBO J. 1988 Nov;7(11):3337–3344. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03205.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kadonaga J. T., Tjian R. Affinity purification of sequence-specific DNA binding proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Aug;83(16):5889–5893. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.16.5889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Klehr D., Maass K., Bode J. Scaffold-attached regions from the human interferon beta domain can be used to enhance the stable expression of genes under the control of various promoters. Biochemistry. 1991 Feb 5;30(5):1264–1270. doi: 10.1021/bi00219a015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kohwi-Shigematsu T., Kohwi Y. Torsional stress stabilizes extended base unpairing in suppressor sites flanking immunoglobulin heavy chain enhancer. Biochemistry. 1990 Oct 16;29(41):9551–9560. doi: 10.1021/bi00493a009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lebkowski J. S., Laemmli U. K. Non-histone proteins and long-range organization of HeLa interphase DNA. J Mol Biol. 1982 Apr 5;156(2):325–344. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90332-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lee D. K., Horikoshi M., Roeder R. G. Interaction of TFIID in the minor groove of the TATA element. Cell. 1991 Dec 20;67(6):1241–1250. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90300-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Levy-Wilson B., Fortier C. The limits of the DNase I-sensitive domain of the human apolipoprotein B gene coincide with the locations of chromosomal anchorage loops and define the 5' and 3' boundaries of the gene. J Biol Chem. 1989 Dec 15;264(35):21196–21204. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Loc P. V., Strätling W. H. The matrix attachment regions of the chicken lysozyme gene co-map with the boundaries of the chromatin domain. EMBO J. 1988 Mar;7(3):655–664. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb02860.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ludérus M. E., de Graaf A., Mattia E., den Blaauwen J. L., Grande M. A., de Jong L., van Driel R. Binding of matrix attachment regions to lamin B1. Cell. 1992 Sep 18;70(6):949–959. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90245-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Maxam A. M., Gilbert W. A new method for sequencing DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Feb;74(2):560–564. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.2.560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mielke C., Kohwi Y., Kohwi-Shigematsu T., Bode J. Hierarchical binding of DNA fragments derived from scaffold-attached regions: correlation of properties in vitro and function in vivo. Biochemistry. 1990 Aug 14;29(32):7475–7485. doi: 10.1021/bi00484a017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mirkovitch J., Mirault M. E., Laemmli U. K. Organization of the higher-order chromatin loop: specific DNA attachment sites on nuclear scaffold. Cell. 1984 Nov;39(1):223–232. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90208-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Nelson W. G., Pienta K. J., Barrack E. R., Coffey D. S. The role of the nuclear matrix in the organization and function of DNA. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1986;15:457–475. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.15.060186.002325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Nikolov D. B., Hu S. H., Lin J., Gasch A., Hoffmann A., Horikoshi M., Chua N. H., Roeder R. G., Burley S. K. Crystal structure of TFIID TATA-box binding protein. Nature. 1992 Nov 5;360(6399):40–46. doi: 10.1038/360040a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Phi-Van L., von Kries J. P., Ostertag W., Strätling W. H. The chicken lysozyme 5' matrix attachment region increases transcription from a heterologous promoter in heterologous cells and dampens position effects on the expression of transfected genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 May;10(5):2302–2307. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.5.2302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Razin S. V., Kekelidze M. G., Lukanidin E. M., Scherrer K., Georgiev G. P. Replication origins are attached to the nuclear skeleton. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986 Oct 24;14(20):8189–8207. doi: 10.1093/nar/14.20.8189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Reddy P., Hahn S. Dominant negative mutations in yeast TFIID define a bipartite DNA-binding region. Cell. 1991 Apr 19;65(2):349–357. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90168-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Robinson S. I., Small D., Idzerda R., McKnight G. S., Vogelstein B. The association of transcriptionally active genes with the nuclear matrix of the chicken oviduct. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983 Aug 11;11(15):5113–5130. doi: 10.1093/nar/11.15.5113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Romig H., Fackelmayer F. O., Renz A., Ramsperger U., Richter A. Characterization of SAF-A, a novel nuclear DNA binding protein from HeLa cells with high affinity for nuclear matrix/scaffold attachment DNA elements. EMBO J. 1992 Sep;11(9):3431–3440. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05422.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Small D., Nelkin B., Vogelstein B. The association of transcribed genes with the nuclear matrix of Drosophila cells during heat shock. Nucleic Acids Res. 1985 Apr 11;13(7):2413–2431. doi: 10.1093/nar/13.7.2413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Smith D. B., Johnson K. S. Single-step purification of polypeptides expressed in Escherichia coli as fusions with glutathione S-transferase. Gene. 1988 Jul 15;67(1):31–40. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90005-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Solomon M. J., Strauss F., Varshavsky A. A mammalian high mobility group protein recognizes any stretch of six A.T base pairs in duplex DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Mar;83(5):1276–1280. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.5.1276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Starr D. B., Hawley D. K. TFIID binds in the minor groove of the TATA box. Cell. 1991 Dec 20;67(6):1231–1240. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90299-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Stief A., Winter D. M., Strätling W. H., Sippel A. E. A nuclear DNA attachment element mediates elevated and position-independent gene activity. Nature. 1989 Sep 28;341(6240):343–345. doi: 10.1038/341343a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Stucka R., Feldmann H. An element of symmetry in yeast TATA-box binding protein transcription factor IID. Consequence of an ancestral duplication? FEBS Lett. 1990 Feb 26;261(2):223–225. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(90)80558-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Vaughn J. P., Dijkwel P. A., Mullenders L. H., Hamlin J. L. Replication forks are associated with the nuclear matrix. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Apr 25;18(8):1965–1969. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.8.1965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wobbe C. R., Struhl K. Yeast and human TATA-binding proteins have nearly identical DNA sequence requirements for transcription in vitro. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Aug;10(8):3859–3867. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.8.3859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Yang C. C., Nash H. A. The interaction of E. coli IHF protein with its specific binding sites. Cell. 1989 Jun 2;57(5):869–880. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90801-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. von Kries J. P., Buhrmester H., Strätling W. H. A matrix/scaffold attachment region binding protein: identification, purification, and mode of binding. Cell. 1991 Jan 11;64(1):123–135. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90214-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]