Computer-enhanced emotion in facial expressions (original) (raw)

Abstract

Benson & Perrett's (1991 b) computer-based caricature procedure was used to alter the positions of anatomical landmarks in photographs of emotional facial expressions with respect to their locations in a reference norm face (e.g. a neutral expression). Exaggerating the differences between an expression and its norm produces caricatured images, whereas reducing the differences produces 'anti-caricatures'. Experiment 1 showed that caricatured (+50% different from neutral) expressions were recognized significantly faster than the veridical (0%, undistorted) expressions. This held for all six basic emotions from the Ekman & Friesen (1976) series, and the effect generalized across different posers. For experiment 2, caricatured (+50%) and anti-caricatured (-50%) images were prepared using two types of reference norm; a neutral-expression norm, which would be optimal if facial expression recognition involves monitoring changes in the positioning of underlying facial muscles, and a perceptually-based norm involving an average of the expressions of six basic emotions (excluding neutral) in the Ekman & Friesen (1976) series. The results showed that the caricatured images were identified significantly faster, and the anti-caricatured images significantly slower, than the veridical expressions. Furthermore, the neutral-expression and average-expression norm caricatures produced the same pattern of results.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (372.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Burt D. M., Perrett D. I. Perception of age in adult Caucasian male faces: computer graphic manipulation of shape and colour information. Proc Biol Sci. 1995 Feb 22;259(1355):137–143. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1995.0021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ekman P. Strong evidence for universals in facial expressions: a reply to Russell's mistaken critique. Psychol Bull. 1994 Mar;115(2):268–287. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hasselmo M. E., Rolls E. T., Baylis G. C. The role of expression and identity in the face-selective responses of neurons in the temporal visual cortex of the monkey. Behav Brain Res. 1989 Apr 1;32(3):203–218. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(89)80054-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Rhodes G., Brennan S., Carey S. Identification and ratings of caricatures: implications for mental representations of faces. Cogn Psychol. 1987 Oct;19(4):473–497. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(87)90016-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Valentine T. A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1991 May;43(2):161–204. doi: 10.1080/14640749108400966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Young A. W., McWeeny K. H., Hay D. C., Ellis A. W. Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on identity and expression. Psychol Res. 1986;48(2):63–68. doi: 10.1007/BF00309318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Young A. W., Newcombe F., de Haan E. H., Small M., Hay D. C. Face perception after brain injury. Selective impairments affecting identity and expression. Brain. 1993 Aug;116(Pt 4):941–959. doi: 10.1093/brain/116.4.941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]