Qualitative and quantitative differences in T cell receptor binding of agonist and antagonist ligands - PubMed (original) (raw)
Qualitative and quantitative differences in T cell receptor binding of agonist and antagonist ligands
S M Alam et al. Immunity. 1999 Feb.
Free article
Abstract
The kinetics of interaction between TCR and MHC-peptide show a general relationship between affinity and the biological response, but the reported kinetic differences between antigenic and antagonistic peptides are very small. Here, we show a remarkable difference in the kinetics of TCR interactions with strong agonist ligands at 37 degrees C compared to 25 degrees C. This difference is not seen with antagonist/positive selecting ligands. The interaction at 37 degrees C shows biphasic binding kinetics best described by a model of TCR dimerization. The altered kinetics greatly increase the stability of complexes with agonist ligands, accounting for the large differences in biological response compared to other ligands. Thus, there may be an allosteric, as well as a kinetic, component to the discrimination between agonists and antagonists.
Similar articles
- TCR binding kinetics measured with MHC class I tetramers reveal a positive selecting peptide with relatively high affinity for TCR.
Holmberg K, Mariathasan S, Ohteki T, Ohashi PS, Gascoigne NR. Holmberg K, et al. J Immunol. 2003 Sep 1;171(5):2427-34. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.5.2427. J Immunol. 2003. PMID: 12928390 - A TCR binds to antagonist ligands with lower affinities and faster dissociation rates than to agonists.
Lyons DS, Lieberman SA, Hampl J, Boniface JJ, Chien Y, Berg LJ, Davis MM. Lyons DS, et al. Immunity. 1996 Jul;5(1):53-61. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80309-x. Immunity. 1996. PMID: 8758894 - The role of T cell receptor dimerization for T cell antagonism and T cell specificity.
Salzmann M, Bachmann MF. Salzmann M, et al. Mol Immunol. 1998 Apr;35(5):271-7. doi: 10.1016/s0161-5890(98)00035-2. Mol Immunol. 1998. PMID: 9747887 Review. - Interaction of antigenic peptides with MHC and TCR molecules.
Sette A, Alexander J, Grey HM. Sette A, et al. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1995 Sep;76(3 Pt 2):S168-71. doi: 10.1016/s0090-1229(95)90108-6. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1995. PMID: 7554462 Review.
Cited by
- TCR-H: explainable machine learning prediction of T-cell receptor epitope binding on unseen datasets.
T RR, Demerdash ONA, Smith JC. T RR, et al. Front Immunol. 2024 Aug 16;15:1426173. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1426173. eCollection 2024. Front Immunol. 2024. PMID: 39221256 Free PMC article. - Mechanical regulation of lymphocyte activation and function.
Pathni A, Wagh K, Rey-Suarez I, Upadhyaya A. Pathni A, et al. J Cell Sci. 2024 Jul 1;137(13):jcs219030. doi: 10.1242/jcs.219030. Epub 2024 Jul 12. J Cell Sci. 2024. PMID: 38995113 Review. - Immunization-induced antigen archiving enhances local memory CD8+ T cell responses following an unrelated viral infection.
Doan TA, Forward TS, Schafer JB, Lucas ED, Fleming I, Uecker-Martin A, Ayala E, Guthmiller JJ, Hesselberth JR, Morrison TE, Tamburini BAJ. Doan TA, et al. NPJ Vaccines. 2024 Mar 21;9(1):66. doi: 10.1038/s41541-024-00856-6. NPJ Vaccines. 2024. PMID: 38514656 Free PMC article. - Force-Induced Site-Specific Enzymatic Cleavage Probes Reveal That Serial Mechanical Engagement Boosts T Cell Activation.
Rogers J, Ma R, Foote A, Hu Y, Salaita K. Rogers J, et al. J Am Chem Soc. 2024 Mar 20;146(11):7233-7242. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c08137. Epub 2024 Mar 7. J Am Chem Soc. 2024. PMID: 38451498 Free PMC article. - Antigen perception in T cells by long-term Erk and NFAT signaling dynamics.
Wither MJ, White WL, Pendyala S, Leanza PJ, Fowler DM, Kueh HY. Wither MJ, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Dec 26;120(52):e2308366120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2308366120. Epub 2023 Dec 19. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023. PMID: 38113261 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials