Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations - PubMed (original) (raw)
Review
Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations
A Force et al. Genetics. 1999 Apr.
Abstract
The origin of organismal complexity is generally thought to be tightly coupled to the evolution of new gene functions arising subsequent to gene duplication. Under the classical model for the evolution of duplicate genes, one member of the duplicated pair usually degenerates within a few million years by accumulating deleterious mutations, while the other duplicate retains the original function. This model further predicts that on rare occasions, one duplicate may acquire a new adaptive function, resulting in the preservation of both members of the pair, one with the new function and the other retaining the old. However, empirical data suggest that a much greater proportion of gene duplicates is preserved than predicted by the classical model. Here we present a new conceptual framework for understanding the evolution of duplicate genes that may help explain this conundrum. Focusing on the regulatory complexity of eukaryotic genes, we show how complementary degenerative mutations in different regulatory elements of duplicated genes can facilitate the preservation of both duplicates, thereby increasing long-term opportunities for the evolution of new gene functions. The duplication-degeneration-complementation (DDC) model predicts that (1) degenerative mutations in regulatory elements can increase rather than reduce the probability of duplicate gene preservation and (2) the usual mechanism of duplicate gene preservation is the partitioning of ancestral functions rather than the evolution of new functions. We present several examples (including analysis of a new engrailed gene in zebrafish) that appear to be consistent with the DDC model, and we suggest several analytical and experimental approaches for determining whether the complementary loss of gene subfunctions or the acquisition of novel functions are likely to be the primary mechanisms for the preservation of gene duplicates. For a newly duplicated paralog, survival depends on the outcome of the race between entropic decay and chance acquisition of an advantageous regulatory mutation. Sidow 1996(p. 717) On one hand, it may fix an advantageous allele giving it a slightly different, and selectable, function from its original copy. This initial fixation provides substantial protection against future fixation of null mutations, allowing additional mutations to accumulate that refine functional differentiation. Alternatively, a duplicate locus can instead first fix a null allele, becoming a pseudogene. Walsh 1995 (p. 426) Duplicated genes persist only if mutations create new and essential protein functions, an event that is predicted to occur rarely. Nadeau and Sankoff 1997 (p. 1259) Thus overall, with complex metazoans, the major mechanism for retention of ancient gene duplicates would appear to have been the acquisition of novel expression sites for developmental genes, with its accompanying opportunity for new gene roles underlying the progressive extension of development itself. Cooke et al. 1997 (p. 362)
Similar articles
- The probability of duplicate gene preservation by subfunctionalization.
Lynch M, Force A. Lynch M, et al. Genetics. 2000 Jan;154(1):459-73. doi: 10.1093/genetics/154.1.459. Genetics. 2000. PMID: 10629003 Free PMC article. - Epigenetic silencing may aid evolution by gene duplication.
Rodin SN, Riggs AD. Rodin SN, et al. J Mol Evol. 2003 Jun;56(6):718-29. doi: 10.1007/s00239-002-2446-6. J Mol Evol. 2003. PMID: 12911035 - Evolution of the duplicated intracellular lipid-binding protein genes of teleost fishes.
Venkatachalam AB, Parmar MB, Wright JM. Venkatachalam AB, et al. Mol Genet Genomics. 2017 Aug;292(4):699-727. doi: 10.1007/s00438-017-1313-5. Epub 2017 Apr 7. Mol Genet Genomics. 2017. PMID: 28389698 Review. - Analysing gene function after duplication.
Massingham T, Davies LJ, Liò P. Massingham T, et al. Bioessays. 2001 Oct;23(10):873-6. doi: 10.1002/bies.1128. Bioessays. 2001. PMID: 11598954 Review.
Cited by
- Layered entrenchment maintains essentiality in the evolution of Form I Rubisco complexes.
Schulz L, Zarzycki J, Steinchen W, Hochberg GKA, Erb TJ. Schulz L, et al. EMBO J. 2024 Nov 18. doi: 10.1038/s44318-024-00311-1. Online ahead of print. EMBO J. 2024. PMID: 39558108 - Genetic analysis of medaka fish illuminates conserved and divergent roles of Pax6 in vertebrate eye development.
Mikula Mrstakova S, Kozmik Z. Mikula Mrstakova S, et al. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024 Oct 24;12:1448773. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1448773. eCollection 2024. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024. PMID: 39512904 Free PMC article. - Genetic and Developmental Divergence in the Neural Crest Program between Cichlid Fish Species.
Marconi A, Vernaz G, Karunaratna A, Ngochera MJ, Durbin R, Santos ME. Marconi A, et al. Mol Biol Evol. 2024 Nov 1;41(11):msae217. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msae217. Mol Biol Evol. 2024. PMID: 39412298 Free PMC article. - Identification and functional analysis of the Dof transcription factor genes in sugar beet.
Sun Y, Zhang Y, Jian C, Wang T, Cao G, Li N, Li G, Zhang S. Sun Y, et al. J Plant Res. 2024 Oct 10. doi: 10.1007/s10265-024-01588-3. Online ahead of print. J Plant Res. 2024. PMID: 39387971 - Dosage constraint of the ribosome-associated molecular chaperone drives the evolution and fates of its duplicates in bacteria.
Wan T, Zhuo L, Pan Z, Chen R-y, Ma H, Cao Y, Wang J, Wang J-j, Hu W-f, Lai Y-j, Hayat M, Li Y-z. Wan T, et al. mBio. 2024 Nov 13;15(11):e0199424. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01994-24. Epub 2024 Oct 7. mBio. 2024. PMID: 39373534 Free PMC article.
References
- Development. 1993 Dec;119(4):1203-15 - PubMed
- Genomics. 1992 Aug;13(4):1157-61 - PubMed
- Genetics. 1992 Dec;132(4):1119-30 - PubMed
- Nature. 1997 Jun 12;387(6634):708-13 - PubMed
- Mol Biol Evol. 1987 Jul;4(4):406-25 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases