Fidelity of G protein beta-subunit association by the G protein gamma-subunit-like domains of RGS6, RGS7, and RGS11 - PubMed (original) (raw)
Fidelity of G protein beta-subunit association by the G protein gamma-subunit-like domains of RGS6, RGS7, and RGS11
B E Snow et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999.
Abstract
Several regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins contain a G protein gamma-subunit-like (GGL) domain, which, as we have shown, binds to Gbeta5 subunits. Here, we extend our original findings by describing another GGL-domain-containing RGS, human RGS6. When RGS6 is coexpressed with different Gbeta subunits, only RGS6 and Gbeta5 interact. The expression of mRNA for RGS6 and Gbeta5 in human tissues overlaps. Predictions of alpha-helical and coiled-coil character within GGL domains, coupled with measurements of Gbeta binding by GGL domain mutants, support the contention that Ggamma-like regions within RGS proteins interact with Gbeta5 subunits in a fashion comparable to conventional Gbeta/Ggamma pairings. Mutation of the highly conserved Phe-61 residue of Ggamma2 to tryptophan, the residue present in all GGL domains, increases the stability of the Gbeta5/Ggamma2 heterodimer, highlighting the importance of this residue to GGL/Gbeta5 association.
Figures
Figure 1
Gβ binding specificity of RGS6 and RGS7. Gβ subunits were cotranslated in reticulocyte lysates with (A) HA-tagged Gγ2 or (B) HA-tagged, truncated RGS6 (ΔDΔC, where ΔD indicates a DEP domain deletion and ΔC indicates a C-terminal deletion; amino acids 255–456) or truncated RGS7 (ΔDΔC; amino acids 202–395, SwissProt P49802) protein. Lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) in low detergent with anti-HA mAb, and immunoprecipitated proteins and clarified supernatants were visualized separately by SDS/PAGE and autoradiography. (C) Expression vectors for full-length, HA-tagged RGS6 and individual, myc-tagged Gβ subunits were transiently cotransfected into COS-7 cells. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-HA mAb, and coimmunoprecipitated Gβ subunits were detected by immunoblotting (Blot) with anti-myc-HRP or anti-HA-HRP conjugates.
Figure 2
Comparison of RGS6 and _G_β5 expression patterns. Northern blots of 20 μg total RNA (A) or 2 μg poly(A+) RNA from various human tissues (B and C) were serially hybridized with a _G_β5 cDNA probe (ref. 8), with a glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) cDNA probe as a control for RNA loading and quality, and with an RGS6 cDNA probe. kb, kilobase.
Figure 3
In vitro Gβ binding specificity of GGL domain mutants. (A) Secondary structure predictions for the RGS6 GGL domain and sequence alignment between Gγ2, RGS6, RGS7, RGS9, and RGS11. Identical residues are in black boxes; conserved residues are shown in shaded boxes. For RGS6, probabilities of α-helical character (indexed to a maximum of 9; ref. 19) and coiled-coil interaction (indexed to a maximum of 1.0; ref. 33) are plotted above the primary sequence of the GGL domain (x axis). α-Helices within Gγ2 (ref. 32) are indicated by an α above the sequence. The position and nature of point mutations are denoted above or below the sequence line with arrows. Individual Gβ subunits were cotranslated in reticulocyte lysates with wild-type or mutant RGS6 (B), RGS7 (C), and RGS11 proteins (D–F). HA-tagged RGS or Gγ proteins were immunoprecipitated in low detergent (except as noted in E) with anti-HA mAb, and associated Gβ proteins were visualized by SDS/PAGE and autoradiography. (E) Immunoprecipitations (IP) of cotranslated Gβ5 and wild-type (lane 1) or W274F mutant (lanes 2 and 3) RGS11ΔDΔC proteins were performed in high-detergent (lanes 1 and 3) or low-detergent (lane 2) conditions and visualized separately from clarified supernatants (Sup’nt) as above.
Figure 4
Gβ binding specificity of Gγ1 and Gγ2 mutants. HA-tagged Gγ proteins (wild-type or mutated as indicated) were either cotranslated in vitro (A and C) or cotransfected into COS-7 cells (B) with individual Gβ subunits, immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-HA mAb in either low detergent (0.05% C12E10) or high detergent (RIPA), and visualized by SDS/PAGE and autoradiography (A and C) or immunoblotting (B) with indicated antisera (Blot). “Fusion” denotes chimeric protein composed of HA-tagged Gγ2 (F61W) subunit fused to the rat RGS12 RGS domain.
Figure 5
Specificity-determining residues at the interface of Gβ1 and Gγ1 compared with equivalent regions of modeled Gβ5 and the GGL domain of RGS11. Highlighted in blue are van der Waals surfaces of Gβ1 contacting Phe-64 of Gγ1 (A) or similar contacts between Gβ5 and Trp-274 of the RGS11 GGL domain (B). Residues colored red in the Gβ1/Gγ1 structure differ from equivalent residues in the Gβ5/GGL model. Except for the conserved tripeptide motif (NPF or NPW), thin red and green lines trace the Cα-backbone of Gβ1/Gγ1 and Gβ5/GGL, respectively. Just before the conserved tripeptide motif, the Cα-traces diverge because of the insertion of a single residue in Gγ1 relative to the GGL domain.
Similar articles
- A G protein gamma subunit-like domain shared between RGS11 and other RGS proteins specifies binding to Gbeta5 subunits.
Snow BE, Krumins AM, Brothers GM, Lee SF, Wall MA, Chung S, Mangion J, Arya S, Gilman AG, Siderovski DP. Snow BE, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Oct 27;95(22):13307-12. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.22.13307. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998. PMID: 9789084 Free PMC article. - Regulators of G protein signaling 6 and 7. Purification of complexes with gbeta5 and assessment of their effects on g protein-mediated signaling pathways.
Posner BA, Gilman AG, Harris BA. Posner BA, et al. J Biol Chem. 1999 Oct 22;274(43):31087-93. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.43.31087. J Biol Chem. 1999. PMID: 10521509 - Gbeta5 prevents the RGS7-Galphao interaction through binding to a distinct Ggamma-like domain found in RGS7 and other RGS proteins.
Levay K, Cabrera JL, Satpaev DK, Slepak VZ. Levay K, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Mar 2;96(5):2503-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.5.2503. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999. PMID: 10051672 Free PMC article. - Ggamma-like (GGL) domains: new frontiers in G-protein signaling and beta-propeller scaffolding.
Sondek J, Siderovski DP. Sondek J, et al. Biochem Pharmacol. 2001 Jun 1;61(11):1329-37. doi: 10.1016/s0006-2952(01)00633-5. Biochem Pharmacol. 2001. PMID: 11331068 Review. - Structure, function, and localization of Gβ5-RGS complexes.
Slepak VZ. Slepak VZ. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2009;86:157-203. doi: 10.1016/S1877-1173(09)86006-7. Epub 2009 Oct 7. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2009. PMID: 20374716 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
- A splice acceptor variant in RGS6 associated with intellectual disability, microcephaly, and cataracts disproportionately promotes expression of a subset of RGS6 isoforms.
Ahlers-Dannen KE, Yang J, Spicer MM, Fu D, DeVore A, Fisher RA. Ahlers-Dannen KE, et al. J Hum Genet. 2024 Apr;69(3-4):145-152. doi: 10.1038/s10038-024-01220-1. Epub 2024 Feb 9. J Hum Genet. 2024. PMID: 38332109 - Protein Profiling of RGS6, a Pleiotropic Gene Implicated in Numerous Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Reveals Multi-Isoformic Expression and a Novel Brain-Specific Isoform.
Ahlers-Dannen KE, Yang J, Spicer MM, Maity B, Stewart A, Koland JG, Fisher RA. Ahlers-Dannen KE, et al. eNeuro. 2022 Jan 18;9(1):ENEURO.0379-21.2021. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0379-21.2021. Print 2022 Jan-Feb. eNeuro. 2022. PMID: 34880111 Free PMC article. - Mechanisms and Regulation of Neuronal GABAB Receptor-Dependent Signaling.
Rose TR, Wickman K. Rose TR, et al. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2022;52:39-79. doi: 10.1007/7854_2020_129. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 32808092 Review. - RGS Proteins as Critical Regulators of Motor Function and Their Implications in Parkinson's Disease.
Ahlers-Dannen KE, Spicer MM, Fisher RA. Ahlers-Dannen KE, et al. Mol Pharmacol. 2020 Dec;98(6):730-738. doi: 10.1124/mol.119.118836. Epub 2020 Feb 3. Mol Pharmacol. 2020. PMID: 32015009 Free PMC article. Review. - Age-dependent nigral dopaminergic neurodegeneration and α-synuclein accumulation in RGS6-deficient mice.
Luo Z, Ahlers-Dannen KE, Spicer MM, Yang J, Alberico S, Stevens HE, Narayanan NS, Fisher RA. Luo Z, et al. JCI Insight. 2019 May 23;5(13):e126769. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.126769. JCI Insight. 2019. PMID: 31120439 Free PMC article.
References
- Siderovski D P, Hessel A, Chung S, Mak T W, Tyers M. Curr Biol. 1996;6:211–212. - PubMed
- Dohlman H G, Thorner J. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:3871–3874. - PubMed
- Berman D M, Gilman A G. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:1269–1272. - PubMed
- Hart M J, Jiang X, Kozasa T, Roscoe W, Singer W D, Gilman A G, Sternweis P C, Bollag G. Science. 1998;280:2112–2114. - PubMed
- Fukuhara S, Murga C, Zohar M, Igishi T, Gutkind J S. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:5868–5879. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
Miscellaneous