Prediction of benefit from carotid endarterectomy in individual patients: a risk-modelling study. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group - PubMed (original) (raw)
Clinical Trial
. 1999 Jun 19;353(9170):2105-10.
doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)11415-0.
Affiliations
- PMID: 10382694
- DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)11415-0
Clinical Trial
Prediction of benefit from carotid endarterectomy in individual patients: a risk-modelling study. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group
P M Rothwell et al. Lancet. 1999.
Abstract
Background: Carotid endarterectomy lowers the risk of carotid territory ipsilateral ischaemic stroke, and is the treatment of choice, in patients with recently symptomatic 70-99% carotid stenosis. However, the 3-year risk of stroke on medical treatment alone is only about 20%. We investigated whether the efficacy of endarterectomy would be improved if patients with a high risk of stroke on medical treatment and a low risk of operative stroke or death could be identified.
Methods: We developed two prognostic models from data on patients with 0-69% carotid stenosis in the European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). The medical model predicted risk of ipsilateral carotid territory major ischaemic stroke (fatal or lasting longer than 7 days) on medical treatment and the surgical model predicted risk of major stroke and death within 30 days of endarterectomy. From these models we developed a prognostic score to identify patients with a high risk of stroke on medical treatment but a low operative risk. We validated the models and tested the scoring system on 990 ECST patients with 70-99% carotid stenosis assigned surgery (594) or medical treatment only (396).
Findings: When patients with 70-99% stenosis were stratified by the scoring system, which was based on seven independent prognostic factors, endarterectomy was beneficial in only 162 (16%) patients. The 5-year absolute risk of carotid territory ipsilateral major ischaemic stroke, operative major stroke, or death was lowered by 33% in the 16% of patients with a score of 4 or more (odds ratio 0.12 [95% CI 0.05-0.29], p<0.0001), but not in the other 828 (84%) patients (1.00 [0.65-1.54], p=0.7).
Interpretation: Many patients with recently symptomatic 70-99% carotid stenosis may not benefit from carotid endarterectomy. Validation of the predictive score is needed on external datasets, but risk-factor modelling could be useful to identify those patients in whom endarterectomy will be beneficial.
Comment in
- Carotid surgery can be hazardous for your health.
Hoefnagels W. Hoefnagels W. Lancet. 1999 Dec 18-25;354(9196):2165-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)77069-0. Lancet. 1999. PMID: 10609844 No abstract available.
Similar articles
- Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators.
Barnett HJ, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M, Fox AJ, Ferguson GG, Haynes RB, Rankin RN, Clagett GP, Hachinski VC, Sackett DL, Thorpe KE, Meldrum HE, Spence JD. Barnett HJ, et al. N Engl J Med. 1998 Nov 12;339(20):1415-25. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199811123392002. N Engl J Med. 1998. PMID: 9811916 Clinical Trial. - A systematic comparison of the risks of stroke and death due to carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic and asymptomatic stenosis.
Rothwell PM, Slattery J, Warlow CP. Rothwell PM, et al. Stroke. 1996 Feb;27(2):266-9. doi: 10.1161/01.str.27.2.266. Stroke. 1996. PMID: 8571421 Review. - Endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Review of the European and North American Symptomatic Carotid Surgery Trials.
Gasecki AP, Hachinski VC, Mendel T, Barnett HT. Gasecki AP, et al. Nebr Med J. 1992 Jun;77(6):121-3. Nebr Med J. 1992. PMID: 1620265 Review.
Cited by
- Comparison of carotid endarterectomy and stenting in real world practice using a regional quality improvement registry.
Nolan BW, De Martino RR, Goodney PP, Schanzer A, Stone DH, Butzel D, Kwolek CJ, Cronenwett JL; Vascular Study Group of New England. Nolan BW, et al. J Vasc Surg. 2012 Oct;56(4):990-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.03.009. Epub 2012 May 10. J Vasc Surg. 2012. PMID: 22579135 Free PMC article. - Analysis of carotid artery plaque and wall boundaries on CT images by using a semi-automatic method based on level set model.
Saba L, Gao H, Acharya UR, Sannia S, Ledda G, Suri JS. Saba L, et al. Neuroradiology. 2012 Nov;54(11):1207-14. doi: 10.1007/s00234-012-1040-x. Epub 2012 May 6. Neuroradiology. 2012. PMID: 22562690 - Carotid atherosclerotic plaque instability and cognition determined by ultrasound-measured plaque strain in asymptomatic patients with significant stenosis.
Dempsey RJ, Varghese T, Jackson DC, Wang X, Meshram NH, Mitchell CC, Hermann BP, Johnson SC, Berman SE, Wilbrand SM. Dempsey RJ, et al. J Neurosurg. 2018 Jan;128(1):111-119. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.JNS161299. Epub 2017 Mar 10. J Neurosurg. 2018. PMID: 28298048 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial. - Carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis.
Orrapin S, Rerkasem K. Orrapin S, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 7;6(6):CD001081. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001081.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28590505 Free PMC article. Updated. Review. - [Secondary stroke prevention after TIA or ischemic stroke].
Diener HC, Nickenig G. Diener HC, et al. Herz. 2021 Jun;46(3):293-302. doi: 10.1007/s00059-021-05035-0. Epub 2021 Apr 29. Herz. 2021. PMID: 33914089 German.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources