Underestimation of risk associations due to regression dilution in long-term follow-up of prospective studies - PubMed (original) (raw)
Underestimation of risk associations due to regression dilution in long-term follow-up of prospective studies
R Clarke et al. Am J Epidemiol. 1999.
Abstract
In prospective studies, disease rates during follow-up are typically analyzed with respect to the values of factors measured during an initial baseline survey. However, because of "regression dilution," this generally tends to underestimate the real associations of disease rates with the "usual" levels of such risk factors during some particular exposure period. The "regression dilution ratio" describes the ratio of the steepness of the uncorrected association to that of the real association. To assess the relevance of the usual value of a risk factor during particular exposure periods (e.g., first, second, and third decades) to disease risks, regression dilution ratios can be derived by relating baseline measurements of the risk factor to replicate measurements from a reasonably representative sample of study participants after an interval equivalent to about the midpoint of each exposure period (e.g., at 5, 15, and 25 years, respectively). This report illustrates the impact of this time interval on the magnitude of the regression dilution ratios for blood pressure and blood cholesterol. The analyses were based on biennial remeasurements over 30 years for participants in the Framingham Study (Framingham, Massachusetts) and a 26-year resurvey for a sample of men in the Whitehall Study (London, England). They show that uncorrected associations of disease risk with baseline measurements underestimate the strength of the real associations with usual levels of these risk factors during the first decade of exposure by about one-third, the second decade by about one-half, and the third decade by about two-thirds. Hence, to correct appropriately for regression dilution, replicate measurements of such risk factors may be required at varying intervals after baseline for at least a sample of participants.
Similar articles
- Regression dilution bias in blood total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and blood pressure in the Glostrup and Framingham prospective studies.
Lewington S, Thomsen T, Davidsen M, Sherliker P, Clarke R. Lewington S, et al. J Cardiovasc Risk. 2003 Apr;10(2):143-8. doi: 10.1097/01.hjr.0000060834.46105.3c. J Cardiovasc Risk. 2003. PMID: 12668912 - Underestimation of the importance of blood pressure and cholesterol for coronary heart disease mortality in old age.
Clarke R, Lewington S, Youngman L, Sherliker P, Peto R, Collins R. Clarke R, et al. Eur Heart J. 2002 Feb;23(4):286-93. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2001.2781. Eur Heart J. 2002. PMID: 11812064 - Extent of regression dilution for established and novel coronary risk factors: results from the British Regional Heart Study.
Emberson JR, Whincup PH, Morris RW, Walker M, Lowe GD, Rumley A. Emberson JR, et al. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2004 Apr;11(2):125-34. doi: 10.1097/01.hjr.0000114967.39211.e5. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2004. PMID: 15187816 - Blood cholesterol and vascular mortality by age, sex, and blood pressure: a meta-analysis of individual data from 61 prospective studies with 55,000 vascular deaths.
Prospective Studies Collaboration; Lewington S, Whitlock G, Clarke R, Sherliker P, Emberson J, Halsey J, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R. Prospective Studies Collaboration, et al. Lancet. 2007 Dec 1;370(9602):1829-39. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61778-4. Lancet. 2007. PMID: 18061058 Review. - Blood pressure, cholesterol, and common causes of death: a review. Prospective Studies Collaboration.
Lewington S, MacMahon S. Lewington S, et al. Am J Hypertens. 1999 Oct;12(10 Pt 2):96S-98S. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(99)00162-4. Am J Hypertens. 1999. PMID: 10555608 Review.
Cited by
- Menarche, menopause, and breast cancer risk: individual participant meta-analysis, including 118 964 women with breast cancer from 117 epidemiological studies.
Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Nov;13(11):1141-51. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70425-4. Epub 2012 Oct 17. Lancet Oncol. 2012. PMID: 23084519 Free PMC article. - Psychosocial factors and hospitalisations for COVID-19: Prospective cohort study based on a community sample.
Batty GD, Deary IJ, Luciano M, Altschul DM, Kivimäki M, Gale CR. Batty GD, et al. Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Oct;89:569-578. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.06.021. Epub 2020 Jun 17. Brain Behav Immun. 2020. PMID: 32561221 Free PMC article. - Circulating liver function markers and colorectal cancer risk: A prospective cohort study in the UK Biobank.
He MM, Fang Z, Hang D, Wang F, Polychronidis G, Wang L, Lo CH, Wang K, Zhong R, Knudsen MD, Smith SG, Xu RH, Song M. He MM, et al. Int J Cancer. 2021 Apr 15;148(8):1867-1878. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33351. Epub 2020 Nov 2. Int J Cancer. 2021. PMID: 33091956 Free PMC article. - Adiposity, fat-free mass and incident heart failure in 500 000 individuals.
Oguntade AS, Taylor H, Lacey B, Lewington S. Oguntade AS, et al. Open Heart. 2024 Jul 4;11(2):e002711. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-002711. Open Heart. 2024. PMID: 38964877 Free PMC article. - Is heme iron intake associated with risk of coronary heart disease? A meta-analysis of prospective studies.
Yang W, Li B, Dong X, Zhang XQ, Zeng Y, Zhou JL, Tang YH, Xu JJ. Yang W, et al. Eur J Nutr. 2014;53(2):395-400. doi: 10.1007/s00394-013-0535-5. Epub 2013 May 26. Eur J Nutr. 2014. PMID: 23708150
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical