Comparison of isometric contractile properties of the tongue muscles in three species of frogs, Litoria caerulea, Dyscophus guinetti, and Bufo marinus - PubMed (original) (raw)
Comparison of isometric contractile properties of the tongue muscles in three species of frogs, Litoria caerulea, Dyscophus guinetti, and Bufo marinus
S E Peters et al. J Morphol. 1999 Nov.
Abstract
Previous studies show that anurans feed in at least three different ways. Basal frogs have a broad tongue that shortens during protraction and emerges only a short distance from the mouth. Some frogs have long, narrow tongues that elongate dramatically due primarily to inertia from mouth opening, which is transferred to the tongue. A few species have a hydrostatic mechanism that produces tongue elongation during protraction. This functional diversity occurs among frogs that share the same two pairs of tongue muscles. Our study compares the isometric contractile properties of these tongue muscles among three frog species that represent each feeding mechanism. Nerves to the paired protractors and retractors were stimulated electrically in each species to record the force properties, contraction speeds, and fatigabilites of these muscles. Few differences were found in the isometric contractile properties of tongue muscles, and the greatest differences were found in the retractors, not the protractors. We propose that the unique arrangement of the tongue muscles in frogs results in a retractor that may also be coactivated with the protractor in order to produce normal tongue protraction. Inertial effects from body, head, and jaw movements, along with clear differences that we found in passive resistance of the tongues to elongation, may explain much of the behavioral variation in tongue use among species.
Copyright 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Similar articles
- Neuromuscular control of prey capture in frogs.
Nishikawa KC. Nishikawa KC. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1999 May 29;354(1385):941-54. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1999.0445. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1999. PMID: 10382226 Free PMC article. - Mechanism of tongue protraction during prey capture in the spadefoot toad Spea multiplicata (Anura: Pelobatidae).
O'Reilly SR, Nishikawa KC. O'Reilly SR, et al. J Exp Zool. 1995 Nov 1;273(4):282-96. doi: 10.1002/jez.1402730403. J Exp Zool. 1995. PMID: 8530912 - Phenotype and contractile properties of mammalian tongue muscles innervated by the hypoglossal nerve.
Smith JC, Goldberg SJ, Shall MS. Smith JC, et al. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2005 Jul 28;147(2-3):253-62. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2005.02.016. Epub 2005 Apr 18. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2005. PMID: 16087149 Review. - Prey capture in frogs: alternative strategies, biomechanical trade-offs, and hierarchical decision making.
Monroy JA, Nishikawa K. Monroy JA, et al. J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol. 2011 Feb 1;315A(2):61-71. doi: 10.1002/jez.601. J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol. 2011. PMID: 20309849 Review.
Cited by
- Frogs use a viscoelastic tongue and non-Newtonian saliva to catch prey.
Noel AC, Guo HY, Mandica M, Hu DL. Noel AC, et al. J R Soc Interface. 2017 Feb;14(127):20160764. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2016.0764. J R Soc Interface. 2017. PMID: 28148766 Free PMC article. - Shooting Mechanisms in Nature: A Systematic Review.
Sakes A, van der Wiel M, Henselmans PW, van Leeuwen JL, Dodou D, Breedveld P. Sakes A, et al. PLoS One. 2016 Jul 25;11(7):e0158277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158277. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27454125 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources