Measurement of locus copy number by hybridisation with amplifiable probes - PubMed (original) (raw)
Measurement of locus copy number by hybridisation with amplifiable probes
J A Armour et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000.
Abstract
Despite its fundamental importance in genome analysis, it is only recently that systematic approaches have been developed to assess copy number at specific genetic loci, or to examine genomic DNA for submicro-scopic deletions of unknown location. In this report we show that short probes can be recovered and amplified quantitatively following hybridisation to genomic DNA. This simple observation forms the basis of a new approach to determining locus copy number in complex genomes. The power and specificity of multiplex amplifiable probe hybridisation is demonstrated by the simultaneous assessment of copy number at a set of 40 human loci, including detection of deletions causing Duchenne muscular dystrophy and Prader-Willi/Angelman syndromes. Assembly of other probe sets will allow novel, technically simple approaches to a wide variety of genetic analyses, including the potential for extension to high resolution genome-wide screens for deletions and amplifications.
Figures
Figure 1
General principle of MAPH. Test DNA is denatured and hybridised with a set of amplifiable probes, each recognising a unique region in the genome. After stringent washing to allow retention only of specifically bound probes, the bound probe fragments are amplified using a common primer pair and quantified, for example after polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Since an excess of probe is used, the amount of each probe recovered will be proportional to the copy number of the corresponding sequence in the test DNA.
Figure 2
Gel analysis of recovered probes from analysis of DNA from 10 individuals examined using a mix of 40 probes from human loci, of which 13 are shown in the enlarged region. The chromosome or locus of origin for each probe is shown on the right. Arrows mark deleted bands (see also Fig. 3): individual 9 is a male with a complete deletion of exon 53 of DMD, and heterozygous deletions of this region of DMD can be seen in females 2 and 7 as reductions in the intensity relative to the adjacent Xp22 probe. Individuals 1 and 6 have heterozygous deletions of SNRPN.
Figure 3
Quantitative analysis of signal intensity from two separate experiments each examining 12 DNA samples (the 10 individuals shown in Fig. 2 plus two further control samples) with a total of 40 probes. Phosphorimager data were used to produce estimates of relative intensity for each band, with the mean for each probe standardised to 1.0 (see Materials and Methods). Among control samples, ratios centre on 1.0 for autosomal probes and X-linked probes in females, and are clustered around 0.5 for X-linked probes in males.
Similar articles
- High throughput screening of human subtelomeric DNA for copy number changes using multiplex amplifiable probe hybridisation (MAPH).
Hollox EJ, Atia T, Cross G, Parkin T, Armour JA. Hollox EJ, et al. J Med Genet. 2002 Nov;39(11):790-5. doi: 10.1136/jmg.39.11.790. J Med Genet. 2002. PMID: 12414816 Free PMC article. - High-resolution analysis of acquired genomic imbalances in bone marrow samples from chronic myeloid leukemia patients by use of multiple short DNA probes.
Reid AG, Tarpey PS, Nacheva EP. Reid AG, et al. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2003 Jul;37(3):282-90. doi: 10.1002/gcc.10215. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2003. PMID: 12759926 - High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays.
Pinkel D, Segraves R, Sudar D, Clark S, Poole I, Kowbel D, Collins C, Kuo WL, Chen C, Zhai Y, Dairkee SH, Ljung BM, Gray JW, Albertson DG. Pinkel D, et al. Nat Genet. 1998 Oct;20(2):207-11. doi: 10.1038/2524. Nat Genet. 1998. PMID: 9771718 - Multiplex Amplifiable Probe Hybridization (MAPH) methodology as an alternative to comparative genomic hybridization (CGH).
Kousoulidou L, Sismani C, Patsalis PC. Kousoulidou L, et al. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;653:47-71. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-759-4_4. Methods Mol Biol. 2010. PMID: 20721737 Review. - MLPA and MAPH: sensitive detection of deletions and duplications.
den Dunnen JT, White SJ. den Dunnen JT, et al. Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2006 Nov;Chapter 7:Unit 7.14. doi: 10.1002/0471142905.hg0714s51. Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2006. PMID: 18428396 Review.
Cited by
- Insights into the Clinical, Biological and Therapeutic Impact of Copy Number Alteration in Cancer.
Carey-Smith SL, Kotecha RS, Cheung LC, Malinge S. Carey-Smith SL, et al. Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jun 21;25(13):6815. doi: 10.3390/ijms25136815. Int J Mol Sci. 2024. PMID: 38999925 Free PMC article. Review. - EOSAL-CNV for Easy and Rapid Detection of CNVs by Fragment Analysis : EOSAL: A Fast and Reliable New Method for CNV Detection.
Lara-Hernandez F, Cortez J, Garcia-Sorribes S, Blesa S, Olivares MD, Alic AS, Garcia-Garcia AB, Chaves FJ, Ivorra C. Lara-Hernandez F, et al. Methods Mol Biol. 2023;2621:241-253. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2950-5_13. Methods Mol Biol. 2023. PMID: 37041448 - From First to Second: How Stickler's Diagnostic Genetics Has Evolved to Match Sequencing Technologies.
Martin H, Richards AJ, Snead MP. Martin H, et al. Genes (Basel). 2022 Jun 23;13(7):1123. doi: 10.3390/genes13071123. Genes (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35885907 Free PMC article. Review. - Segmental duplication-quantitative fluorescent-polymerase chain reaction: An approach for the diagnosis of Down syndrome in India.
Asim A, Agarwal S. Asim A, et al. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Mar;15(1):18-22. doi: 10.4274/tjod.56244. Epub 2018 Mar 29. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29662711 Free PMC article. - Genetic characteristics of polycistronic system‑mediated randomly‑inserted multi‑transgenes in miniature pigs and mice.
Kong S, Li L, Zhu W, Xin L, Ruan J, Zhang Y, Yang S, Li K. Kong S, et al. Mol Med Rep. 2018 Jan;17(1):37-50. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2017.7842. Epub 2017 Oct 20. Mol Med Rep. 2018. PMID: 29115474 Free PMC article.
References
- Baker S.J., Fearon,E.R., Nigro,J.M., Hamilton,S.R., Preisinger,A.C., Jessup,J.M., van Tuinen,P., Ledbetter,D.H., Barker,D.F., Nakamura,Y., White,R. and Vogelstein,B. (1989) Science, 244, 217–222. - PubMed
- Fearon E., Cho,K.R., Nigro,J.M., Kern,S.E., Simons,J.W., Ruppert,J.M., Hamilton,S.R., Preisinger,A.C., Thomas,G., Kinzler,K.W. and Vogelstein,B. (1990) Science, 247, 49–56. - PubMed
- Vogelstein B., Fearon,E.R., Kern,S.E., Hamilton,S.R., Preisinger,A.C., Nakamura,Y. and White,R. (1989) Science, 244, 207–211. - PubMed
- Solomon E., Borrow,J. and Goddard,A.D. (1991) Science, 254, 1153–1160. - PubMed
- Flint J., Wilkie,A.O.M., Buckle,V.J., Winter,R.M., Holland,A.J. and McDermid,H.E. (1995) Nature Genet., 9, 132–139. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources