Predictive factors in prostate cancer: current concepts from the 1999 College of American Pathologists Conference on Solid Tumor Prognostic Factors and the 1999 World Health Organization Second International Consultation on Prostate Cancer - PubMed (original) (raw)
Affiliations
- PMID: 10632123
Review
Predictive factors in prostate cancer: current concepts from the 1999 College of American Pathologists Conference on Solid Tumor Prognostic Factors and the 1999 World Health Organization Second International Consultation on Prostate Cancer
D G Bostwick et al. Semin Urol Oncol. 1999 Nov.
Abstract
Many clinically important predictive factors in prostate cancer are derived from light microscopic examination of tissue specimens by the pathologist. Two separate international consensus conferences held in 1999 addressed the contemporary status of such prognostic factors, sponsored by the College of American Pathologists (CAP) and the World Health Organization (WHO). Both conferences concluded that the following factors are recommended for routine use based on evidence from multiple published trials: TNM stage, histological grade using the Gleason system, surgical margin status, and serum prostate-specific antigen concentration. The WHO conference additionally recommended use of WHO nuclear grade, location of cancer within the prostate, and pathological effects of treatment. Other factors were categorized as promising or of unproven utility, including a wide variety of histopathologic and genetic markers. Standards are needed for analysis and quantitation of methods of tissue analysis, particularly for immunohistochemical studies and genotypic studies. This report describes the recommendations and conclusions of these two conferences.
Similar articles
- Prognostic markers in prostate cancer.
Ross JS, Sheehan CE, Fisher HA, Kauffman RA, Dolen EM, Kallakury BV. Ross JS, et al. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2002 Mar;2(2):129-42. doi: 10.1586/14737159.2.2.129. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2002. PMID: 11962333 Review. - Prognostic and predictive factors and reporting of prostate carcinoma in prostate needle biopsy specimens.
Amin M, Boccon-Gibod L, Egevad L, Epstein JI, Humphrey PA, Mikuz G, Newling D, Nilsson S, Sakr W, Srigley JR, Wheeler TM, Montironi R. Amin M, et al. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 2005 May;(216):20-33. doi: 10.1080/03008880510030923. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 2005. PMID: 16019757 Review. - Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Cheng L, Jones TD, Lin H, Eble JN, Zeng G, Carr MD, Koch MO. Cheng L, et al. J Urol. 2005 Dec;174(6):2181-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000181215.41607.c3. J Urol. 2005. PMID: 16280760 - Prognostic and predictive factors in prostate cancer: historical perspectives and recent international consensus initiatives.
Srigley JR, Amin M, Boccon-Gibod L, Egevad L, Epstein JI, Humphrey PA, Mikuz G, Newling D, Nilsson S, Sakr W, Wheeler TM, Montironi R. Srigley JR, et al. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 2005 May;(216):8-19. doi: 10.1080/03008880510030914. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 2005. PMID: 16019756 Review.
Cited by
- Comparison of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging and Amide Proton Transfer Imaging in the Diagnosis and Risk Assessment of Prostate Cancer.
Yin H, Wang D, Yan R, Jin X, Hu Y, Zhai Z, Duan J, Zhang J, Wang K, Han D. Yin H, et al. Front Oncol. 2021 Apr 15;11:640906. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.640906. eCollection 2021. Front Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33937041 Free PMC article. - Models predicting survival to guide treatment decision-making in newly diagnosed primary non-metastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review.
Thurtle D, Rossi SH, Berry B, Pharoah P, Gnanapragasam VJ. Thurtle D, et al. BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 22;9(6):e029149. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029149. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31230029 Free PMC article. - Individual prognosis at diagnosis in nonmetastatic prostate cancer: Development and external validation of the PREDICT Prostate multivariable model.
Thurtle DR, Greenberg DC, Lee LS, Huang HH, Pharoah PD, Gnanapragasam VJ. Thurtle DR, et al. PLoS Med. 2019 Mar 12;16(3):e1002758. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002758. eCollection 2019 Mar. PLoS Med. 2019. PMID: 30860997 Free PMC article. - Correlations Between Intratumoral Interstitial Fibrillary Network and Vascular Network in Gleason Patterns of Prostate Adenocarcinoma.
Pleșea RM, Șerbănescu MS, Alexandru DO, Ciovică V, Stoiculescu A, Pop OT, Simionescu C, Pleșea IE. Pleșea RM, et al. Curr Health Sci J. 2015 Oct-Dec;41(4):345-355. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.41.04.09. Epub 2015 Dec 22. Curr Health Sci J. 2015. PMID: 30538841 Free PMC article. - Androgen Receptor Expression in Epithelial and Stromal Cells of Prostatic Carcinoma and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.
Filipovski V, Kubelka-Sabit K, Jasar D, Janevska V. Filipovski V, et al. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2017 Aug 5;5(5):608-612. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2017.151. eCollection 2017 Aug 15. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2017. PMID: 28932300 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous