Phase I clinical trial design in cancer drug development - PubMed (original) (raw)
Phase I clinical trial design in cancer drug development
E A Eisenhauer et al. J Clin Oncol. 2000 Feb.
Abstract
The past decade has seen the publication of a number of new proposals for the design of phase I trials of anticancer agents. The purpose of these proposals has been to address ethical concerns about treating excessive numbers of patients at subtherapeutic doses of a new agent and to increase the overall efficiency of the process while enhancing the precision of the recommended phase II dose. In early 1998, a workshop of phase I investigators was held under the sponsorship of Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute (Wallingford, CT) to review the experience to date with novel phase I methodologies, with a particular focus on their efficiency and safety. This report summarizes the material presented. It was concluded that for phase I trials of antineoplastics (cytotoxics), which begin at 0.1 mouse-equivalent LD10 doses, evidence to date suggests that the historic approach of using a modified Fibonacci escalation and three patients per dose level is not necessary and is seldom used. One patient per dose level and more rapid escalation schemes, both empirically based and statistically based, are commonly used with apparent safety. There remain questions, however: Which of the dose escalation schemes is optimal? Are there alternatives to toxicity as a phase I end point, and will these end points be reliable in defining active doses? Answering these questions in a reasonable time frame will be important if new anticancer agents are not to suffer undue delays in phase I evaluation.
Similar articles
- [Phase I clinical trial design of anticancer agents--a Fibonacci and a modified Fibonacci sequence].
Kusaba H, Tamura T. Kusaba H, et al. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2000 May;27(5):775-8. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2000. PMID: 10832451 Review. Japanese. - Revisiting the definition of dose-limiting toxicities in paediatric oncology phase I clinical trials: An analysis from the Innovative Therapies for Children with Cancer Consortium.
Bautista F, Moreno L, Marshall L, Pearson ADJ, Geoerger B, Paoletti X. Bautista F, et al. Eur J Cancer. 2017 Nov;86:275-284. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.09.015. Epub 2017 Oct 19. Eur J Cancer. 2017. PMID: 29055843 - [Phase I cancer trials methodology].
Le Tourneau C, Faivre S, Raymond E, Diéras V. Le Tourneau C, et al. Bull Cancer. 2007 Nov;94(11):943-51. Bull Cancer. 2007. PMID: 18055311 French. - Phase I trial design: are new methodologies being put into practice?
Dent SF, Eisenhauer EA. Dent SF, et al. Ann Oncol. 1996 Aug;7(6):561-6. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a010671. Ann Oncol. 1996. PMID: 8879368 Review. - Accelerated titration designs for phase I clinical trials in oncology.
Simon R, Freidlin B, Rubinstein L, Arbuck SG, Collins J, Christian MC. Simon R, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997 Aug 6;89(15):1138-47. doi: 10.1093/jnci/89.15.1138. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997. PMID: 9262252
Cited by
- Clearance as an Early Indicator of Efficacy for Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies: Circumventing Dose Selection Challenges in Oncology.
Chen C, Fan X, Zhang L, Xu P, Zou H, Zhao X, Gupta M, Feng YS, Xu XS, Yan X. Chen C, et al. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2023 May;62(5):705-713. doi: 10.1007/s40262-023-01231-9. Epub 2023 Mar 17. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2023. PMID: 36930421 Clinical Trial. - Guidelines for clinical evaluation of anti-cancer drugs.
Minami H, Kiyota N, Kimbara S, Ando Y, Shimokata T, Ohtsu A, Fuse N, Kuboki Y, Shimizu T, Yamamoto N, Nishio K, Kawakami Y, Nihira SI, Sase K, Nonaka T, Takahashi H, Komori Y, Kiyohara K. Minami H, et al. Cancer Sci. 2021 Jul;112(7):2563-2577. doi: 10.1111/cas.14967. Epub 2021 Jun 8. Cancer Sci. 2021. PMID: 33990993 Free PMC article. - A statistical evaluation of dose expansion cohorts in phase I clinical trials.
Boonstra PS, Shen J, Taylor JM, Braun TM, Griffith KA, Daignault S, Kalemkerian GP, Lawrence TS, Schipper MJ. Boonstra PS, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Feb 20;107(3):dju429. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju429. Print 2015 Mar. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015. PMID: 25710960 Free PMC article. - Change in tumor size by RECIST correlates linearly with overall survival in phase I oncology studies.
Jain RK, Lee JJ, Ng C, Hong D, Gong J, Naing A, Wheler J, Kurzrock R. Jain RK, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jul 20;30(21):2684-90. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.4752. Epub 2012 Jun 11. J Clin Oncol. 2012. PMID: 22689801 Free PMC article. - Systematic comparison of the statistical operating characteristics of various Phase I oncology designs.
Ananthakrishnan R, Green S, Chang M, Doros G, Massaro J, LaValley M. Ananthakrishnan R, et al. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2016 Nov 24;5:34-48. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2016.11.006. eCollection 2017 Mar. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2016. PMID: 29740620 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous