Distinct protein interaction domains and protein spreading in a complex centromere - PubMed (original) (raw)

. 2000 Apr 1;14(7):783-91.

Affiliations

Distinct protein interaction domains and protein spreading in a complex centromere

J F Partridge et al. Genes Dev. 2000.

Abstract

Fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe) centromeres are composed of large (40-100 kb) inverted repeats that display heterochromatic features, thus providing a good model for higher eukaryotic centromeres. The association of three proteins that mediate region-specific silencing across centromere 1 has been mapped by quantitative chromatin immunoprecipitation. Swi6 and Chp1 are confined to the flanking outer repeats and Swi6 can spread across at least 3 kb of extraneous chromatin in cen1. In contrast, Mis6 coats the inner repeats and central core. tRNA genes demarcate this transition zone. These analyses clearly define two distinct domains within this complex centromere which interact with different proteins.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1

Chp1 and Mis6 silence distinct centromeric domains. (A) mis6-302 specifically alleviates central core silencing, but not silencing of the outer repeats. (B) Chp1, like Clr4, Rik1 and Swi6 is required for silencing of the outer repeats, but not the central core. For both A and B, competitive radioactive PCR was performed on cDNA generated by RT–PCR from strains with ura4+ (U) inserted within the central core (site 9), the inner and outer repeats of centromere 1 (sites 6 and 13) or in euchromatin (R.Int::ura4+) and a fully expressed ura4–DS/E minigene (L) at the ura4 locus. Separated PCR products were quantified. Levels of ura4 (U) were normalized to ura4–DS/E (L) in the mutant strains and expressed relative to values obtained for the wild-type background for each insertion site. In A, mis6-302 and wild-type strains were grown at 25°C, or shifted to the nonpermissive temperature for 4 hr prior to RNA extraction.

Figure 2

Figure 2

Mis6 and Swi6 associate with distinct domains of cen1. (A) Strains with ura4+ at different positions within cen1 (U) and the ura4–DS/E minigene at the ura4 locus (L), were formaldehyde fixed. Chromatin was prepared and sheared to 500–1000 bp prior to immunoprecipitation with anti-Swi6 or anti-HA antibodies (Mis6–3xHA strains). Recovered immunoprecipitated DNAs (ip) were compared with input crude DNA (c) by competitive PCR of ura4+. (B) Quantitative chromatin immunoprecipitation shows that Swi6 associates with the outer repeats, and Mis6 with the inner repeats and central core of cen1. Chromatin immunoprecipitation from strains with ura4 inserted at different positions within cen1 (represented by cartoon at right) is shown. For some insertion sites, two strains bearing different orientations of ura4+ were tested (open arrowheads; see Allshire et al. 1995). Results for both Swi6 and HA immunoprecipitation of Mis6–3xHA strains is shown. (C) Quantitation of these results is plotted. Levels of enrichment of ura4 (U) at each insertion site were quantified relative to ura4–DS/E (L) and normalized to values obtained for strains bearing a random integrant of ura4 (R.Int::ura4+). Results for several experiments investigating Swi6 and Mis6–3xHA immunoprecipitation are plotted. (D) Swi6 immunoprecipitation of centromeric chromatin is Clr4, Rik1, and Swi6 dependent. Swi6 chromatin immunoprecipitation of ura4+ (U) at centromeric site 13 is abolished in yeast bearing mutations in clr4 and rik1.

Figure 3

Figure 3

tRNA genes demarcate a transition zone between Mis6 and Swi6 cen1 association. (A) PCR primers were designed to amplify sequences internal (Int) or external (Ext), indicated by the hatched boxes in imr1L, surrounding the tRNAAla and tRNAGlu genes (filled arrowheads, B) from immunoprecipitated samples. Swi6 and Mis6–3xHA immunoprecipitates were assessed for the levels of Ext and Int PCR products relative to the fbp1+ control. (B) Diagram of cen1 showing the mapping of the transition zone between centromeric Mis6–3xHA and Swi6 to a region containing tRNA genes. Mis6–3xHA immunoprecipitates gave an average threefold enrichment of Int product over Ext, and Swi6, a threefold enrichment of Ext over Int.

Figure 4

Figure 4

Chp1 displays a similar cen1 association pattern as Swi6. (A) Multiplex PCR was performed to detect association of Chp1–6xMyc with centromeric chromatin. Primers were designed to two sites (imr/otr junction and a region of cnt1), which give amplification specifically from cen1 sequences, and to the euchromatic fbp1+ gene locus to act as a control for nonspecific association. Chp1–6xMyc and Swi6 immunoprecipitates both showed enrichment of the imr/otr product relative to fbp1 and showed no enrichment for the central core sequence (cnt1). In contrast, Mis6–3xHA immunoprecipitates showed enrichment for cnt1 and not for imr/otr. (B) Chp1–6xMyc interactions across cen1 were mapped by specific PCR from immunoprecipitates of strains with different cen1–ura4 insertions using various primers from cen1 and one primer anchored in the ura4+ gene. Enrichment of centromeric ura4+ by immunoprecipitation is reflected by increased intensity of the smaller PCR products, which vary in size from different strains, depending on the location of the centromeric primers, relative to the large PCR product of constant size that reflects association with the euchromatic ura4–DS/E locus. (C) Using this assay, Chp1–6xMyc and Swi6 associate with the flanking repeats but not the central core of cen1. Relative ip values are an average of 2 (Swi6), and 3 (Chp1–myc) experiments. (D) Chp1–6xMyc immunoprecipitation at site 13 is dependent on Clr4 and Rik1 but not Swi6.

Figure 5

Figure 5

Swi6 can spread over noncentromeric DNA. Strains with 1.3 kb or 3 kb surrounding ura4+ and inserted at site 13 showed equivalent levels of Swi6 chromatin immunoprecipitation of ura4+ as strains with only ura4+ at that site.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aagaard L, Laible G, Selenko P, Schmid M, Dorn R, Schotta G, Kuhfittig S, Wolf A, Lebersorger A, Singh PB, et al. Functional mammalian homologues of the Drosophila PEV modifier Su(var)3-9 encode centromere-associated proteins which complex with the heterochromatin component M31. EMBO J. 1999;18:1923–1938. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allshire RC. Epigenetic mechanisms of gene regulation. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1996. Transcriptional silencing in the fission yeast: A manifestation of higher order chromosome structure and functions; pp. 443–466.
    1. Allshire RC, Javerzat J-P, Redhead NJ, Cranston G. Position effect variegation at fission yeast centromeres. Cell. 1994;76:157–169. - PubMed
    1. Allshire RC, Nimmo ER, Ekwall K, Javerzat J-P, Cranston G. Mutations derepressing silent domains within fission yeast centromeres disrupt chromosome segregation. Genes & Dev. 1995;9:218–233. - PubMed
    1. Baum M, Ngan VK, Clarke L. The centromeric K-type repeat and the central core are together sufficient to establish a functional Schizosaccharomyces pombe centromere. Mol Biol Cell. 1994;5:747–761. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources