Characteristics of sequential movements during early learning period in monkeys - PubMed (original) (raw)
. 2000 Apr;131(3):293-304.
doi: 10.1007/s002219900283.
Affiliations
- PMID: 10789945
- DOI: 10.1007/s002219900283
Characteristics of sequential movements during early learning period in monkeys
M K Rand et al. Exp Brain Res. 2000 Apr.
Abstract
We previously demonstrated that the organization of a learned sequential movement, after long-term practice, is based on the entire sequence and that the information pertaining to the sequence is largely specific to the hand used for practice. However, it remained unknown whether these characteristics are present from the beginning of learning. To answer the question, we examined the performance of four monkeys for the same sequential procedure in the early stage of learning. The monkeys' task was to press five consecutive pairs of buttons (which were illuminated), in a correct order for every pair, which they had to find by trial-and-error during a block of trials. We first examined whether the memory of a sequential procedure that was learned once was specific to the hand used for practice. The second time that the monkeys attempted to learn a novel sequence, they were required to use either the same hand they used the first time or the opposite hand. The number of errors decreased to a similar degree in the same-hand condition and in the opposite-hand condition. The performance time decreased in the same-hand condition, but not in the opposite-hand condition. The results suggest that, in the early stage of learning, memory of the correct performance of a sequential procedure is not specific to the hand originally used to perform the sequence (unlike the well-learned stage, where the transfer was incomplete), whereas memory of the fast performance of a sequential procedure is relatively specific to the hand used for practice (like the well-learned stage). We then examined whether memory of a sequential procedure depends on the entire sequence, not individual stimulus sets. For the second learning block, we had the monkey learn the sequence in the same or reversed order. In the reversed order, the order within each set was identical, but the order of sets was reversed. The number of errors decreased in both the same-order and reversed-order conditions to a similar degree for two out of four monkeys; the decrease was larger in the same-order condition for the other two monkeys. For all monkeys, the performance time decreased in the same-order condition, but not in the reversed-order condition. The results suggest that the memory structure for correct performance varies among monkeys in the early stage of learning (unlike the well-learned stage, where the memory of individual sets was consistently absent). On the other hand, memory of the fast performance of a sequential procedure is relatively specific to the learned order used for practice (like the well-learned stage).
Similar articles
- Characteristics of a long-term procedural skill in the monkey.
Rand MK, Hikosaka O, Miyachi S, Lu X, Miyashita K. Rand MK, et al. Exp Brain Res. 1998 Feb;118(3):293-7. doi: 10.1007/s002210050284. Exp Brain Res. 1998. PMID: 9497137 - Learning of sequential movements in the monkey: process of learning and retention of memory.
Hikosaka O, Rand MK, Miyachi S, Miyashita K. Hikosaka O, et al. J Neurophysiol. 1995 Oct;74(4):1652-61. doi: 10.1152/jn.1995.74.4.1652. J Neurophysiol. 1995. PMID: 8989401 - Anticipatory saccades in sequential procedural learning in monkeys.
Miyashita K, Rand MK, Miyachi S, Hikosaka O. Miyashita K, et al. J Neurophysiol. 1996 Aug;76(2):1361-6. doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.76.2.1361. J Neurophysiol. 1996. PMID: 8871244 - Comparing cognition by integrating concept learning, proactive interference, and list memory.
Wright AA, Kelly DM, Katz JS. Wright AA, et al. Learn Behav. 2018 Jun;46(2):107-123. doi: 10.3758/s13420-018-0316-3. Learn Behav. 2018. PMID: 29492785 Review. - Conditional visuo-motor learning and dimension reduction.
Hadj-Bouziane F, Frankowska H, Meunier M, Coquelin PA, Boussaoud D. Hadj-Bouziane F, et al. Cogn Process. 2006 Jun;7(2):95-104. doi: 10.1007/s10339-005-0028-4. Epub 2006 Jan 28. Cogn Process. 2006. PMID: 16683172 Review.
Cited by
- Task-Irrelevant Expectation Violations in Sequential Manual Actions: Evidence for a "Check-after-Surprise" Mode of Visual Attention and Eye-Hand Decoupling.
Foerster RM. Foerster RM. Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 23;7:1845. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01845. eCollection 2016. Front Psychol. 2016. PMID: 27933016 Free PMC article. - Sequence specific motor performance gains after memory consolidation in children and adolescents.
Dorfberger S, Adi-Japha E, Karni A. Dorfberger S, et al. PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e28673. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028673. Epub 2012 Jan 19. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22276097 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial. - Intensionality is more cognitively demanding than false belief in adults: evidence from a non-inferential sentence-reading task.
Yeung EKL, Cheung H. Yeung EKL, et al. Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 4;14(1):561. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51181-w. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38177291 Free PMC article. - Rats' learning of a new motor skill: insight into the evolution of motor sequence learning.
Hermer-Vazquez L, Moshtagh N. Hermer-Vazquez L, et al. Behav Processes. 2009 May;81(1):50-9. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.12.022. Epub 2009 Jan 17. Behav Processes. 2009. PMID: 19429196 Free PMC article. - Songbirds work around computational complexity by learning song vocabulary independently of sequence.
Lipkind D, Zai AT, Hanuschkin A, Marcus GF, Tchernichovski O, Hahnloser RHR. Lipkind D, et al. Nat Commun. 2017 Nov 1;8(1):1247. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01436-0. Nat Commun. 2017. PMID: 29089517 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical