Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome - PubMed (original) (raw)
Clinical Trial
. 2000 May 4;342(18):1301-8.
doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421801.
- PMID: 10793162
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421801
Free article
Clinical Trial
Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network et al. N Engl J Med. 2000.
Free article
Abstract
Background: Traditional approaches to mechanical ventilation use tidal volumes of 10 to 15 ml per kilogram of body weight and may cause stretch-induced lung injury in patients with acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. We therefore conducted a trial to determine whether ventilation with lower tidal volumes would improve the clinical outcomes in these patients.
Methods: Patients with acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome were enrolled in a multicenter, randomized trial. The trial compared traditional ventilation treatment, which involved an initial tidal volume of 12 ml per kilogram of predicted body weight and an airway pressure measured after a 0.5-second pause at the end of inspiration (plateau pressure) of 50 cm of water or less, with ventilation with a lower tidal volume, which involved an initial tidal volume of 6 ml per kilogram of predicted body weight and a plateau pressure of 30 cm of water or less. The primary outcomes were death before a patient was discharged home and was breathing without assistance and the number of days without ventilator use from day 1 to day 28.
Results: The trial was stopped after the enrollment of 861 patients because mortality was lower in the group treated with lower tidal volumes than in the group treated with traditional tidal volumes (31.0 percent vs. 39.8 percent, P=0.007), and the number of days without ventilator use during the first 28 days after randomization was greater in this group (mean [+/-SD], 12+/-11 vs. 10+/-11; P=0.007). The mean tidal volumes on days 1 to 3 were 6.2+/-0.8 and 11.8+/-0.8 ml per kilogram of predicted body weight (P<0.001), respectively, and the mean plateau pressures were 25+/-6 and 33+/-8 cm of water (P<0.001), respectively.
Conclusions: In patients with acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome, mechanical ventilation with a lower tidal volume than is traditionally used results in decreased mortality and increases the number of days without ventilator use.
Comment in
- ACP J Club. 2001 Jan-Feb;134(1):16
- Culmination of an era in research on the acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Tobin MJ. Tobin MJ. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 4;342(18):1360-1. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421808. N Engl J Med. 2000. PMID: 10793169 No abstract available. - Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury.
Laffey JG, Kavanagh BP. Laffey JG, et al. N Engl J Med. 2000 Sep 14;343(11):812; author reply 813-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200009143431113. N Engl J Med. 2000. PMID: 10991704 No abstract available. - Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury.
Ney L, Kuebler WM. Ney L, et al. N Engl J Med. 2000 Sep 14;343(11):812-3; author reply 813-4. N Engl J Med. 2000. PMID: 10991705 No abstract available. - Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury.
Oba Y, Salzman GA. Oba Y, et al. N Engl J Med. 2000 Sep 14;343(11):813; author reply 813-4. N Engl J Med. 2000. PMID: 10991706 No abstract available.
Similar articles
- Evaluation of a ventilation strategy to prevent barotrauma in patients at high risk for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Pressure- and Volume-Limited Ventilation Strategy Group.
Stewart TE, Meade MO, Cook DJ, Granton JT, Hodder RV, Lapinsky SE, Mazer CD, McLean RF, Rogovein TS, Schouten BD, Todd TR, Slutsky AS. Stewart TE, et al. N Engl J Med. 1998 Feb 5;338(6):355-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199802053380603. N Engl J Med. 1998. PMID: 9449728 Clinical Trial. - Effect of a protective-ventilation strategy on mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Amato MB, Barbas CS, Medeiros DM, Magaldi RB, Schettino GP, Lorenzi-Filho G, Kairalla RA, Deheinzelin D, Munoz C, Oliveira R, Takagaki TY, Carvalho CR. Amato MB, et al. N Engl J Med. 1998 Feb 5;338(6):347-54. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199802053380602. N Engl J Med. 1998. PMID: 9449727 Clinical Trial. - Ventilation strategy using low tidal volumes, recruitment maneuvers, and high positive end-expiratory pressure for acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.
Meade MO, Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Slutsky AS, Arabi YM, Cooper DJ, Davies AR, Hand LE, Zhou Q, Thabane L, Austin P, Lapinsky S, Baxter A, Russell J, Skrobik Y, Ronco JJ, Stewart TE; Lung Open Ventilation Study Investigators. Meade MO, et al. JAMA. 2008 Feb 13;299(6):637-45. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.6.637. JAMA. 2008. PMID: 18270352 Clinical Trial. - Lung protective ventilation strategy for the acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Petrucci N, De Feo C. Petrucci N, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;2013(2):CD003844. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003844.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 23450544 Free PMC article. Review. - Ventilation with lower tidal volumes versus traditional tidal volumes in adults for acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Petrucci N, Iacovelli W. Petrucci N, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(2):CD003844. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003844.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004. PMID: 15106222 Updated. Review.
Cited by
- Critical care--where have we been and where are we going?
Vincent JL. Vincent JL. Crit Care. 2013;17 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S2. doi: 10.1186/cc11500. Epub 2013 Mar 12. Crit Care. 2013. PMID: 23514264 Free PMC article. Review. - Predictive Role of Lung Injury Prediction Score in the Development of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Korea.
Kim BK, Kim S, Kim CY, Kim YJ, Lee SH, Cha JH, Kim JH. Kim BK, et al. Yonsei Med J. 2021 May;62(5):417-423. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2021.62.5.417. Yonsei Med J. 2021. PMID: 33908212 Free PMC article. - Mechanobiological Principles Influence the Immune Response in Regeneration: Implications for Bone Healing.
Knecht RS, Bucher CH, Van Linthout S, Tschöpe C, Schmidt-Bleek K, Duda GN. Knecht RS, et al. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021 Feb 12;9:614508. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.614508. eCollection 2021. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021. PMID: 33644014 Free PMC article. Review. - Multi-factorial barriers and facilitators to high adherence to lung-protective ventilation using a computerized protocol: a mixed methods study.
Knighton AJ, Kean J, Wolfe D, Allen L, Jacobs J, Carpenter L, Winberg C, Berry JG, Peltan ID, Grissom CK, Srivastava R. Knighton AJ, et al. Implement Sci Commun. 2020;1(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00057-x. Epub 2020 Jul 28. Implement Sci Commun. 2020. PMID: 32835225 Free PMC article. - Effects of anesthetic regimes on inflammatory responses in a rat model of acute lung injury.
Fortis S, Spieth PM, Lu WY, Parotto M, Haitsma JJ, Slutsky AS, Zhong N, Mazer CD, Zhang H. Fortis S, et al. Intensive Care Med. 2012 Sep;38(9):1548-55. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2610-4. Epub 2012 Jun 19. Intensive Care Med. 2012. PMID: 22711173 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources