Interindividual variability of the modulatory effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical excitability - PubMed (original) (raw)
. 2000 Aug;133(4):425-30.
doi: 10.1007/s002210000432.
Affiliations
- PMID: 10985677
- DOI: 10.1007/s002210000432
Interindividual variability of the modulatory effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical excitability
F Maeda et al. Exp Brain Res. 2000 Aug.
Abstract
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) appears to have effects on cortical excitability that extend beyond the train of rTMS itself. These effects may be inhibitory or facilitatory and appear to depend on the frequency, intensity, duration and intertrain interval of the rTMS. Many studies assume facilitatory effects of high-frequency rTMS and inhibitory effects of low-frequency rTMS. Nevertheless, the interindividual variability of this modulation of cortical excitability by rTMS has not been systematically investigated. In this study, we applied 240 pulses of rTMS at 90% of the subjects' motor threshold to their motor cortex at different frequencies (1, 10, 15 and 20 Hz) and examined the effects on motor evoked potentials (frequency tuning curve). Although the averaged group data showed a frequency-dependent increase in cortical excitability, each subject had a different pattern of frequency tuning curve, i.e. a different modulatory effect on cortical excitability at different rTMS frequencies. The interindividual variability of these modulatory effects was still high, though less so, when the number of rTMS pulses was increased to 1,600. These findings illustrate the degree of variability of the rTMS effects in the human brain.
Similar articles
- Modulation of input-output curves by low and high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex.
Gangitano M, Valero-Cabré A, Tormos JM, Mottaghy FM, Romero JR, Pascual-Leone A. Gangitano M, et al. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002 Aug;113(8):1249-57. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00109-8. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002. PMID: 12140004 - Modulation of cortical excitability induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: influence of timing and geometrical parameters and underlying mechanisms.
Pell GS, Roth Y, Zangen A. Pell GS, et al. Prog Neurobiol. 2011 Jan;93(1):59-98. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.10.003. Epub 2010 Nov 5. Prog Neurobiol. 2011. PMID: 21056619 Review. - Intra- and interindividual variability of motor responses to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Sommer M, Wu T, Tergau F, Paulus W. Sommer M, et al. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002 Feb;113(2):265-9. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(01)00726-x. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002. PMID: 11856631 - Comparison between short train, monophasic and biphasic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the human motor cortex.
Arai N, Okabe S, Furubayashi T, Terao Y, Yuasa K, Ugawa Y. Arai N, et al. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Mar;116(3):605-13. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.09.020. Epub 2004 Nov 5. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005. PMID: 15721074 - A comprehensive review of the effects of rTMS on motor cortical excitability and inhibition.
Fitzgerald PB, Fountain S, Daskalakis ZJ. Fitzgerald PB, et al. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Dec;117(12):2584-96. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.06.712. Epub 2006 Aug 4. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006. PMID: 16890483 Review.
Cited by
- Converging Evidence for Frontopolar Cortex as a Target for Neuromodulation in Addiction Treatment.
Soleimani G, Joutsa J, Moussawi K, Siddiqi SH, Kuplicki R, Bikson M, Paulus MP, Fox MD, Hanlon CA, Ekhtiari H. Soleimani G, et al. Am J Psychiatry. 2024 Feb 1;181(2):100-114. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.20221022. Epub 2023 Nov 29. Am J Psychiatry. 2024. PMID: 38018143 Free PMC article. Review. - A framework for targeting alternative brain regions with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression.
Schutter DJ, van Honk J. Schutter DJ, et al. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2005 Mar;30(2):91-7. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2005. PMID: 15798784 Free PMC article. Review. - When and How to Interpret Null Results in NIBS: A Taxonomy Based on Prior Expectations and Experimental Design.
de Graaf TA, Sack AT. de Graaf TA, et al. Front Neurosci. 2018 Dec 11;12:915. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00915. eCollection 2018. Front Neurosci. 2018. PMID: 30618550 Free PMC article. - Effects of combining two techniques of non-invasive brain stimulation in subacute stroke patients: a pilot study.
Pipatsrisawat S, Klaphajone J, Kitisak K, Sungkarat S, Wivatvongvana P. Pipatsrisawat S, et al. BMC Neurol. 2022 Mar 17;22(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02607-3. BMC Neurol. 2022. PMID: 35300622 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial. - Non-invasive brain stimulation for improving gait, balance, and lower limbs motor function in stroke.
Veldema J, Gharabaghi A. Veldema J, et al. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022 Aug 3;19(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-01062-y. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022. PMID: 35922846 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources