Evidence-based medicine: a commentary on common criticisms - PubMed (original) (raw)

. 2000 Oct 3;163(7):837-41.

Affiliations

Evidence-based medicine: a commentary on common criticisms

S E Straus et al. CMAJ. 2000.

Abstract

Discussions about evidence-based medicine engender both negative and positive reactions from clinicians and academics. Ways to achieve evidence-based practice are reviewed here and the most common criticisms described. The latter can be classified as "limitations universal to the practice of medicine," "limitations unique to evidence-based medicine" and "misperceptions of evidence-based medicine." Potential solutions to the true limitations of evidence-based medicine are discussed and areas for future work highlighted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 1992;268:2420-5. - PubMed
    1. Guyatt GH. Evidence-based medicine. ACP J Club 1991;114:A-16.
    1. Bordley DR, Fagan M, Theige D. Evidence-based medicine: a powerful educational tool for clerkship education. Am J Med 1997;102:427-32. - PubMed
    1. Sackett DL, Richardson WS, Rosenberg WMC, Haynes RB. Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM. London (UK): Churchill Livingstone; 1997.
    1. McColl A, Smith H, White P, Field J. General practitioners‚ perceptions of the route to evidence based medicine: a questionnaire survey. BMJ 1998; 316:361-5. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources