Intact visual perceptual discrimination in humans in the absence of perirhinal cortex - PubMed (original) (raw)
Intact visual perceptual discrimination in humans in the absence of perirhinal cortex
C E Stark et al. Learn Mem. 2000 Sep-Oct.
Abstract
While the role of the perirhinal cortex in declarative memory has been well established, it has been unclear whether the perirhinal cortex might serve an additional nonmnemonic role in visual perception. Evidence that the perirhinal cortex might be important for visual perception comes from a recent report that monkeys with perirhinal cortical lesions are impaired on difficult (but not on simple) visual discrimination tasks. We administered these same tasks to nine amnesic patients, including three severely impaired patients with complete damage to perirhinal cortex bilaterally (E.P., G.P., and G.T.). The patients performed all tasks as well as controls. We suggest that the function of perirhinal cortex as well as antero-lateral temporal cortex may differ between humans and monkeys.
Figures
Figure 1
Examples of trials from three of the difficult tasks. (a) Visually degraded object discrimination with a 30%–40% white-noise mask (Task 4). (b) Visually degraded object discrimination (the same trial) with a 70%–80% white-noise mask (Task 6). (c) Face discrimination (Task 7). Although performance on each of these tasks has been reported to be impaired in monkeys with perirhinal damage (Buckley et al. 1998; Buckley and Gaffan, in press), patients with complete damage to perirhinal cortex bilaterally performed normally. The correct choice in each of these examples is the lower left corner.
Figure 2
T2-weighted magnetic resonance images showing the extent of bilateral temporal lobe damage in each of the patients in the encephalitic group. The left side of the brain is on the left side of the image, and the top of the image is anterior. Damaged tissue is indicated by bright signal. In patient E.P (left) the damage extends 7 cm caudally from the temporal pole bilaterally and includes the amygdala, the hippocampal region (dentate gyrus, cell fields of the hippocampus proper, and subicular complex), entorhinal cortex, perirhinal cortex, and the rostral parahippocampal cortex (∼ 20% on the left and 60% on the right). The lesion also extends laterally to include the rostral portion of the fusiform gyrus. In patient G.P. (center) the damage extends through the anterior 7 cm of the left temporal lobe and the anterior 6 cm of the right temporal lobe. The damage includes bilaterally the amygdala and the hippocampal region and the entorhinal, perirhinal, and parahippocampal cortices. Lateral damage is most severe in the anterior 1 cm of the temporal lobe, where it includes the fusiform gyrus as well as the inferior, middle, and superior temporal gyri. From 1 to 4.5 cm caudally, the lateral damage is restricted to the fusiform gyrus and the inferior temporal gyrus. The insular cortex is also damaged, with the lesion extending further caudally on the left side (3cm) than on the right side (2.5 cm). In patient G.T. (right) the damage extends through the anterior 7 cm of the left temporal lobe and the anterior 5 cm of the right temporal lobe. The damage includes bilaterally the amygdala and the hippocampal region and the entorhinal, perirhinal, and parahippocampal cortices. Lateral cortical regions (fusiform gyrus and inferior, middle, and superior temporal gyri) are also damaged bilaterally at the level of the temporal pole. The damage to the fusiform gyrus continues caudally from the temporal pole for 6.0 cm on the left and for 4.5 cm on the right. The damage to the inferior, middle, and superior temporal gyri extends caudally from the temporal pole for 4.5 cm on the left and for 2.5 cm on the right. There is also bilateral damage to insular cortex, more extensive on the left than on the right.
Figure 3
Results from the three easy perceptual tasks (size, color, polygon discrimination) and four more difficult tasks (the face discrimination task and the three visually degraded object–discrimination tasks with a “snow mask” covering 30%–80% of each object). Performance on the three easy tasks has been reported to be unimpaired in monkeys with perirhinal damage, and performance on the difficult tasks has been reported to be impaired (Buckley et al. 1998; Buckley and Gaffan, in press). Performance is shown both for five control volunteers (CON) and for three amnesic patients with large medial temporal lobe lesions resulting from herpes simplex encephalitis (ENC). Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean.
Figure 4
Results from all seven tests for all four groups of participants averaged across the three test sessions (CON, five controls; ENC, three amnesic patients with large medial temporal lobe lesions due to encephalitis; H, three amnesic patients with damage limited to the hippocampal formation; and KOR, three amnesic patients with diencephalic damage due to Korsakoff's syndrome). None of the amnesic groups were impaired relative to controls on any test. Average scores for individual participants are shown (black dots) along with the standard error of the mean for each group (error bars). The tests are ordered according to how difficult they were for the controls (CON).
Similar articles
- The human perirhinal cortex and recognition memory.
Buffalo EA, Reber PJ, Squire LR. Buffalo EA, et al. Hippocampus. 1998;8(4):330-9. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1063(1998)8:4<330::AID-HIPO3>3.0.CO;2-L. Hippocampus. 1998. PMID: 9744420 - The human medial temporal lobe processes online representations of complex objects.
Barense MD, Gaffan D, Graham KS. Barense MD, et al. Neuropsychologia. 2007 Oct 1;45(13):2963-74. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.05.023. Epub 2007 Jun 14. Neuropsychologia. 2007. PMID: 17658561 - Intact visual discrimination of complex and feature-ambiguous stimuli in the absence of perirhinal cortex.
Levy DA, Shrager Y, Squire LR. Levy DA, et al. Learn Mem. 2005 Jan-Feb;12(1):61-6. doi: 10.1101/lm.84405. Epub 2005 Jan 12. Learn Mem. 2005. PMID: 15647593 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial. - The perceptual-mnemonic/feature conjunction model of perirhinal cortex function.
Bussey TJ, Saksida LM, Murray EA. Bussey TJ, et al. Q J Exp Psychol B. 2005 Jul-Oct;58(3-4):269-82. doi: 10.1080/02724990544000004. Q J Exp Psychol B. 2005. PMID: 16194969 Review. - Perirhinal cortex ablation impairs visual object identification.
Buckley MJ, Gaffan D. Buckley MJ, et al. J Neurosci. 1998 Mar 15;18(6):2268-75. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-06-02268.1998. J Neurosci. 1998. PMID: 9482811 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
- Inconsistencies between human and macaque lesion data can be resolved with a stimulus-computable model of the ventral visual stream.
Bonnen T, Eldridge MAG. Bonnen T, et al. Elife. 2023 Jun 6;12:e84357. doi: 10.7554/eLife.84357. Elife. 2023. PMID: 37278517 Free PMC article. - Reevaluating the role of the hippocampus in memory: A meta-analysis of neurotoxic lesion studies in nonhuman primates.
Waters SJ, Basile BM, Murray EA. Waters SJ, et al. Hippocampus. 2023 Jun;33(6):787-807. doi: 10.1002/hipo.23499. Epub 2023 Jan 17. Hippocampus. 2023. PMID: 36649170 Free PMC article. - Activity in perirhinal and entorhinal cortex predicts perceived visual similarities among category exemplars with highest precision.
Ferko KM, Blumenthal A, Martin CB, Proklova D, Minos AN, Saksida LM, Bussey TJ, Khan AR, Köhler S. Ferko KM, et al. Elife. 2022 Mar 21;11:e66884. doi: 10.7554/eLife.66884. Elife. 2022. PMID: 35311645 Free PMC article. - When the ventral visual stream is not enough: A deep learning account of medial temporal lobe involvement in perception.
Bonnen T, Yamins DLK, Wagner AD. Bonnen T, et al. Neuron. 2021 Sep 1;109(17):2755-2766.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.06.018. Epub 2021 Jul 14. Neuron. 2021. PMID: 34265252 Free PMC article. - Reconciling the object and spatial processing views of the perirhinal cortex through task-relevant unitization.
Fiorilli J, Bos JJ, Grande X, Lim J, Düzel E, Pennartz CMA. Fiorilli J, et al. Hippocampus. 2021 Jul;31(7):737-755. doi: 10.1002/hipo.23304. Epub 2021 Feb 1. Hippocampus. 2021. PMID: 33523577 Free PMC article. Review.
References
- Biber C, Butters N, Rosen J, Gerstman L, Mattis S. Encoding strategies and recognition of faces by alcoholic Korsakoff and other brain-damaged patients. J Clin Neuropsy. 1981;3:315–330.
- Buckley MJ, Booth MCA, Rolls ET, Gaffan D. Selective visual-perceptual deficits following perirhinal cortex ablation in the macaque. Soc Neurosci Abstr. 1998;24:18.
- Buckley MJ, Gaffan D. Impairment of visual object-discrimination learning after perirhinal cortex ablation. Behav Neurosci. 1997;111:467–475. - PubMed
- ————— Learning and transfer of object-reward associations and the role of the perirhinal cortex. Behav Neurosci. 1998a;112:15–23. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- MH12278/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- R37 MH024600/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- R01 MH024600/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- MH24600/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- F32 MH012278/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources