Deletion of MUD2, the yeast homolog of U2AF65, can bypass the requirement for sub2, an essential spliceosomal ATPase - PubMed (original) (raw)
Deletion of MUD2, the yeast homolog of U2AF65, can bypass the requirement for sub2, an essential spliceosomal ATPase
A L Kistler et al. Genes Dev. 2001.
Abstract
Mammalian U2AF65 and UAP56 are required for prespliceosome (PS) formation. We tested the predictions that the yeast UAP56 homolog, SUB2, is required for the same step and functions collaboratively with MUD2, the yeast homolog of U2AF65. Unexpectedly, sub2-1 extracts accumulate PS-like complexes. Moreover, deletion of MUD2 exacerbates the cs phenotype of sub2 alleles yet suppresses both the ts sub2-1 and the lethal Deltasub2 phenotypes. We propose that Sub2 functionally interacts with Mud2 both before and after PS formation. In the absence of Mud2, Sub2 function becomes dispensable.
Figures
Figure 1
Sub2 is highly homologous to UAP56. Alignment of UAP56 and Sub2. Sequences were aligned with CLUSTALW and MacBoxShade. Dark gray boxes highlight identical amino acids, light gray boxes highlight similar residues. Thick black bars above the aligned sequences highlight the seven conserved motifs (I, Ia, II–VI) of helicase superfamily 2. Mutations present in sub2-1 (plain letters) and sub2-5 (circled letters) are indicated below the altered residue.
Figure 2
Biochemical phenotype of heat-inactivated sub2-1 mutant. (A) Time course of in vitro splicing activity of sub2-1 extracts. sub2-1 (lanes 1–8) or SUB2 (lanes 9–16) extracts were preincubated at 37°C (lanes 1–4 and 9–12) or on ice (lanes 5–8 and 13–16) for 15 min and then assayed for splicing activity with radiolabeled pre-actin RNA at 23°C for 0, 8, 16, and 30 min. (B) Spliceosome assembly phenotype of sub2-1 extract. Spliceosome assembly of 37°C preincubated samples from the 16-min timepoint shown in A (sub2-1, lane 3 and SUB2, lane 11) was assessed by native gel analysis (Cheng and Abelson 1986). Spliceosome complexes corresponding to H (heterogenous), PS (prespliceosome), and S (spliceosome) are indicated at left; lane 1, sub2-1; lane 2, SUB2. (C) Chase of splicing defect in sub2-1 extract. Heat-preincubated sub2-1 (lanes 1, 3–5) or U2-inactivated extracts (lanes 2,6) were incubated with radiolabeled preactin RNA in a two-step incubation schematized in the box above the gel. Extracts used in each stage of the incubation experiment are indicated above each lane. sub2-1Δ, 37°C preincubated extract; U2-, U2 oligo-inactivated extract; sub2-1+, mock- (ice) preincubated extract; U2+, mock oligo-inactivated extract.
Figure 3
Impact of Δ_mud2_ on the lethality of Δ_sub2_. Growth on 5-FOA-LEU media of Δ_sub2MUD2/pSUB-URA3 CEN_ strain (left side of plate) compared with growth of Δ_sub2_Δ_mud2/pSUB2-URA3 CEN_ strain (right side of plate) transformed with either pSUB2-LEU2 CEN (upper segment), pMUD2-LEU2 CEN (middle segment), or pLEU2 CEN (lower segment) plasmids.
Figure 4
Models for a Sub2-Mud2-dependent splicing pathway and a Sub2-Mud2-independent splicing pathway. Spliceosomal complexes formed during the early ATP-independent and ATP-dependent stages of splicing are diagrammed. CC1, commitment complex 1; CC2, commitment complex 2; PS, prespliceosome. Circled B, BBP; Circled M, Mud2. The U1 snRNP, U2 snRNP, and Sub2, Prp5, and Cus2 are denoted by labeled shapes. Hypothesized defects in Sub2 functions by different sub2 alleles are indicated at right in the Sub2–Mud2 dependent pathway model. Small arrows from Prp5 and Sub2 indicate activity on potential substrates in the presence of ATP. A possible scenario for the functions of both Prp5 and Sub2 during the ATP-dependent conversion of CC2 to PS complex is shown surrounded by brackets in the Sub2–Mud2 dependent pathway model. Potentially less stable binding of BBP with BPS in the absence of Mud2 is denoted by a dotted outline for the BBP symbol in the Sub2–Mud2 independent pathway.
Similar articles
- Transient interaction of BBP/ScSF1 and Mud2 with the splicing machinery affects the kinetics of spliceosome assembly.
Rutz B, Séraphin B. Rutz B, et al. RNA. 1999 Jun;5(6):819-31. doi: 10.1017/s1355838299982286. RNA. 1999. PMID: 10376880 Free PMC article. - The yeast MUD2 protein: an interaction with PRP11 defines a bridge between commitment complexes and U2 snRNP addition.
Abovich N, Liao XC, Rosbash M. Abovich N, et al. Genes Dev. 1994 Apr 1;8(7):843-54. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.7.843. Genes Dev. 1994. PMID: 7926772 - Mutational analyses of trimethylguanosine synthase (Tgs1) and Mud2: proteins implicated in pre-mRNA splicing.
Chang J, Schwer B, Shuman S. Chang J, et al. RNA. 2010 May;16(5):1018-31. doi: 10.1261/rna.2082610. Epub 2010 Apr 1. RNA. 2010. PMID: 20360394 Free PMC article. - The evolutionary conservation of the splicing apparatus between fission yeast and man.
Wentz-Hunter K, Potashkin J. Wentz-Hunter K, et al. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. 1995;(33):226-8. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. 1995. PMID: 8643378 Review. - The branchpoint binding protein: in and out of the spliceosome cycle.
Rymond BC. Rymond BC. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2010;693:123-41. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2010. PMID: 21189690 Review.
Cited by
- Structural basis for recognition of intron branchpoint RNA by yeast Msl5 and selective effects of interfacial mutations on splicing of yeast pre-mRNAs.
Jacewicz A, Chico L, Smith P, Schwer B, Shuman S. Jacewicz A, et al. RNA. 2015 Mar;21(3):401-14. doi: 10.1261/rna.048942.114. Epub 2015 Jan 13. RNA. 2015. PMID: 25587180 Free PMC article. - Dead-box proteins: a family affair--active and passive players in RNP-remodeling.
Linder P. Linder P. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(15):4168-80. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl468. Epub 2006 Aug 26. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006. PMID: 16936318 Free PMC article. Review. - Mud2 functions in transcription by recruiting the Prp19 and TREX complexes to transcribed genes.
Minocha R, Popova V, Kopytova D, Misiak D, Hüttelmaier S, Georgieva S, Sträßer K. Minocha R, et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Oct 12;46(18):9749-9763. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky640. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018. PMID: 30053068 Free PMC article. - Biogenesis of mRNPs: integrating different processes in the eukaryotic nucleus.
Luna R, Gaillard H, González-Aguilera C, Aguilera A. Luna R, et al. Chromosoma. 2008 Aug;117(4):319-31. doi: 10.1007/s00412-008-0158-4. Epub 2008 Apr 22. Chromosoma. 2008. PMID: 18427828 Review. - DEAD-box helicases as integrators of RNA, nucleotide and protein binding.
Putnam AA, Jankowsky E. Putnam AA, et al. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013 Aug;1829(8):884-93. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2013.02.002. Epub 2013 Feb 15. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013. PMID: 23416748 Free PMC article. Review.
References
- Abovich N, Rosbash M. Cross-intron bridging interactions in the yeast commitment complex are conserved in mammals. Cell. 1997;89:403–412. - PubMed
- Abovich N, Liao XC, Rosbash M. The yeast MUD2 protein: An interaction with PRP11 defines a bridge between commitment complexes and U2 snRNP addition. Genes & Dev. 1994;8:843–854. - PubMed
- Berglund JA, Chua K, Abovich N, Reed R, Rosbash M. The splicing factor BBP interacts specifically with the pre-mRNA branchpoint sequence UACUAAC. Cell. 1997;89:781–787. - PubMed
- Bird LE, Subramanya HS, Wigley DB. Helicases: A unifying structural theme? Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1998;8:14–18. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
Research Materials