Genome-wide profiling of gene amplification and deletion in cancer - PubMed (original) (raw)
Affiliations
- PMID: 11197775
Review
Genome-wide profiling of gene amplification and deletion in cancer
H Kashiwagi et al. Hum Cell. 2000 Sep.
Abstract
Accumulations of genetic changes in somatic cells induce phenotypic transformations leading to cancer. Among these genetic changes, gene amplification and deletion are most frequently observed in several kinds of cancers. Amplification of oncogene and/or deletion of tumor suppressor gene, together with dysfunction of the gene by point mutation, are the main causes of cancer. Genome-wide analysis of amplification and deletion of genes in cancers is basic to resolving the mechanisms of carcinogenesis. Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) developed in 1992 has been utilized to identify DNA copy number abnormalities in various kind of cancers and several reports have shown its usefulness in screening of the genes involved in carcinogenesis, and also in the identification of prognostic factors in cancer. We have shown that 1q23 gain is associated with neuroblastomas that are resistant to aggressive treatment, and have poor prognosis, and 1q and 13q gains are possibly related to drug resistance in ovarian cancers. Recently, the "rough draft" of the human genome was reported and we are ready to utilize the vast information on genomic sequences in cancer research. Moreover, microarray technology enables us to analyze more than ten thousand genes at a time and revealed genetic abnormalities in cancers at a genome-wide level. By combination of microarray and CGH, a powerful screening method for oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes in cancers, called array-CGH, has been developed by several groups. In this article, we overview these genome-wide analytical methods, CGH and array-CGH, and discuss their potential in molecular characterization of cancers.
Similar articles
- Detection of oncogene amplifications in medulloblastomas by comparative genomic hybridization and array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
Tong CY, Hui AB, Yin XL, Pang JC, Zhu XL, Poon WS, Ng HK. Tong CY, et al. J Neurosurg. 2004 Feb;100(2 Suppl Pediatrics):187-93. doi: 10.3171/ped.2004.100.2.0187. J Neurosurg. 2004. PMID: 14758948 - Combined array-comparative genomic hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism-loss of heterozygosity analysis reveals complex genetic alterations in cervical cancer.
Kloth JN, Oosting J, van Wezel T, Szuhai K, Knijnenburg J, Gorter A, Kenter GG, Fleuren GJ, Jordanova ES. Kloth JN, et al. BMC Genomics. 2007 Feb 20;8:53. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-8-53. BMC Genomics. 2007. PMID: 17311676 Free PMC article. - Chromosomal gains and losses indicate oncogene and tumor suppressor gene candidates in salivary gland tumors.
Giefing M, Wierzbicka M, Rydzanicz M, Cegla R, Kujawski M, Szyfter K. Giefing M, et al. Neoplasma. 2008;55(1):55-60. Neoplasma. 2008. PMID: 18190242 - Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization and its applications in human genetics.
Oostlander AE, Meijer GA, Ylstra B. Oostlander AE, et al. Clin Genet. 2004 Dec;66(6):488-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2004.00322.x. Clin Genet. 2004. PMID: 15521975 Review. - New molecular tumor markers for endometrial cancer.
Numa F, Umayahara K, Suehiro Y, Suminami Y, Oga A, Sasaki K, Kato H. Numa F, et al. Hum Cell. 2001 Dec;14(4):272-4. Hum Cell. 2001. PMID: 11925928 Review.
Cited by
- Aberrant Expression of Breast Development-Related MicroRNAs, miR-22, miR-132, and miR-212, in Breast Tumor Tissues.
Damavandi Z, Torkashvand S, Vasei M, Soltani BM, Tavallaei M, Mowla SJ. Damavandi Z, et al. J Breast Cancer. 2016 Jun;19(2):148-55. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2016.19.2.148. Epub 2016 Jun 24. J Breast Cancer. 2016. PMID: 27382390 Free PMC article. - Circulating Tumor Cell-Free DNA Genes as Prognostic Gene Signature for Platinum Resistant Ovarian Cancer Diagnosis.
Gunderson CC, Radhakrishnan R, Gomathinayagam R, Husain S, Aravindan S, Moore KM, Dhanasekaran DN, Jayaraman M. Gunderson CC, et al. Biomark Insights. 2022 Mar 28;17:11772719221088404. doi: 10.1177/11772719221088404. eCollection 2022. Biomark Insights. 2022. PMID: 35370397 Free PMC article. - KCNJ3 is a new independent prognostic marker for estrogen receptor positive breast cancer patients.
Kammerer S, Sokolowski A, Hackl H, Platzer D, Jahn SW, El-Heliebi A, Schwarzenbacher D, Stiegelbauer V, Pichler M, Rezania S, Fiegl H, Peintinger F, Regitnig P, Hoefler G, Schreibmayer W, Bauernhofer T. Kammerer S, et al. Oncotarget. 2016 Dec 20;7(51):84705-84717. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13224. Oncotarget. 2016. PMID: 27835900 Free PMC article. - Roadblocks en route to the clinical application of induced pluripotent stem cells.
Lowry WE, Quan WL. Lowry WE, et al. J Cell Sci. 2010 Mar 1;123(Pt 5):643-51. doi: 10.1242/jcs.054304. J Cell Sci. 2010. PMID: 20164303 Free PMC article. - An Immunocompetent Environment Unravels the Proto-Oncogenic Role of miR-22.
Centomo ML, Vitiello M, Poliseno L, Pandolfi PP. Centomo ML, et al. Cancers (Basel). 2022 Dec 19;14(24):6255. doi: 10.3390/cancers14246255. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36551740 Free PMC article. Review.