Antigen-specific inhibition of effector T cell function in humans after injection of immature dendritic cells - PubMed (original) (raw)
Clinical Trial
Antigen-specific inhibition of effector T cell function in humans after injection of immature dendritic cells
M V Dhodapkar et al. J Exp Med. 2001.
Abstract
Immunostimulatory properties of dendritic cells (DCs) are linked to their maturation state. Injection of mature DCs rapidly enhances antigen-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell immunity in humans. Here we describe the immune response to a single injection of immature DCs pulsed with influenza matrix peptide (MP) and keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) in two healthy subjects. In contrast to prior findings using mature DCs, injection of immature DCs in both subjects led to the specific inhibition of MP-specific CD8+ T cell effector function in freshly isolated T cells and the appearance of MP-specific interleukin 10-producing cells. When pre- and postimmunization T cells were boosted in culture, there were greater numbers of MP-specific major histocompatibility complex tetramer-binding cells after immunization, but these had reduced interferon production and lacked killer activity. These data demonstrate the feasibility of antigen-specific inhibition of effector T cell function in vivo in humans and urge caution with the use of immature DCs when trying to enhance tumor or microbial immunity.
Figures
Figure 1
Immune responses in uncultured T cells. (A and B) MP-, gag-, and influenza (Flu)-specific IFN-γ–producing cells from before and after DC immunization were quantified in freshly isolated uncultured PBMCs using an ELISPOT assay. Data for influenza specific cells is per 105 cells. SEM for all measurements is <20%. (A) Im1; (B) Im2. (C and D). Pre- and postimmunization samples were thawed together and assayed for antigen-specific T cells secreting IFN-γ, IL-4, and IL-10 using a 16-h ELISPOT assay. Antigens were HLA A2.1–restricted peptides from influenza MP, HIV-gag (gag), and CMV pp65 (CMV). Positive controls for the assays included SEA for IFN-γ and IL-10 and PHA for IL-4 (not shown). SEM for all measurements is <20%. (C) Im1; (D) Im2. (E) Use of peptide-pulsed DCs as APCs in the ELISPOT. Pre- and postimmunization specimens were examined using peptide-pulsed mature DCs as APCs (PBMC/DC ratio 30:1) in the ELISPOT. SEM for all measurements is <20%. (F) Quantification of MP-specific T cells using MHC tetramers in uncultured cells. Pre-/postimmunization specimens were stained with A*0201–MP tetramers at 37°C and analyzed by flow cytometry. Data shown are gated for CD8+ T cells and expressed as percent CD8+ T cells binding A*0201–MP tetramer.
Figure 1
Immune responses in uncultured T cells. (A and B) MP-, gag-, and influenza (Flu)-specific IFN-γ–producing cells from before and after DC immunization were quantified in freshly isolated uncultured PBMCs using an ELISPOT assay. Data for influenza specific cells is per 105 cells. SEM for all measurements is <20%. (A) Im1; (B) Im2. (C and D). Pre- and postimmunization samples were thawed together and assayed for antigen-specific T cells secreting IFN-γ, IL-4, and IL-10 using a 16-h ELISPOT assay. Antigens were HLA A2.1–restricted peptides from influenza MP, HIV-gag (gag), and CMV pp65 (CMV). Positive controls for the assays included SEA for IFN-γ and IL-10 and PHA for IL-4 (not shown). SEM for all measurements is <20%. (C) Im1; (D) Im2. (E) Use of peptide-pulsed DCs as APCs in the ELISPOT. Pre- and postimmunization specimens were examined using peptide-pulsed mature DCs as APCs (PBMC/DC ratio 30:1) in the ELISPOT. SEM for all measurements is <20%. (F) Quantification of MP-specific T cells using MHC tetramers in uncultured cells. Pre-/postimmunization specimens were stained with A*0201–MP tetramers at 37°C and analyzed by flow cytometry. Data shown are gated for CD8+ T cells and expressed as percent CD8+ T cells binding A*0201–MP tetramer.
Figure 1
Immune responses in uncultured T cells. (A and B) MP-, gag-, and influenza (Flu)-specific IFN-γ–producing cells from before and after DC immunization were quantified in freshly isolated uncultured PBMCs using an ELISPOT assay. Data for influenza specific cells is per 105 cells. SEM for all measurements is <20%. (A) Im1; (B) Im2. (C and D). Pre- and postimmunization samples were thawed together and assayed for antigen-specific T cells secreting IFN-γ, IL-4, and IL-10 using a 16-h ELISPOT assay. Antigens were HLA A2.1–restricted peptides from influenza MP, HIV-gag (gag), and CMV pp65 (CMV). Positive controls for the assays included SEA for IFN-γ and IL-10 and PHA for IL-4 (not shown). SEM for all measurements is <20%. (C) Im1; (D) Im2. (E) Use of peptide-pulsed DCs as APCs in the ELISPOT. Pre- and postimmunization specimens were examined using peptide-pulsed mature DCs as APCs (PBMC/DC ratio 30:1) in the ELISPOT. SEM for all measurements is <20%. (F) Quantification of MP-specific T cells using MHC tetramers in uncultured cells. Pre-/postimmunization specimens were stained with A*0201–MP tetramers at 37°C and analyzed by flow cytometry. Data shown are gated for CD8+ T cells and expressed as percent CD8+ T cells binding A*0201–MP tetramer.
Figure 1
Immune responses in uncultured T cells. (A and B) MP-, gag-, and influenza (Flu)-specific IFN-γ–producing cells from before and after DC immunization were quantified in freshly isolated uncultured PBMCs using an ELISPOT assay. Data for influenza specific cells is per 105 cells. SEM for all measurements is <20%. (A) Im1; (B) Im2. (C and D). Pre- and postimmunization samples were thawed together and assayed for antigen-specific T cells secreting IFN-γ, IL-4, and IL-10 using a 16-h ELISPOT assay. Antigens were HLA A2.1–restricted peptides from influenza MP, HIV-gag (gag), and CMV pp65 (CMV). Positive controls for the assays included SEA for IFN-γ and IL-10 and PHA for IL-4 (not shown). SEM for all measurements is <20%. (C) Im1; (D) Im2. (E) Use of peptide-pulsed DCs as APCs in the ELISPOT. Pre- and postimmunization specimens were examined using peptide-pulsed mature DCs as APCs (PBMC/DC ratio 30:1) in the ELISPOT. SEM for all measurements is <20%. (F) Quantification of MP-specific T cells using MHC tetramers in uncultured cells. Pre-/postimmunization specimens were stained with A*0201–MP tetramers at 37°C and analyzed by flow cytometry. Data shown are gated for CD8+ T cells and expressed as percent CD8+ T cells binding A*0201–MP tetramer.
Figure 1
Immune responses in uncultured T cells. (A and B) MP-, gag-, and influenza (Flu)-specific IFN-γ–producing cells from before and after DC immunization were quantified in freshly isolated uncultured PBMCs using an ELISPOT assay. Data for influenza specific cells is per 105 cells. SEM for all measurements is <20%. (A) Im1; (B) Im2. (C and D). Pre- and postimmunization samples were thawed together and assayed for antigen-specific T cells secreting IFN-γ, IL-4, and IL-10 using a 16-h ELISPOT assay. Antigens were HLA A2.1–restricted peptides from influenza MP, HIV-gag (gag), and CMV pp65 (CMV). Positive controls for the assays included SEA for IFN-γ and IL-10 and PHA for IL-4 (not shown). SEM for all measurements is <20%. (C) Im1; (D) Im2. (E) Use of peptide-pulsed DCs as APCs in the ELISPOT. Pre- and postimmunization specimens were examined using peptide-pulsed mature DCs as APCs (PBMC/DC ratio 30:1) in the ELISPOT. SEM for all measurements is <20%. (F) Quantification of MP-specific T cells using MHC tetramers in uncultured cells. Pre-/postimmunization specimens were stained with A*0201–MP tetramers at 37°C and analyzed by flow cytometry. Data shown are gated for CD8+ T cells and expressed as percent CD8+ T cells binding A*0201–MP tetramer.
Figure 1
Immune responses in uncultured T cells. (A and B) MP-, gag-, and influenza (Flu)-specific IFN-γ–producing cells from before and after DC immunization were quantified in freshly isolated uncultured PBMCs using an ELISPOT assay. Data for influenza specific cells is per 105 cells. SEM for all measurements is <20%. (A) Im1; (B) Im2. (C and D). Pre- and postimmunization samples were thawed together and assayed for antigen-specific T cells secreting IFN-γ, IL-4, and IL-10 using a 16-h ELISPOT assay. Antigens were HLA A2.1–restricted peptides from influenza MP, HIV-gag (gag), and CMV pp65 (CMV). Positive controls for the assays included SEA for IFN-γ and IL-10 and PHA for IL-4 (not shown). SEM for all measurements is <20%. (C) Im1; (D) Im2. (E) Use of peptide-pulsed DCs as APCs in the ELISPOT. Pre- and postimmunization specimens were examined using peptide-pulsed mature DCs as APCs (PBMC/DC ratio 30:1) in the ELISPOT. SEM for all measurements is <20%. (F) Quantification of MP-specific T cells using MHC tetramers in uncultured cells. Pre-/postimmunization specimens were stained with A*0201–MP tetramers at 37°C and analyzed by flow cytometry. Data shown are gated for CD8+ T cells and expressed as percent CD8+ T cells binding A*0201–MP tetramer.
Figure 2
(A–C) T cell recall assays in culture after DC immunization. Pre- and postimmunization specimens were thawed and cocultured with MP-pulsed DCs (unpulsed DCs as controls) for 7 d. After 7-d culture, MP-specific T cells were quantified by MHC tetramers (A), ELISPOT (B), and CTL assay (C). (A) MHC tetramer assay. Data are expressed as percent CD8+ T cells binding A*0201–MP tetramer. (B) ELISPOT assay. On day 7, cells were transferred to an ELISPOT plate and restimulated (Restim) overnight with specific antigen (10 μg/ml MP) or left without restimulation (as controls), and antigen-specific IFN-γ–producing cells were quantified using an ELISPOT. SEM for all measurements is <30%. (C) CTL assay. MP-specific lysis was measured using MP-pulsed T2 targets. Data shown are after subtracting lysis with control unpulsed T2 targets and from cells after expansion using unpulsed DCs.
Figure 2
(A–C) T cell recall assays in culture after DC immunization. Pre- and postimmunization specimens were thawed and cocultured with MP-pulsed DCs (unpulsed DCs as controls) for 7 d. After 7-d culture, MP-specific T cells were quantified by MHC tetramers (A), ELISPOT (B), and CTL assay (C). (A) MHC tetramer assay. Data are expressed as percent CD8+ T cells binding A*0201–MP tetramer. (B) ELISPOT assay. On day 7, cells were transferred to an ELISPOT plate and restimulated (Restim) overnight with specific antigen (10 μg/ml MP) or left without restimulation (as controls), and antigen-specific IFN-γ–producing cells were quantified using an ELISPOT. SEM for all measurements is <30%. (C) CTL assay. MP-specific lysis was measured using MP-pulsed T2 targets. Data shown are after subtracting lysis with control unpulsed T2 targets and from cells after expansion using unpulsed DCs.
Figure 2
(A–C) T cell recall assays in culture after DC immunization. Pre- and postimmunization specimens were thawed and cocultured with MP-pulsed DCs (unpulsed DCs as controls) for 7 d. After 7-d culture, MP-specific T cells were quantified by MHC tetramers (A), ELISPOT (B), and CTL assay (C). (A) MHC tetramer assay. Data are expressed as percent CD8+ T cells binding A*0201–MP tetramer. (B) ELISPOT assay. On day 7, cells were transferred to an ELISPOT plate and restimulated (Restim) overnight with specific antigen (10 μg/ml MP) or left without restimulation (as controls), and antigen-specific IFN-γ–producing cells were quantified using an ELISPOT. SEM for all measurements is <30%. (C) CTL assay. MP-specific lysis was measured using MP-pulsed T2 targets. Data shown are after subtracting lysis with control unpulsed T2 targets and from cells after expansion using unpulsed DCs.
Figure 3
Priming of KLH-specific T cells in vivo. (A) Antigen-dependent proliferation. Pre- and postimmunization PBMCs were thawed together and cultured in the absence or presence of KLH (10 μg/ml). Data shown are KLH-specific proliferation after subtracting [3H]TdR incorporation in control wells. SEM for all measurements is <30%. (B) KLH-specific IFN-γ– and IL-4–producing cells from before and after DC immunization were quantified in freshly isolated uncultured PBMCs using an ELISPOT assay. KLH-specific SFCs were calculated after subtracting data from control wells without antigen.
Figure 3
Priming of KLH-specific T cells in vivo. (A) Antigen-dependent proliferation. Pre- and postimmunization PBMCs were thawed together and cultured in the absence or presence of KLH (10 μg/ml). Data shown are KLH-specific proliferation after subtracting [3H]TdR incorporation in control wells. SEM for all measurements is <30%. (B) KLH-specific IFN-γ– and IL-4–producing cells from before and after DC immunization were quantified in freshly isolated uncultured PBMCs using an ELISPOT assay. KLH-specific SFCs were calculated after subtracting data from control wells without antigen.
Similar articles
- Mature dendritic cells boost functionally superior CD8(+) T-cell in humans without foreign helper epitopes.
Dhodapkar MV, Krasovsky J, Steinman RM, Bhardwaj N. Dhodapkar MV, et al. J Clin Invest. 2000 Mar;105(6):R9-R14. doi: 10.1172/JCI9051. J Clin Invest. 2000. PMID: 10727452 Free PMC article. - Rapid generation of broad T-cell immunity in humans after a single injection of mature dendritic cells.
Dhodapkar MV, Steinman RM, Sapp M, Desai H, Fossella C, Krasovsky J, Donahoe SM, Dunbar PR, Cerundolo V, Nixon DF, Bhardwaj N. Dhodapkar MV, et al. J Clin Invest. 1999 Jul;104(2):173-80. doi: 10.1172/JCI6909. J Clin Invest. 1999. PMID: 10411546 Free PMC article. - Dendritic cell gene therapy.
Onaitis M, Kalady MF, Pruitt S, Tyler DS. Onaitis M, et al. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2002 Jul;11(3):645-60. doi: 10.1016/s1055-3207(02)00027-3. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2002. PMID: 12487060 Review. - Requirement of mature dendritic cells for efficient activation of influenza A-specific memory CD8+ T cells.
Larsson M, Messmer D, Somersan S, Fonteneau JF, Donahoe SM, Lee M, Dunbar PR, Cerundolo V, Julkunen I, Nixon DF, Bhardwaj N. Larsson M, et al. J Immunol. 2000 Aug 1;165(3):1182-90. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.3.1182. J Immunol. 2000. PMID: 10903715 - Maturation requirements for dendritic cells in T cell stimulation leading to tolerance versus immunity.
Tan JK, O'Neill HC. Tan JK, et al. J Leukoc Biol. 2005 Aug;78(2):319-24. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1104664. Epub 2005 Apr 4. J Leukoc Biol. 2005. PMID: 15809288 Review.
Cited by
- Targeting lymph nodes for enhanced cancer vaccination: From nanotechnology to tissue engineering.
Wang J, Zhang Z, Liang R, Chen W, Li Q, Xu J, Zhao H, Xing D. Wang J, et al. Mater Today Bio. 2024 Apr 26;26:101068. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101068. eCollection 2024 Jun. Mater Today Bio. 2024. PMID: 38711936 Free PMC article. Review. - The Confounding Role of Graft-Versus-Host Disease in Animal Models of Cancer Immunotherapy: A Systematic Review.
Ashraf H, Heydarnejad M, Kosari F. Ashraf H, et al. Arch Iran Med. 2024 Mar 1;27(3):159-167. doi: 10.34172/aim.2024.24. Arch Iran Med. 2024. PMID: 38685841 Free PMC article. - Application of Engineered Dendritic Cell Vaccines in Cancer Immunotherapy: Challenges and Opportunities.
Li P, Jia L, Bian X, Tan S. Li P, et al. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2023 Dec;24(12):1703-1719. doi: 10.1007/s11864-023-01143-7. Epub 2023 Nov 14. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37962824 Review. - Biomaterials Facilitating Dendritic Cell-Mediated Cancer Immunotherapy.
Dong H, Li Q, Zhang Y, Ding M, Teng Z, Mou Y. Dong H, et al. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2023 Jun;10(18):e2301339. doi: 10.1002/advs.202301339. Epub 2023 Apr 23. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2023. PMID: 37088780 Free PMC article. Review. - A randomised controlled trial of long NY-ESO-1 peptide-pulsed autologous dendritic cells with or without alpha-galactosylceramide in high-risk melanoma.
Dasyam N, Sharples KJ, Barrow C, Huang Y, Bauer E, Mester B, Wood CE, Authier-Hall A, Dzhelali M, Ostapowicz T, Kumar R, Lowe J, Maxwell A, Burn OK, Williams GM, Carley SE, Caygill G, Jones J, Chan STS, Hinder VA, Macapagal J, McCusker M, Weinkove R, Brimble MA, Painter GF, Findlay MP, Dunbar PR, Gasser O, Hermans IF. Dasyam N, et al. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2023 Jul;72(7):2267-2282. doi: 10.1007/s00262-023-03400-y. Epub 2023 Mar 7. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2023. PMID: 36881133 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
- Banchereau J., Steinman R.M. Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature. 1998;392:245–252. - PubMed
- Cella M., Sallusto F., Lanzavecchia A. Origin, maturation and antigen presenting function of dendritic cells. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 1997;9:10–16. - PubMed
- Thurner B., Haendle I., Roder C., Dieckmann D., Keikavoussi P., Jonuleit H., Bender A., Maczek C., Schreiner D., von den Driesch P. Vaccination with mage-3A1 peptide–pulsed mature, monocyte-derived dendritic cells expands specific cytotoxic T cells and induces regression of some metastases in advanced stage IV melanoma. J. Exp. Med. 1999;190:1669–1678. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials