Checkpoint adaptation precedes spontaneous and damage-induced genomic instability in yeast - PubMed (original) (raw)

Checkpoint adaptation precedes spontaneous and damage-induced genomic instability in yeast

D J Galgoczy et al. Mol Cell Biol. 2001 Mar.

Abstract

Despite the fact that eukaryotic cells enlist checkpoints to block cell cycle progression when their DNA is damaged, cells still undergo frequent genetic rearrangements, both spontaneously and in response to genotoxic agents. We and others have previously characterized a phenomenon (adaptation) in which yeast cells that are arrested at a DNA damage checkpoint eventually override this arrest and reenter the cell cycle, despite the fact that they have not repaired the DNA damage that elicited the arrest. Here, we use mutants that are defective in checkpoint adaptation to show that adaptation is important for achieving the highest possible viability after exposure to DNA-damaging agents, but it also acts as an entrée into some forms of genomic instability. Specifically, the spontaneous and X-ray-induced frequencies of chromosome loss, translocations, and a repair process called break-induced replication occur at significantly reduced rates in adaptation-defective mutants. This indicates that these events occur after a cell has first arrested at the checkpoint and then adapted to that arrest. Because malignant progression frequently involves loss of genes that function in DNA repair, adaptation may promote tumorigenesis by allowing genomic instability to occur in the absence of repair.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1

Adaptation increases X-ray resistance in diploids. (A) Strains were plated and X-irradiated, and all resulting colonies were counted, regardless of their growth rate. Haploid strains (rad52 cdc5-ad or rad52 CDC5) were mated to themselves to produce isogenic diploids (20). (B and C) Cells were irradiated with 3 kilorads, and microcolony assays were performed to determine the percentage of cells that had adapted, as described elsewhere (20). (D) Either 30,000 cells (rad52 CDC5/rad52 CDC5 diploids, left) or 100,000 cells (rad52 cdc5-ad/rad52 cdc5-ad diploids, right) were plated, subjected to 3 kilorads of X-irradiation, and allowed to form colonies. (E) Model showing one broken and two unbroken chromosomes (each line represents two identical sisters) in haploid and diploid strains. Adaptation generates viable but karyotypically altered monosomic diploids.

FIG. 2

Adaptation precedes spontaneous chromosome loss. The frequency of spontaneous chromosome loss was determined using haploid strains harboring an extra copy of chromosome VII containing the CYH2 and ADE3 genes. Haploid CDC5 rad52 and cdc5-ad rad52 disomic strains (as in Table 1) were grown on nonselective plates and photographed. Chromosome losses appear as white sectors.

FIG. 3

Adaptation is required for spontaneous and damage-induced BIR events. Haploid CDC5 rad51 and cdc5-ad rad51 strains (as in Table 1) were altered to replace the centromere-linked LEU1 gene on the control chromosome with the URA3 gene (shown as B and b::URA3, respectively). Markers A, D, E, and F represent ADE3, ARO2, LYS5, and adh4::HIS3, respectively. Control chromosome DNA is shown in outline. For spontaneous events, strains were plated on medium lacking leucine (selecting for marker B) and containing cycloheximide (selecting against CYH2). The prominent classes of rearrangements are diagrammed. For X-ray induced events, cells were plated on nonselective plates, subjected to 3 kilorads of X rays, allowed to form colonies, and replica plated on cycloheximide plates lacking leucine to screen for BIR events.

FIG. 4

Translocations and BIR can both arise from a DNA lesion. (A) This diagram illustrates the expected outcome of a reciprocal recombination event in G2 between sister chromatids of different homologs. Segregation of sisters after mitosis will yield two possible outcomes: (i) both daughters can have markers identical to the starting strain (not shown), or (ii) each daughter can be homozygous for markers distal to the site of recombination (shown). (B) Outline of the experiment, the results of which are shown in panel C. Disomic rad51 CDC5 colonies (from irradiated nonselective plates) were scored for BIR events (as described in Materials and Methods). Colonies found to contain cells that had undergone BIR were restreaked from the original nonselective plate, and the resultant colonies were analyzed genetically for rearrangements of chromosome VII (BIR and/or deletions-translocations, as determined genetically). (C) DNA from the following strains were run on CHEF gels, blotted, and probed for the test chromosome: “starting strain” and “control strain” are marker strains with and without the test chromosome, respectively; 13 translocations-truncations isolated after restreaking 13 independent BIR-containing colonies (one translocation-truncation from each original colony) (lanes 1 to 13); and 4 translocations-truncations (lanes 14A to D) and 2 BIR (lanes 14 BIR E and F) colonies isolated from the same irradiated BIR-containing colony (6 total colonies isolated from one original colony). (D) Model showing three pairs of sister chromatids; the black and outlined sets represent the test and control chromosomes, respectively, and gray represents a different chromosome. Adaptation results in daughters that repair independently.

FIG. 5

A large region of chromosome VII flanked by two homologous tRNA genes is frequently deleted. (A) Marker strains with (lane 1) or without (lane 2) the control chromosome; 13 strains identified as large internal deletions from rad51 CDC5 (lanes 3 to 15) or rad51 cdc5-ad (lanes 16 to 28) were run on a CHEF gel, blotted, and probed for the test chromosome. (B) DNA from the starting strain or a strain containing a large internal deletion (as in panel A, lane 3) was fluorescently labeled and hybridized to a DNA array as described previously (9). Hybridization ratios are shown for genes on the left arm of chromosome VII. Arrows designate leucine tRNA genes flanking the deletion. (C) Oligonucleotides corresponding to the outside of the deletion were used in a PCR on the strains shown in panel A. M, marker. (D) The putative SSA intermediate between the centromere proximal [TL (CAA) G2] and distal [TL (CAA) G1] tRNA genes flanking the internal deletions mapped in panels A to C. The oligonucleotides used in panel C are indicated as arrows.

References

1. Bosco G, Haber J E. Chromosome break-induced DNA replication leads to nonreciprocal translocations and telomere capture. Genetics. 1998;150:1037–1047. - PMC - PubMed
1. Chu S, DeRisi J, Eisen M, Mulholland J, Botstein D, Brown P O, Herskowitz I. The transcriptional program of sporulation in budding yeast. Science. 1998;282:699–705. . (Erratum, 282:1421.) - PubMed
1. Fasullo M, Bennett T, AhChing P, Koudelik J. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD9 checkpoint reduces the DNA damage-associated stimulation of directed translocations. Mol Cell Biol. 1998;18:1190–1200. - PMC - PubMed
1. Featherstone C, Jackson S P. DNA double-strand break repair. Curr Biol. 1999;9:R759–R761. - PubMed
1. Friedberg E C, Walker G C, Siede W. DNA repair and mutagenesis. Washington, D.C.: ASM Press; 1995.

Checkpoint adaptation precedes spontaneous and damage-induced genomic instability in yeast - PubMed (original) (raw)