Access to complementary medicine via general practice - PubMed (original) (raw)
. 2001 Jan;51(462):25-30.
Affiliations
- PMID: 11271869
- PMCID: PMC1313895
Access to complementary medicine via general practice
K J Thomas et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Jan.
Abstract
Background: The popularity of complementary medicine continues to be asserted by the professional associations and umbrella organisations of these therapies. Within conventional medicine there are also signs that attitudes towards some of the complementary therapies are changing.
Aim: To describe the scale and scope of access to complementary therapies (acupuncture, chiropractic, homoeopathy, hypnotherapy, medical herbalism, and osteopathy) via general practice in England.
Design of study: A postal questionnaire sent to 1226 individual general practitioners (GPs) in a random cluster sample of GP partnerships in England. GPs received up to three reminders.
Setting: One in eight (1226) GP partnerships in England in 1995.
Method: Postal questionnaire to assess estimates of the number of practices offering 'in-house' access to a range of complementary therapies or making National Health Service (NHS) referrals outside the practice; sources of funding for provision and variations by practice characteristics.
Results: A total of 964 GPs replied (78.6%). Of these, 760 provided detailed information. An estimated 39.5% (95% CI = 35%-43%) of GP partnerships in England provided access to some form of complementary therapy for their NHS patients. If all non-responding partnerships are assumed to be non-providers, the lowest possible estimate is 30.3%. An estimated 21.4% (95% CI = 19%-24%) were offering access via the provision of treatment by a member of the primary health care team, 6.1% (95% CI = 2%-10%) employed an 'independent' complementary therapist, and an estimated 24.6% of partnerships (95% CI = 21%-28%) had made NHS referrals for complementary therapies. The reported volume of provision within any individual service tended to be low. Acupuncture and homoeopathy were the most commonly available therapies. Patients made some payment for 25% of practice-based provision. Former fundholding practices were significantly more likely to offer complementary therapies than non-fundholding practices, (45% versus 36%, P = 0.02). Fundholding did not affect the range of therapies offered, and patients from former fundholding practices were no more likely to pay for treatment.
Conclusion: Access to complementary health care for NHS patients was widespread in English general practices in 1995. This data suggests that a limited range of complementary therapies were acceptable to a large proportion of GPs. Fundholding clearly provided a mechanism for the provision of complementary therapies in primary care. Patterns of provision are likely to alter with the demise of fundholding and existing provision may significantly reduce unless the Primary Care Groups or Primary Care Trusts are prepared to support the 'levelling up' of some services.
Similar articles
- Use and expenditure on complementary medicine in England: a population based survey.
Thomas KJ, Nicholl JP, Coleman P. Thomas KJ, et al. Complement Ther Med. 2001 Mar;9(1):2-11. doi: 10.1054/ctim.2000.0407. Complement Ther Med. 2001. PMID: 11264963 - Sustaining complementary therapy provision in primary care: lessons from existing services.
Luff D, Thomas KJ. Luff D, et al. Complement Ther Med. 2000 Sep;8(3):173-9. doi: 10.1054/ctim.2000.0391. Complement Ther Med. 2000. PMID: 11068347 - Setting standards of prescribing performance in primary care: use of a consensus group of general practitioners and application of standards to practices in the north of England.
Bateman DN, Eccles M, Campbell M, Soutter J, Roberts SJ, Smith JM. Bateman DN, et al. Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Jan;46(402):20-5. Br J Gen Pract. 1996. PMID: 8745847 Free PMC article. Review. - Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM): a review for the primary care physician.
Onopa J. Onopa J. Hawaii Med J. 1999 Feb;58(2):9-19. Hawaii Med J. 1999. PMID: 10098319 Review.
Cited by
- Effects of acupuncture at acupoints with lower versus higher pain threshold for knee osteoarthritis: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Liu J, Li Y, Li L, Luo X, Li N, Yang X, Zhang H, Liu Z, Kang D, Luo Y, Liu Y, Jia Y, Ren Y, Yao M, Wang Y, Chen J, Maiji M, Zou K, Zhao L, Liang F, Sun X. Liu J, et al. Chin Med. 2022 Jun 8;17(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13020-022-00626-3. Chin Med. 2022. PMID: 35676697 Free PMC article. - Acupuncture treatment for knee osteoarthritis with sensitive points: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Tang L, Jia P, Zhao L, Kang D, Luo Y, Liu J, Li L, Zheng H, Li Y, Li N, Guyatt G, Sun X. Tang L, et al. BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 2;8(10):e023838. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023838. BMJ Open. 2018. PMID: 30282686 Free PMC article. - Complementary therapies in the NHS: some thoughts and three cases.
Peters D. Peters D. London J Prim Care (Abingdon). 2008;1(2):108-11. doi: 10.1080/17571472.2008.11493223. London J Prim Care (Abingdon). 2008. PMID: 25949573 Free PMC article. No abstract available. - Prevalence of use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) by physicians in the UK: a systematic review of surveys.
Posadzki P, Alotaibi A, Ernst E. Posadzki P, et al. Clin Med (Lond). 2012 Dec;12(6):505-12. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.12-6-505. Clin Med (Lond). 2012. PMID: 23342401 Free PMC article. Review. - Complementary and alternative health care in Israel.
Shuval JT, Averbuch E. Shuval JT, et al. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2012 Feb 20;1(1):7. doi: 10.1186/2045-4015-1-7. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2012. PMID: 22913721 Free PMC article.
References
- Br J Gen Pract. 1990 Sep;40(338):376-8 - PubMed
- J R Soc Med. 1994 Sep;87(9):523-5 - PubMed
- Fam Pract. 1997 Aug;14(4):302-6 - PubMed
- BMJ. 1997 Dec 20-27;315(7123):1639-40 - PubMed
- J R Soc Med. 1998 Sep;91(9):465-70 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials