Value of flow diagrams in reports of randomized controlled trials - PubMed (original) (raw)
Value of flow diagrams in reports of randomized controlled trials
M Egger et al. JAMA. 2001.
Abstract
Context: Diagrams of the flow of participants through a clinical trial are recommended in the Consolidated Standards for Reporting of Trials (CONSORT) statement, but it is unclear whether such flow diagrams improve the quality of trial reports.
Objective: To examine the information contributed by flow diagrams and the completeness of reporting overall in reports of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in 5 general and internal medicine journals.
Design and setting: Analysis of 270 reports of RCTs published in 1998 in the Annals of Internal Medicine (AIM; n = 19), BMJ (n = 42), JAMA (n = 45), The Lancet (n = 81), and The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM; n = 83).
Main outcome measures: Proportion of reports that included a flow diagram, information provided in flow diagrams, and completeness of reporting about flow of participants overall in flow diagrams or text.
Results: A total of 139 reports (51.5%) of RCTs included a flow diagram, but this varied widely among journals (AIM, 21.0%; BMJ, 38.1%; JAMA, 80.0%; The Lancet, 93.8%; and NEJM, 8.4%). Diagrams generally provided useful information, but only 73 (52.5%) included the number of participants who received allocated interventions and only 32 (23.0%) included the number of participants included in the analysis. In logistic regression analysis, overall completeness of reporting about flow of study participants was associated with publication of a flow diagram.
Conclusions: Flow diagrams are associated with improved quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. However, the structure of current flow diagrams is less than ideal. We propose a revised flow diagram that includes all important counts through the stages of parallel group trials.
Comment in
- CONSORT revised--improving the reporting of randomized trials.
Rennie D. Rennie D. JAMA. 2001 Apr 18;285(15):2006-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.15.2006. JAMA. 2001. PMID: 11308440 No abstract available.
Similar articles
- Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation.
Moher D, Jones A, Lepage L; CONSORT Group (Consolidated Standards for Reporting of Trials). Moher D, et al. JAMA. 2001 Apr 18;285(15):1992-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.15.1992. JAMA. 2001. PMID: 11308436 - Reporting of participant flow diagrams in published reports of randomized trials.
Hopewell S, Hirst A, Collins GS, Mallett S, Yu LM, Altman DG. Hopewell S, et al. Trials. 2011 Dec 5;12:253. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-253. Trials. 2011. PMID: 22141446 Free PMC article. - Completeness of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials in subscription and open access journals: cross-sectional study.
Jerčić Martinić-Cezar I, Marušić A. Jerčić Martinić-Cezar I, et al. Trials. 2019 Dec 2;20(1):669. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3781-x. Trials. 2019. PMID: 31791393 Free PMC article. - The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration.
Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, Gøtzsche PC, Lang T; CONSORT GROUP (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials). Altman DG, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2001 Apr 17;134(8):663-94. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-134-8-200104170-00012. Ann Intern Med. 2001. PMID: 11304107 Review. - The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials.
Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman D; CONSORT Group (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials). Moher D, et al. JAMA. 2001 Apr 18;285(15):1987-91. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.15.1987. JAMA. 2001. PMID: 11308435 Review.
Cited by
- Risk of bias in exercise science: A systematic review of 340 studies.
Preobrazenski N, McCaig A, Turner A, Kushner M, Pacitti L, Mendolia P, MacDonald B, Storoschuk K, Bouck T, Zaza Y, Lu S, Gurd BJ. Preobrazenski N, et al. iScience. 2024 Jan 26;27(3):109010. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109010. eCollection 2024 Mar 15. iScience. 2024. PMID: 38405604 Free PMC article. - Abstracts of randomized controlled trials in pediatric dentistry: reporting quality and spin.
Guo F, Ye W, Qin D, Fang X, Hua F, He H. Guo F, et al. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Nov 10;23(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-02085-2. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023. PMID: 37950213 Free PMC article. - Reporting of flow diagrams in randomised controlled trials published in periodontology and implantology: a survey.
Meyer HJ, Pandis N, Seehra J, Faggion CM Jr. Meyer HJ, et al. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Apr 27;23(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01923-7. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023. PMID: 37106314 Free PMC article. - Assessment of Reporting Quality of Drug-Related Randomized Controlled Trials Conducted in India and Published in MEDLINE-Indexed Indian Journals Over a Decade: A Systematic Review.
Singh MP, Prakash MG, Gaikwad NR, Keche YN, Dhaneria S. Singh MP, et al. Cureus. 2023 Jan 29;15(1):e34353. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34353. eCollection 2023 Jan. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 36874727 Free PMC article. Review. - Development and psychometric evaluation of the Implementation Science Research Project Appraisal Criteria (ImpResPAC) tool: a study protocol.
Sweetnam C, Goulding L, Davis RE, Khadjesari Z, Boaz A, Healey A, Sevdalis N, Bakolis I, Hull L. Sweetnam C, et al. BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 16;12(12):e061209. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061209. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 36526311 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources