Lack of congruence in the ratings of patients' health status by patients and their physicians - PubMed (original) (raw)
Lack of congruence in the ratings of patients' health status by patients and their physicians
M E Suarez-Almazor et al. Med Decis Making. 2001 Mar-Apr.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine if physician assessments of their patients' health status after the medical encounter are comparable to their patients' self-assessment of their own health.
Methods: Consecutive patients with musculoskeletal diseases were recruited when they attended 1 of the rheumatology outpatient clinics selected for the study. Five physicians participated in the study, 4 based at an academic center and 1 in the community. Patients were interviewed after seeing the physician; they completed health status questionnaires (mHAQ and SF-12) and rated their pain, worry about disease, and overall health status on visual analog scales. Standard gamble techniques were used to obtain patient utilities in relation to their health status, "gambling" on the probability of obtaining perfect health from an intervention with varying risks of death. After the medical encounter, physicians were asked to rate their patients' health status with similar instruments and with standard gamble elicitation techniques, blinded to the patients' responses.
Results: A total of 105 patients participated in the study; 70% were female; mean age was 54+/-16 years; 64% had a connective tissue disease, most commonly rheumatoid arthritis; and the other diseases in this group included soft tissue rheumatism, osteoarthritis, or low back pain. Statistically significant differences were observed between patient and physician ratings for pain, overall health, and standard gamble. On average, physicians rated their patients' health status higher than the patients themselves and were less willing to gamble on the risk of death versus perfect health. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were low: 0.42 for pain, 0.11 for worry, 0.11 for overall health, and 0.04 for standard gamble utilities. Similar findings were observed when subgroup analysis was performed for individual physicians and for patients with connective tissue diseases. No specific patient characteristic consistently related to increased divergence in the ratings.
Conclusions: These findings suggest that the communication between physicians and their patients at the time of the medical encounter needs to be enhanced. An understanding of their patients' health perceptions may assist physicians in suggesting appropriate interventions, taking into account their patients' benefit-risk preferences.
Similar articles
- Preference-based measurement of health-related quality of life (HRQL) in children with chronic musculoskeletal disorders (MSKDs).
Brunner HI, Maker D, Grundland B, Young NL, Blanchette V, Stain AM, Feldman BM. Brunner HI, et al. Med Decis Making. 2003 Jul-Aug;23(4):314-22. doi: 10.1177/0272989X03256008. Med Decis Making. 2003. PMID: 12926581 Clinical Trial. - The accuracy of physicians' perceptions of patients' suffering: findings from two teaching hospitals.
Lesho E, Foster L, Wang Z, Sarmiento D, Dennison S, Vahey MT, Nolan E, Smalls C. Lesho E, et al. Acad Med. 2009 May;84(5):636-42. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31819facf1. Acad Med. 2009. PMID: 19704201 - Differences between patients' and physicians' evaluations of outcome after total hip arthroplasty.
Lieberman JR, Dorey F, Shekelle P, Schumacher L, Thomas BJ, Kilgus DJ, Finerman GA. Lieberman JR, et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Jun;78(6):835-8. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199606000-00005. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996. PMID: 8666600 - The validity of the MIMIC (Multiple Indicators/MultIple Causes) health index--some empirical evidence.
Leu RE, Gerfin M, Spycher S. Leu RE, et al. Dev Health Econ Public Policy. 1992;1:109-42. doi: 10.1007/978-94-011-2392-1_6. Dev Health Econ Public Policy. 1992. PMID: 10151742 Review. - "Perfect health" versus "disease free": the impact of anchor point choice on the measurement of preferences and the calculation of disease-specific disutilities.
King JT Jr, Styn MA, Tsevat J, Roberts MS. King JT Jr, et al. Med Decis Making. 2003 May-Jun;23(3):212-25. doi: 10.1177/0272989X03023003003. Med Decis Making. 2003. PMID: 12809319 Review.
Cited by
- Comparison of two multi-criteria decision techniques for eliciting treatment preferences in people with neurological disorders.
Ijzerman MJ, van Til JA, Snoek GJ. Ijzerman MJ, et al. Patient. 2008 Dec 1;1(4):265-72. doi: 10.2165/1312067-200801040-00008. Patient. 2008. PMID: 22272994 - Perceptions of physical activity engagement among adults with rheumatoid arthritis and rheumatologists.
Iversen MD, Scanlon L, Frits M, Shadick NA, Sharby N. Iversen MD, et al. Int J Clin Rheumtol. 2015;10(2):67-77. doi: 10.2217/ijr.15.3. Int J Clin Rheumtol. 2015. PMID: 26075028 Free PMC article. - Are all outcomes in chronic heart failure rated equally? An argument for a patient-centred approach to outcome assessment.
Chang S, Newton PJ, Inglis S, Luckett T, Krum H, Macdonald P, Davidson PM. Chang S, et al. Heart Fail Rev. 2014 Mar;19(2):153-62. doi: 10.1007/s10741-012-9369-0. Heart Fail Rev. 2014. PMID: 23238990 Review. - Standards of Comparison and Discordance in Rheumatoid Arthritis Global Assessments Between Patients and Clinicians.
Ward MM, Guthrie LC, Alba MI. Ward MM, et al. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Aug;69(8):1260-1265. doi: 10.1002/acr.23103. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017. PMID: 27696779 Free PMC article. - Agreement between prostate cancer patients and their clinicians about utilities and attribute importance.
Elstein AS, Chapman GB, Chmiel JS, Knight SJ, Chan C, Nadler RB, Kuzel TM, Siston AK, Bennett CL. Elstein AS, et al. Health Expect. 2004 Jun;7(2):115-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00267.x. Health Expect. 2004. PMID: 15117386 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources