Evaluation of the Hexaplex assay for detection of respiratory viruses in children - PubMed (original) (raw)
Abstract
The Hexaplex assay (Prodesse, Inc., Milwaukee, Wis.) is a multiplex reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR assay for the detection of parainfluenza virus types 1, 2, and 3, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) types A and B, and influenza virus types A and B. We evaluated the Hexaplex assay in comparison with conventional viral cell cultures and rapid enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) for RSV (Directigen; Becton Dickinson Inc., Cockeysville, Md.) and influenza A virus (Abbott Test Pack; Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Ill.) for the detection of respiratory viruses from pediatric respiratory specimens obtained from children seen at Children's Hospital of Wisconsin from December 1997 through May 1998. A total of 363 respiratory specimens were evaluated. The tissue culture prevalence of parainfluenza virus during this period of time was low (1.1%). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of Hexaplex compared to tissue culture for the detection of parainfluenza virus were 100, 95.8, 19.0, and 100%, respectively. Only one specimen was determined to contain influenza B virus by Hexaplex; it was tissue culture negative. A specimen was considered to contain RSV or influenza A virus when it was either culture positive or culture negative but Hexaplex and EIA positive. Prior to the analysis of discrepant results, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value for the detection of RSV were 91.2, 100, 100, and 98.0%, respectively, for tissue culture; 84.5, 100, 100, and 96.6% for EIA; and 98.5, 91.5, 72.8, and 99.6% for Hexaplex, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value for the detection of influenza A virus prior to the analysis of discrepant results were 100, 100, 100, and 100%, respectively, for culture, 78.0, 100, 100, and 89.4% for EIA, respectively, and 95.1, 94.1, 67.2, and 99.3% for Hexaplex, respectively. Culture- and/or EIA-negative, Hexaplex-positive specimens were analyzed by a second RT-PCR assay which used primers specific for a different genomic region than that used in the Hexaplex assay. After analysis of these discrepant results, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value for the detection of RSV were 74.3, 100, 100, and 93.5%, respectively, for tissue culture; 70.3, 100, 100, and 92.5% for EIA; and 98.6, 97.4, 91.2, and 99.6% for Hexaplex. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value for the detection of influenza A virus were 83.3, 100, 100, and 97.4%, respectively, for tissue culture; 69.4, 100, 100, and 83.3% for EIA; and 95.8, 98.7, 92.0, and 99.3% for Hexaplex. Hexaplex is a rapid, sensitive, and specific method for the detection of the seven most common respiratory viruses in children.
Similar articles
- Evaluation of the Prodesse Hexaplex multiplex PCR assay for direct detection of seven respiratory viruses in clinical specimens.
Hindiyeh M, Hillyard DR, Carroll KC. Hindiyeh M, et al. Am J Clin Pathol. 2001 Aug;116(2):218-24. doi: 10.1309/F1R7-XD6T-RN09-1U6L. Am J Clin Pathol. 2001. PMID: 11488068 - Rapid and sensitive method using multiplex real-time PCR for diagnosis of infections by influenza a and influenza B viruses, respiratory syncytial virus, and parainfluenza viruses 1, 2, 3, and 4.
Templeton KE, Scheltinga SA, Beersma MF, Kroes AC, Claas EC. Templeton KE, et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Apr;42(4):1564-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.4.1564-1569.2004. J Clin Microbiol. 2004. PMID: 15071005 Free PMC article. - GeneScan reverse transcription-PCR assay for detection of six common respiratory viruses in young children hospitalized with acute respiratory illness.
Erdman DD, Weinberg GA, Edwards KM, Walker FJ, Anderson BC, Winter J, González M, Anderson LJ. Erdman DD, et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Sep;41(9):4298-303. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.9.4298-4303.2003. J Clin Microbiol. 2003. PMID: 12958260 Free PMC article. - Developments in tissue culture detection of respiratory viruses.
McAdam AJ, Riley AM. McAdam AJ, et al. Clin Lab Med. 2009 Dec;29(4):623-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2009.07.009. Clin Lab Med. 2009. PMID: 19892224 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
- Evaluation of the QuickLab RSV test, a new rapid lateral-flow immunoassay for detection of respiratory syncytial virus antigen.
Slinger R, Milk R, Gaboury I, Diaz-Mitoma F. Slinger R, et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Aug;42(8):3731-3. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.8.3731-3733.2004. J Clin Microbiol. 2004. PMID: 15297522 Free PMC article. - Evaluation of a multiplexed PCR assay for detection of respiratory viral pathogens in a public health laboratory setting.
Marshall DJ, Reisdorf E, Harms G, Beaty E, Moser MJ, Lee WM, Gern JE, Nolte FS, Shult P, Prudent JR. Marshall DJ, et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Dec;45(12):3875-82. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00838-07. Epub 2007 Oct 10. J Clin Microbiol. 2007. PMID: 17928425 Free PMC article. - Practical implementation of a multiplex PCR for acute respiratory tract infections in children.
Gruteke P, Glas AS, Dierdorp M, Vreede WB, Pilon JW, Bruisten SM. Gruteke P, et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Dec;42(12):5596-603. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.12.5596-5603.2004. J Clin Microbiol. 2004. PMID: 15583287 Free PMC article. - Monoclonal antibodies versus reverse transcription-PCR for detection of respiratory viruses in a patient population with respiratory tract infections admitted to hospital.
Rovida F, Percivalle E, Zavattoni M, Torsellini M, Sarasini A, Campanini G, Paolucci S, Baldanti F, Revello MG, Gerna G. Rovida F, et al. J Med Virol. 2005 Feb;75(2):336-47. doi: 10.1002/jmv.20276. J Med Virol. 2005. PMID: 15602736 Free PMC article. - Utility of DNA microarrays for detection of viruses in acute respiratory tract infections in children.
Chiu CY, Urisman A, Greenhow TL, Rouskin S, Yagi S, Schnurr D, Wright C, Drew WL, Wang D, Weintrub PS, Derisi JL, Ganem D. Chiu CY, et al. J Pediatr. 2008 Jul;153(1):76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.12.035. Epub 2008 Mar 7. J Pediatr. 2008. PMID: 18571541 Free PMC article.