A majority of patients with Barrett's oesophagus are unlikely to benefit from endoscopic cancer surveillance - PubMed (original) (raw)
A majority of patients with Barrett's oesophagus are unlikely to benefit from endoscopic cancer surveillance
S Gudlaugsdottir et al. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001 Jun.
Abstract
Background: Endoscopic cancer surveillance has been advocated for patients with Barrett's oesophagus. However, only a small minority of patients dies from adenocarcinoma in Barrett's oesophagus. It has been calculated that endoscopic cancer surveillance will only add to the quality of life of individuals in whom the incidence of adenocarcinoma in Barrett's oesophagus is greater than 1/200 patient-years.
Objective: To determine the proportion of a consecutive cohort of patients, in whom Barrett's oesophagus was diagnosed over a 5-year period, likely to benefit from endoscopic cancer surveillance.
Methods: All patients who had died during the observation period or were over 75 years old and those with diseases likely to impair survival were excluded. Next, all patients in whom the risk of developing adenocarcinoma in Barrett's oesophagus fell below 1/200 patient-years were excluded (including all women, all men under the age of 60 and all men with Barrett's oesophagus of < 3 cm in length). Patients with dysplasia of any degree and/or presence of an ulcer or stricture in Barrett's oesophagus were reinstated.
Results: Of 335 adult patients diagnosed with Barrett's oesophagus but without adenocarcinoma or high-grade dysplasia, 75 had died from unrelated causes, 47 had other diseases limiting survival and 59 were over 75 years old. After exclusion of all women, all men with Barrett's oesophagus of < 3 cm in length and all men under 60 years old, 15 patients were left. However, 32 were reinstated because of risk factors and another five because of insufficient data, resulting in 52 of the original 335 patients (15.5%) being eligible for endoscopic cancer surveillance.
Conclusion: This study suggests that less than 20% of patients identified with Barrett's oesophagus at routine endoscopy would benefit from endoscopic cancer surveillance. Prospective surveillance programmes should be limited to patients with an increased cancer risk and a good health profile.
Comment in
- Barrett's oesophagus: better left alone?
Lambert R. Lambert R. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001 Jun;13(6):627-30. doi: 10.1097/00042737-200106000-00002. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001. PMID: 11434585 Review.
Similar articles
- Surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus: exploring the uncertainty through systematic review, expert workshop and economic modelling.
Garside R, Pitt M, Somerville M, Stein K, Price A, Gilbert N. Garside R, et al. Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(8):1-142, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10080. Health Technol Assess. 2006. PMID: 16545207 Review. - Incidence of adenocarcinoma and mortality in patients with Barrett's oesophagus diagnosed between 1976 and 1986: implications for endoscopic surveillance.
Rana PS, Johnston DA. Rana PS, et al. Dis Esophagus. 2000;13(1):28-31. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-2050.2000.00069.x. Dis Esophagus. 2000. PMID: 11005328 Review. - Barrett's oesophagus: better left alone?
Lambert R. Lambert R. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001 Jun;13(6):627-30. doi: 10.1097/00042737-200106000-00002. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001. PMID: 11434585 Review. - Surveillance for Barrett's oesophagus: results from a programme in Northern Ireland.
Murphy SJ, Dickey W, Hughes D, O'Connor FA. Murphy SJ, et al. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Oct;17(10):1029-35. doi: 10.1097/00042737-200510000-00005. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005. PMID: 16148547 - Risk stratification of Barrett's oesophagus using a non-endoscopic sampling method coupled with a biomarker panel: a cohort study.
Ross-Innes CS, Chettouh H, Achilleos A, Galeano-Dalmau N, Debiram-Beecham I, MacRae S, Fessas P, Walker E, Varghese S, Evan T, Lao-Sirieix PS, O'Donovan M, Malhotra S, Novelli M, Disep B, Kaye PV, Lovat LB, Haidry R, Griffin M, Ragunath K, Bhandari P, Haycock A, Morris D, Attwood S, Dhar A, Rees C, Rutter MD, Ostler R, Aigret B, Sasieni PD, Fitzgerald RC; BEST2 study group. Ross-Innes CS, et al. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jan;2(1):23-31. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30118-2. Epub 2016 Nov 11. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017. PMID: 28404010
Cited by
- [Barrett esophagus: epidemiology, incidence of carcinoma, need for screening].
Arnold R, Wied M. Arnold R, et al. Internist (Berl). 2003 Jan;44(1):43-4, 47-51. doi: 10.1007/s00108-002-0813-4. Internist (Berl). 2003. PMID: 12677704 German. No abstract available. - Stool DNA testing for the detection of pancreatic cancer: assessment of methylation marker candidates.
Kisiel JB, Yab TC, Taylor WR, Chari ST, Petersen GM, Mahoney DW, Ahlquist DA. Kisiel JB, et al. Cancer. 2012 May 15;118(10):2623-31. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26558. Epub 2011 Sep 22. Cancer. 2012. PMID: 22083596 Free PMC article. - Surveillance in Barrett's oesophagus: a personal view.
Basu KK, de Caestecker JS. Basu KK, et al. Postgrad Med J. 2002 May;78(919):263-8. doi: 10.1136/pmj.78.919.263. Postgrad Med J. 2002. PMID: 12151566 Free PMC article. Review. - Impact of endoscopic surveillance on mortality from Barrett's esophagus-associated esophageal adenocarcinomas.
Corley DA, Mehtani K, Quesenberry C, Zhao W, de Boer J, Weiss NS. Corley DA, et al. Gastroenterology. 2013 Aug;145(2):312-9.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.05.004. Epub 2013 May 11. Gastroenterology. 2013. PMID: 23673354 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical