Measurement error correction in nutritional epidemiology based on individual foods, with application to the relation of diet to breast cancer - PubMed (original) (raw)
. 2001 Nov 1;154(9):827-35.
doi: 10.1093/aje/154.9.827.
Affiliations
- PMID: 11682365
- DOI: 10.1093/aje/154.9.827
Measurement error correction in nutritional epidemiology based on individual foods, with application to the relation of diet to breast cancer
B Rosner et al. Am J Epidemiol. 2001.
Abstract
Nutrient intake is often measured with error by commonly used dietary instruments such as the food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) or 24-hour recall. More accurate assessments of true intake are obtained by using weighed diet records, in which subjects record what they eat on a real-time basis, but these records are expensive to administer. Validation studies are often performed to relate "gold standard" intake to intake according to surrogate instruments and to correct relative risk estimates obtained in the main study for measurement error. Most measurement error correction methods use validation study data at the nutrient level. However, subjects almost always report intake at the food rather than the nutrient level. In addition, the validity of measurement of different foods can vary considerably; it is relatively high for some foods (e.g., beverages) but relatively low for others (e.g., meats, vegetables). This differential validity could be incorporated into measurement error methods and potentially improve on nutrient-based measurement error methods. In this paper, the authors discuss correction methods for food-based measurement error and apply them to study the relation between FFQ intake in 1980 and incident breast cancer in 1980-1994 among approximately 89,000 women in the Nurses' Health Study, in whom approximately 3,000 incident breast cancers were observed.
Similar articles
- Measurement error models for ordinal exposure variables measured with error.
Rosner BA. Rosner BA. Stat Med. 1996 Feb 15;15(3):293-303. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960215)15:3<293::AID-SIM166>3.0.CO;2-E. Stat Med. 1996. PMID: 8643887 - Dealing with dietary measurement error in nutritional cohort studies.
Freedman LS, Schatzkin A, Midthune D, Kipnis V. Freedman LS, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Jul 20;103(14):1086-92. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr189. Epub 2011 Jun 8. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011. PMID: 21653922 Free PMC article. - Measurement error and results from analytic epidemiology: dietary fat and breast cancer.
Prentice RL. Prentice RL. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996 Dec 4;88(23):1738-47. doi: 10.1093/jnci/88.23.1738. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996. PMID: 8944004 Clinical Trial. - Bias in dietary-report instruments and its implications for nutritional epidemiology.
Kipnis V, Midthune D, Freedman L, Bingham S, Day NE, Riboli E, Ferrari P, Carroll RJ. Kipnis V, et al. Public Health Nutr. 2002 Dec;5(6A):915-23. doi: 10.1079/PHN2002383. Public Health Nutr. 2002. PMID: 12633516 Review. - Regression calibration method for correcting measurement-error bias in nutritional epidemiology.
Spiegelman D, McDermott A, Rosner B. Spiegelman D, et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997 Apr;65(4 Suppl):1179S-1186S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/65.4.1179S. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997. PMID: 9094918 Review.
Cited by
- Correcting for measurement error in assessing gestational age in a low-resource setting: a regression calibration approach.
Agogo GO, Verani JR, Otieno NA, Nyawanda BO, Widdowson MA, Chaves SS. Agogo GO, et al. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Oct 12;10:1222772. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1222772. eCollection 2023. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 37901408 Free PMC article. - A multivariate joint model to adjust for random measurement error while handling skewness and correlation in dietary data in an epidemiologic study of mortality.
Agogo GO, Muchene L, Orindi B, Murphy TE, Mwambi H, Allore HG. Agogo GO, et al. Ann Epidemiol. 2023 Jun;82:8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2023.03.007. Epub 2023 Mar 25. Ann Epidemiol. 2023. PMID: 36972757 Free PMC article. - Differences in all-cause mortality risk associated with animal and plant dietary protein sources consumption.
Haghighatdoost F, Mohammadifard N, Zakeri P, Najafian J, Sadeghi M, Roohafza H, Sarrafzadegan N. Haghighatdoost F, et al. Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 28;13(1):3396. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30455-9. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 36854962 Free PMC article. - Ideal cardiovascular health metrics and the risk of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Korean adults.
Shim SY, Jung SJ, Kim SU, Kim HC. Shim SY, et al. Clin Hypertens. 2023 Jan 15;29(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40885-022-00227-0. Clin Hypertens. 2023. PMID: 36641485 Free PMC article. - Reliability of Questionnaire-Based Dose Reconstruction: Human Factor Uncertainties in the Radiation Dosimetry of Chernobyl Cleanup Workers.
Drozdovitch V, Chizhov K, Chumak V, Bakhanova E, Trotsyuk N, Bondarenko P, Golovanov I, Kryuchkov V. Drozdovitch V, et al. Radiat Res. 2022 Aug 1;198(2):172-180. doi: 10.1667/RADE-21-00207.1. Radiat Res. 2022. PMID: 35604875 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical