Prolonged residence time of a noncovalent molecular adapter, beta-cyclodextrin, within the lumen of mutant alpha-hemolysin pores - PubMed (original) (raw)
Prolonged residence time of a noncovalent molecular adapter, beta-cyclodextrin, within the lumen of mutant alpha-hemolysin pores
L Q Gu et al. J Gen Physiol. 2001 Nov.
Abstract
Noncovalent molecular adapters, such as cyclodextrins, act as binding sites for channel blockers when lodged in the lumen of the alpha-hemolysin (alphaHL) pore, thereby offering a basis for the detection of a variety of organic molecules with alphaHL as a sensor element. beta-Cyclodextrin (betaCD) resides in the wild-type alphaHL pore for several hundred microseconds. The residence time can be extended to several milliseconds by the manipulation of pH and transmembrane potential. Here, we describe mutant homoheptameric alphaHL pores that are capable of accommodating betaCD for tens of seconds. The mutants were obtained by site-directed mutagenesis at position 113, which is a residue that lies near a constriction in the lumen of the transmembrane beta barrel, and fall into two classes. Members of the tight-binding class, M113D, M113N, M113V, M113H, M113F and M113Y, bind betaCD approximately 10(4)-fold more avidly than the remaining alphaHL pores, including WT-alphaHL. The lower K(d) values of these mutants are dominated by reduced values of k(off). The major effect of the mutations is most likely a remodeling of the binding site for betaCD in the vicinity of position 113. In addition, there is a smaller voltage-sensitive component of the binding, which is also affected by the residue at 113 and may result from transport of the neutral betaCD molecule by electroosmotic flow. The mutant pores for which the dwell time of betaCD is prolonged can serve as improved components for stochastic sensors.
Figures
Scheme S1
Figure 1
Representations of staphylococcal α-hemolysin (αHL) and β-cyclodextrin (βCD). (A) Sagittal section through the WT-αHL pore showing the location of Met-113 (dark green), Glu-111 (red), Lys-147 (blue), Asn-139 (yellow), and Leu-135 (green). (B) Structure of βCD. (C) Schematic of the WT-αHL pore showing βCD lodged in the lumen of the channel. The location is based on mutagenesis data (Gu et al. 1999, Gu et al. 2001), including that described here. (D) Sequence of the transmembrane β barrel of αHL-RL2. WT residues are shown in parentheses.
Figure 2
Representative current traces from single αHL pores showing the blockade of Met-113 mutants by βCD. All traces were recorded under symmetrical conditions in buffer containing 1 M NaCl, 10 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.5; 40 μM βCD was added to the trans chamber. (left) Traces recorded at −40 mV; (right) traces recorded at +40 mV. The mutants shown are all derived from RL2 (see the first paragraph of
results
). The broken line indicates zero current. The mutants are ordered (top to bottom) according to increasing affinity for βCD.
Figure 4
Plots of kinetic constants for the Met-113 mutants versus the van der Waals volume (Creighton 1993) of the residue at position 113. (A) 1/K d; (B) kon; and (C) koff. (closed gray circle) −40 mV; (○) +40 mV. Some of the points are obscured, but the values can be found in Table .
Figure 3
Dwell times for the interaction between βCD and the Met-113 mutants. (A) Values of τoff, the dwell time of βCD in the pore, and τon, the inter-event interval at 40 μM trans βCD. (closed gray circle) −40 mV; (○) +40 mV. The mutants are ordered (left to right) according to increasing affinity for βCD. (B) Dependence of τoff and τon on the concentration of βCD (trans) for WT-αHL and selected mutants.
Figure 3
Dwell times for the interaction between βCD and the Met-113 mutants. (A) Values of τoff, the dwell time of βCD in the pore, and τon, the inter-event interval at 40 μM trans βCD. (closed gray circle) −40 mV; (○) +40 mV. The mutants are ordered (left to right) according to increasing affinity for βCD. (B) Dependence of τoff and τon on the concentration of βCD (trans) for WT-αHL and selected mutants.
Figure 5
Plots of single-channel conductance values for the Met-113 mutants with and without βCD bound versus the van der Waals volume of the residue at position 113. (A) Conductance values at −40 mV: (closed gray circle), αHL conductance; (○) αHL•βCD conductance. (B) Conductance values at +40 mV. (C) Ratio of conductance at +40 mV to conductance at −40 mV (g+40/g-40). (D) Conductance of the pore with βCD bound divided by the conductance of the pore itself. (closed gray square), −40 mV; (□) +40 mV.
Figure 6
Representative current traces from single αHL pores showing blockades by βCD. All traces were recorded under symmetrical conditions in buffer containing 1 M NaCl, 10 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.5. βCD (40 μM) was present on the trans side of the membrane. (A) WT-αHL, (B) N139Q(WT), (C) L135N(RL2), (D) M113N(WT), (E) M113N/N139Q(WT), and (F) M113N/L135N(RL2). The broken line indicates zero current.
Figure 7
Relationships of the voltage dependence of kinetic constants for the interaction of αHL and βCD, and the charge selectivity of the pore. (A) Plot of β1/K versus α, where β1/K = log[(1/K d+40)/(1/K d−40)] = log(K d−40/K d+40) for the mutants in Table . β1/K > 0 reflects a stronger affinity at +40 mV than −40 mV, and β1/K < 0, the opposite. α = log(PK+/PCl−), a measure of the charge selectivity of each mutant. Where α > 0, a pore is cation selective, and where α < 0, a pore is anion selective. A line was fitted to the data by linear regression. The correlation coefficient is R2 = 0.80. (B) Plot of βkon versus α, where βkon = log(kon+40/kon-40). R2 = 0.79. (C) Plot of βkoff versus α, where βkoff = log(koff+40/koff-40). R2 = 0.77.
Figure 7
Relationships of the voltage dependence of kinetic constants for the interaction of αHL and βCD, and the charge selectivity of the pore. (A) Plot of β1/K versus α, where β1/K = log[(1/K d+40)/(1/K d−40)] = log(K d−40/K d+40) for the mutants in Table . β1/K > 0 reflects a stronger affinity at +40 mV than −40 mV, and β1/K < 0, the opposite. α = log(PK+/PCl−), a measure of the charge selectivity of each mutant. Where α > 0, a pore is cation selective, and where α < 0, a pore is anion selective. A line was fitted to the data by linear regression. The correlation coefficient is R2 = 0.80. (B) Plot of βkon versus α, where βkon = log(kon+40/kon-40). R2 = 0.79. (C) Plot of βkoff versus α, where βkoff = log(koff+40/koff-40). R2 = 0.77.
Figure 7
Relationships of the voltage dependence of kinetic constants for the interaction of αHL and βCD, and the charge selectivity of the pore. (A) Plot of β1/K versus α, where β1/K = log[(1/K d+40)/(1/K d−40)] = log(K d−40/K d+40) for the mutants in Table . β1/K > 0 reflects a stronger affinity at +40 mV than −40 mV, and β1/K < 0, the opposite. α = log(PK+/PCl−), a measure of the charge selectivity of each mutant. Where α > 0, a pore is cation selective, and where α < 0, a pore is anion selective. A line was fitted to the data by linear regression. The correlation coefficient is R2 = 0.80. (B) Plot of βkon versus α, where βkon = log(kon+40/kon-40). R2 = 0.79. (C) Plot of βkoff versus α, where βkoff = log(koff+40/koff-40). R2 = 0.77.
Similar articles
- Interaction of the noncovalent molecular adapter, beta-cyclodextrin, with the staphylococcal alpha-hemolysin pore.
Gu LQ, Bayley H. Gu LQ, et al. Biophys J. 2000 Oct;79(4):1967-75. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76445-9. Biophys J. 2000. PMID: 11023901 Free PMC article. - Reversal of charge selectivity in transmembrane protein pores by using noncovalent molecular adapters.
Gu LQ, Dalla Serra M, Vincent JB, Vigh G, Cheley S, Braha O, Bayley H. Gu LQ, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Apr 11;97(8):3959-64. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.8.3959. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000. PMID: 10760267 Free PMC article. - Electroosmotic enhancement of the binding of a neutral molecule to a transmembrane pore.
Gu LQ, Cheley S, Bayley H. Gu LQ, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Dec 23;100(26):15498-503. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2531778100. Epub 2003 Dec 15. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003. PMID: 14676320 Free PMC article. - Ion selectivity of alpha-hemolysin with a beta-cyclodextrin adapter. I. Single ion potential of mean force and diffusion coefficient.
Luo Y, Egwolf B, Walters DE, Roux B. Luo Y, et al. J Phys Chem B. 2010 Jan 21;114(2):952-8. doi: 10.1021/jp906790f. J Phys Chem B. 2010. PMID: 20041673 Free PMC article. - Beta-barrel membrane protein folding and structure viewed through the lens of alpha-hemolysin.
Montoya M, Gouaux E. Montoya M, et al. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2003 Jan 10;1609(1):19-27. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2736(02)00663-6. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2003. PMID: 12507754 Review.
Cited by
- Molecular Determinants of Current Blockade Produced by Peptide Transport Through a Nanopore.
Liu J, Aksimentiev A. Liu J, et al. ACS Nanosci Au. 2023 Nov 14;4(1):21-29. doi: 10.1021/acsnanoscienceau.3c00046. eCollection 2024 Feb 21. ACS Nanosci Au. 2023. PMID: 38406313 Free PMC article. Review. - Cyclodextrins: Only Pharmaceutical Excipients or Full-Fledged Drug Candidates?
Kovacs T, Nagy P, Panyi G, Szente L, Varga Z, Zakany F. Kovacs T, et al. Pharmaceutics. 2022 Nov 22;14(12):2559. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14122559. Pharmaceutics. 2022. PMID: 36559052 Free PMC article. Review. - Nanopore sensors for viral particle quantification: current progress and future prospects.
Akhtarian S, Miri S, Doostmohammadi A, Brar SK, Rezai P. Akhtarian S, et al. Bioengineered. 2021 Dec;12(2):9189-9215. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2021.1995991. Bioengineered. 2021. PMID: 34709987 Free PMC article. Review. - Nanopore sensing: A physical-chemical approach.
Robertson JWF, Ghimire ML, Reiner JE. Robertson JWF, et al. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 2021 Sep 1;1863(9):183644. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2021.183644. Epub 2021 May 11. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 2021. PMID: 33989531 Free PMC article. Review. - Polynucleotide transport through lipid membrane in the presence of starburst cyclodextrin-based poly(ethylene glycol)s.
Eskandani Z, Le Gall T, Montier T, Lehn P, Montel F, Auvray L, Huin C, Guégan P. Eskandani Z, et al. Eur Phys J E Soft Matter. 2018 Nov 15;41(11):132. doi: 10.1140/epje/i2018-11743-3. Eur Phys J E Soft Matter. 2018. PMID: 30426391
References
- Bath B.R., Lee R.D., White H.S., Scott E.R. Imaging molecular transport in porous membranes. Observation and analysis of electroosmotic flow in individual pores using the scanning electrochemical microscope. Anal. Chem. 1998;70:1047–1058.
- Bath B.R., White H.S., Scott E.R. Electrically facilitated molecular transport. Analysis of the relative contributions of diffusion, migration, and electroosmosis to solute transport in an ion-exchange membrane. Anal. Chem. 2000;72:433–442. - PubMed
- Bayley H. Pore-forming proteins with built-in triggers and switches. Bioorg. Chem. 1995;23:340–345.
- Bayley H. Building a door into cells. Sci. Am. 1997;277:62–67. - PubMed
- Bayley H. Designed membrane channels and pores. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 1999;10:94–103. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources