How to find the good and avoid the bad or ugly: a short guide to tools for rating quality of health information on the internet - PubMed (original) (raw)

Review

How to find the good and avoid the bad or ugly: a short guide to tools for rating quality of health information on the internet

Petra Wilson. BMJ. 2002.

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

• [Quality criteria for medical websites].
  Dørup JG, Vedsted P. Dørup JG, et al. Ugeskr Laeger. 2002 Sep 16;164(38):4428-31. Ugeskr Laeger. 2002. PMID: 12362737 Danish. No abstract available.
• Societal dimensions of third-party evaluation of Internet health content.
  Lampe K, Cross P, Brickley D, Kohler C, Roine R, Eysenbach G. Lampe K, et al. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2003;95:661-6. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2003. PMID: 14664063
• Ensuring health-site quality.
  [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Internet Healthc Strateg. 2002 Jan;4(1):1-5. Internet Healthc Strateg. 2002. PMID: 11855163 No abstract available.
• Quality of health information on the Web: where are we now?
  Schloman BF. Schloman BF. Online J Issues Nurs. 2003;8(1):8. Online J Issues Nurs. 2003. PMID: 12729456 Review. No abstract available.
• Examination of instruments used to rate quality of health information on the internet: chronicle of a voyage with an unclear destination.
  Gagliardi A, Jadad AR. Gagliardi A, et al. BMJ. 2002 Mar 9;324(7337):569-73. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7337.569. BMJ. 2002. PMID: 11884320 Free PMC article. Review.

Cited by

• Assessment of the online presence and regulatory compliance of dental practice websites in France.
  Pollet A, Diakonoff H. Pollet A, et al. Digit Health. 2024 May 27;10:20552076241258143. doi: 10.1177/20552076241258143. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec. Digit Health. 2024. PMID: 38812847 Free PMC article.
• Research Progress and Model Construction for Online Health Information Seeking Behavior.
  Liu ZW. Liu ZW. Front Res Metr Anal. 2022 Feb 11;6:706164. doi: 10.3389/frma.2021.706164. eCollection 2021. Front Res Metr Anal. 2022. PMID: 35224421 Free PMC article. Review.
• Readability and Quality of Online Information on Osteoarthritis: An Objective Analysis With Historic Comparison.
  Murray KE, Murray TE, O'Rourke AC, Low C, Veale DJ. Murray KE, et al. Interact J Med Res. 2019 Sep 16;8(3):e12855. doi: 10.2196/12855. Interact J Med Res. 2019. PMID: 31538953 Free PMC article.
• A Tool That Assesses the Evidence, Transparency, and Usability of Online Health Information: Development and Reliability Assessment.
  Dobbins M, Watson S, Read K, Graham K, Yousefi Nooraie R, Levinson AJ. Dobbins M, et al. JMIR Aging. 2018 May 7;1(1):e3. doi: 10.2196/aging.9216. JMIR Aging. 2018. PMID: 31518240 Free PMC article.
• Evaluation Breast Cancer Information on The Internet in Arabic.
  Alnaim L. Alnaim L. J Cancer Educ. 2019 Aug;34(4):810-818. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1378-9. J Cancer Educ. 2019. PMID: 29923058

References

1. 1. Harris Poll. www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp (accessed 14 Nov 2001).
2. 1. Eysenbach G, Eun Ryoung Sa ER, Diepgen TL. Shopping around the internet today and tomorrow: towards the millennium of cybermedicine. BMJ. 1999;319:1294. - PMC - PubMed
3. 1. McLellen F. “Like hunger, like thirst”: patients, journals and the internet. Lancet. 1998;352 (suppl II):39–43S. - PubMed
4. 1. Jadad A, Gagliardi A. Rating health information on the internet: navigation to knowledge or to Babel. JAMA. 1998;279(8):611–614. - PubMed
5. 1. Gagliardi A, Jadad A. Examination of instruments used to rate quality of health information on the internet: chronicle of a voyage with an unclear destination. BMJ. 2002;324:569–573. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

• Full Text Sources

  • Europe PubMed Central
  • HighWire
  • Ovid Technologies, Inc.
  • PubMed Central

• Research Materials

  • NCI CPTC Antibody Characterization Program