Genome size reduction through illegitimate recombination counteracts genome expansion in Arabidopsis - PubMed (original) (raw)

Genome size reduction through illegitimate recombination counteracts genome expansion in Arabidopsis

Katrien M Devos et al. Genome Res. 2002 Jul.

Abstract

Genome size varies greatly across angiosperms. It is well documented that, in addition to polyploidization, retrotransposon amplification has been a major cause of genome expansion. The lack of evidence for counterbalancing mechanisms that curtail unlimited genome growth has made many of us wonder whether angiosperms have a "one-way ticket to genomic obesity." We have therefore investigated an angiosperm with a well-characterized and notably small genome, Arabidopsis thaliana, for evidence of genomic DNA loss. Our results indicate that illegitimate recombination is the driving force behind genome size decrease in Arabidopsis, removing at least fivefold more DNA than unequal homologous recombination. The presence of highly degraded retroelements also suggests that retrotransposon amplification has not been confined to the last 4 million years, as is indicated by the dating of intact retroelements.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1

Unequal intrastrand recombination between LTR retrotransposons. (A) Structure of a complete element, with a direct repeat (DR) of flanking target-site DNA, two long terminal repeats (LTRs), a primer-binding site (PBS), and polypurine tract (PPT) needed for element replication and encoded gene products (gag, pol). (B) Solo LTR resulting from intra-element recombination. The dotted line is presented to facilitate depiction of the folding needed to accomplish this recombination and does not represent any significant stretch of DNA. (C) Recombinant element resulting from recombination between 5′ and 3′ LTRs of two adjacent elements. The solid black line represents sequences between the two LTR retrotransposons that are deleted via this intrastrand event. Note that the two flanking direct repeats are now different, because one is the 3′ target site of one element (black arrow) and the other is the 5′ target site from the adjacent element (white arrow). (D) “Complete” element without target-site duplication resulting from unequal recombination between two 5′ LTRs, two 3′ LTRs, or the internal regions of two elements. Once again, DNA between the two LTR retrotransposons is lost, along with one LTR-retrotransposon copy. (E) “Solo” LTR without target-site duplication resulting from recombination between 3′ and 5′ LTRs of two elements. As before, DNA between the two LTR retrotransposons (solid black line) is lost. In all cases shown, unequal intrastrand recombination only creates a deletion if the two participant retroelements are in direct orientation on the same chromosome arm.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bennett MD, Leitch IJ. Nuclear DNA amounts in Angiosperms. Ann Bot. 1995;76:113–176.
    1. Bennetzen JL, Kellogg EA. Do plants have a one-way ticket to genomic obesity? Plant Cell. 1997;9:1509–1514. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blanc G, Barakat A, Guyot R, Cooke R, Delseney M. Extensive duplication and reshuffling in the Arabidopsis genome. Plant Cell. 2000;12:1093–1101. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ehrlich SD. Illegitimate recombination in bacteria. In: Berg DE, Howe MM, editors. Mobile DNA. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Microbiology; 1989. pp. 799–832.
    1. Gorbunova V, Levy AA. Non-homologous DNA end-joining in plant cells is associated with deletions and filler DNA insertions. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:4650–4657. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources