Issues in the selection of a summary statistic for meta-analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes - PubMed (original) (raw)
Comparative Study
. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1575-600.
doi: 10.1002/sim.1188.
Affiliations
- PMID: 12111921
- DOI: 10.1002/sim.1188
Comparative Study
Issues in the selection of a summary statistic for meta-analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes
Jonathan J Deeks. Stat Med. 2002.
Abstract
Meta-analysis of binary data involves the computation of a weighted average of summary statistics calculated for each trial. The selection of the appropriate summary statistic is a subject of debate due to conflicts in the relative importance of mathematical properties and the ability to intuitively interpret results. This paper explores the process of identifying a summary statistic most likely to be consistent across trials when there is variation in control group event rates. Four summary statistics are considered: odds ratios (OR); risk differences (RD) and risk ratios of beneficial (RR(B)); and harmful outcomes (RR(H)). Each summary statistic corresponds to a different pattern of predicted absolute benefit of treatment with variation in baseline risk, the greatest difference in patterns of prediction being between RR(B) and RR(H). Selection of a summary statistic solely based on identification of the best-fitting model by comparing tests of heterogeneity is problematic, principally due to low numbers of trials. It is proposed that choice of a summary statistic should be guided by both empirical evidence and clinically informed debate as to which model is likely to be closest to the expected pattern of treatment benefit across baseline risks. Empirical investigations comparing the four summary statistics on a sample of 551 systematic reviews provide evidence that the RR and OR models are on average more consistent than RD, there being no difference on average between RR and OR. From a second sample of 114 meta-analyses evidence indicates that for interventions aimed at preventing an undesirable event, greatest absolute benefits are observed in trials with the highest baseline event rates, corresponding to the model of constant RR(H). The appropriate selection for a particular meta-analysis may depend on understanding reasons for variation in control group event rates; in some situations uncertainty about the choice of summary statistic will remain.
Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Similar articles
- Bayesian random effects meta-analysis of trials with binary outcomes: methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk scales.
Warn DE, Thompson SG, Spiegelhalter DJ. Warn DE, et al. Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1601-23. doi: 10.1002/sim.1189. Stat Med. 2002. PMID: 12111922 - Benefits and risks of adjunctive inhaled corticosteroids in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a meta-analysis.
Sobieraj DM, White CM, Coleman CI. Sobieraj DM, et al. Clin Ther. 2008 Aug;30(8):1416-25. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.08.004. Clin Ther. 2008. PMID: 18803985 - Estimating risk difference from relative association measures in meta-analysis can infrequently pose interpretational challenges.
Murad MH, Montori VM, Walter SD, Guyatt GH. Murad MH, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Aug;62(8):865-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.11.005. Epub 2009 Feb 20. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009. PMID: 19230610 - Meta-analysis: role of Helicobacter pylori eradication in the prevention of peptic ulcer in NSAID users.
Vergara M, Catalán M, Gisbert JP, Calvet X. Vergara M, et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Jun 15;21(12):1411-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02444.x. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005. PMID: 15948807 Review. - [Meta-analysis of therapeutic and preventive clinical trials].
Lugosi L, Molnár I. Lugosi L, et al. Orv Hetil. 2000 Dec 17;141(51):2779-84. Orv Hetil. 2000. PMID: 11196238 Review. Hungarian.
Cited by
- Treatments of unscheduled vaginal bleeding due to progestin-only contraception.
Steinfeldt M, Lora Matos AD, Cu C, Heinrich C, Hartman C, Gibson E, Becerra Mateus JC, Al Abosy J, Abedi P, Jahanfar S. Steinfeldt M, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Sep 2;9(9):CD015441. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015441. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 39221618 Free PMC article. - Psychotherapeutic and pharmacological agents for post-traumatic stress disorder with sleep disorder: network meta-analysis.
Huang CY, Zhao YF, Zhang ZX, Liu RB, Liu JL, Li XZ, Luo J, Yue L, Zhang C. Huang CY, et al. Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2381696. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2381696. Epub 2024 Jul 26. Ann Med. 2024. PMID: 39061119 Free PMC article. - Use of colloids and crystalloids for perioperative clinical infusion management in cardiac surgery patients and postoperative outcomes: a meta-analysis.
Chen SD, Ma YT, Wei HX, Ou XR, Liu JY, Tian YL, Zhang C, Xu YJ, Kong Y. Chen SD, et al. Perioper Med (Lond). 2024 Jul 24;13(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s13741-024-00445-0. Perioper Med (Lond). 2024. PMID: 39049111 Free PMC article. - Early pharmacological interventions for prevention of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in individuals experiencing acute traumatic stress symptoms.
Bertolini F, Robertson L, Bisson JI, Meader N, Churchill R, Ostuzzi G, Stein DJ, Williams T, Barbui C. Bertolini F, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 20;5(5):CD013613. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013613.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38767196 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Miscellaneous