Community interventions for reducing smoking among adults - PubMed (original) (raw)

Review

Community interventions for reducing smoking among adults

R H Secker-Walker et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002.

Abstract

Background: Since smoking behaviour is determined by social context, the best way to reduce the prevalence of smoking may be to use community-wide programmes which use multiple channels to provide reinforcement, support and norms for not smoking.

Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of community interventions for reducing the prevalence of smoking.

Search strategy: We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group specialised register, MEDLINE (1966-August 2001) and EMBASE (1980-August 2001) and reference lists of articles.

Selection criteria: Controlled trials of community interventions for reducing smoking prevalence in adult smokers. The primary outcome was smoking behaviour.

Data collection and analysis: Data were extracted by one person and checked by a second.

Main results: Thirty two studies were included, of which seventeen included only one intervention and one comparison community. Only four studies used random assignment of communities to either the intervention or comparison group. The population size of the communities ranged from a few thousand to over 100,000 people. Change in smoking prevalence was measured using cross-sectional follow-up data in 27 studies. The estimated net decline ranged from -1.0% to 3.0% for men and women combined (10 studies). For women, the decline ranged from -0.2% to + 3.5% per year (n=11), and for men the decline ranged from -0.4% to +1.6% per year (n=12). Cigarette consumption and quit rates were only reported in a small number of studies. The two most rigorous studies showed limited evidence of an effect on prevalence. In the US COMMIT study there was no differential decline in prevalence between intervention and control communities, and there was no significant difference in the quit rates of heavier smokers who were the target intervention group. In the Australian CART study there was a significantly greater quit rate for men but not women.

Reviewer's conclusions: The failure of the largest and best conducted studies to detect an effect on prevalence of smoking is disappointing. A community approach will remain an important part of health promotion activities, but designers of future programmes will need to take account of this limited effect in determining the scale of projects and the resources devoted to them.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The first author was a principal investigator in one study included in the review.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

References to studies included in this review

    1. Anantha N, Nandakumar A, Vishwanath N, Venkatesh T, Pallad YG, Manjunath P, et al. Efficacy of an anti‐tobacco community education program in India. Cancer Causes and Control 1995;6:119‐29. - PubMed
    1. Baxter AP, Milner PC, Hawkins S, Leaf M, Simpson C, Wilson KV, et al. The impact of heart health promotion on coronary heart disease lifestyle risk factors in schoolchildren: Lessons learnt from a community‐based project. Public Health 1997;111:231‐7. - PubMed
    2. Baxter T, Milner P, Wilson K, Leaf M, Nichol J, Freeman J, et al. A cost effective, community based heart health promotion project in England: Prospective comparative study. BMJ 1997;315(7108):582‐5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brownson RC, Smith CA, Jorge NE, Deprima LT, Dean CG, Cates RW. The role of data‐driven planning and coalition development in preventing cardiovascular disease. Public Health Reports 1992;107:32‐7. - PMC - PubMed
    2. Brownson RC, Smith CA, Pratt M, Mack NE, Jackson‐Thompson J, Dean CG, et al. Preventing cardiovascular disease through community‐based risk reduction: the Bootheel Heart Health Project. American Journal of Public Health 1996;86:206‐13. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bruckert E, Emmerich J, Thomas D, Charpak Y, Bichon L, Clergeot A. [Effects of an educational campaign on cardiovascular risk factors in a French town (Epernon, study town). Methods and preliminary results: prevalence and level of risk factors] [French]. Revue d'Epidemiologie et de Sante Publique 1994;42:128‐37. - PubMed
    2. Bruckert E, Thomas D, Emmerich J, Blin P, Bichon L, Amelineau E. [Impact of an information campaign on cardiovascular risk factors. 5‐year results at the study town Epernon] [French]. Presse Medicale 1999;28(10):517‐22. - PubMed
    1. Assaf AR, Banspach SW, Lasater TM, McKinlay SM, Carleton RA. The Pawtucket Heart Health Program: II Evaluation strategies. Rhode Island Medical Journal 1987;70:541‐6. - PubMed
    2. Carleton RA, Lasater TM, Assaf A, Lefebvre RC, McKinlay SM. The Pawtucket Heart Health Program: I An experiment in population‐based disease prevention. Rhode Island Medical Journal 1987;70:533‐8. - PubMed
    3. Carleton RA, Lasater TM, Assaf AR, Feldman HA, McKinlay S. The Pawtucket Heart Health Program: community changes in cardiovascular risk factors and projected disease risk. American Journal of Public Health 1995;85:777‐85. - PMC - PubMed
    4. Elder JP, McGraw SA, Abrams DB, Ferreira A, Lasater TM, Longpre H, et al. Organizational and community approaches to community‐wide prevention of heart disease: the first two years of the Pawtucket Heart Health Program. Preventive Medicine 1986;15:107‐17. - PubMed
    5. Elder JP, McGraw SA, Rodrigues A, Lasater TM, Ferreira A, Kendall L, et al. Evaluation of two community‐wide smoking cessation contests. Preventive Medicine 1987;16:221‐34. - PubMed
    6. Gans KM, Bain SL, Plotkin B, Lasater TM, Carleton RA. Implementation and institutionalisation of Heart Health Programming in schools: the Pawtucket Heart Health Program experience. Journal of Health Education 1994;25:89‐98.
    7. Lasater TM, Carleton RA, Lefebvre RC. The Pawtucket Heart Health Program: V. Utilizing community resources for primary prevention. Rhode Island Medical Journal 1988;71:63‐7. - PubMed
    8. Lasater TM, Lefebvre RC, Carleton RA. The Pawtucket Heart Health Program: IV Community level programming for heart health. Rhode Island Medical Journal 1988;71:31‐4. - PubMed
    9. Lefebvre RC, Harden EA, Zompa B. The Pawtucket Heart Health Program. III Social marketing to promote community health. Rhode Island Medical Journal 1988;71:27‐30. - PubMed
    10. Lefebvre RC, Lasater TM, Carleton RA, Peterson G. Theory and delivery of Health Programming in the community: The Pawtucket Heart Health Program. Preventive Medicine 1987;16:80‐95. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

    1. Abramson JH, Gofin J, Hopp C, Schein MH, Naveh P. The CHAD program for the control of cardiovascular risk factors in a Jerusalem community: a 24‐year retrospect. Israeli Journal of Medical Science 1994;30(1):108‐19. - PubMed
    2. Abramson JH, Gofin R, Hopp C, Gofin J, Donchin M, Habib J. Evaluation of a community program for the control of cardiovascular risk factors: the CHAD program in Jerusalem. Israeli Journal of Medical Science 1981;17(2‐3):201‐12. - PubMed
    3. Abramson JH, Hopp C, Gofin J, Gofin R, Makler A, Habib J, et al. A community program for the control of cardiovascular risk factors: a preliminary evaluation of the effectiveness of the CHAD program in Jerusalem. Journal of Community Health 1979;5(1):3‐21. - PubMed
    4. Gofin J, Gofin R, Abramson JH, Ban R. Ten‐year evaluation of hypertension, overweight, cholesterol, and smoking control: the CHAD program in Jerusalem. Community Syndrome of Hypertension, Atherosclerosis and Diabetes. Preventive Medicine 1986;15(3):304‐12. - PubMed
    5. Hopp C. A community program in primary care for control of cardiovascular risk factors: steps in program development. Israeli Journal of Medical Science 1983;19(8):748‐51. - PubMed
    1. Brownson RC, Mayer JP, Dusseault PM, Dabney S, Wright KS, Jackson‐Thompson J, et al. Developing and evaluating a cardiovascular risk reduction project. American Journal of Health Behavior 1997;21:333‐44.
    1. Cheng X, Xu X, Zhang Z. Results of community intervention trial for chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases and chronic cor‐pulmonale from 1992 to 1999]. Zhonghua Jiehe He Huxi ZaZhi 2001;24:579‐83. - PubMed
    1. Darity WA, Cernada GP, Chen TTL, Pastides H, Stanek E, Tuthill R, et al. Cancer prevention (smoking) in the black population: A community research/intervention model. In: Jones L editor(s). Minorities and Cancer. New York: Springer/Verlag, 1989:121‐126.
    2. Darity WA, Tuthill RW, Winder AE, Cernada GP, Chen TTL, Buchanan DR, et al. A multi‐city community based smoking research intervention project in the African‐American population. International Quarterly of Community Health Education 1997;17:117‐30. - PubMed
    1. Fang XH, Kronmal RA, Li SC, Longstreth WT, Cheng XM, Wang WZ, et al. Prevention of stroke in urban China ‐ a community‐based intervention trial. Stroke 1999;30:495‐501. - PubMed

Additional references

    1. Abbot NC, Stead LF, White AR, Barnes J. Hypnotherapy for smoking cessation. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 2. [Art. No.: CD001008. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001008] - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bauman KE, Suchindran CM, Murray DM. The paucity of effects in community trials: Is secular trend the culprit?. Preventive Medicine 1999;28:426‐9. - PubMed
    1. Donner A, Klar N. Statistical considerations in the design and analysis of community intervention trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1996;49(4):435‐9. - PubMed
    1. Dwyer T, Pierce JP, Hannam CD, Burke N. Evaluation of the Sydney "Quit for Life" anti‐smoking campaign. Medical Journal of Australia 1986;144:344‐7. - PubMed
    1. Eriksen MP, Gottlieb NH. A review of the health impact of smoking control at the workplace. American Journal of Health Promotion 1998;13:83‐104. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources