Laparoscopic approaches to fusion of the lumbosacral spine: latest techniques - PubMed (original) (raw)
Review
Laparoscopic approaches to fusion of the lumbosacral spine: latest techniques
Stephen E Heim et al. Orthop Clin North Am. 2002 Apr.
Abstract
The particular advantages of interbody cages include the beneficial effects on bone healing associated with the anterior column location (Wolff's Law), the stabilization potential in appropriate motion segments, the ability to restore anterior column height and foraminal volume, and the avoidance of the fusion disease phenomenon. These advantages do not depend on whether the approach of insertion is open or laparoscopic. The specific and demonstrated chief benefit of the laparoscopic approach to interbody cage insertion is the reduction in surgical morbidity. This is especially evident when the laparoscopic technique is combined with the use of bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP-2). It is the author's belief that this significant diminution in patient morbidity drives the further acceptance of the laparoscopic approach in a manner similar to the evolution of arthroscopic orthopedic surgery and laparoscopic general surgery. The main disadvantage of the laparoscopic approach is the initial learning curve of the surgical team with the technique. The anterior approach to cage placement (open or laparoscopic) also is limited regarding the inability to decompress the spinal canal directly. It is recommended that the interbody cages be considered as only one option in the stabilization of symptomatic motion segments. With care in patient selection, their ability to function in a stand-alone configuration has been demonstrated successfully. To evolve to the laparoscopic placement technique of interbody cages, the access surgeon or spine surgeon should begin as part of a team with the open approach placing the particular instrumentation system they plan to use laparoscopically. Together, the access surgeon and spine surgeon team should attend a hands-on laparoscopic course for the specific instrumentation system. Finally, in terms of initial case selection, one should begin with nondeformity L5-S1 cases and, most importantly, allow time.
Similar articles
- Laparoscopic discectomy with anterior lumbar interbody fusion. A preliminary review.
Mathews HH, Evans MT, Molligan HJ, Long BH. Mathews HH, et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Aug 15;20(16):1797-802. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199508150-00009. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995. PMID: 7502137 - Laparoscopic approach to L4-L5 for interbody fusion using BAK cages: experience in the first 58 cases.
Regan JJ, Aronoff RJ, Ohnmeiss DD, Sengupta DK. Regan JJ, et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Oct 15;24(20):2171-4. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199910150-00018. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999. PMID: 10543017 - Intervertebral cages for degenerative spinal diseases.
Blumenthal SL, Ohnmeiss DD; NASS. Blumenthal SL, et al. Spine J. 2003 Jul-Aug;3(4):301-9. doi: 10.1016/s1529-9430(03)00004-4. Spine J. 2003. PMID: 14589191 Review. - Comparison of TLIF with rhBMP-2 versus no TLIF and higher posterolateral rhBMP-2 dose at L5-S1 for long fusions to the sacrum with sacropelvic fixation in patients with primary adult deformity.
Rahman RK, Buchowski JM, Stephens B, Dorward IG, Koester LA, Bridwell KH. Rahman RK, et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Dec 15;38(26):2264-71. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000045. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013. PMID: 24108280 - Circumferential fusion of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine.
Grob D, Scheier HJ, Dvorak J, Siegrist H, Rubeli M, Joller R. Grob D, et al. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1991;111(1):20-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00390187. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1991. PMID: 1772720 Review.
Cited by
- Low Back Pain: Current Surgical Approaches.
Baliga S, Treon K, Craig NJ. Baliga S, et al. Asian Spine J. 2015 Aug;9(4):645-57. doi: 10.4184/asj.2015.9.4.645. Epub 2015 Jul 28. Asian Spine J. 2015. PMID: 26240729 Free PMC article. Review. - [Interbody metal implants ("cages") for lumbar fusion].
Freiherr von Salis-Soglio G, Scholz R, Seller K. Freiherr von Salis-Soglio G, et al. Orthopade. 2005 Oct;34(10):1033-9. doi: 10.1007/s00132-005-0840-7. Orthopade. 2005. PMID: 16075251 Review. German.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical