Pretreatment cytogenetic abnormalities are predictive of induction success, cumulative incidence of relapse, and overall survival in adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 8461) - PubMed (original) (raw)
Clinical Trial
. 2002 Dec 15;100(13):4325-36.
doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-03-0772. Epub 2002 Aug 1.
Krzysztof Mrózek, Richard K Dodge, Andrew J Carroll, Colin G Edwards, Diane C Arthur, Mark J Pettenati, Shivanand R Patil, Kathleen W Rao, Michael S Watson, Prasad R K Koduru, Joseph O Moore, Richard M Stone, Robert J Mayer, Eric J Feldman, Frederick R Davey, Charles A Schiffer, Richard A Larson, Clara D Bloomfield; Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 8461)
Affiliations
- PMID: 12393746
- DOI: 10.1182/blood-2002-03-0772
Free article
Clinical Trial
Pretreatment cytogenetic abnormalities are predictive of induction success, cumulative incidence of relapse, and overall survival in adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 8461)
John C Byrd et al. Blood. 2002.
Free article
Abstract
We analyzed prospectively 1213 adults with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) to ascertain the prognostic impact of cytogenetic abnormalities on complete remission (CR) rate, 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and 5-year overall survival (OS). All patients received similar induction therapy. Median follow-up for surviving patients was 8.3 years. Nonprioritized cytogenetics distinguished t(8;21) and inv(16)/t(16;16) as conferring a significantly better prognosis than normal karyotype. Prognostic impact of many abnormalities could not be determined independently because of their association with complex karyotype. Neither complex karyotype nor secondary aberrations affected outcome of patients with t(8;21), inv(16)/t(16;16), or t(9;11). Among other patients, those with complex karyotypes had significantly worse outcomes than cytogenetically normal patients. Based on outcome for specific cytogenetic abnormalities and karyotype complexity, patients were divided into 3 risk groups: favorable (CR 88%, CIR 54%, OS 55%), intermediate (CR 67%, CIR 67%, OS 24%), and adverse (CR 32%, CIR 92%, OS 5%). Multivariate analyses confirmed the major contribution of cytogenetics to the probability of attaining CR, CIR, and OS. For the adverse-risk group, the probability of achieving CR was 4.0 and 11.9 times lower, the probability of relapse 3.0 and 4.4 times higher, and the risk of death 2.1 and 4.3 times higher than those for the intermediate and favorable groups, respectively. We conclude that although the prognostic impact of many recurring abnormalities has not been ascertained independently of complex karyotype, cytogenetics is among the most useful factors predicting attainment of CR, CIR, and long-term survival in adult AML.
Comment in
- Description of a novel subtype of acute myeloid leukemia defined by recurrent CBFB insertions.
Ryland GL, Umeda M, Holmfeldt L, Lehmann S, Herlin MK, Ma J, Khanlari M, Rubnitz JE, Ries RE, Kosasih HJ, Ekert PG, Goh HN, Tiong IS, Grimmond SM, Haferlach C, Day RB, Ley TJ, Meshinchi S, Ma X, Blombery P, Klco JM. Ryland GL, et al. Blood. 2023 Feb 16;141(7):800-805. doi: 10.1182/blood.2022017874. Blood. 2023. PMID: 36179268 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
- The prognostic value of cytogenetics is reinforced by the kind of induction/consolidation therapy in influencing the outcome of acute myeloid leukemia--analysis of 848 patients.
Visani G, Bernasconi P, Boni M, Castoldi GL, Ciolli S, Clavio M, Cox MC, Cuneo A, Del Poeta G, Dini D, Falzetti D, Fanin R, Gobbi M, Isidori A, Leoni F, Liso V, Malagola M, Martinelli G, Mecucci C, Piccaluga PP, Petti MC, Rondelli R, Russo D, Sessarego M, Specchia G, Testoni N, Torelli G, Mandelli F, Tura S. Visani G, et al. Leukemia. 2001 Jun;15(6):903-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402142. Leukemia. 2001. PMID: 11417475 Review. - The predictive value of hierarchical cytogenetic classification in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML): analysis of 1065 patients entered into the United Kingdom Medical Research Council AML11 trial.
Grimwade D, Walker H, Harrison G, Oliver F, Chatters S, Harrison CJ, Wheatley K, Burnett AK, Goldstone AH; Medical Research Council Adult Leukemia Working Party. Grimwade D, et al. Blood. 2001 Sep 1;98(5):1312-20. doi: 10.1182/blood.v98.5.1312. Blood. 2001. PMID: 11520776 Clinical Trial. - Prognostic factors and outcome of core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia patients with t(8;21) differ from those of patients with inv(16): a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study.
Marcucci G, Mrózek K, Ruppert AS, Maharry K, Kolitz JE, Moore JO, Mayer RJ, Pettenati MJ, Powell BL, Edwards CG, Sterling LJ, Vardiman JW, Schiffer CA, Carroll AJ, Larson RA, Bloomfield CD. Marcucci G, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 20;23(24):5705-17. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.15.610. J Clin Oncol. 2005. PMID: 16110030 - Frequency of prolonged remission duration after high-dose cytarabine intensification in acute myeloid leukemia varies by cytogenetic subtype.
Bloomfield CD, Lawrence D, Byrd JC, Carroll A, Pettenati MJ, Tantravahi R, Patil SR, Davey FR, Berg DT, Schiffer CA, Arthur DC, Mayer RJ. Bloomfield CD, et al. Cancer Res. 1998 Sep 15;58(18):4173-9. Cancer Res. 1998. PMID: 9751631 Clinical Trial. - Prognosis of inv(16)/t(16;16) acute myeloid leukemia (AML): a survey of 110 cases from the French AML Intergroup.
Delaunay J, Vey N, Leblanc T, Fenaux P, Rigal-Huguet F, Witz F, Lamy T, Auvrignon A, Blaise D, Pigneux A, Mugneret F, Bastard C, Dastugue N, Van den Akker J, Fière D, Reiffers J, Castaigne S, Leverger G, Harousseau JL, Dombret H; French Acute Myeloid Leukemia Intergroup; Groupe Ouest-Est des Leucémies Aiguës Myéoblastiques; Leucémies Aiguës Myéoblastiques de l'Enfant; Acute Leukemia French Association; Bordeaux-Grenoble-Marseille-Toulouse cooperative groups. Delaunay J, et al. Blood. 2003 Jul 15;102(2):462-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-11-3527. Epub 2003 Mar 20. Blood. 2003. PMID: 12649129 Review.
Cited by
- Clinical significance of up-regulated ID1 expression in Chinese de novo acute myeloid leukemia.
Zhou JD, Yang L, Zhu XW, Wen XM, Yang J, Guo H, Chen Q, Yao DM, Ma JC, Lin J, Qian J. Zhou JD, et al. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015 May 1;8(5):5336-44. eCollection 2015. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015. PMID: 26191235 Free PMC article. - To transplant or not to transplant for adult acute myeloid leukemia: an ever-evolving decision.
Gerds AT, Appelbaum FR. Gerds AT, et al. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2012 Oct;10(10):655-62. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2012. PMID: 23187771 Free PMC article. - Clonal evolution of acute leukemia genomes.
Jan M, Majeti R. Jan M, et al. Oncogene. 2013 Jan 10;32(2):135-40. doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.48. Epub 2012 Feb 20. Oncogene. 2013. PMID: 22349821 Free PMC article. Review. - Age and Modified European LeukemiaNet Classification to Predict Transplant Outcomes: An Integrated Approach for Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation.
Oran B, Jimenez AM, De Lima M, Popat UR, Bassett R, Andersson B, Borthakur G, Bashir Q, Chen J, Ciurea SO, Jabbour E, Cortes J, Kebriaei P, Khouri IF, Qazilbash MH, Ravandi F, Rondon G, Lu X, Shpall EJ, Champlin RE. Oran B, et al. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015 Aug;21(8):1405-1412. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.03.023. Epub 2015 Mar 31. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015. PMID: 25840338 Free PMC article. - Targeting binding partners of the CBFβ-SMMHC fusion protein for the treatment of inversion 16 acute myeloid leukemia.
Richter L, Wang Y, Hyde RK. Richter L, et al. Oncotarget. 2016 Oct 4;7(40):66255-66266. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11357. Oncotarget. 2016. PMID: 27542261 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Supplementary concepts
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources