Nasal swab versus nasopharyngeal aspirate for isolation of respiratory viruses - PubMed (original) (raw)

Comparative Study

Nasal swab versus nasopharyngeal aspirate for isolation of respiratory viruses

Terho Heikkinen et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2002 Nov.

Abstract

To determine the usefulness of nasal swabs as a simple method for detection of respiratory viruses, we compared nasal swabs and nasopharyngeal aspirates obtained at the same time from the opposite nostrils of 230 children with upper respiratory infection. The sensitivity of nasal swabs was comparable to that of nasopharyngeal aspirates for the detection of all major respiratory viruses except respiratory syncytial virus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Carrat, F., A. Tachet, C. Rouzioux, B. Housset, and A. J. Valleron. 1999. Evaluation of clinical case definitions of influenza: detailed investigation of patients during the 1995-1996 epidemic in France. Clin. Infect. Dis. 28:283-290. - PubMed
    1. Cherry, J. D. 1998. Enteroviruses: coxsackieviruses, echoviruses, and polioviruses, p. 1787-1839. In R. D. Feigin and J. D. Cherry (ed.), Textbook of pediatric infectious diseases, 4th ed. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, Pa.
    1. Covalciuc, K. A., K. H. Webb, and C. A. Carlson. 1999. Comparison of four clinical specimen types for detection of influenza A and B viruses by optical immunoassay (FLU OIA test) and cell culture methods. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:3971-3974. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Englund, J. A., P. A. Piedra, A. Jewell, K. Patel, B. B. Baxter, and E. Whimbey. 1996. Rapid diagnosis of respiratory syncytial virus infections in immunocompromised adults. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:1649-1653. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hall, C. B., and R. G. Douglas, Jr. 1975. Clinically useful method for the isolation of respiratory syncytial virus. J. Infect. Dis. 131:1-5. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources